Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 168, Issue 3–4, pp 631–644 | Cite as

A Characteristic Rupture Model for the 2001 Geiyo, Japan, Earthquake

  • Shin’ichi Matsuzaki
  • Arben Pitarka
  • Nancy Collins
  • Robert Graves
  • Yoshimitsu Fukushima
Article
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

In this study we present a characteristic kinematic rupture model for an intraslab earthquake of the type of the 2001 Geiyo earthquake. The procedure for developing the characteristic rupture model follows the recipe developed by Irikura and Miyake (Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, 2006) with a few modifications. We used the functional form of Nakamura and Miyatake [Zisin (J Seism Soc Jpn), 53, 1–9, 2000] to model the spatial and temporal variability of the slip rate function. In our procedure the earthquake source is specified by the kinematic description of the fault model that incorporates spatial heterogeneity in slip and rise time and constant rupture velocity. In the proposed characteristic model the asperity locations and rupture initiation point were the only parameters that were constrained by the available earthquake rupture models of the target earthquake. The quality of the characteristic rupture model was assessed by comparing recorded and synthetic ground motion time histories from the 2001 Geiyo earthquake calculated with a standard broadband (0.1–10 Hz) ground motion simulation technique. Our analyses show that the characteristic rupture model performs well in reproducing the recorded ground motion, in spite of its simple representation of the fault geometry and kinematic rupture complexity. The analyses of ground motion sensitivity to relative location of asperities, and their stress drop contrast suggest that the overall ground motion goodness of fit remains the same at short periods, but decreases slightly at periods longer than 1 s. We suspect that, due to the depth of the intraslab source (40–50 km), the higher-frequency ground motions are relatively insensitive to the details of the slip distribution and slip contrast. On the other hand, even for intraslab events, the lower-frequency motions are influenced by rupture directivity effects and slip distribution.

Keywords

Strong ground motion broadband simulation technique characteristic rupture model intraslab earthquake 2001 Geiyo Japan earthquake 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. In this study we used strong motion records of K-NET and KiK-net operated by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention.

References

  1. Asano, K., Iwata, T., and Irikura, K. (2003), Source characteristics of shallow intraslab earthquakes derived from strong motion simulations, Earth Planets Space 55, e5–e8.Google Scholar
  2. Asano, K., Iwata, T., and Irikura, K. (2004), Characterization of source models of shallow intraslab earthquakes using strong motion data, In Proceedings of 13th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper No. 835.Google Scholar
  3. Boore, D. (1983), Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1865–1894.Google Scholar
  4. Boore, D. and Joyner, W. B. (1997), Site amplification for generic rock sites, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 327–341.Google Scholar
  5. Dan, K., Sato, T., and Irikura, K. (2002), Characterizing source model for strong motion prediction based on asperity model, In 11-th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp 555–560 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  6. Dan, K., Watanabe, M., Sato, T., Ishii, T. (2001), Short period source spectra inferred from variable-slip rupture models and modeling of earthquakes faults for strong motion prediction by semi-empirical method, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. AIJ, 545, 51–62 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Frankel, A. (1995), Simulating strong motion of large earthquakes using recordings of small earthquakes: the Loma Prieta mainshock as a test case, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1144–1160.Google Scholar
  8. Graves, R. (1996), Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered grid finite differences, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1091–1106.Google Scholar
  9. Graves, R., Aagaard, B. T., Hudnut, K. W., Star, L. M., Stewart, J. P., and Jordan, T. H. (2008), Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern San Andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35:L22302. doi: 10.1029/2008GL035750
  10. Graves, R. and Pitarka, A. (2004), Broad band time history simulation using a hybrid approach, In Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, No. 1098.Google Scholar
  11. Hartzell, S., Harmsen, S., Frankel, A., and Larsen, S. (1999), Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1484–1504.Google Scholar
  12. Hartzell, S. and Heaton, T. (1983), Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1553–1583.Google Scholar
  13. Irikura, K. and Miyake, H. (2006), Recipe for predicting strong ground motions: the state of the arts and future prospects, In Proceedings of the 8-th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2006, San Francisco, California, USA, No. 744.Google Scholar
  14. Kagawa, T., Irikura, K., and Somerville, P. (2004), Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between surface and buried rupture earthquakes, Earth Planets Space 56, 3–14.Google Scholar
  15. Kakehi, Y. (2004), Analysis of the 2001 Geiyo, Japan earthquake using high-density strong ground motion data: Detailed rupture process of a slab earthquake in a medium with a large velocity contrast, J. Geophys. Res. 109, B08306.Google Scholar
  16. Miyatake, T., Yagi, Y., and Yasuda, T. (2004), The dynamic rupture process of the 2001 Geiyo, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L1212.Google Scholar
  17. Nakamura, H. and Miyatake, T. (2000), An approximate expression of slip velocity time function for simulation of near-field strong motion, Zisin (J. Seism. Soc. Jpn.) 53, 1–9 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Pitarka, A. (1999), 3D elastic finite difference modeling of seismic wave propagation using staggered grid with non-uniform spacing, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 54–68.Google Scholar
  19. Pitarka, A., Somerville, P., Fukushima, Y., Uetake, T., and Irikura, K. (2000), Simulation of near-fault strong ground motion using hybrid Green’s functions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 566–586.Google Scholar
  20. Sasatani, T., Morikawa, N., and Maeda, T. (2006), Source characteristics of intraslab earthquakes, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido. University 69, 123–134 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  21. Satoh, T. (2006), Influence of fault mechanism, depth, and region on stress drop of small and moderate earthquakes in Japan, Struct. Eng./Earthq. Eng. (Jpn. Soc Civil Eng.) 23(1), 125–134.Google Scholar
  22. Sekiguchi, H. and Iwata, T. (2002), Rupture process and strong ground motion of the 2001 Geiyo earthquake, Japan, In Chikyu monthly, Special issue 38 ‘Reviews of Seismo-Tectonics in Western Japan’ (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  23. Somerville, P. G. et al. (1999), Characterizing earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59–80.Google Scholar
  24. Yagi, Y. and Kikuchi, M. (2001), Kinematic rupture model of the 2001 Geiyo earthquake, http://wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/yuji/Aki-nada/.

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser / Springer Basel AG 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shin’ichi Matsuzaki
    • 1
  • Arben Pitarka
    • 2
  • Nancy Collins
    • 3
  • Robert Graves
    • 3
  • Yoshimitsu Fukushima
    • 4
  1. 1.Shikoku Electric Power CompanyTakamatsuJapan
  2. 2.BAE SystemsPatrick AFBUSA
  3. 3.URS CorporationPasadenaUSA
  4. 4.Ohaski Research Institute, Shimizu CorporationTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations