Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 170, Issue 1–2, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Effects of Location Errors in Pattern Informatics

Article

Abstract

The effect of location errors in the performance of seismicity-based forecasting methods was studied here using one particular binary forecast technique, the Pattern Informatics (PI) technique (Rundle et al., Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99, 2514–2521, 2002; Tiampo et al., Pure Appl Geophys 159, 2429–2467, 2002). The Southern Californian dataset was used to generate a series of perturbed catalogs by adding different levels of noise to epicenter locations. The PI technique was applied to these perturbed datasets to perform retrospective forecasts that were evaluated by means of skill scores, commonly used in atmospheric sciences. These results were then compared to the effectiveness obtained from the original dataset. Isolated instances of decline of the PI performance were observed due to the nature of the skill scores themselves, but no clear trend of degradation was identified. Dependence on the total number of events in a catalog also was studied, with no systematic degradation in the performance of the PI for catalogs with events in the cases studied. These results suggest that the stability of the PI method is due to the invariance of the clustering patterns identified by the TM metric (Thirumalai and Mountain, Phys Rev A 39, 3563–3573, 1989) when applied to seismicity.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the NSERC & Aon Benfield/ICLR Industrial Research Chair in Earthquake Hazard assessment. The authors would like to thank H. C. Li for his valuable comments to this work.

References

  1. Chen C, Rundle J.B, Holliday J.R, Nanjo K.Z, Turcotte D.L, Li S, and Tiampo K.F (2005) The 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake as a typical example of seismic activation and quiescence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L22315, 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. Cho N.F, Tiampo K.F, McKinnon S.D, Vallejos J.A, Klein W, and Dominguez R. (2010) A simple metric to quantify seismicity clustering. Nonlinear. Proc. Geoph. 17, 293–302.Google Scholar
  3. Cicerone R.D, Ebel J.E., and Britton J. (2009) A systematic compilation of earthquake precursors. Tectonophysics 476, 371–396.Google Scholar
  4. Farquhar I.E, Ergodic theory in statistical mechanics. Monographs in Statistical Physics Vol 7. (Interscience Publishers, 1964).Google Scholar
  5. Field E.H. (2007) Overview of the working group for the delopment of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM). Seismol. Res. Lett. 78, 7–16.Google Scholar
  6. Harte D., and Vere-Jones D. (2005) The entropy score and its uses in earthquake forecasting. Pure Appl. Geophys. 162, 1229–1253.Google Scholar
  7. Heidke P. (1926) Berechnung des erfolges und der güte der windstärkevorhersagen im sturmwarnungdienst. Geogr. Ann. 8, 301–349.Google Scholar
  8. Holliday J.R., Nanjo K.Z., Tiampo K.F., Rundle J.B., and Turcotte D.L. (2005) Earthquake forecasting and its verification. Nonlinear. Proc. Geoph. 12, 965–977.Google Scholar
  9. Hutton K., and Yu E. (2009) News flash! SCSN earthquake catalog completed. http://www.data.scec.org/about/scsncatalog.pdf last accessed on June/2011.
  10. Jiang C.S., and Wu Z.L. (2008) Retrospective forecasting test of a statistical physics model for earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan region. Sci. China. Ser. D 51, 1401–1410.Google Scholar
  11. Kanamori H, The nature of seismicity patterns before large earthquakes. Series 4: Earthquake Prediction—An International Review, (AGU Geophys. Mono., Washington D.C. 1981) pp 1–19.Google Scholar
  12. Kanamori H, (2003) Earthquake Prediction: An Overview. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, (Academic Press, Amsterdam) pp 1205–1216.Google Scholar
  13. Keilis-Borok V (2002) Earthquake prediction: state-of-the-art and end emerging possibilities. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 30, 1–33.Google Scholar
  14. Nanjo K.Z., Holliday J.R., Chen C.C., Rundle J.B., and Turcotte D.L. (2005) Application of a modified Pattern Informatics method to forecasting the locations of future large earthquakes in the central Japan. Tectonophysics 424, 351–366.Google Scholar
  15. Perlock P (2009) Imaging Faults in 3-D Using the Pattern Informatics Technique. M. Sc. Thesis—University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  16. Petersen M.D, Frankel A.D, Harmsen S.C, Mueller C.S, Haller K.M, Wheeler R.L, Wesson R.L, Zeng Y, Boyd O.S., Perkins D.M., Luco N., Field E.H, Wills C.J, and Rustales K.S (2008) Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Map. Tech. Rep. open-file report 2008–1128, USGS.Google Scholar
  17. Rundle J.B, Tiampo K.F, Klein W, and Martins J.S.S (2002) Self-organization in leaky threshold systems: The influence of near-mean field dynamics and its implications for earthquakes, neurobiology, and forecasting. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2514–2521, Supplement 1.Google Scholar
  18. Shcherbakov R, Turcotte D.L, Rundle J.B, Tiampo K.F, Holliday J.R, 2010 Forecasting the locations of future large earthquakes: an analysis and verification. Pure Appl. Geophys. 167, pp. 743–749.Google Scholar
  19. Thirumalai D, Mountain R.D (1989) Ergodic behavior in supercooled liquids and in glasses. Phys. Rev. A 39, No 7, 3563–3573.Google Scholar
  20. Thirumalai D, Mountain R.D (1993) Activated dynamics, loss of ergodicity, and transport in supercooled liquids. Phys. Rev. E 47, No 1, 479–489.Google Scholar
  21. Tiampo K.F, Rundle J.B, McGinnis S, and Klein W (2002) Pattern dynamics and forecast methods in seismically active regions. Pure Appl. Geophys. 159, 2429–2467.Google Scholar
  22. Tiampo K.F, Rundle J.B, and Klein W (2006) Stress shadows determined from a phase dynamical measure of historic seismicity. Pure Appl. Geophys. 163, 2407–2416.Google Scholar
  23. Tiampo K.F, Rundle J.B, Klein W, Holliday J.R, Sá Martins J.S, Ferguson C.D (2007) Ergodicity in natural earthquake fault networks. Phys. Rev. E 75, 1–15.Google Scholar
  24. van Stiphout T, Schorlemmer D, and Wiemer S (2011) The effect of uncertainties on estimates of background seismicity rate. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 101, No 2, 482–494.Google Scholar
  25. Werner M.J, Sornette D (2008) Magnitude uncertainties impact seismic rate estimations, forecasts, and predictability experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B08302, 1–20.Google Scholar
  26. Wiemer S, Giardini D, Fäh D, Deichmann N, and Sellami S (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland: best estimates and uncertainties. J. Seism. 13, No 4, 449–478.Google Scholar
  27. Wilks D.S, Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. (Academic Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  28. Woodcock, F. (1976). The evaluation of yes/no forecasts for scientific and administrative purposes. Mon. Weather Rev. 104, No 10, 1209–1214.Google Scholar
  29. Zaliapin I, Ben-Zion Y (2011) Asymmetric distribution of aftershocks on large faults in California. Geophys. J. Int. 185, No 3, 1288–1304.Google Scholar
  30. Zhao Y, Wu Z, Jiang C, Zhu C (2010) Reverse Tracing of Precursors Applied to the Annual Earthquake Forecast: Retrospective Test of the Annual Consultation in the Sichuan-Yunnan Region of Southwest China. Pure Appl. Geophys. 167, 783800.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations