Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 174, Issue 7, pp 2663–2676 | Cite as

The Structure of the Onega Downthrown Block and Adjacent Geological Objects According to the Microseismic Sounding Method

  • Konstantin B. Danilov
Article

Abstract

The geological structure of the major part of the Arkhangelsk region in the North–West Russia has been poorly studied. In the present work, the microseismic sounding method was, for the first time, used to carry out a detailed geological–geophysical survey in the region. The particles motion study confirmed the results of mathematical modeling of the smallest imaged heterogeneity and resolution of the method. The microseism stability study allowed to determine the amount of error of the microseismic sounding method which is 1–2 dB. Two geophysical cross sections of the north-eastern and south-western boundaries of the Onega downthrown block were studied. The method was shown to allow obtaining seismic images with a high precision in the horizontal direction at relatively low costs in terms of time and finances. The obtained data provided additional information about the structure of the crust, which was consistent with the known geological and geophysical information for the surveyed area. Based on the data, it was concluded that the main reasons of the dissonance of geological information were most likely the division of the downthrown block into the northern and southern blocks and horizontal displacement of the layer to the North at a depth ranging from 3 to 5 km. It was suggested that the most active tectonic processes, including eruptions of ancient volcanoes, occurred in the northern block. Two benches at the studied downthrown block were allocated at the depths of 5 and 10 km.

Keywords

Microseism sounding amplification particles motion errors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr Danil Korelskiy and Danilov Mikhailare are gratefully acknowledged for the language help. The discussions with Dr A. V. Gorbatikov, Dr V. I. Francuzova, Dr A. N. Morozov, Yu. N. Afonin, and A. V Koshkin were very helpful. This work was carried out as a part of the research project of Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, project no AAAA-A16-116052710111-2.

References

  1. Asten, M. W. (1978). Geological control on the three-component spectra of Rayleigh-wave microseisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68, 1623–1636.Google Scholar
  2. Asten, M. W., & Henstridge, J. D. (1984). Array estimators and the use of microseisms for of sedimentary basins. Geophysics, 49, 1828–1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bath, M. (1974). Spectral analysis in geophysics. Amsterdam: Elsivier.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., & Pierre-Yves, Bard. (2006). The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: A literature review. Earth-Science Reviews, 79, 205–227. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalton, C. A., & Ekström, G. (2006). Constraints on global maps of phase velocity from surface-wave amplitudes. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 820–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03142.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalton, C. A., Hjorleifsdottir, V., & Ekstrom, G. (2014). A comparison of approaches to the prediction of surface wave amplitude. Geophysical Journal International, 196(1), 386–404. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danilov, K.B. (2011). Application of microseismic sounding for the study of Lomonosov diatremes (Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province), Bulletin of the Kamchatka regional organizations educational and scientific center. Series: Earth Science, 17, 231–237. http://www.kscnet.ru/kraesc/2011/2011_17/2011_17.html.
  8. Eddy, C. L., & Ekström, G. (2014). Local amplification of Rayleigh waves in the continental United States observed on the USArray. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 402, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egorkin, A.V. (1987). Structure of the crust and upper mantle along profiles Cheshskaya Bay—Pay-Khoy Ridge, the White Sea—Vorkuta, the Dvina Bay—the Mezen River, the river Onega—Cheshskaya Bay, river Vaga—the White Sea. The report of cameral party of Special Regional Geophysical Expedition on results of the regional seismic researches DSS, reflection method which are carried out in 19851987 in the north of the European part of the USSR (in two books). Sheets R-39, 40,41, 42; Q-37, 38, 39, 40, 41; P-37, 38. Moscow, DC: Special Regional Geophysical Expedition.Google Scholar
  10. Fedorov, D.L. (2004). Results of regional geological and geophysical work in Mezenskaya syncline in 20002001. Moscow, DC: performance report by ZAO “Valdaygeologiya” Federal State Institution State Research and Production Enterprise “Spetsgeofizika”.Google Scholar
  11. Francuzova, V.I., Makarov, V.I., & Danilov, K.B. (2013). Velocity heterogeneity of crust of southeast Belomorya according to a method of microseismic sounding, Geophysical investigations, 14, 47–55. http://gr.ifz.ru/soderzhanie/tom-14-nomer-3-2013/.
  12. GEOFON [Electronic resource] http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/geofon/. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  13. Gorbatikov, A. V., Larin, N. V., Moiseev, E. I., & Belyashov, A. V. (2009). The microseismic sounding method: Application for the study of the buried diatreme structure. Doklady Earth Sciences, 428(1), 1222–1226. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X0907040X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorbatikov, A. V., Montesinos, F. G., Arnoso, J., Stepanova, M Yu., Benavent, M., & Tsukanov, A. A. (2013). New features in the subsurface structure model of El Hierro Island (Canaries) from low-frequency microseismic sounding: an insight into the 2011 Seismo-Volcanic Crisis. Surveys In Geophysics, 34, 463–489. doi: 10.1007/s10712-013-9240-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorbatikov, A. V., Ovsyuchenko, A. N., Rogozhin, E. A., Stepanova, M Yu., & Larin, N. V. (2011). The structure of the Vladikavkaz Fault Zone based on the study utilizing a complex of geological-geophysical methods. Seismic Instruments, 47(4), 307–313. doi: 10.3103/S0747923911040037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorbatikov, A. V., & Stepanova, M. J. (2008). Statistical characteristics and stationarity properties of low-frequency seismic signals. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 44(1), 50–59. doi: 10.1007/s11486-008-1007-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorbatikov, A. V., Sobisevich, A. L., & Ovsyuchenko, A. N. (2008a). Development of the model of the deep structure of Akhtyr flexure-fracture zone and Shugo mud volcano. Doklady Earth Sciences, 421(2), 969–973. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X0806024X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorbatikov, A. V., Stepanova, M. J., & Korablev, G. E. (2008b). Microseismic field affected by local geological heterogeneities and microseismic sounding of the medium. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 7, 577–592. doi: 10.1134/S1069351308070082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorbatikov, A. V., & Tsukanov, A. A. (2011). Simulation of the Rayleigh waves in the proximity of the scattering velocity inhomogeneities. Exploring the capabilities of the microseismic sounding method. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 4, 354–369. doi: 10.1134/S1069351311030013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horike, M. (1985). Inversion of phase velocity of long-period microtremors to the S-wave-velocity structure down to the basement in urbanized areas. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 33, 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaworski, B. M., & Detlaf, A. A. (1981). Handbook of physics. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  22. Kadyrova, E.R., Smirnov O.A., Tkachenko K. Yu., & et al. (2007). Report “Support fieldwork, processing and integrated interpretation of seismic exploration CMP-2D Arkhangelsk licensed site”. Arhangelsk region, Q-37, P-37. Moscow, DC: JSC “Pangaea”.Google Scholar
  23. Kanai, K., & Tanaka, T. (1954). Measurement of the microtremor. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute. The University of Tokyo, 32, 199–209.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, L. J., & Bellon, R. S. (1978). Microtremor site analysis study at Beatty, Nevada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68, 757–765.Google Scholar
  25. Kostyuchenko, S.L., Zolotov, E.E., & Rakitov, V.A. (2004). Sites of profiles Quartz and Ruby, in ed. Sharov, N.V. (Ed.): Deep structure and seismicity of the Karelian region and its margins (pp. 76–85) Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  26. Leonov, M.G. (2010).Tectonic map of the White Sea and adjacent areas in the scale of 1:1500000. GS Kazanin, Moscow: LLC “IPP Kuna”.Google Scholar
  27. Lin, F.-C., Tsai, V. C., & Ritzwoller, M. H. (2012). The local amplification of surface waves: a new observable to constrain elastic velocities, density, and anelastic attenuation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, B06302. doi: 10.1029/2012JB009208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslov, A. V., Olovyanishnikov, V. G., & Isherskaya, M. V. (2002). Rifey eastern, north-eastern and northern periphery of the Russian platform and the western Urals megazone: litostratigrafiya, formation conditions and types of sedimentary sequences. Litosfera, 2, 54–59.Google Scholar
  29. Monakhov, F. I. (1977). Low-frequency seismic noise of the earth. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  30. Nogoshi, M., & Igarashi, T. (1971). On the Amplitude Characteristics of Microtremor (Part 2) (in Japanese with English abstract). Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan, 24, 26–40.Google Scholar
  31. Parsekian, A. D., Singha, K., Minsley, B. J., Holbrook, W. S., & Slater, L. (2015). Multiscale geophysical imaging of the critical zone. Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 1–26. doi: 10.1002/2014RG000465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Popov, D. V., Danilov, K. D., Zhostkov, R. A., Dudarov, Z. I., & Ivanova, E. V. (2014). Processing the digital microseism recordings using the Data Analysis Kit (DAK) software package. Seismic Instruments, 50, 75–83. doi: 10.3103/S074792391401006X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rawlinson, N., Pozgay, S., & Fishwick, S. (2010). Seismic tomography: A window into deep Earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, 101–135. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2009.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sobisevich, A. L., Gorbatikov, A. V., & Ovsuchenko, A. N. (2008). Deep structure of the Mt. Karabetov Mud volcano. Doklady Earth Sciences, 422(1), 1181–1185. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X08070428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, S. R., Gerstoft, P., & Fehler, M. C. (2009). Estimating site amplification factors from ambient noise. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L09303. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. USGS Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory [Electronic resource] http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/asl/. Accessed  20 May 2014.
  37. Vaganova, N. V. (2012). A structure of crust and the top cloak of the North of the Russian plate on supervision of exchange waves from teleseismic earthquakes. The abstract of the thesis on competition of an academic degree of the candidate of geological and mineralogical sciences. (Yekaterinburg).Google Scholar
  38. Vinnik, L. P. (1968). The structure microseisms and some questions of grouping methodology. Moscow: Nedra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Center for Integrated Arctic ResearchArkhangelskRussia

Personalised recommendations