Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 169, Issue 3, pp 447–465 | Cite as

Direct and Inverse Problems in a Variational Concept of Environmental Modeling

  • Vladimir Penenko
  • Alexander Baklanov
  • Elena Tsvetova
  • Alexander Mahura
Article

Abstract

A concept of environmental forecasting based on a variational approach is discussed. The basic idea is to augment the existing technology of modeling by a combination of direct and inverse methods. By this means, the scope of environmental studies can be substantially enlarged. In the concept, mathematical models of processes and observation data subject to some uncertainties are considered. The modeling system is derived from a specially formulated weak-constraint variational principle. A set of algorithms for implementing the concept is presented. These are: algorithms for the solution of direct, adjoint, and inverse problems; adjoint sensitivity algorithms; data assimilation procedures; etc. Methods of quantitative estimations of uncertainty are of particular interest since uncertainty functions play a fundamental role for data assimilation, assessment of model quality, and inverse problem solving. A scenario approach is an essential part of the concept. Some methods of orthogonal decomposition of multi-dimensional phase spaces are used to reconstruct the hydrodynamic background fields from available data and to include climatic data into long-term prognostic scenarios. Subspaces with informative bases are constructed to use in deterministic or stochastic-deterministic scenarios for forecasting air quality and risk assessment. The results of implementing example scenarios for the Siberian regions are presented.

Keywords

Variational principle weak-constraint formulation sensitivity uncertainty 4D-Var data assimilation uncertainty assessment environmental risk inverse problems 

References

  1. Anthes, R.A. (1974), Data assimilation and initialization of hurricane prediction model. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 702-719.Google Scholar
  2. Baklanov, A. (2000), Modeling of the atmospheric radionuclide transport: local to regional scale. Numerical Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling, Moscow, INM RAS 2, 244-266.Google Scholar
  3. Baklanov, A. (2007), Environmental risk and assessment modelingscientific needs and expected advancements. In: Ebel A. and Davitashvily T. (eds.), Air, Water and Soil Quality Modeling for Risk and Impact Assessment, Springer, 29-44.Google Scholar
  4. Baklanov, A, Sørensen, J.H., Mahura A. (2006), Long-Term Dispersion Modeling. Part I: Methodology for Probabilistic Atmospheric Studies, J. Comp. Technologies, 11, 136-156.Google Scholar
  5. Baklanov, A., J.H. Sørensen and A. Mahura (2007), Methodology for Probabilistic Atmospheric Studies using Long-Term Dispersion Modeling. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13, 541-552; doi:10.1007/s10666-007-9124-4.
  6. Bryson, Jr., A.E. and Ho, Y. (1969), Applied optimal control, Waltham, Massachusetts, Toronto, London, Blaisdell Publishing Company, A Division of Ginn and Company, 544 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Chen S.-J., Y.-H. Kuo, P.-Z. Zhang, Q.-F. Bai (1991), Synoptic climatology of ciclogenesis over East Asia, 1958-1987, Mon. Wea. Rev. 119, 1407-1418.Google Scholar
  8. Chung Y.-S., Hage, K.D., Reinelt, E.R. (1976), On lee cyclogenesis and airflow in the Canadian Rocky mountains and the East Asian mountains. Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 879-891.Google Scholar
  9. Courant, R., Hilbert, D, (1931), Methoden der mathematischen Physik, V.1, Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, H.C. and Turner, R.E. (1977), Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxations: an examination of the technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 103, 225-245.Google Scholar
  11. Le Dimet, F.X., and Talagrand O. (1986), Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects, Tellus, 38A, 97-110.Google Scholar
  12. Evensen, G. and Fario, N. (1997), Solving for the generalized inverse of the Lorenz model. J. Meteor.Soc. Japan 75, 229-243.Google Scholar
  13. Kalman, R.E. (1960), A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Trans. ASME, J. Basic Eng., 82, 34-35.Google Scholar
  14. Kalman, R.E., Bucy, R.S. (1961), New results in linear filtering and prediction theory, Trans. ASME, Ser.D, J. Basic Eng., 83, 95-107.Google Scholar
  15. Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, et al. (1996), The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 77, 437-471.Google Scholar
  16. Kantorovich, L. V. and G. P. Akilov (1982), Functional Analysis, Pergamon Press; 2nd Revised edition.Google Scholar
  17. Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Solonnikov, V.A., and Uraltseva, N.N (1967), Linear and quasi-linear equations of parabolic type, M., Nauka; English transl.: Transl. Math. Monogpaphs, 23, Amer. Math.Soc., Providence, RI, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, J.M., and Derber, J.C. (1985), The use of adjoint equations to solve a variational adjustment problems with advective constraints, Tellus, 37A, pp. 309-322.Google Scholar
  19. Lions, J.L. (1968), Controle optimal de systemes gouvernes par des equations aux derivees partielle. Dunod Gauthier-Villars, Pasis.Google Scholar
  20. Mahura A., Baklanov A, Sørensen J.H. (2006), Long-term dispersion modeling. part II: Assessment of atmospheric transport and deposition patterns from nuclear risk sites in Euro-Arctic region, J. Comp. Technologies, 10, 112-134.Google Scholar
  21. Marchuk, G.I. (1974), The numerical solution of problems in the dynamics of the atmosphere and oceans, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (in Russian).Google Scholar
  22. Marchuk, G.I. (1975), Formulation of the theory of perturbation of complicated models. Applied Mathematics and Optimizations. 2(1), 1-33.Google Scholar
  23. Marchuk, G.I. (1995), Adjoint Equations and Analysis of Complex Systems, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Pearson, K.E. (1974), Handbook of Applied Mathematics, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, N.Y.Google Scholar
  25. Penenko, V.V. (1975), Computational aspects of modeling the dynamics of atmospheric processes and of estimating the influence of various factors on the dynamics of the atmosphere, In: Some problems of Computational and Applied mathematics, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 61-77. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. Penenko, V.V. (1981), Methods of numerical modeling of atmospheric processes, Gidrometeoizdat. Leningrad, 352 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  27. Penenko, V.V. (1985), System organization of mathematical models for the problems of atmospheric physics, ocean and environmental protection, Novosibirsk Computing Center, Preprint No 619, 43 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Penenko, V.V. (1996), Some aspects of mathematical modeling using the models together with observational data, Bull Nov. Comp. Center, Series Num. Model. in Atmosph., etc. 4, 31-52.Google Scholar
  29. Penenko, V.V. (2000), Variational principles in the problems of ecology and climate, In: Dymnikov V. (Ed), Numerical Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling: Proceedings of International Conference, Publ: Institute of Numerical Mathematics of RAS, V.1, 135-148 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  30. Penenko, V.V. (2009), Variational methods of data assimilation and inverse problems for studying the atmosphere, ocean, and environment, Numerical Analysis and Applications, 2009, 2, No 4, 341-351.Google Scholar
  31. Penenko, V.V. (2010), On a concept of environmental forecasting, Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 23, No 6, 432-438.Google Scholar
  32. Penenko, V.V., and Aloyan, A.E., (1985) Models and Methods for Environmental Protection Problems, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 276 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  33. Penenko, V. and A. Baklanov (2001), Methods of sensitivity theory and inverse modeling for estimation of source term and nuclear risk/vulnerability area. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, V. 2074, No 2, 57-66.Google Scholar
  34. Penenko, V., Baklanov, A. and Tsvetova, E. (2002), Methods of sensitivity theory and inverse modeling for estimation of source term. Future Generation Computer Systems, 18, 661-671.Google Scholar
  35. Penenko, V.V., and Obraztsov, N.N. (1976), A variational initialization method for the fields of meteorological elements, Soviet Meteorology and Hydrology, No 1, 1-11.Google Scholar
  36. Penenko, V.V., Tsvetova, E.A., (2005), Energy centers of the climate system and their connection with ecological risk domains, SPIE, V. 6160, part 2, 61602U.Google Scholar
  37. Penenko, V.V., Tsvetova, E.A., (2007), Variational technique for environmental risk/vulnerability assessment and control, In: Ebel A. and Davitashvily T. (eds.), Air, Water and Soil Quality Modeling for Risk and Impact Assessment. Springer, 15-28.Google Scholar
  38. Penenko, V. and Tsvetova, E. (2008), Orthogonal decomposition methods for inclusion of climatic data into environmental studies, Ecol. modeling, 217, 279–291.Google Scholar
  39. Penenko, V. and Tsvetova, E. (2009a), Discrete-analytical methods for the implementation of variational principles in environmental applications, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 226, 319-330.Google Scholar
  40. Penenko, V. V. and Tsvetova, E. A. (2009 b), Optimal forecasting of natural processes with uncertainty assessment, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 50, No. 2, 300–308 .Google Scholar
  41. Preisendorfer, R.W. (1988), Principle component analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Amstedam-Oxford-New York-Tokio, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Schraff, C. and Hess, R. (2003), A description of the nonhydrostatic regional model LM. Part III. Data assimilation, www.cosmo-model.org.
  43. Schwartz, L. (1967). Analyse mathematique, I. Hernman.Google Scholar
  44. Stauffer, D.R. and Seaman, N.L. (1990), Use of four-dimentional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I. Experiments with synoptic scale data, Mon.Wea. Rev., 118, 1250-1277.Google Scholar
  45. Sørensen, J. H., A. Baklanov and S. Hoe (2007), The Danish Emergency Response Model of the Atmosphere. J. Envir. Radioactivity, 96, 122–129.Google Scholar
  46. Talagrand, O. and Courtier, P. (1987), Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. I: Theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 113, 1311-1328.Google Scholar
  47. van Leeuven, P.J. and Evensen, G. (1996), Data assimilation and inverse methods in terms of a probabalistic formulation, Mon. Wea. Rev, 124, 2898-2913.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Penenko
    • 1
  • Alexander Baklanov
    • 2
  • Elena Tsvetova
    • 1
  • Alexander Mahura
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics (ICM&MG)Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Research DepartmentDanish Meteorological Institute (DMI)CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations