Violations of Gutenberg–Richter Relation in Anthropogenic Seismicity
- 397 Downloads
Anthropogenic seismicity (AS) is the undesired dynamic rockmass response to technological processes. AS environments are shallow hence their heterogeneities have important impact on AS. Moreover, AS is controlled by complex and changeable technological factors. This complicated origin of AS explains why models used in tectonic seismicity may be not suitable for AS. We study here four cases of AS, testing statistically whether the magnitudes follow the Gutenberg–Richter relation or not. The considered cases include the data from Mponeng gold mine in South Africa, the data observed during stimulation of geothermal well Basel 1 in Switzerland, the data from Acu water reservoir region in Brazil and the data from Song Tranh 2 hydropower plant region in Vietnam. The cases differ in inducing technologies, in the duration of periods in which they were recorded, and in the ranges of magnitudes. In all four cases the observed frequency–magnitude distributions statistically significantly differ from the Gutenberg–Richter relation. Although in all cases the Gutenberg–Richter b value changed in time, this factor turns out to be not responsible for the discovered deviations from the Gutenberg–Richter-born exponential distribution model. Though the deviations from Gutenberg–Richter law are not big, they substantially diminish the accuracy of assessment of seismic hazard parameters. It is demonstrated that the use of non-parametric kernel estimators of magnitude distribution functions improves significantly the accuracy of hazard estimates and, therefore, these estimators are recommended to be used in probabilistic analyses of seismic hazard caused by AS.
KeywordsMagnitude scaling Gutenberg–Richter relation breakdown non-parametric estimation anthropogenic seismicity
This work was done in the framework of the project IS-EPOS: Digital Research Space of Induced Seismicity for EPOS Purposes (POIG.02.03.00-14-090/13-00), funded by the National Centre for Research and Development in the Operational Program Innovative Economy in the years 2013–2015. The work was also partially supported within statutory activities No 3841/E-41/S/2015 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland. JAGUARS seismic data used in this study were provided by GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Department 3: Geodynamics and Geomaterials, Section 3.2: Geomechanics and Rheology, Telegrafenberg, D14473 Potsdam, Germany and they are available on request. The Authors want to thank M. Nakatani, J. Philipp, Y. Yabe, H. Ogasawara, and co-workers from JAGUARS group for their work in installing and maintaining the JAGUARS network. AFdN thanks CNPq (National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development—Brazil) for his fellowship.
- Aki, K. (1965), Maximum Likelihood Estimate of b in the Formula log N = a - b M and its Confidence Limits, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 43, 237-239.Google Scholar
- Bender, B. (1983), Maximum Likelihood Estimation of b Values for Magnitude Grouped Data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 831-851.Google Scholar
- Bowman, A. W., Hall, P., and Titterington, D. M. (1984), Cross-validation in non-parametric estimation of probabilities and probability densities, Biom. 71, 341–351.Google Scholar
- Cosentino, P., Ficarra, V., and Luzio, D. (1977), Truncated Exponential Frequency-magnitude Relationship in Earthquake Statistics, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67, 1615-1623.Google Scholar
- do Nascimento, A.F., Cowie, P.A., Lunn, R.J., and Pearce, R.G. (2004), Spatio-temporal Evolution of Induced Seismicity at Açu Reservoir, NE Brazil, Geophys. J. Int. 158, 1041–1052, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02351.x.
- Eaton, D.W., and Maghsoudi, S. (2015), 2b… or not 2b? Interpreting Magnitude Distributions From Microseismic Catalogs, First Break 33.Google Scholar
- El Hariri, M., Abercrombie, R.E., Rowe, C.A., and do Nascimento, A.F. (2010), The Role of Fluids in Triggering Earthquakes: Observations From Reservoir Induced Seismicity in Brazil, Geophys. J. Int. 181, 1566–1574, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04554.x.
- Ferreira, J.M., Oliveira, R.T., Assumpção, M., Moreira, J. A.M., Pearce, R.G., and Takeya, M.K. (1995), Correlation of Seismicity and Water Level—An Example From Northeastern Brazil, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1483–1489.Google Scholar
- Feustel, A.J., Temporal-spatial b-values and observed relationships to structurally controlled ground falls in an open-stope mine, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (eds. Gibowicz, S.J. and Lasocki, S.) (Balkema, Rotterdam 1997) pp. 45-47.Google Scholar
- Gibowicz, S.J. (1979), Space and Time Variations of the Frequency-Magnitude Relation for Mining Tremors in the Szombierki Coal Mine in Upper Silesia, Poland, Acta Geophys. Pol. 27, 39-50.Google Scholar
- Gibowicz, S.J. (1990), The mechanism of seismic events induced by mining. In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (ed. Fairhurst, C.) (Balkema, Rotterdam 1990), pp. 3-27.Google Scholar
- Grob, M., and van der Baan, M. (2011a), Statistical Analysis of Microseismic Event Locations and Magnitudes, and Their Geomechanical Implications, SEG Expanded Abstracts 30: 1570–1575.Google Scholar
- Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C.F. (1944), Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 185-188.Google Scholar
- Holub, K. (1995), Analysis of b-Value in the Frequency-energy Distributions. Publs. Inst. Geophys. Polish Acad. Sc. M-19(281), 153-161.Google Scholar
- Johnston, J.C., and Einstein, H.H., A survey of mining associated rockbursts, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (ed. Fairhurst, C.) (Balkema, Rotterdam 1990), pp. 121-128.Google Scholar
- Kijko, A., Drzęźla, B., and Stankiewicz, T. (1987), Bimodal Character of the Distribution of Extreme Seismic Events in Polish Mines, Acta Geophys. Pol. 35, 157-166.Google Scholar
- Kijko, A., Funk, C. W., and Brink, A. v. Z., Identification of anomalous patterns in time-dependent mine seismicity. In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (ed Young, R.P), (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993), pp. 205-210.Google Scholar
- Kozłowska, M., Orlecka-Sikora, B., Kwiatek, G., Boettcher, M.S., and Dresen, G. (2015), Nanoseismicity and Picoseismicity Rate Changes From Static Stress Triggering Caused by a M w 2.2 Earthquake in Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa, J. Geophys. Res. 120, doi: 10.1002/2014JB011410.
- Kwiatek, G., Plenkers, K., Nakatani, M., Yabe, Y., Dresen, G., and JAGUARS-Group (2010), Frequency-Magnitude Characteristics Down to Magnitude -4.4 for Induced Seismicity Recorded at Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 1165–1173, doi: 10.1785/0120090277.
- Kwiatek, G., Plenkers, K., Dresen, G., and JAGUARS Research Group (2011), Source Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling Relations, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, 2592–2608, doi: 10.1785/0120110094.
- Lasocki S. Some estimates of rockburst danger in underground coal mines from energy distribution of M.A. events, In Proc. 4th Conf. Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials (Hardy H.R.Jr. ed), (Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal 1989), pp 617-633.Google Scholar
- Lasocki, S. (1993a), Statistical Prediction of Strong Mining Tremors, Acta Geophys. Pol., 41, 197-234.Google Scholar
- Lasocki S., Statistical Short-term Prediction in Mining Induced Seismicity, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (ed Young, R.P), (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993), pp. 211-216.Google Scholar
- Lasocki, S., Quantitative evidences of complexity of magnitude distribution in mining-induced seismicity: Implications for hazard evaluation, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: Dynamic rock mass response to mining (van Aswegen, G., Durrheim, R.J., Ortlepp, W.D. eds.) (SAIMM S27, Johannesburg, 2001), pp. 543-550.Google Scholar
- Lasocki, S., Kijko, A., and Graham, G. Model-free seismic hazard estimation. In Proc. Int. Conf. Earthquake Hazard and Risk in the Mediterranean Region, EHRMR’99 (Gokcekus H. ed.) (Educational Foundation of Near East University, Lefkosa, T. R. N. Cyprus, 2000), pp. 503-508.Google Scholar
- Leonard, T., Papasouliotis, O., and Main, I.G. (2001), A Poisson Model for Identifying Characteristic Size Effects in Frequency Data: Application to Frequency-Size Distributions for Global Earthquakes, “Starquakes,” and Fault Lengths, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 13473–13484, doi: 10.1029/2000JB900429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maghsoudi, S., Cesca, S., Hainzl, S., Kaiser, D., Becker, D., and Dahm, T. (2013), Improving the Estimation of Detection Probability and Magnitude of Completeness in Strongly Heterogeneous Media, an Application to Acoustic Emission (AE), Geophys. J. Int. 193, 1556–1569, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mallika, K., Gupta, H., Shashidar, D., Purnachandra Rao, N., Yadav, A., Rohilla, S., Satyanarayana, H.V.S., and Srinagesh, D. (2012), Temporal Variation of b Value Associated With the M4 Earthquakes in the Reservoir-Triggered Seismic Environment of the Koyna–Warna Region, Western India, J Seismol 17, 189-195, doi: 10.1007/s10950-012-9318-3.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, S.C., Jones, M., Parker, R., Miong, S., Leaney, S., Dorval, D., DAmico, D., Logel, J., Anderson, E., and Hammermaster, K., Fault activation during hydraulic fracturing. In SEG Houston, International Exposition and Annual Meeting (2009), pp. 1552–1556.Google Scholar
- Mogi, K. (1967), Regional Variation in Magnitude-Frequency Relation of Earthquake, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 45, 313-325.Google Scholar
- Orlecka-Sikora, B., and Lasocki, S. Nonparametric characterization of mining induced seismic sources, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: Controlling Seismic Risk (Potvin, Y., and Hudyma, M., eds.), (Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Nedlands 2005), pp. 555-560.Google Scholar
- Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O., eds, Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. 2, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1972).Google Scholar
- Simpson, D.W., Leith, W.S., and Scholz, C.H. (1988), Two Types of Reservoir-induced Seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 2025-2040.Google Scholar
- Stewart, R. D., and Spottiswoode, S.M., A technique for determining the seismic risk in deep-level mining, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (ed Young, R.P), (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993), pp. 123-128.Google Scholar
- Stock, C., and Smith E. (2002a), Adaptive Kernel Estimation and Continuous Probability Representation of Historical Earthquake Catalogs, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 901-912.Google Scholar
- Trifu, C.-I., Shumila, V., and Urbancic, T.I., Space-time analysis of microseismicity and its potential for estimating seismic hazard in mines, In Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (eds. Gibowicz, S.J. and Lasocki, S.) (Balkema, Rotterdam 1997) pp. 295-298.Google Scholar
- Utsu, T. (1965), A Method for Determination of the Value of b in Formula log N = a - b M Showing the Magnitude-frequency Relation for Earthquakes, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 13, 99-103.Google Scholar
- Wesnousky, S.G. (1999), Crustal Deformation Processes and the Stability of the Gutenberg–Richter Relationship, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89, 1131-1137.Google Scholar
- Wiszniowski, J., Nguyen Van Giang, Plesiewicz, B., Lizurek, G., Lasocki, S., Dinh Quoc Van, Le Quang Khoi (2015), Preliminary Results of Anthropogenic Seismicity Monitoring in the Region of Song Tranh 2 Reservoir, Central Vietnam, Acta Geophysica 63, 843–862, doi: 10.1515/acgeo-2015-0021.Google Scholar