Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 172, Issue 12, pp 3357–3384 | Cite as

OSL Dating and GPR Mapping of Palaeotsunami Inundation: A 4000-Year History of Indian Ocean Tsunamis as recorded in Sri Lanka

  • Ranjith Premasiri
  • Peter Styles
  • Victor Shrira
  • Nigel Cassidy
  • Jean-Luc Schwenninger
Article

Abstract

To evaluate and mitigate tsunami hazard, as long as possible records of inundations and dates of past events are needed. Coastal sediments deposited by tsunamis (tsunamites) can potentially provide this information. However, of the three key elements needed for reconstruction of palaeotsunamis (identification of sediments, dating and finding the inundation distance) the latter remains the most difficult. The existing methods for estimating the extent of a palaeotsunami inundation rely on extensive excavation, which is not always possible. Here, by analysing tsunamites from Sri Lanka identified using sedimentological and paleontological characteristics, we show that their internal dielectric properties differ significantly from surrounding sediments. The significant difference in the value of dielectric constant of the otherwise almost indistinguishable sediments is due to higher water content of tsunamites. The contrasts were found to be sharp and not to erode over thousands of years; they cause sizeable electromagnetic wave reflections from tsunamite sediments, which permit the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to trace their extent and morphology. In this study of the 2004 Boxing Day Indian Ocean tsunami, we use GPR in two locations in Sri Lanka to trace four identified major palaeotsunami deposits for at least 400 m inland (investigation inland was constrained by inaccessible security zones). The subsurface extent of tsunamites (not available without extensive excavation) provides a good proxy for inundation. The deposits were dated using the established method of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL). This dating, partly corroborated by available historical records and independent studies, contributes to the global picture of tsunami hazard in the Indian Ocean. The proposed method of combined GPR/OSL-based reconstruction of palaeotsunami deposits enables estimates of inundation, recurrence and, therefore, tsunami hazard for any sandy coast with identifiable tsunamite deposits. The method could be also used for anchoring and synchronizing chronologies of ancient civilisations adjacent to the ocean shores.

Keywords

Tsunami hazard Reconstruction of palaeotsunami deposits Tsunami sediments Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Tsunami in the Indian Ocean 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for the thorough reading of the manuscript and helpful comments.

References

  1. Abe, T., Goto, K., Sugawara, D. (2012), Relationship between the maximum extent of tsunamis and the inundation limit of the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami on the Sendai Plain, Japan, Sedimentary Geology, 282, 142–150.Google Scholar
  2. Abeyratne, M., Jayasingha, P., Hewamanne, R., Mahawatta, P., and Pushparani, M.D.S. (2007), Thermo-luminescence dating of palaeo-tsunamis and/or large storm-laid sand deposits of small estuary in Kirinda, southern Sri Lanka. A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Session, Geological Society of Sri Lanka, p. 6.Google Scholar
  3. Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri: Book VIII (Indica), (Kessinger Publishing Co, ISBN-10: 1419106783; ISBN-13: 978-1419106781, Whitefish, Montana, USA, 2004).Google Scholar
  4. Blott, S.J. and Pye, K. (2001), Gradisat: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26, 1237–1248.Google Scholar
  5. Bluszcz A., OSL Dating in Archaeology, in Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia (Eds. Scott E. M., Alekseev A. Y. and Zaitseva G), (Springer Netherlands 2006) pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
  6. Bondevik, S., Svendsen, J.I., Johnsen, G., Mangerud, J., and Kaland, P.E. (1997), The Storegga tsunami along the Norwegian coast, its age and runup, Boreas, 26, 29–53.Google Scholar
  7. Bondevik, S. (2008), Earth science: The sands of tsunami time, Nature, 455, 1183–1184.Google Scholar
  8. Bos, A.J.J. and Wallinga, J. (2009), Analysis of the quartz OSL decay curves by differentiation, Radiation Measurements 44, 588–593.Google Scholar
  9. Botha, G.A., Bristow, C.S., Porat, N., Duller, G.A.T., Armitage, S.J.,Roberts, H.M., Clarke, B.M., Kota, M.W., Schoeman, P. Evidence for dune reactivation from GPR profiles on the Maputaland coastal plain, South Africa, In: Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments, (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H.M.), (Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 2003), vol. 211, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
  10. Brill D., Brückner H., Jankaew K., Kelletat D., Scheffers, A and Scheffers S. (2011), Potential predecessors of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami Sedimentary evidence of extreme wave events at Ban Bang Sak, SW Thailand, Sedimentary Geology, 239, 146–161.Google Scholar
  11. Brill D., Klasen N., Brückner H., Jankaew K., Scheffers, A., Kelletat D. and Scheffers S., (2012), OSL dating of tsunami deposits from Phra Thong Island, Thailand, Quaternary Geochronology, 10, 224–229.Google Scholar
  12. Bristow, C.S., Ground penetrating radar in Aeolian dune sands. In., Ed. Ground Penetrating Radar: theory and applications. (ed. Jol, H.M) (Elsevier Science, 2009) pp. 273–297.Google Scholar
  13. Bryant, E.A. and Nott, J. (2001), Geological indicators of large tsunami in Australia, Natural Hazards, 24, 231–249.Google Scholar
  14. Byrne, D. E., L. R. Sykes, and D. M. Davis (1992), Great thrust earthquakes and aseismic slip along the plate boundary of the Makran Subduction Zone, J. Geophys. Res., 97(B1), 449–478.Google Scholar
  15. Choi, B.H, Pelinovsky, E., Kim, K. O. and Lee, J.C. (2003), Simulation of the trans-oceanic tsunami propagation due to the 1883 Krakatau volcanic eruption. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 3, 321–332.Google Scholar
  16. Choi, B.H, Min, B. I., Pelinovsky, E., Tsuji, Y. and Kim, K. O. (2012), Comparable analysis of the distribution functions of runup heights of the 1896, 1933 and 2011 Japanese Tsunamis in the Sanriku area Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1463–1467.Google Scholar
  17. Codrington, H.W., A Short History of Ceylon (Asian Educational Services, New Delhi Madras, 1994).Google Scholar
  18. Dahanayake, K. and Kulasena N. (2008a), Geological evidence for Palaeo-Tsunami in Sri Lanka, Sci. Tsunami Hazards., 27, 54.Google Scholar
  19. Dahanayake, K and Kulasena, N. (2008b), Recognition of diagnostic criteria for recent- and palaeo-tsunami sediments from Sri Lanka, Marine Geology, 254, 180–186.Google Scholar
  20. Dawson, A.G., Shi, S., Dawson, S., Takahashi, T. and Shuto, N. (1996a), Coastal sedimentation associated with the June 2nd and 3rd, 1994 Tsunami in Rajegwesi, Java. Quaternary Science Reviews, 15, 901–912.Google Scholar
  21. Dawson, S., Smith, D. E., Ruffman, A., and Shi, S. (1996b), The diatom biostratigraphy of tsunami sediments: Examples from recent and middle Holocene events, Phys. Chem. Earth, 21, 87–92.Google Scholar
  22. Duller, G. A. T., Luminescence Dating: Guidelines on using luminescence dating in archaeology (English Heritage, Swindon 2008).Google Scholar
  23. Engel M. and Brückner H., (2011), The identification of palaeo-tsunami deposits: a major challenge in coastal sedimentary research, Coastline Reports 17, 65–80.Google Scholar
  24. Ezzy T. R., Huftile G. J. and Cox M. E. Applying ground penetrating radar (GPR) to improve hydrogeological understanding and groundwater modelling within a coastal plain setting, Tecnología de la intrusión de agua de mar en acuíferos costeros: países mediterráneos (IGME, Madrid 2003. ISBN 84-7840-470-8).Google Scholar
  25. Fine I. V., Rabinovich, A. B. and Thomson, R. E. (2005), The dual source region for the 2004 Sumatra Tsunami, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16602, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023521.
  26. Folk R L and Ward W C. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27:3–26, 1957.Google Scholar
  27. Fujino, S., Masuda, F., Tagomori, S., and Matsumoto, D., (2006), Structure and depositional processes of a gravelly tsunami deposit in a shallow marine setting: Lower Cretaceous Miyako Group, Japan, 1: Sedimentary Geology, 187, 127–138.Google Scholar
  28. Goto, K., Chagué-Goff, C., Fujino, S., Goff, J.R., Jaffe, B.E., Nishimura, Y., Richmond, B.M., Sugawara, D., Szczuciński, W., Tappin, D.R., Witter, R.C., Yulianto, E., (2011), New insights of tsunami hazard from the 2011 Tohoku-oki event, Marine Geology 290 (1–4), 46–50.Google Scholar
  29. Hardy S., R., The legends and theories of the Buddhists compared with history and science: with introductory notices of the life and system of Gothama Buddha, (Williams and Norgate, 14, Henrietta street, Covent garden. London, 1866).Google Scholar
  30. Hashimoto, T, Koyanagi, A, Yokosaka, K., Hayashi, Y and Sotobayashi, T (1986), Thermoluminescence colour images from quartz of beach sands, Geochemical J. 20, 111–18.Google Scholar
  31. Havholm, K.G., Bergstrom, N.D., Jol, H.M. and Running, G.L., GPR survey of a Holocene aeolian/fluvial/lacustrine succession, Lauder Sandhills, Manitoba, Canada. In Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H.M.). (The Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 211, 2003), pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
  32. Heinz, J. and Aigner, T., Three-dimensional GPR analysis of various Quaternary gravel-bed braided river deposits (southwestern Germany). In Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H. M.). (Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003, 211), pp 99–110.Google Scholar
  33. Herath, J.W., The Economic Geology of Sri Lanka (Natural Resource Series No 1, NARESA Publication 1985).Google Scholar
  34. Herath, M. M. J. W., Sri Lankan beach mineral sands (Geological Survey Publication. Sri Lanka, 1988).Google Scholar
  35. Hettiarachchi, S.S.L. and Samarawickrama, S.P. (2005), Experience of the Indian Ocean Tsunami on the Sri Lankan coast. International Symposium on Disaster Reduction on Coasts, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. Hindson, R.A. and Andrade, C. (1999), Sedimentation and hydrodynamic processes associated with the tsunami generated by the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, Quaternary International, 56, 27–38.Google Scholar
  37. Huntley, D.J. and Clague, J.J. (1996), Optical dating of tsunami-laid sands, Quaternary Research, 46, 127–140.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson K.L., Eberli, G.P., Amelung, F., McFadden, M.A., Moore A.L., Rankey, E.C. and Jayasena H. A. H., (2014), Holocene Indian Ocean tsunami history in Sri Lanka, Geology 42 (10), 859–862.Google Scholar
  39. Jaffe, B., Gelfenbaum, G., Rubin, D., Peters, R., Anima, R., Swensson, M., Olcese, D. Bernales L., Gomez, J., and Riega, P. (2003), Tsunami Deposits: Identification and Interpretation of Tsunami Deposits from the June 23, 2001 Peru Tsunami, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Sediments 2003, CD-ROM Published by World Scientific Publishing Corp and East Meets West Productions, Corpus Christi, TX, USA. ISBN 981-238-422-7.Google Scholar
  40. Jaffe, B. E. and Gelfenbaum, G. (2007), A simple model for calculating tsunami flow speed from tsunami deposits. Sedimentary Geology, 200, 347–361.Google Scholar
  41. Jankaew K., Atwater B.F., Sawai Y., Choowong M., Charoentitirat, T., Martin, M.E. and Prendergast, A. (2008), Medieval forewarning of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Thailand, Nature, 455, 1228–1231.Google Scholar
  42. Jol H. M., Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (Elsevier, 2008).Google Scholar
  43. Jol H. M., and Bristow C. S., GPR in sediments: Advice on data collection, basic processing and interpretation, a good practice guide, in Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow C. S., and Jol H. M.,), (Geol. Soc. London, 2003), pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
  44. Kato, Y., and M. Kimura (1983), Age and origin of so-called “Tsunami-ishi”, Ishigaki island, Okinawa prefecture, J. Geol. Soc. Japan, 89, 471–474.Google Scholar
  45. Katupotha J. and Fujiwara, K. (1988), Holocene sea level change on the southwest and south coasts of Sri Lanka, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 68, 189–203.Google Scholar
  46. Korycansky, D.G. and Lynett, P.J. (2007), Runup from impact tsunami, Geophysical Journal International, 170, 1076–1088.Google Scholar
  47. Koster, B., Hadler, H., Vött, A. and Reicherter, K. (2013), Application of GPR for visualising spatial distribution and internal structures of tsunami depositsCase studies from Spain and Greece, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplementary Issues, 57(4), 29–45.Google Scholar
  48. Koster B., Hoffmann G., Grützner C. and Reicherter, K. (2014), Ground penetrating radar facies of inferred tsunami deposits on the shores of the Arabian Sea (Northern Indian Ocean), Marine Geology 351(2014) 13–24.Google Scholar
  49. Le Roux, J.P. and Vargas, G. (2005), Hydraulic behaviour of tsunami backflows: insights from their modern and ancient deposits, Environmental Geology, 49, 65–75.Google Scholar
  50. Le Roux, J.P. and Vargas, G. (2007), Structure and depositional processes of a gravelly tsunami deposit in a shallow marine setting: Lower Cretaceous Miyako Group, Japandiscussion, Sedimentary Geology, 201, 485–487.Google Scholar
  51. Mätzler C. and Murk A., Complex dielectric constant of dry sand in the 0.1 to 2 GHz range (Research Report No. 2010-06-MW, Institute of Applied Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland, 2010).Google Scholar
  52. Meyers, R. A., Smith, D. G., Jol, H. M. and Peterson, C. D. (1996), Evidence for eight great earthquake-subsidence events detected with ground-penetrating radar, Willapa barrier, Washington. Geology, 24, 99–102.Google Scholar
  53. Monecke, K., Finger, W., Klarer, D., Kongko, W., Mcadoo, B.G., Moore, A.L. and Sudrajat, S.U. (2008), A 1,000-year sediment record of tsunami recurrence in northern Sumatra. Nature, 455, 1232–1234.Google Scholar
  54. Moore, A.L. (2000), Landward fining in onshore gravel as evidence for a late Pleistocene tsunami on Molokai, Hawaii, Geology, 28, 247–250.Google Scholar
  55. Moore, A.L., McAdoo, B.G., and Ruffman, A. (2007), Landward fining from multiple sources in a sand sheet deposited by the 1929 Grand Banks tsunami, Newfoundland: Sedimentary Geology, 200, 336–346.Google Scholar
  56. Morton, R.A., Gelfenbaum, G., and Jaffe, B.E. (2007), Physical criteria for distinguishing sandy tsunami and storm deposits using modem examples: Sedimentary Geology, 200, 184–207.Google Scholar
  57. Morton, R.A., Goff, J.R., and Nichol, S.L. (2008), Hydrodynamic implications of textural trends in sand deposits of the 2004 tsunami in Sri Lanka, Sedimentary Geology, 207, 56–64.Google Scholar
  58. Murray, A, S. and Wintle, A G. (2000), Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol, Radiation Measurements 32, 57–73.Google Scholar
  59. Pelinovsky E., Choi B.H., Stromkov A., Didenkulova I., and Kim H.-S. (2005), Analysis of Tide-Gauge Records of the 1883 Krakatau Tsunami, In Tsunamis (ed. K.Satake), (Springer, Netherlands), pp. 57–78.Google Scholar
  60. Peters, R., Jaffe, B., and Gelfenbaum, G. (2007), Distribution and sedimentary characteristics of tsunami deposits along the Cascadia margin of western North America, Sedimentary Geology, 200, 372–386.Google Scholar
  61. Pratt, B.R. and Bordonaro, O.L. (2007), Tsunamis in a stormy sea: Middle Cambrian inner-shelf limestones of Western Argentina, Journal of Sedimentary Research, 77, 256–262.Google Scholar
  62. Premasiri H. M. R., Identification of palaeotsunami deposits using ground penetrating radar, sedimentological and micropaleontological techniques; implications for Sri Lankan tsunami hazard (Ph.D. Thesis, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK, 2012) 284 pp.Google Scholar
  63. Prendergast A. L., Cupper, M. L., Jankaew K. and Sawai, Y. (2012), Indian Ocean tsunami recurrence from optical dating of tsunami sand sheets in Thailand, Marine Geology, 295–298.Google Scholar
  64. Ranasinghage, P.N., Holocene coastal development in southeastern-eastern Sri Lanka: Paleodepositional environments and paleo-coastal hazards (Ph.D. thesis, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 2010, 437 pp.).Google Scholar
  65. Ruiz, F., Abad, M., Vidal, J.R., Caceres, L.M., Gonzalez-Regalado, M.L., Carretero, M.I., Pozo, M., and Toscano, F.G. (2008), The geological record of the oldest historical tsunamis in southwestern Spain, Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 114, 145–154.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, D.E., Shi, S., Cullingford, R.A., Dawson, A.G., Dawson, S., Firth, C.R., Foster, I.D.L., Fretwell, P.T., Haggart, B.A., Holloway, L.K., and Long, D. (2004), The Holocene Storegga slide Tsunami in the United Kingdom, Quaternary Science Reviews, 23, 2291–2321.Google Scholar
  67. Soulsby, R., Smith, D., and Ruffman, A., Reconstructing Tsunami Runup from Sedimentary Characteristics—A Simple Mathematical Model, In Coastal Sediments (eds. Kraus, N.C. and Rosati, J.D.) (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007), pp.1075-1088.Google Scholar
  68. Spiske, M., Piepenbreier, J., Benavente, C. and Bahlburg, H. (2013), Preservation potential of tsunami deposits on arid siliciclastic coasts, Earth-Science Reviews 11, 126, 58–73.Google Scholar
  69. Styles, P., Shrira, V. and Premasiri H. M. R. (2007), Sumatra tsunami signature in sediment characteristics on the Sri Lankan coast, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 9, 05310, SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU2007-A-05310.Google Scholar
  70. Styles, P., Environmental Geophysics, (ISBN: 978-90-73834-33-0, EAGE Publications bv., 2011).Google Scholar
  71. Sumangala, H, The Mahawamsa, first thirty-six chapters (Godage Brothers Colombo 1996),Google Scholar
  72. Suraweera, A. V., A comprehensive account of the Kings of Sri Lanka (Rathmalana, Colombo 2000).Google Scholar
  73. Switzer, A.D., Bristow, C.S., and Jones, B.G. (2006), Investigation of large-scale washover of a small barrier system on the southeast Australian coast using ground penetrating radar. Sedimentary Geology, 183, 145–156.Google Scholar
  74. Syvitski, J. P. M., (ed)., Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis (Cambridge University Press 1991).Google Scholar
  75. Tamura, T., Murakami, F., Nanayama, F., Watanabe, K., Saito, Y. (2008), Ground-penetrating radar profiles of Holocene raised-beach deposits in the Kujukuri strand plain, Pacific coast of eastern Japan, Marine Geology, 248, 11–27.Google Scholar
  76. Wagner, J. F. and Chanchai, S. (2011), Grain-Size and Thin Section Characteristics of Tsunami Sediments from Thai-Andaman Coast, Thailand. In The Tsunami Threat—Research and Technology (ed. Nils-Axel Marner, ISBN: 978-953-307-552-5). http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/13086.pdf.
  77. Wagner J.-F. and Srisutam C. (2011), Grain-Size and Thin Section Characteristics of Tsunami Sediments from Thai-Andaman Coast, Thailand. The Tsunami Threat—Research and Technology, Nils-Axel Marner (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-552-5, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/thetsunami-threat-research-and-technology/grain-size-and-thin-section-characteristics-of-tsunami-sedimentsfrom-thai-andaman-coast-thailand.
  78. Wallinga, J. (2002), Optically stimulated luminescence dating of fluvial deposits: a review. Boreas 31, 303–322.Google Scholar
  79. Wattegama, C., (2005), The Seven Tsunamis That Hit The Isle of Lanka, WWW Virtual Library—Sri Lanka, http://www.lankalibrary.com/news/tsunamis2.htm.
  80. Weiss, R., (2008), Sediment grains moved by passing tsunami waves: Tsunami deposits in deep water, Marine Geology, 250, 251–257.Google Scholar
  81. Wijetunga W. M., (2008), The Present Status of the Home gardens in Galle District of Sri Lanka Affected by the December 26, 2004 Tsunami: A Comparison with Non-affected Home gardens in Connection with Restoration, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna.Google Scholar
  82. Witter, R.C., Kelsey, H.M. and Hemphill-Haley, E. (2001), Pacific storms, El Nino and tsunamis: Competing mechanisms for sand deposition in a coastal marsh, Euchre Creek, Oregon, Journal of Coastal Research, 17, 563–583.Google Scholar
  83. Woodroffe, S.A. and Horton, B.P. (2005), Holocene sea-level changes in the Indo-Pacific, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 25, 29–43.Google Scholar
  84. Woodward, J., Ashworth, P.J., Best, J.L., Sambrook Smith, G.H. and Simpson, C.J., The use and application of GPR in sandy fluvial environments: methodological considerations, In Ground penetrating radar in sediments.(eds. C.S. Bristow and H.M. Jol) (Geological Society, London, Special Publications 211, 2003), pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
  85. Yan, Z. and Tang, D. (2008), Changes in Suspended Sediments Associated with 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, Advances in Space Research 43, 89–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Environment, Physical Sciences and Applied Mathematics (EPSAM)Keele UniversityKeeleUK
  2. 2.School of ArchaeologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of Earth Resources EngineeringUniversity of MoratuwaMoratuwaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations