CAS directly interacts with vinculin to control mechanosensing and focal adhesion dynamics
Focal adhesions are cellular structures through which both mechanical forces and regulatory signals are transmitted. Two focal adhesion-associated proteins, Crk-associated substrate (CAS) and vinculin, were both independently shown to be crucial for the ability of cells to transmit mechanical forces and to regulate cytoskeletal tension. Here, we identify a novel, direct binding interaction between CAS and vinculin. This interaction is mediated by the CAS SRC homology 3 domain and a proline-rich sequence in the hinge region of vinculin. We show that CAS localization in focal adhesions is partially dependent on vinculin, and that CAS–vinculin coupling is required for stretch-induced activation of CAS at the Y410 phosphorylation site. Moreover, CAS–vinculin binding significantly affects the dynamics of CAS and vinculin within focal adhesions as well as the size of focal adhesions. Finally, disruption of CAS binding to vinculin reduces cell stiffness and traction force generation. Taken together, these findings strongly implicate a crucial role of CAS–vinculin interaction in mechanosensing and focal adhesion dynamics.
KeywordsCAS Focal adhesions Mechanosensing Vinculin Src Traction forces
Crk-associated substrate (CAS) is an important substrate of Src. CAS is dominantly localized in focal adhesions of adherent cells and plays a central role in the integrin-mediated control of cell behavior . The re-expression of CAS in cas-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) altered by oncogenic Src was shown to elevate cell invasiveness  and lung metastasis formation . BCAR1 (breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance), the human equivalent of CAS, was first discovered in a screen for anti-estrogen drug-resistant genes in breast cancer cells . Increased CAS/BCAR1 levels in breast cancer patients are associated with premature disease recurrence, decreased response to tamoxifen treatment, and lower survival rate .
The structure of CAS consists of an N-terminal SRC homology 3 (SH3) domain, a C-terminally localized Src-binding domain (SBD), and a Cas-family C-terminal homology (CCH) domain. The CAS central region comprises of a substrate domain (SD), which is characterized by 15 Tyr- X- X- Pro (YxxP) motifs. Src family kinases seem to phosphorylate numerous, if not all, of the CAS SD YxxP tyrosines either by binding directly to the CAS SBD, or by indirect association with CAS via a FAK bridge [6, 7]. CAS SD tyrosine phosphorylation, in untransformed cells, takes place at the integrin-mediated adhesion sites , and has been shown to be associated with integrin signaling pathways that regulate cell movement and survival [9, 10, 11, 12].
The SH3 domain of CAS is known to interact with polyproline motifs on numerous proteins , which include FAK and PYK2/RAFTK kinases , FRNK , PTP–PEST , C3G , PTP1B , CMS , and CIZ . The interaction between the prominent focal adhesion protein, FAK, and the CAS SH3 domain [13, 15, 21] contributes to the phosphorylation of SD tyrosine and is further enhanced by Src that is bound to the FAK autophosphorylation site . Accordingly, CAS SH3 domain deletion diminishes the phosphorylation of CAS SD tyrosine  and greatly reduces the localization of CAS to focal adhesions . Detection of CAS in focal adhesions of FAK null cells , however, also indicates the presence of other SH3 domain binding partners.
CAS acts as a primary force sensor, transducing forces into mechanical extension of the substrate domain and thereby priming its phosphorylation and subsequent activation of downstream signaling . Stretch-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of CAS by Src family kinases is involved in force-dependent activation of the MAP kinase cascade and the small GTPase Rap1 [25, 26]. Details of how mechanical forces are coupled to the CAS protein are currently elusive. It has been suggested that mechanical stress leads to force-dependent extension of the CAS substrate domain and enhances its susceptibility to phosphorylation .
In this study, we identified a novel direct interaction of CAS with vinculin mediated by the CAS SH3 domain and a proline-rich sequence in the hinge region of vinculin. We found that this interaction is important for CAS localization in focal adhesions, focal adhesion dynamics, mechanosensing, and traction force generation.
CAS SH3 domain interacts with the polyproline motif PPKP on vinculin
As the CAS SH3 domain is also known to interact with FAK , we investigated whether CAS SH3 interaction with vinculin is independent of FAK. GFP–CAS was immuno-precipitated from FAK−/− cells and Western-blot analysis showed that CAS also interacts with vinculin in FAK-deficient cells (Fig. 1c). Moreover, GST-pull-down assays with the WT CAS SH3 domain were performed with or without FAK depletion using an anti-FAK antibody. FAK depletion in cell lysate did not affect the interaction of WT CAS SH3 domain and vinculin (Fig.S1), suggesting that the CAS–vinculin interaction is FAK independent and potentially direct. In a far-Western experiment, we confirmed that CAS directly interacts with vinculin (Fig. 1d).
We then searched for the binding motif on vinculin that is responsible for CAS SH3 domain binding. We analyzed CAS SH3 binding motifs among known CAS SH3 binding partners and identified as a conserved motif a PXKP sequence (Table S1). In vinculin, the P860PKP sequence in the proline-rich region of vinculin, also known as hinge region , is a single potential CAS SH3 binding motif. To abolish the capability of CAS SH3 domain binding to vinculin, the in silico-identified SH3 domain-binding motif PPKPP was mutated into PPNSS (PNSS). The importance of the PPKP motif for vinculin-CAS interaction was verified by co-immunoprecipitation experiments with full-length CAS and vinculin PNSS mutant or vinculin WT. Binding of CAS to vinculin carrying the PNSS mutation was abolished (Fig. 1e). In contrast, the binding of paxillin and Arp2, which bind the tail region of vinculin  and proline-rich region surrounding P776 and P878 , respectively, was not significantly affected by this mutation (Fig. 1e, f). This further confirmed that CAS–vinculin interaction is through direct binding, as a potential linker molecule would need to recognize the PPKPP binding motif on vinculin and at the same time would need to bind to the CAS-SH3 domain, and both with higher affinity than a direct CAS–vinculin interaction, which is highly unlikely.
The interaction of CAS with vinculin in living cells was assessed using fluorescent confocal microscopy. CAS−/− cells were transfected with CAS Y12 variants that were N-terminally tagged with GFP, and the co-localization with vinculin was examined. As expected, CAS WT or Y12F CAS (both interact with vinculin, see Fig. 1b) were found to be co-localized with vinculin. CAS with a phosphomimicking mutation Y12E, that blocks interaction with vinculin, did not co-localize with vinculin in focal adhesions (Fig. S2).
Taken together, these results suggest that CAS directly interacts with vinculin, and that the CAS–vinculin interaction can be potentially regulated by phosphorylation of Tyr12 on the SH3 domain of CAS .
CAS localization in focal adhesion is partially dependent on FAK, but also on vinculin
CAS–vinculin interaction is important for focal adhesion dynamics
CAS–vinculin interaction is important for stretch-induced phosphorylation of the CAS substrate domain
We further analyzed the dynamics of CAS Y410 phosphorylation during stretch. CAS Y410 phosphorylation appears rapidly, peaks after 15 min, and then disappears (Fig. 6c). In contrast, CAS Y12 phosphorylation exhibits different dynamics, characterized by a gradual increase of Y12 phosphorylation during stretch (Fig. 6c).
Taken together, these data indicate that vinculin-CAS interaction is required for stretch-induced CAS substrate domain phosphorylation and supports our hypothesis that vinculin serves as a mechanical coupling protein to transmit forces to the CAS molecule.
Loss of CAS–vinculin interaction reduces cell stiffness and traction forces, but does not affect adhesion strength
To ensure that the lower traction forces of the phospho-mimicking CAS mutants are not caused by diminished adhesion strength, we measured with magnetic tweezers the forces that were needed to detach integrin-bound beads from the cells. The bead binding strength was not markedly different between the CAS WT and CAS Y12 mutant (Y12E, Y12F) cells (Fig. S5). Therefore, the reduced traction forces that we observed in the phospho-mimicking Y12E mutant are not caused by poor adhesion, but are likely due to diminished contractile activation. Taken together, these findings are in support of our hypothesis that proper CAS–vinculin binding is important for vinculin and/or CAS to fulfill its mechano-regulating function.
In this study, we have identified vinculin as a new binding partner of CAS. We have shown that CAS directly interacts with vinculin, and that this interaction is dependent on the CAS SH3 domain and the PKPP sequence of the vinculin’s hinge-region. Vinculin affects the dynamics of CAS within focal adhesions and vice versa. Moreover, vinculin is important for proper CAS localization and targeting in focal adhesions. Disruption of CAS–vinculin interaction leads to decreased cell stiffness and impairs traction force generation. These findings suggest that the interaction of CAS–vinculin is important for regulating the mechanical properties of cells.
Vinculin PNSS mutation
To analyze CAS–vinculin interaction, we have mutated vinculin in P860PKPP to P860PNSS and have shown that PNSS mutated vinculin does not bind CAS (Fig. 1e). The P860PKPP motif is located within the hinge region of vinculin. Three proline-rich sequences conserved across species can be identified  within the hinge region. Looking from the N-terminus, the first F842PPPP motif is distinct from sequences generally recognized by SH3 domains and mediates interaction of vinculin with VASP . The third P871PPRPPPP motif was shown to mediate the interaction of vinculin with Arp2/3  and proteins of the vinexin family . The second AP860PKPPLP together with the third motif was suggested to be involved in binding of vinexin family proteins through interaction with a pair of its SH3 domains in tandem . In our study, we identified this second motif as a target binding site of the CAS SH3 domain. The PNSS mutation of the second motif specifically blocks interaction with CAS without significantly affecting the interaction with Arp2/3 or paxillin (Fig. 1e, f). We cannot rule out that mutation of the second motif to PNSS does not affect the binding of proteins of the vinexin family or some unknown vinculin binding partners, however, our results are most consistent with the notion that the inhibition of CAS–vinculin interaction is responsible for the observed phenotypes of the PNSS mutant.
Vinculin influences targeting of CAS to focal adhesions
Correct assembly and disassembly of focal adhesions is required for regulation of cell migration and proliferation . CAS and vinculin are both important focal adhesion proteins. The interaction between them that we report in this study offers a new insight into the regulation of protein dynamics in focal adhesions. CAS is recruited early to the newly formed adhesions and persists throughout their lifetime . It has been previously shown that the CAS SH3 domain is important for its localization to focal adhesions [22, 27] through coupling to FAK [13, 21]. In this study, we identify vinculin as another important CAS SH3 binding partner. The localization of CAS in focal adhesion, either in FAK−/− or Vin−/− cells, is significantly reduced (Fig. 2), demonstrating that both FAK and vinculin are essential for proper localization of CAS. Since FAK and vinculin localize in different layers of focal adhesions , we speculate that CAS may be present throughout the entire focal adhesion complex to integrate signals from different layers. In addition, re-expression of vinculin PNSS, unlike re-expression of vinculin WT in Vin−/− cells, was not able to restore CAS localization to focal adhesions (Fig. 2b, Fig. S3B). This suggests that a direct interaction of CAS with vinculin is necessary for proper localization of CAS to focal adhesions. However, when a form of activated vinculin is re-expressed in Vin−/− cells, CAS localization is restored even when the vinculin lacks the CAS-binding region . This suggests that in the case of focal adhesions stabilized by pre-activated vinculin, either FAK can fully restore the CAS localization to focal adhesions, or the second focal adhesions-targeting domain of CAS, the C-terminal CCH domain  can in these conditions gain the ability to compensate for the loss of direct CAS–vinculin interaction.
Dynamics of CAS and vinculin within focal adhesions
Previously, we have shown that substitution of tyrosine 12 in the CAS SH3 domain to phosphomimicking glutamate results in increased cell migration, and this effect is probably caused by increased focal adhesion dynamics . Vinculin stabilizes focal adhesions and slows down migration . Moreover, the dynamics of vinculin in focal adhesions decreases during the maturation of adhesion contacts . Our FRAP experiments indicate that CAS and vinculin mutually affect their dynamics within focal adhesions, and that this effect is dependent on their direct interaction. CAS dynamics in focal adhesions was decreased when WT vinculin was re-expressed in Vin−/− cells, whereas re-expression of the mutated (PNSS) vinculin, which can not bind CAS, did not affect CAS dynamics when compared to Vin−/− cells (Fig. 4b). Conversely, the exchange rate of vinculin in focal adhesions was increased in cells expressing CAS Y12E, which cannot interact with vinculin, when compared to cells expressing CAS WT (Fig. 5a). Moreover, the dynamics of the mutated (PNSS) vinculin was not sensitive to expression of Tyr12 CAS variants (CAS WT, Y12E, Y12F) and was similar to WT vinculin dynamics expressed in CAS Y12E cells (Fig. 5b). Taken together, the presence of CAS in the cells and its ability to localize to focal adhesions affects vinculin dynamics. However, the dynamics of the vinculin PNSS mutant (no interaction with CAS) in focal adhesions is neither affected by the presence of CAS nor by the ability of CAS to localize to focal adhesions. These observations are most consistent with the notion that CAS directly affects vinculin dynamics in focal adhesions through a direct interaction with vinculin. In addition, the data suggest that phosphorylation of CAS on Tyr 12 can potentially represent a novel mechanism regulating vinculin dynamics in focal adhesions .
Changes in the dynamics of focal adhesion proteins are often associated with changes in the size of adhesion structures. In this study, we have shown that disruption of CAS–vinculin interaction in vinculin-deficient cells and in vinculin PNSS mutant cells leads to a decreased size of adhesive structures (Fig. 3). This is consistent with previous findings that vinculin-deficient cells have smaller focal adhesions [48, 49], and also with our observation of smaller focal adhesions in CAS-deficient cells re-expressing the CAS Y12E mutant (Fig. S6). In contrast, FAK−/− cells have larger focal adhesions when compared to WT MEFs  or Vin−/− and CAS−/− cells (see Fig. S3A), suggesting that unlike CAS–vinculin, CAS–FAK interaction is probably not directly involved in the regulation of focal adhesion size.
CAS-mediated effects on vinculin dynamics in focal adhesions and size of focal adhesions may be mechanistically explained by CAS interaction with vinculin that leads to stabilization of vinculin in its open conformation. According to Humphries and colleagues, activated vinculin forms exhibit increased residency time in focal adhesions and increase in size of focal adhesions .
CAS binding to vinculin regulates mechanosensing
Focal adhesions are cellular structures that sense external and internal forces and mechanical properties of the environment. CAS is one of the mechanosensors that is activated by extension and subsequent phosphorylation of tyrosines in the CAS substrate domain . For proper mechanotransduction, CAS has to be anchored on at least two distant sides of the molecule to other force-transmitting proteins. Because vinculin is one of the main force-transmitting proteins in focal adhesions [38, 52, 53], we tested the role of CAS–vinculin interaction for mechanosensing. Stretching experiments revealed an attenuated CAS substrate domain phosphorylation in CAS Y12E transfected cells and also in vinculin PNSS mutant cells, both of which lack CAS–vinculin binding, strongly suggesting that for stretch-dependent phosphorylation of CAS, the interaction of CAS with vinculin is indispensable (Fig. 6).
Previously, we have shown that phosphomimicking mutation of tyrosine 12 (CAS Y12E) delocalizes CAS from focal adhesions . Consistently, we show here that CAS Y12E does not co-localize with vinculin in focal adhesions and that only the CAS WT and CAS Y12F substrate domain was tyrosine phosphorylated in focal adhesions after stretching (Fig. S7). These findings further support our interpretation that a direct interaction of CAS with vinculin is necessary for mechanical stress-mediated CAS substrate domain phosphorylation.
CAS–vinculin interaction affects cell stiffness and traction force generation
The ability of the cell to resist deformation is important for normal cell function. Cell stiffness is determined by various factors such as number and bond elasticity of force-transmitting and force-generating molecular interactions within the cytoskeleton: between the cytoskeleton and focal adhesions, between cells, and between the cell and the extracellular matrix. We show here that CAS–vinculin interactions participate in these processes through modulating the cytoskeletal prestress. When we applied magnetic pulling forces on CAS Y12E and Vin PNSS cells where CAS–vinculin interaction was inhibited, magnetic beads moved more easily compared to wild-type cells, indicating a lower cell stiffness (Fig. 7). We have previously shown that Src-transformed CAS−/− MEFs expressing CAS Y12E are more invasive in collagen gels than wild-type cells , which we attribute to their lower resistance against deformation when navigating through a 3-D environment with a high degree of steric hindrance [54, 55].
In spread cells, cell stiffness is linearly related to cytoskeletal prestress and traction forces . Diminished traction forces can be the result of either reduced actomyosin contractility [56, 57] or reduced adhesion strength [58, 59]. It has been previously shown that loss of vinculin resulted in decreased traction force generation [38, 60], and that the presence of CAS in focal adhesions is crucial for cell contractility . Our data suggest that it is the interaction of both proteins, CAS and vinculin, that is important for traction force generation. CAS–vinculin interactions, however, are not important for maintaining adhesion strength (Fig. S5) even though the size and dynamics of focal adhesions is altered when CAS–vinculin interaction is disrupted. This suggests that the larger traction forces in CAS WT and Y12F cells are facilitated by CAS–vinculin interactions that modulate actomyosin contractility through downstream signaling mechanisms, likely involving the force-dependent activation of CAS.
To summarize, we have identified vinculin as a novel binding partner of CAS, and have shown that CAS–vinculin interactions are important for the internal dynamics of focal adhesion, sensing of mechanical stress, regulating cell stiffness and traction forces.
CAS-dependent mechanosensing: a possible role of CAS and Src in a negative feedback circuit
CAS was proposed to be a primary mechanical force sensor, transducing forces into mechanical extension of the CAS substrate domain and thereby priming the substrate domain for subsequent activation of downstream signaling . The concept of CAS as a mechanical sensor requires at least two anchoring sites along the CAS structure. The N-terminal SH3 and C-terminal CCH domain, both important for CAS targeting to focal adhesions , most likely represent such anchoring domains. Our data suggest that CAS–vinculin interaction is a critical focal adhesion anchoring mechanism for CAS and is essential for CAS-mediated mechanotransduction.
The CAS substrate domain tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphorylation of tyrosine 12 exhibit significantly different dynamics (Fig. 6c). While the substrate domain phosphorylation is rapid and returns to basal levels 30 min after the onset of stretch, phosphorylation on tyrosine 12 is gradual and becomes noticeably elevated only 20 min after the onset of stretch. The faster dynamics of tyrosine phosphorylation in the mechanically extended substrate domain versus phosphorylation of tyrosine 12 could reflect that the latter is a much weaker phosphorylation motif for Src kinase and also less accessible. The observation of different dynamics of substrate domain and tyrosine 12 phosphorylation supports the notion of a dual role of Src in CAS-mediated mechanotransduction. Mechanical stretch of the cell is transmitted through focal adhesions to the CAS substrate domain, which becomes physically extended, undergoes phosphorylation by Src, and subsequently leads to the activation of CAS-mediated mechanotransduction pathways. Later, the loss of CAS–vinculin association after tyrosine 12 eventually becomes phosphorylated (Fig. 6c) releases the SH3-mediated anchoring of CAS to focal adhesions and reverse the CAS substrate domain to its unextended state. This in turn can be expected to inhibit CAS-mediated signaling either by gradual loss of substrate domain phosphorylation, or by making the substrate domain inaccessible for downstream signaling proteins. Hence, a Src-mediated negative feedback loop would imply that CAS signaling during a static mechanical stretch is only transient.
Materials and methods
Cell transfection and culture
CAS−/− and FAK−/− MEFs were obtained from Steven Hanks (Vanderbilt University, Nashville). Wild-type MEFs and Vin−/− cells were a kind gift from Dr. W.H. Ziegler, University of Leipzig. CAS−/− MEFs stably re-expressing CAS Tyr12 variants (WT, Y12E, Y12F), were prepared using pIRES3-puro-CAS vector variants as described previously . All transfections were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol using Jet Prime (Polyplus Transfection). CAS−/− were transfected with pEGFP-C1 CAS  or pcDNA3.1- EGFP-vinculin . Vin−/− MEFs were transfected with pcDNA3.1- EGFP-vinculin and pCS2-wtCAS-venus . FAK−/− cells were transfected with pCS2-wtCAS-venus. All cell lines were cultivated in full DMEM (Life Technologies) with 4.5 g/l L-glucose, L-glutamine, and pyruvate, supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2 % antibiotic–antimycotic (Life Technologies), and 1 % MEM non-essential amino acids (Life Technologies). To abrogate the PKPP CAS SH3-binding motif in vinculin, we mutagenized the vinculin cDNA using QuikChange II Kit (Stratagene). The resulting construct was verified by sequencing.
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation
Subconfluent cell cultures were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in modified RIPA buffer (0.15 M NaCl; 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 1 % Nonidet P-40; 0.1 % SDS; 1 % sodium deoxycholate; 5 mM EDTA; 50 mM NaF). Protein concentrations in lysates were determined using the DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein lysates were diluted in Laemmli sample buffer (0.35 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 10 % SDS; 40 % glycerol; 0.012 % Bromophenol blue). For immunoblotting, samples were separated on 10 % SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Non-specific activity was blocked by incubating membranes for 45 min at room temperature in Tris-buffered saline containing 5 % non-fat dry milk. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, washed extensively with Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TTBS), and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)—conjugated secondary antibodies. After extensive washing in TTBS, the blots were developed using the LAS-1000 Single System (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). The monoclonal antibody against CAS (clone 24) was obtained from BD Transduction Laboratories. Anti-vinculin monoclonal antibodies were from Sigma Aldrich. Anti-FAK polyclonal rabbit antibodies (FAK C-20), anti-GFP (sc8334), and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse and anti–rabbit immunoglobulin G were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Phospho-specific antibodies against CAS phosphotyrosine 410 were bought from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibody against CAS phosphotyrosine 12 was developed recently . Quantification of Western blots was carried out using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).
For immunoprecipitations, cells were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NP-40, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF). Lysates containing 500 mg of proteins were incubated overnight on ice with 1 μg of primary antibody (monoclonal anti-GFP antibody; Molecular Probes, Invitrogen), and immune complexes were collected by additional 2-h incubation with protein A–Sepharose (20 μl of 50 % slurry; Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA). The immunoprecipitates were washed five times with 1 ml of ice-cold NP-40 lysis buffer, resuspended in 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and processed for immunoblotting.
Cell lysates were prepared from Vinculin−/− MEFs re-expressing Vinculin WT tagged with GFP in a NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NP-40, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF). Protein samples were prepared as described under “Immunoprecipitations”. After SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and far-Western-blot analysis was carried out by incubating the protein blots with the recombinant protein probe at 1.2 μg/ml and anti-GST antibody (Sigma, 1:4000) in 1 % BSA in TTBS overnight. After extensive washing with TTBS, blots were treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and the blots were developed using the LAS-1000 Single System (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
GST pull-downs and MS analysis
CAS SH3 domain and mutational variants with either the non-phosphorylatable Y12F substitution or a negative control phospho-mimicking Y12E substitution were N-terminally fused with glutathione-S-transferase. The recombinant protein was purified and incubated with HeLa cell lysate by applying an affinity chromatography strategy. The interacting proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins differentially bound by both WT and Y12F CAS–SH3 domain variants were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting using a 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOF (AB SCIEX) mass spectrometer.
Cell lysates were incubated with glutathione Sepharose 4B beads with immobilized GST or GST–CAS–SH3 variants at 4 °C for 2 h. The beads were washed extensively and boiled in Laemmli sample buffer, and proteins were detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Cells were seeded either on coverslips or on PDMS membranes (for stretching), both coated with human 5 μg/ml fibronectin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells seeded on coverslips were grown for 24–48 h, and subsequently fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.5 % Triton X-100, washed extensively with PBS, and blocked in 3 % bovine serum albumin. Cells attached to PDMS membranes were stretched for 10 min at 0.25 Hz and 20 % peak-to-peak amplitude, immediately fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.5 % Triton X-100, washed with PBS, and blocked in 3 % bovine serum albumin. PDMS membranes with cells were then mounted on coverslips. The cells (both on coverslips and PDMS membranes) were sequentially incubated with primary antibodies for 2 h, secondary antibodies for 60 min, and if needed with Dy-405 phalloidin (Dyomics) for 15 min, and extensive washing between each step. The primary antibodies were as follows: anti-vinculin (Jackson Biotechnology), anti-paxillin (BD Transduction Laboratories). The secondary antibodies were as follows: anti-rabbit (Alexa 546) and anti-mouse (Alexa 594, Alexa 633; Molecular Probes). Images were acquired with a TCS SP2 microscope system (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Leica 63×/1.45 oil objective.
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
FRAP studies were conducted on live cells expressing either venus-tagged CAS or GFP-tagged vinculin. The cells were placed on glass-bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA) coated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin and cultured for 24 h before the experiment. Measurements were performed in DMEM at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 and 12–18 focal adhesions from different cells, expressing CAS-venus or GFP-vinculin were analyzed. After a brief measurement for monitoring baseline intensity (488 nm), a high-energy beam was used to bleach 40–80 % of the intensity in the spot. The intensity of recovery of the bleached region was extracted from the images series, and curves were fitted to a single-exponential using SigmaPlot (SYSTAT Software). The characteristic fluorescence recovery time was extracted from the FRAP curves as described by Tolde et al. .
Stretch experiments were carried out either on flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard) substrates that were molded into the shape of a cell culture well or on commercial silicone chambers (B Bridge International) all with 4.0 cm2 internal surface . The stretchers for both types of chambers consist of a linear stage for uniaxial stretch and are driven by a computer controlled stepper motor. The substrates were then coated with 5 μg/ml fibronectin in PBS overnight at 4 °C, and 10,000 cells were seeded 24 h prior to experiments. Uniaxial stretch was performed in the incubator under normal cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5 % CO2, 95 % humidity) for 10 min at 20 % stretch amplitude (peak-to-peak) .
Traction measurements were performed on 7.0 % acrylamide/bisacrylamide (ratio 29:1) gels (Young’s modulus 18.0 kPa, thickness 300 μm) with 1.0 μm red fluorescent beads embedded at the top surface [66, 67]. Gels were coated with 5 μg/ml fibronectin at 4 °C overnight. Cells were seeded on the gels at a density of 5,000 cells per cm2 and incubated under normal growth conditions overnight. During measurements, the cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. Cell tractions were computed by an unconstrained fast Fourier traction cytometry method  and measured before and after the cells were treated with 80 μM cytochalasin D to relax the traction forces.
Magnetic tweezers experiments
We used high-force magnetic tweezers as described in . For measurements, 30,000 cells were seeded overnight in a 35-mm tissue culture dish. Thirty minutes prior to experiments, cells were incubated with 4.5-μm fibronectin-coated superparamagnetic beads (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). The tip of the magnetic tweezers was then placed at a distance of 20–30 μm from a bead bound to a cell. Transfected cells were identified in fluorescence mode. During measurements, bright field images were taken at 40× magnification (NA 0.6) with a CCD camera (ORCA ER, Hamamatsu) at a rate of 40 frames/s. The bead position was tracked using an intensity-weighted center-of-mass algorithm. Measurements on multiple beads per well were performed at 37 °C for a maximum duration of 30 min.
Statistical analysis was performed with an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Numbers indicate actual p value for particular test.
We thank Marie Charvátová, Navid Bonakdar, Astrid Mainka, and Michael Kuhn for their help with experiments. This work was supported by grants from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Grant# 13-24851J), Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MSM0021620858), Bayerische Forschungsallianz, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
- 5.Dorssers LCJ, Grebenchtchikov N, Brinkman A, Look MP, Klijn AGM, Geurts-Moespot A, Span PN, Foekens JA, Sweep CGJ (2004) Application of a newly developed ELISA for BCAR1 protein for prediction of clinical benefit of tamoxifen therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. Clin Chem 50:1445–1447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Polte TR, Hanks SK (1997) Complexes of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Crk-associated substrate (p130(Cas)) are elevated in cytoskeleton-associated fractions following adhesion and Src transformation—requirements for Src kinase activity and FAK proline-rich motifs. J Biol Chem 272:5501–5509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Tatarova Z, Brabek J, Rosel D, Novotny M (2012) SH3 domain tyrosine phosphorylation—sites, role and evolution. PLoS One 7: Article ID e36310Google Scholar
- 63.Tolde O, Rosel D, Janostiak R, Vesely P, Brabek J (2012) Dynamics and morphology of focal adhesions in complex 3D environment. Folia Biol 58:177–184Google Scholar
- 64.Faust U, Hampe N, Rubner W, Kirchgessner N, Safran S, Hoffmann B, Merkel R (2011) Cyclic stress at mHz frequencies aligns fibroblasts in direction of zero strain. PLoS One 6:e28963Google Scholar
- 66.Pelham RJ, Wang YL (1998) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility (vol 94, pg 13661, 1997). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12070–12070Google Scholar
- 67.Raupach C, Zitterbart DP, Mierke CT, Metzner C, Muller FA., Fabry B (2007) Stress fluctuations and motion of cytoskeletal-bound markers. Phys Rev 76: Article ID 011918Google Scholar
- 68.Kollmannsberger P, Fabry B (2007) High-force magnetic tweezers with force feedback for biological applications. Rev Sci Instrum 78: Article ID 114301Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.