Advertisement

Annales Henri Poincaré

, Volume 20, Issue 8, pp 2555–2584 | Cite as

Split Property for Free Massless Finite Helicity Fields

  • Roberto Longo
  • Vincenzo MorinelliEmail author
  • Francesco Preta
  • Karl-Henning Rehren
Article

Abstract

We prove the split property for any finite helicity free quantum fields. Finite helicity Poincaré representations extend to the conformal group \({{\mathcal {C}}}\) (cf. Mack in Commun Math Phys 55:1–28, 1977) and the conformal covariance plays an essential role in the argument: The split property is ensured by the trace class condition \(\mathrm {Tr}\;(e^{-\beta L_0})<\infty \) for the conformal Hamiltonian \(L_0\) of the Möbius covariant restriction of the net on the time axis. We extend the argument for the scalar case presented in Buchholz et al. (Commun Math Phys 270:267–293, 2007). We provide the direct sum decomposition into irreducible representations of the conformal extension of any helicity-h representation to the subgroup of transformations fixing the time axis. Our analysis provides new relations among finite helicity representations and suggests a new construction for representations and free quantum fields with nonzero helicity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

V. M. thanks Gerardo Morsella and Massimo Bianchi for valuable discussions. R. L. and V. M. acknowledge the MIUR Excellence Department Project awarded to the Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, CUP E83C18000100006.

Note Added.

The suggestions discussed in the Outlook are confirmed in [28].

References

  1. 1.
    Araki, H.: A lattice of von Neumann algebras associated with the quantum theory of a free Bose field. J. Math. Phys. 4, 1343–1362 (1963)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bisognano, J.J., Wichmann, E.H.: On the duality condition for quantum fields. J. Math. Phys. 17, 303–321 (1976)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borchers, H.-J.: Field operators as \(C^\infty \) functions in spacelike directions. Nuovo Cim. 33, 1600–1613 (1964)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borchers, H.-J.: The CPT-theorem in two-dimensional theories of local observables. Commun. Math. Phys. 143, 315–332 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunetti, R., Guido, D., Longo, R.: Modular localization and Wigner particles. Rev. Math. Phys. 14, 759–786 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brunetti, R., Guido, D., Longo, R.: Modular structure and duality in conformal quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 156, 201–219 (1993)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchholz, D.: Product states for local algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 36, 287–304 (1974)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buchholz, D., D’Antoni, C., Longo, R.: Nuclear maps and modular structures. I. General properties. J. Funct. Anal. 88, 233–250 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchholz, D., D’Antoni, C., Longo, R.: Nuclearity and thermal states in conformal field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 270, 267–293 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchholz, D., Wichmann, E.H.: Causal independence and the energy-level density of states in local quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 106, 321–344 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doplicher, S., Longo, R.: Standard and split inclusions of von Neumann algebras. Invent. Math. 75, 493–536 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doplicher, S., Longo, R.: Local aspects of superselection rules. II. Commun. Math. Phys. 88, 399–409 (1983)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Folland, G.B.: A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis. Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guido, D., Longo, R.: An algebraic spin and statistics theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 172, 517–533 (1995)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guido, D., Longo, R., Wiesbrock, H.-W.: Extensions of conformal nets and superselection structures. Commun. Math. Phys. 192, 217–244 (1998)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harlow, D., Ooguri, H.: Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, arXiv:1810.05338 (2018)
  17. 17.
    Hislop, P.D.: Conformal covariance, modular structure, and duality for local algebras in free massless quantum field theories. Ann. Phys. 185, 193–230 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hislop, P.D., Longo, R.: Modular structure of the local algebras associated with the free massless scalar field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 84, 71–85 (1982)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hollands, S., Sanders, K.: Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory, arXiv:1702.04924 (2017)
  20. 20.
    Leyland, P., Roberts, J.E., Testard, D.: Duality for quantum free fields, unpublished manuscript, Marseille (1978)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Longo, R.: “Lectures on Conformal Nets”, preliminary lecture notes. http://www.mat.uniroma2.it/~longo/Lecture-Notes.html
  22. 22.
    Longo, R.: Real Hilbert subspaces, modular theory, \({{{\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{R})}}\) and CFT. In: Von Neumann algebras in Sibiu, pp. 33–91, Theta Ser. Adv. Math. 10, Theta, Bucharest (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Longo, R., Morinelli, V., Rehren, K.-H.: Where infinite spin particles are localizable. Commun. Math. Phys. 345, 587–614 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mack, G.: All unitary ray representations of the conformal group \({\rm SU}(2, 2)\) with positive energy. Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 1–28 (1977)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mackey, G.W.: Induced representations of locally compact groups. I. Ann. Math. 55, 101–139 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mackey, G.W.: The theory of unitary group representations. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1955; London (1976)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morinelli, V.: The Bisognano–Wichmann property on nets of standard subspaces, some sufficient conditions. Ann. H. Poinc. 19, 937–958 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morinelli, V., Rehren, K.-H.: Spacelike deformations: Higher-spin fields from scalar fields, arXiv:1905.08714 (2019)
  29. 29.
    Morinelli, V., Tanimoto, Y., Weiner, M.: Conformal covariance and the split property. Commun. Math. Phys. 357, 379–406 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neeb, K.-H., Olafsson, G.: Antiunitary representations and modular theory, arXiv:1704.01336 (2017)
  31. 31.
    Osterwalder, K.: Duality for free Bose fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 29, 1–14 (1973)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rieffel, M.A., Van Daele, A.: A bounded operator approach to Tomita–Takesaki theory. Pac. J. Math. 69, 187–221 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varadarajan, V.S.: Geometry of Quantum Theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weinberg, S.: The quantum theory of fields. Vol. I. Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weinberg, S., Witten, E.: Limits on massless particles. Phys. Lett. B 96, 59–62 (1980)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wigner, E.P.: On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Ann. Math. 40, 149–204 (1939)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Longo
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Morinelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Preta
    • 2
  • Karl-Henning Rehren
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversità di Roma Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.Courant Institute of Mathematical SciencesNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations