Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 173, Issue 12, pp 4101–4116 | Cite as

Source Characterization and Tsunami Modeling of Submarine Landslides Along the Yucatán Shelf/Campeche Escarpment, Southern Gulf of Mexico

  • Jason D. ChaytorEmail author
  • Eric L. Geist
  • Charles K. Paull
  • David W. Caress
  • Roberto Gwiazda
  • Jaime Urrutia Fucugauchi
  • Mario Rebolledo Vieyra


Submarine landslides occurring along the margins of the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) represent a low-likelihood, but potentially damaging source of tsunamis. New multibeam bathymetry coverage reveals that mass wasting is pervasive along the Yucatán Shelf edge with several large composite landslides possibly removing as much as 70 km3 of the Cenozoic sedimentary section in a single event. Using GIS-based analysis, the dimensions of six landslides from the central and northern sections of the Yucatán Shelf/Campeche Escarpment were determined and used as input for preliminary tsunami generation and propagation models. Tsunami modeling is performed to compare the propagation characteristics and distribution of maximum amplitudes throughout the GOM among the different landslide scenarios. Various factors such as landslide geometry, location along the Yucatán Shelf/Campeche Escarpment, and refraction during propagation result in significant variations in the affected part of the Mexican and US Gulf Coasts. In all cases, however, tsunami amplitudes are greatest along the northern Yucatán Peninsula.


Tsunami Wave Tsunami Hazard Shelf Edge Submarine Landslide Tsunami Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Schmidt Ocean Institute, the captain and crew of the R/V Falkor, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Eve Lundsten, Krystle Anderson, and Brian Andrews. Nathan Miller, Uri ten Brink, David Tappin, and three anonymous reviewers provided helpful reviews which improved the manuscript. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.


  1. Adatte, T., Stinnesbeck, W., & Keller, G. (1996). Lithostratigraphic and mineralogic correlations of near K/T boundary clastic sediments in northeastern Mexico: Implications for origin and nature of deposition. In G. Ryder, D. Fastovsky, S. Gartner (Eds.), The Cretaceous–Tertiary event and other catastrophes in earth history: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Special Paper 307, 211–226.Google Scholar
  2. Amante, C., & Eakins, B.W. (2009). ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: Procedures, data sources and analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. doi: 10.7289/V5C8276M.
  3. Bourgeois, J. T., Hansen, A., Wiberg, P. L., & Kauffman, E. G. (1988). A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary in Texas. Science, 241, 567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, W. R., Meyerhoff, A. A., Brown, N. K., Furrer, M., Pyle, T., & Antoine, J. W. (1969). Escarpments reef trends, and diapiric structures, eastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 53, 2506–2542.Google Scholar
  5. Chaytor, J. D., ten Brink, U. S., Solow, A. R., & Andrews, B. D. (2009). Size distribution of submarine landslides along the US Atlantic margin. Marine Geology, 264(1–2), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaytor, J.D., Twichell, D.C., Lynett, P., & Geist, E.L. (2010). Distribution and tsunamigenic potential of submarine landslides in the Gulf of Mexico. In: D.C. Mosher, L. Moscardelli, R.C. Shipp, J.D. Chaytor, C.D. Baxter, H.J. Lee, & R. Urgeles (Eds.), Submarine mass movements and their consequences, advances in natural and technological hazards research (745–754), vol 28. Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Dalle Valle, G., & Gamberi, F. (2011). Pockmarks and seafloor instability in the Olbia continental slope (northeastern Sardinian margin, Tyrrhenian Sea). Marine Geophysical Researches, 32, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denne, R. A., Scott, E. D., Eickhoff, D. P., Kaiser, J. S., Hill, R. J., & Spaw, J. M. (2013). Massive Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary deposit, deep-water Gulf of Mexico: New evidence for widespread Chicxulub-induced slope failure. Geology, 41, 983–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewing, M., Worzel, J. L., Beall, A. O., et al. (1969). Initial reports of the deep sea drilling project (Vol. 1). Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  10. Geist, E. L., Lynett, P. J., & Chaytor, J. D. (2009). Hydrodynamic modeling of tsunamis from the Currituck landslide. Marine Geology, 264, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horrillo, J., Wood, A., Kim, G. B., & Parambath, A. (2013). A simplified 3-D Navier Stokes numerical model for landslide-tsunami: Application to the Gulf of Mexico. Journal Geophysical Research, 118, 6934–6950.Google Scholar
  12. Horrillo, J.J., Wood, A.L., Williams, C., Parambath, A., & Kim, G.-B. (2010). Construction of tsunami inundation maps in the Gulf of Mexico, Tech. Rep, National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP), National Weather Service Program Office, NOAA.Google Scholar
  13. Lawton, T. F., Shipley, K. W., Aschoff, J. L., Giles, K. A., & Vega, F. J. (2005). Basinward transport of Chicxulub ejecta by tsunami-induced backflow, La Popa basin, northeastern Mexico, and its implications for distribution of impact-related deposits flanking the Gulf of Mexico. Geology, 33, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindsay, J. F., Shipley, T. H., & Worzel, J. L. (1975). Role of canyons in the growth of the Campeche Escarpment. Geology, 3, 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Locker, S. D., & Buffler, R. T. (1983). Comparison of lower Cretaceous carbonate shelf margins, northern Campeche Escarpment and northern Florida Escarpment, Gulf of Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Studies in Geology, 15, 123–128.Google Scholar
  16. López-Venegas A.M., ten Brink U.S., Geist E.L (2008). Submarine landslide as the source for the October 11, 1918 Mona Passage tsunami: Observations and modeling. Marine Geology, 254(1), 35–46. Google Scholar
  17. Lynett, P., & Liu, P. L. F. (2002). A numerical study of submarine landslide generated waves and runup. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Ser. A, 458, 2885–2910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynett, P., & Liu, P. L. F. (2005). A numerical study of the run-up generated by three-dimensional landslides. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 110, C03006. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulder, T. (2011). Gravity processes and deposits on continental slope, rise and abyssal plains. In H. Huneke & T. Mulder (Eds.), Deep-sea sediments (pp. 25–125). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Geophysical Data Center/World Data Service (NGDC/WDS): Global Historical Tsunami Database. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. doi: 10.7289/V5PN93H7.
  21. Pampell-Manis, A., Horrillo, J., Shigihara, Y., & Parambath, L. (2016). Probabilistic assessment of landslide tsunami hazard for the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans. doi: 10.1002/2015JC011261.Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, T., Geist, E. L., Ryan, H. F., Lee, H. J., Haeussler, P. J., Lynett, P., et al. (2014). Source and progression of a submarine landslide and tsunami: The 1964 Great Alaska earthquake at Valdez. Journal Geophysical Research. doi: 10.1002/2014JB011514.Google Scholar
  23. Paull, C. K., Caress, D. W., Gwiazda, R., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Rebolledo-Vieyra, M., Lundsten, E., et al. (2014). Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary exposed: Campeche Escarpment, Gulf of Mexico. Marine Geology, 357, 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paull, C. K., Freeman-Lynde, R., Bralower, T. J., Gardemal, J. M., Neumann, A. C., D’Argenio, B., et al. (1990a). Geology of the strata exposed on the Florida Escarpment. Marine Geology, 91, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paull, C. K., Spiess, F. N., Curray, J. R., & Twichell, D. (1990b). Origin of Florida Canyon and the role of spring sapping on the formation of submarine box canyons. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 102, 502–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaw, C. E., & Benson, L. (2015). Possible tsunami deposits on the Caribbean coast of the Yucatán Peninsula. Journal of Coastal Research, 31, 1306–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ten Brink, U. S., Geist, E. L., & Andrews, B. D. (2006). Size distribution of submarine landslides and its implication to tsunami hazard in Puerto Rico. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L11307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Twichell, D. C., Parson, L. M., & Paull, C. K. (1990). Variations in the styles of erosion along the Florida Escarpment, eastern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 7, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward, S. N. (2001). Landslide tsunami. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106(B6), 11201–11215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Worzel, J.L., Bryant, W., Beall Jr., A.O., Capo, R., Dickinson, K., Foreman, H.P., Laury, R., McNeely, B.W., & Smith, L. (1970). Site 86 Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 10, Texas A & M University, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX, United States, pp 25–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason D. Chaytor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eric L. Geist
    • 2
  • Charles K. Paull
    • 3
  • David W. Caress
    • 3
  • Roberto Gwiazda
    • 3
  • Jaime Urrutia Fucugauchi
    • 4
  • Mario Rebolledo Vieyra
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyMenlo ParkUSA
  3. 3.Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMoss LandingUSA
  4. 4.Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico
  5. 5.Centro de Investigación Científica de YucatánMéridaMexico

Personalised recommendations