Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 169, Issue 10, pp 1749–1776 | Cite as

Tomographic Imaging of the Seismic Structure Beneath the East Anatolian Plateau, Eastern Turkey

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The high level of seismic activity in eastern Turkey is thought to be mainly associated with the continuing collision of the Arabian and Eurasian tectonic plates. The determination of a detailed three-dimensional (3D) structure is crucial for a better understanding of this on-going collision or subduction process; therefore, a body wave tomographic inversion technique was performed on the region. The tomographic inversion used high quality arrival times from earthquakes occurring in the region from 1999 to 2001 recorded by a temporary 29 station broadband IRIS-PASSCAL array operated by research groups from the Universities of Boğaziçi (Turkey) and Cornell (USA). The data was inverted and consisted of 3,114 P- and 2,298 S-wave arrival times from 252 local events with magnitudes (M D) ranging from 2.5 to 4.8. The stability and resolution of the results were qualitatively assessed by two synthetic tests: a spike test and checkerboard resolution test and it was found that the models were well resolved for most parts of the imaged domain. The tomographic inversion results reveal significant lateral heterogeneities in the study area to a depth of ~20 km. The P- and S-wave velocity models are consistent with each other and provide evidence for marked heterogeneities in the upper crustal structure beneath eastern Turkey. One of the most important features in the acquired tomographic images is the high velocity anomalies, which are generally parallel to the main tectonic units in the region, existing at shallow depths. This may relate to the existence of ophiolitic units at shallow depths. The other feature is that low velocities are widely dispersed through the 3D structure beneath the region at deeper crustal depths. This feature can be an indicator of the mantle upwelling or support the hypothesis that the Anatolian Plateau is underlain by a partially molten uppermost mantle.

Keywords

Seismic tomography body waves three-dimensional velocity structure three-dimensional crustal models Eastern Anatolia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey and Prof. Dr. Niyazi Turkelli for providing both the data and valuable assistance. I also appreciate all the help from the reviewers and editor to improve the manuscript. The figures were created using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith, 1991).

References

  1. Aki, K. and Lee, W. H. K. (1976), Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earthquakes, 1. A homogeneous initial model, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 4381–4399.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Damegh, K. E., Sandvol, E., Al-Lazki, A. and Barazangi, M. (2004), Regional wave propagation (Sn and Lg) and Pn attenuation in the Arabian plate and surrounding regions, Geophys. J. Int. 157, 775–795.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Lazki, A., Seber, D., Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., Mohamad, R. and Barazangi, M. (2003), Tomographic Pn velocity and anisotropy structure beneath the Anatolian Plateau (eastern Turkey) and the surrounding regions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(24), 8043, doi: 10.1029/2003Gl017391.
  4. Al-Lazki, A., Sandvol, E., Seber, D., Barazangi, M., Turkelli, N. and Mohamad, R. (2004), On tomographic imaging of mantle lid velocity and anisotropy at the junction of the Arabian, Eurasian and African Plates, Geophys. J. Int. 158, 1024–1040.Google Scholar
  5. Angus, D., Wilson, D., Sandvol, E. and Ni, J. (2006), Lithospheric structure of the Arabian and Eurasian collision zone in eastern Turkey from S-wave receiver functions, Geophys. J. Int. 166, 1335–1346.Google Scholar
  6. Aydin, I., Karat, H. and Koçak, A. (2005), Curie-point depth map of Turkey, Geophys. J. Int. 162, 633–640.Google Scholar
  7. Belousov, V. V., Pavlenkova, N. I. and Kvyatkovskaya, G. N. (1992), Structure of the crust and upper mantle of the [Former] USSR, Int. Geol. Rev. 34, 213–338.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, N. I. and Mooney, W. D. (1995), Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 9761–9788.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. F., Hemton, M. R., Kidd, W. S. F., Saroglu, F. and Sengör, A. M. C. (1986), Shortening of continental lithosphere: The neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia—a young collision zone, In Coward, M. P. and Reis, A. C., (eds), Collision Tectonics, Geology Society of London Special Publication, 19, (R. M. Shackleton Volume), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
  10. Dilek, Y. and Pavlides, S. (2006), Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean and Asia, Geol. Soc. Am. Special Papers, 409.Google Scholar
  11. Facenne, C., Bellier, O., Martinod, J., Pirimallo, C. and Regard, V. (2006), Slab detachment beneath eastern Anatolia: a possible cause for the formation of the North Anatolian Fault, Earth Planet. Sc. Let. 242, 85–97.Google Scholar
  12. Fuezalida, H. A., Dorbath, L., Cisternas, A., Eyidogan, H., Barka, A., Rivera, L., Haessler H., Philip H. and Lyberis N. (1997), Mechanism of the 1992 Erzincan earthquake and its aftershocks of the Erzincan Basin and decoupling on the North Anatolian Fault, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Furlong, K., Beroza, G. C., Brun, J., Cowie, P. A., Handy, M. R., Mooney, W. D., Taymaz, T., Teyssier, C., Vauchez, A. and Wernicke, B. (2007), Nucleation and Growth of Fault System, In Handy M. R., Hirt G. and Hovius N. (eds), Tectonic Faults-Agents of Change on a Dynamic Earth, pp: 78–98. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 USA, 504 pp, ISBN: 978-0-262-08362-1.Google Scholar
  14. Gok, R., Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., Seber, D., and Barazangi, M. (2003), Sn attenuation in the Anatolian and Iranian plateau and surrounding regions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018912.
  15. Gökalp, H. (2007a), Different approaches in local earthquake tomography: an application on the Alban Hills volcano (Central Italy), Ann. Geophys. Italy, 50(2), 149–163.Google Scholar
  16. Gökalp, H. (2007b), Local earthquake tomography of the Erzincan Basin and the surrounding area in Turkey, Ann. Geophys. Italy, 50(6), 707–724, doi: 10.4401/ag-3052.
  17. Jackson, J. A. and Mckenzie, D. (1988), The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of the active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East, Geophys. J. Int. 93, 45–73.Google Scholar
  18. Keskin, A. (2007), Eastern Anatolia: a hotspot in a collision zone without a mantle plume, Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper, 430, 693–722.Google Scholar
  19. Koçyigit, A., Yilmaz, A., Adamia, S. and Kuloshvili, S. (2001), Neotectonics of East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) and Lesser Caucasus: implication from transition for thrusting to strike-slip faulting, Geodin. Acta 14, 177–195.Google Scholar
  20. Le Pichon, X. and Kreemer, C. (2010), The Miocene-to- Present Kinematic Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East and Its Implications for Dynamics, Ann. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc. 38, 323–351.Google Scholar
  21. Lei, J. and Zhao, D. (2007), Teleseismic evidence for a break-off subducting slab under Eastern Turkey, Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 257, 14–28.Google Scholar
  22. Leveque, J., Rivera, L. and Wittlinger, G. (1993), On the use of the checkerboard test to assess the resolution of tomographic inversions, Geophys. J. Int. 115, 313–318.Google Scholar
  23. Maggi, A. and Priestley, K. (2005), Surface waveform tomography of the Turkish–Iranian plateau, Geophys, J. Int. 160, 1068–1080.Google Scholar
  24. Maggi, A., Jackson, J. A., Mckenzie, D. and Priestly, K. (2000), Earthquake focal depths, effective elastic thickness, and the strength of the continental lithosphere, Geology 28, 495–498.Google Scholar
  25. Mcclusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., et al. (2000), Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5695–5719.Google Scholar
  26. Mcclusky, S., Reilinger, R., Mahmoud, S., Ben-Sari, D. and Tealeb, A. (2003), GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions, Geophys. J. Int. 155, 126–138.Google Scholar
  27. Mckenzie, D. P. (1976), The East Anatolian Fault: A major structure in eastern Turkey, Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 29, 189–193.Google Scholar
  28. Mckenzie, D. P. (1978), Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan Belt: The Aegean Sea and surrounding regions, Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc. 55, 217–254.Google Scholar
  29. Nolet, G. (1985), Solving and resolving inadequate and noisy tomographic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 61, 463–482.Google Scholar
  30. Örgülü, G., Aktar, M., Turkelli, N., Sandvol, E. and Barazangi, M. (2003), Contribution to the seismotectonics of the Eastern Anatolian Plateau from moderate and small size events, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(24).Google Scholar
  31. Ozacar, A. A., Gilbert, H. and Zandt, G. (2008), Upper mantle discontinuity structure beneath East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) from receiver functions, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett. 269, 427–435.Google Scholar
  32. Paige, C. C. and Saunders, M. A. (1982), LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, ACM T. Math. Software 8, 43–71.Google Scholar
  33. Papazachos, C. B. and Nolet, G. (1997), P and S deep velocity structure of the Hellenic area obtained by robust nonlinear inversion of travel times, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8349–8367.Google Scholar
  34. Pearce, J. A., Bender, J. F., De Long, S. E., Kidd, W. S. F., Low, P. J., Guner Y, Saroglu, F., Moorbath, S. and Mitchell, J. G. (1990), Genesis of collision volcanism in eastern Anatolia, Turkey, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 44, 189–229.Google Scholar
  35. Podgorski, J., Hearn, E. H., Mcclusky, S. C., Reilinger, R., Taymaz, T., Tan, O., Prilepin, M., Guseva, T. and Nadariya, M. (2007), Postseismic Deformation Following the 1991 Racha, Georgia Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34(4):L04310, doi: 10.1029/2006GL028477.
  36. Reilinger, R. E, Mcclusky, S. C., Oral, M. B., King, R. W., Toksöz, M. N., Barka, A. A., Kinik, I., Lenk, O. and Sanli, I., (1997), Global positioning system measurement at present-day crustal movements in the Arabia–Africa–Eurasia plate collision zone, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 9983–9999.Google Scholar
  37. Rotstein, Y. and Kafka, A. L. (1982), Seismotectonics of the southern boundary of Anatolia, eastern Mediterranean region: Subduction, collision and arc jumping, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 7694–7706.Google Scholar
  38. Sandvol, E., Al-Damegh, K., Calvert, A., Seber, D., Barazangi, M., Mohamad, R., Gok, R., Turkelli, N. and Gurbuz, C. (2001), Tomographic imaging of Lg and Sn propagation in the Middle East, Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 1121–1163.Google Scholar
  39. Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., Zor, E., Gok, R., Bekler, T. and Gurbuz, C. (2003a), Shear wave splitting in a young continent–continent collision: An example from Eastern Turkey, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(24):8041, doi: 10.1029/2003GL017390.
  40. Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N. and Barazangi, M. (2003b), The Eastern Turkey Seismic Experiment: The study of a young continent–continent collision, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(24):8038, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018912.
  41. Şaroğlu, F., Emre, Ö. and Kusçu, I. (1992), Active Fault Map of Turkey, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  42. Sengör, A. M. C. and Kidd, W. S. K. (1979), The post-collisional tectonics of the Turkish–Iranian Plateau and a comparison with Tibet, Tectonophysics 55, 361–376.Google Scholar
  43. Sengör, A. M. C. and Yilmaz, Y. (1981), Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach, Tectonophysics 75, 181–241.Google Scholar
  44. Sengör, A. M. C., Gorur, N. and Saroglu, F. (1985), Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study, in Strike-slip faulting and basin formation In: Biddle, K. T. and Christie-Brick, N. (eds), Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists. Special Publication, pp 227–261.Google Scholar
  45. Sengör, A. M. C., Özeren, S., Genç, T. and Zor, E. (2003), East Anatolian high plateau as a mantle-supported, north–south shortened domal structure, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 8045, doi: 10.1029/2003GL017858.
  46. Sengör, A. M. C., Tüysüz, O., Imren, C., Sakinc, M., Eyidogan, H., Görür, N., Le Pichon, X. and Rangin, C. (2005), The North Anatolian Fault: a new look, Ann. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc. 33, 37–112.Google Scholar
  47. Spakman, W. and Nolet, G. (1988), Imaging algorithms, accuracy and resolution in delay time tomography, In: Mathematical Geophysics (eds. Vlarr, N. et al.) D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass, pp 155–187.Google Scholar
  48. Spakman, W., Van Der Lee, S. and Van Der Hilst, R. (1993), Travel-time tomography of the European-Mediterranean mantle down to 1,400 km, Phys. Earth Planet In. 79, 3–74.Google Scholar
  49. Taymaz, T., Jackson, J. A. and Westawey, R. (1990), Earthquake mechanism in the Hellenic Trench near Crete, Geophys. J. Int. 102, 695–731.Google Scholar
  50. Taymaz, T., Jackson, J. A. and Mckenzie, D. (1991a), Active Tectonics of the North and Central Aegean Sea, Geophys. J. Int. 106, 433–490.Google Scholar
  51. Taymaz, T., Eyidogan, H. and Jackson, J. A. (1991b), Source parameters of the large earthquake in the East Anatolian Zone (Turkey), Geophys. J. Int. 106, 537–550.Google Scholar
  52. Taymaz, T., Westawey, R. and Reilinger, R. (eds) (2004), Active Faulting and Crustal Deformation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Tectonophysics 391, 1–374.Google Scholar
  53. Taymaz, T., Yilmaz, Y. and Dilek, Y. (eds) (2007), The Geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia, Geol. Soc., London, Special Publications, 291, 1–16.Google Scholar
  54. Taymaz, T, Tan, O. and Yolsal, S. (2008), Recent Devastating Earthquakes in Turkey and Active Tectonics of the Aegean and Marmara Seas, In: Proceedings of the NATO-Science Series: IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 81: Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard Mitigation in Balkan Countries (ed. Eystein, S. Husebye), Borovetz, Bulgaria, September 11–18, 2005, 289 pages, pp. 47–57, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6815-7, ISBN: 978-1-4020-6813-3, MARCH 2008.
  55. Tezcan, A. (1995), geothermal explorations and heat flow in Turkey. In: Terrestrial heat Flow and Geothermal Energy in Asia (eds. Gupta, ML and Yamamo, M.), Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 23–42.Google Scholar
  56. Thurber, C. H. (1983), Earthquake location and three-dimensional crustal structure in the Coyote Lake area, central California, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8226–8236.Google Scholar
  57. Turkelli, N., Sandvol, E., Zor, E., Gok, R., Bekler, T., Al-Lazki, A., Karabulut, H., Kuleli, S., Eken, T., Gurbuz, C., Bayraktutan, S., Seber, D. and Barazangi, M. (2003), Seismogenic zones in Eastern Turkey, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(24), 8039, doi: 10.1029/2003GL01823.
  58. Um, J. and Thurber, C. H. (1987), A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 77, 972–986.Google Scholar
  59. Wessel, D. A. and Smith, W. H. F. (1991), Free software helps map and display data, EOS Trans. AGU, 72(441), 445–446.Google Scholar
  60. Yilmaz, Y., Saraglu, F. and Guner, Y. (1987), Initiation of the neomagmatism in East Anatolia, Tectonophysics, 134, 177–199.Google Scholar
  61. Yilmaz, Y., Saraglu, F. and Guner, Y. (1998), Geology of the Quaternary volcanic centres of the east Anatolia, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 85 173–210.Google Scholar
  62. Zhao, D., Hasegawa, H. and Horiuchi, S. (1992), Tomographic imaging of P and S wave velocity structure beneath northeastern Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19,909–19,928.Google Scholar
  63. Zhao, D., Hasegawa, H. and Kanamori, H. (1994), Deep structure of the Japan subduction zone as derived from local, regional and teleseismic events, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 22,313–22,329.Google Scholar
  64. Zhao, D., Santosh, M. and Yamada, A. (2010), Dissecting large earthquakes in Japan: Role of arc magma and fluids. Island Arc 19, 4–16.Google Scholar
  65. Zhao, D., Yu, S. and Ohtani, E. (2011), East Asia: Seismotectonics, magmatism and mantle dynamics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 40, 689–709.Google Scholar
  66. Zor, E. (2008), Tomographic evidence of slab detachment beneath eastern Turkey and the Caucasus, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 1273–1282.Google Scholar
  67. Zor, E., Sandvol, E., Gurbuz, C., Turkelli, N., Seber, D. and Barazangi, M. (2003), The crustal structure of the Eastern Anatolian plateau (Turkey) from receiver functions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018192.

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Faculty, Department of GeophysicsKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations