# Fractal symmetry of protein interior: what have we learned?

- 620 Downloads
- 20 Citations

## Abstract

The application of fractal dimension-based constructs to probe the protein interior dates back to the development of the concept of fractal dimension itself. Numerous approaches have been tried and tested over a course of (almost) 30 years with the aim of elucidating the various facets of symmetry of self-similarity prevalent in the protein interior. In the last 5 years especially, there has been a startling upsurge of research that innovatively stretches the limits of fractal-based studies to present an array of unexpected results on the biophysical properties of protein interior. In this article, we introduce readers to the fundamentals of fractals, reviewing the commonality (and the lack of it) between these approaches before exploring the patterns in the results that they produced. Clustering the approaches in major schools of protein self-similarity studies, we describe the evolution of fractal dimension-based methodologies. The genealogy of approaches (and results) presented here portrays a clear picture of the contemporary state of fractal-based studies in the context of the protein interior. To underline the utility of fractal dimension-based measures further, we have performed a correlation dimension analysis on all of the available non-redundant protein structures, both at the level of an individual protein and at the level of structural domains. In this investigation, we were able to separately quantify the self-similar symmetries in spatial correlation patterns amongst peptide–dipole units, charged amino acids, residues with the π-electron cloud and hydrophobic amino acids. The results revealed that electrostatic environments in the interiors of proteins belonging to ‘α/α toroid’ (all-α class) and ‘PLP-dependent transferase-like’ domains (α/β class) are highly conducive. In contrast, the interiors of ‘zinc finger design’ (‘designed proteins’) and ‘knottins’ (‘small proteins’) were identified as folds with the least conducive electrostatic environments. The fold ‘conotoxins’ (peptides) could be unambiguously identified as one type with the least stability. The same analyses revealed that peptide–dipoles in the α/β class of proteins, in general, are more correlated to each other than are the peptide–dipoles in proteins belonging to the all-α class. Highly favorable electrostatic milieu in the interiors of TIM-barrel, α/β-hydrolase structures could explain their remarkably conserved (evolutionary) stability from a new light. Finally, we point out certain inherent limitations of fractal constructs before attempting to identify the areas and problems where the implementation of fractal dimension-based constructs can be of paramount help to unearth latent information on protein structural properties.

## Keywords

Fractal Dimension Aromatic Amino Acid Correlation Dimension Hydrophobic Amino Acid Fractal Kinetic## Notes

### Acknowledgments

One of the authors, Anirban, would like to thank the COE-DBT scheme, Govt. of India, for supporting him during the tenure of this work. He would also like to thank Charudatta Navare for various technical help and Professor Paul Bourke for permitting him to use the self-similarity figures.

## Supplementary material

## References

- 1.Karplus M (2000) Aspects of protein reaction dynamics: deviations from simple behavior. J Phys Chem B 104:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.De Leeuw M, Reuveni S, Klafter J, Granek R (2009) Coexistence of flexibility and stability of proteins: an equation of state. PLoS One 4(10):e7296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Reuveni S (2008) Proteins: unraveling universality in a realm of specificity. PhD thesis. Tel Aviv University, Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
- 4.Goetze T, Brickmann J (1992) Self similarity of protein surfaces. Biophys J 61:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Tissen J, Fraaije J, Drenth J, Berendsen H (1994) Mesoscopic theories for protein crystal growth. Acta Cryst D 50:569–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Banerji A, Ghosh I (2009) A new computational model to study mass inhomogeneity and hydrophobicity inhomogeneity in proteins. Eur Biophys J 38:577–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Liang J, Dill KA (2001) Are proteins well-packed? Biophys J 81:751–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Havlin S, Ben-Avraham D (1982) New approach to self-avoiding walks as a critical phenomenon. J Phys A 15:L321–L328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Havlin S, Ben-Avraham D (1982) Fractal dimensionality of polymer chains. J Phys A 15:L311–L316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Havlin S, Ben-Avraham D (1982) New method of analysing self-avoiding walks in four dimensions. J Phys A 15:L317–L320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Co, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hausdorff F (1919) Dimension und ¨ausseres Mass. Math Ann 79:157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Barnsley M (1988) Fractals everywhere. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Falconer K (1990) Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 15.Meakin P (1998) Fractals scaling, and growth far from equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 16.Isogai Y, Itoh T (1984) Fractal analysis of tertiary structure of protein molecule. J Phys Soc Jpn 53:2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wagner GC, Colvin JT, Allen JP, Stapleton HJ (1985) Fractal models of protein structure, dynamics, and magnetic relaxation. J Am Chem Soc 107:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Colvin JT, Stapleton HJ (1985) Fractal and spectral dimensions of biopolymer chains: solvent studies of electron spin relaxation rates in myoglobin azide. J Chem Phys 82:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Tanford C (1961) Physical chemistry of macromolecules. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wang CX, Shi YY, Huang FH (1990) Fractal study of tertiary structure of proteins. Phys Rev A 41:7043–7048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Xiao Y (1994) Comment on fractal study of tertiary structure of proteins. Phys Rev E 46:6Google Scholar
- 22.Bytautas L, Klein DJ, Randic M, Pisanski T (2000) Foldedness in linear polymers: a difference between graphical and Euclidean distances, DIMACS. Ser Discr Math Theor Comput Sci 51:39–61Google Scholar
- 23.Aszódi A, Taylor WR (1993) Connection topology of proteins. Bioinformatics 9:523–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gennes P (1996) Scaling concepts in polymer physics. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Elber R (1989) Fractal analysis of protein. In: Avnir D (ed) The fractal approach to heterogeneous chemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Dewey TG (1993) Protein structure and polymer collapse. J Chem Phys 98:2250–2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dewey TG (1995) Fractal dimensions of proteins: what are we learning? Het Chem Rev 2:91–101Google Scholar
- 28.Dewey TG (1997) Fractals in molecular biophysics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 29.Enright MB, Leitner DM (2005) Mass fractal dimension and the compactness of proteins. Phys Rev E 71:011912Google Scholar
- 30.Reuveni S, Granek R, Klafter J (2008) Proteins: coexistence of stability and flexibility. Phys Rev Lett 100:208101Google Scholar
- 31.Banerji A, Ghosh I (2009) Revisiting the myths of protein interior: studying proteins with mass-fractal hydrophobicity-fractal and polarizability-fractal dimensions. PLoS One 4(10):e7361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Moret MA, Miranda JG, Nogueira E Jr, Santana MC, Zebende GF (2005) Self-similarity and protein chains. Phys Rev E 71:012901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Lee CY (2006) Mass fractal dimension of the ribosome and implication of its dynamic characteristics. Phys Rev E 73:042901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Figueirêdo PH, Moret MA, Nogueira E Jr, Coutinho S (2008) Dihedral-angle Gaussian distribution driving protein folding. Phys A 387:2019–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Hong L, Jinzhi L (2009) Scaling law for the radius of gyration of proteins and its dependence on hydrophobicity. J Polym Sci Part B 47:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Novikov VU, Kozlov GV (2000) Structure and properties of polymers in terms of the fractal approach. Russ Chem Rev 69:523–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Phys D 9:183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Lee CY (2008) Self-similarity of biopolymer backbones in the ribosome. Phys A 387:4871–4880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Tejera E, Machadoa A, Rebelo I, Nieto-Villar J (2009) Fractal protein structure revisited: topological kinetic and thermodynamic relationships. Phys A 388:4600–4608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Takens F (1985) On the numerical determination of the dimension of an attractor. In: Braaksma B, Broer H, Takens F (eds) Lecture notes in mathematics, vol 1125. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–106Google Scholar
- 41.Steinbach PJ, Ansari A, Berendzen J, Braunstein D, Chu K, Cowen BR, Ehrenstein D, Frauenfelder H, Johnson JB, Lamb DC (1991) Ligand binding to heme proteins: connection between dynamics and function. Biochemistry 30:3988–4001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Rasmussen BF, Stock AM, Ringe D, Petsko GA (1992) Crystalline ribonuclease A loses function below the dynamical transition at 220 K. Nature 357:423–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Wilson KG (1975) The renormalization group: critical phenomena and the Kondo problem. Rev Mod Phys 47:773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Wilson KG (1979) Problems in physics with many scales of length. Sci Am 241:140–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Goldenfeld N (1992) Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- 46.Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG (1992) Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9029–9033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG (1992) Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4918–4922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Family F (1982) Direct renormalization group study of loops in polymer. Phys Lett 92A:341–344Google Scholar
- 49.Pierri CL, Grassi AD, Turi A (2008) Lattices for ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Struct Funct Bioinf 73:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Böhm G (1991) Protein folding and deterministic chaos: limits of protein folding simulations and calculations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 1:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Li HQ, Chen SH, Zhao HM (1990) Fractal structure and conformational entropy of protein chain. Int J Biol Macromol 12:374–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Nonnenmacher TF (1989) Fractal scaling mechanisms in biomembranes. Eur Biophys J 16:375–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Bohr HG, Wolynes PG (1992) Initial events of protein folding from an information-processing viewpoint. Phys Rev A 46:5242–5248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Chan HS, Dill KA (1991) Polymer principles in protein structure and stability. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 20:447–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Coveney PV, Fowler PW (2005) Modelling biological complexity: a physical scientist’s perspective. J R Soc Interf 2:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Heath AP, Kavraki LE, Clementi C (2007) From coarse-grain to all-atom: toward multiscale analysis of protein landscapes. Proteins 68:646–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Song C, Havlin S, Makse HA (2006) Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks. Nat Phys 2:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.Kitsak M, Havlin S, Paul G, Riccaboni M, Pammolli F, Stanley HE (2007) Betweenness centrality of fractal and nonfractal scale-free model networks and tests on real networks. Phys Rev E 75:056115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Rozenfeld HD, Song C, Makse HA (2010) The small world-fractal transition in complex networks through renormalization group. Phys Rev Lett 104:025701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Freed KF (1987) Renormalization group theory of macromolecules. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 61.Karplus M, McCammon J (1983) Dynamics of proteins: elements and functions. Annu Rev Biochem 53:263–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Levitt M, Sanders C, Stern PS (1985) Protein normal-mode dynamics; trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease, and lysozyme. J Mol Biol 181:423–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Alexander S, Orbach RL (1982) Density of states on fractals: fractons. J Phys Lett 43:L625–L631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Elber R, Karplus M (1986) Low frequency modes in proteins: use of effective-medium approximation to interpret fractal dimension observed in electron-spin relaxation meaurements. Phys Rev Lett 56:394–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Burioni R, Cassi D (1996) Universal properties of spectral dimension. Phys Rev Lett 76:1091–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.Burioni R, Cassi D, Fontana MP, Vulpiani A (2002) Vibrational thermodynamic instability of recursive networks. Europhys Lett 58:806–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 67.Burioni R, Cassi D, Cecconi F, Vulpiani A (2004) Topological thermal instability and length of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 55:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Leitner DM (2009) Frequency-resolved communication maps for proteins and other nanoscale materials. J Chem Phys 130:195101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 69.Chen J, Bryngelson JD, Thirumalai D (2008) Estimations of the size of nucleation regions in globular proteins. J Phys Chem B 112:16115–16120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Frauenfelder H, Parak F, Young RD (1988) Conformational substates in proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 17:451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Allen JP, Colvin JT, Stinson DG, Flynn CP, Stapleton HJ (1982) Protein conformation from electron spin relaxation data. Biophys J 38:299–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Stapleton HJ, Allen JP, Flynn CP, Stinson DG, Kurtz SR (1980) Fractal form of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 45:1456–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 73.Helman JS, Coniglio A, Tsallis C (1984) Fractons and the fractal structure of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 53:1195–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 74.Herrmann HJ (1986) Comment on fractons and the fractal structure of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 56:2432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 75.Stapleton HJ (1985) Comment on fractons and the fractal structure of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 54:1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.Liebovitch LS, Fischbary J, Koniarek JP, Todorova I, Wang M (1987) Fractal model of ion-channel kinetics. Biochim Biophys Acta 869:173–180Google Scholar
- 77.Liebovitch LS, Fischbary J, Koniarek J (1987) Ion channel kinetics: a model based on fractal scaling rather than multistate markov processes. Math Biosci 84:37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 78.Liebovitch LS, Sullivan JM (1987) Fractal analysis of a voltage-dependent potassium channel from cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. Biophys J 52:979–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 79.Korn SJ, Horn R (1988) Statistical discrimination of fractal and Markov models of single channel gating. Biophys J 54:871–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 80.French AS, Stockbridge LL (1988) Fractal and Markov behavior in ion channel kinetics. Can J Physiol Pharm 66:967–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 81.Millhauser G, Salpeter L, Oswald RE (1988) Diffusion models of ion-channel gating and the origin of the power-law distributions from single-channel recording. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1503–1507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 82.Lauger P (1988) Internal motions in proteins and gating kinetics of ion channels. Biophys J 53:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 83.Liebovitch LS, Toth TI (1990) Using fractals to understand the opening and closing of ion channels. Ann Biomed Eng 18:177–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 84.Liebovitch LS, Toth TI (1991) A model of ion channel kinetics using deterministic chaotic rather than stochastic processes. J Theor Biol 148:243–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 85.Lowen SB, Teich MC (1993) Fractal renewal processes. IEEE Trans Info Theory 39:1669–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 86.Churilla AM, Gottschalke WA, Liebovitch LS, Selector LY, Todorov AT, Yeandle S (1995) Membrane potential fluctuations of human T-lymphocytes have fractal characteristics of fractional Brownian motion. Ann Biomed Eng 24:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 87.Lowen SB, Liebovitch LS, White JA (1999) Fractal ion-channel behavior generates fractal firing patterns in neuronal models. Phys Rev E 59:5970–5980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 88.Rodriguez M, Pereda E, Gonzalez J, Abdala P, Obeso JA (2003) Neuronal activity in the substantia nigra in the anaesthetized rat has fractal characteristics. Evidence for firing-code patterns in the basal ganglia. Exp Brain Res 151:167–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 89.Kim S, Jeong J, Kim YKY, Jung SH, Lee KJ (2005) Fractal stochastic modeling of spiking activity in suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. J Comp Neurosci 19:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 90.Brooks CL, Karplus M, Pettitt BM (1988) Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 91.Dewey TG, Spencer DB (1991) Are protein dynamics fractal? Commun Mol Cell Biophys 7:155–171Google Scholar
- 92.Bagchi B, Fleming GR (1990) Dynamics of activationless reactions in solution. J Phys Chem 94:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 93.Zwanzig R (1990) Rate processes with dynamical disorder. Acc Chem Res 23:148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 94.Dewey TG, Bann JG (1992) Protein dynamics and noise. Biophys J 63:594–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 95.Ramakrishnan A, Sadana A (1999) Analysis of analyte-receptor binding kinetics for biosensor applications: an overview of the influence of the fractal dimension on the surface on the binding rate coefficient. Biotech Appl Biochem 29:45–57Google Scholar
- 96.Goychuk I, Hänggi P (2002) Ion channel gating: a first-passage time analysis of the Kramers type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3552–3556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 97.Carlini P, Bizzarri AR, Cannistraro S (2002) Temporal fluctuations in the potential energy of proteins: noise and diffusion. Phys D 165:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 98.Kopelmann R (1986) Rate processes on fractals: theory, simulations, and experiments. J Stat Phys 42:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 99.Kopelmann R (1988) Fractal reaction kinetics. Science (Washington DC) 241:1620–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 100.Li HQ, Chen SH, Zhao HM (1990) Fractal mechanisms for the allosteric effects of proteins and enzyme. Biophys J 58:1313–1320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 101.Lewis M, Rees DC (1985) Fractal surfaces of proteins. Science 230:1163–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 102.Argyrakis P, Kopelman R (1990) Nearest-neighbor distance distribution and self-ordering in diffusion-controlled reactions. Phys Rev A 41:2114–2126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 103.Turner TE, Schnell S, Burrage K (2004) Stochastic approaches for modelling in vivo reactions. Comp Biol Chem 28:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 104.Berry H (2002) Monte Carlo simulations of enzyme reactions in two dimensions: fractal kinetics and spatial segregation. Biophys J 83:1891–1901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.Yuste SB, Acedo L, Lindenberg K (2004) Reaction front in an A + B -> C reaction-subdiffusion process. Phys Rev E 69:036126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 106.Kosmidis K, Argyrakis P, Macheras P (2003) Fractal kinetics in drug release from finite fractal matrices. J Chem Phys 119:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 107.Grimaa R, Schnell S (2006) A systematic investigation of the rate laws valid in intracellular environments. Biophys Chem 124:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 108.Shlesinger MF (1988) Fractal time in condensed matter. Annu Rev Phys Chem 39:269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 109.Yu X, Leitner DM (2003) Anomalous diffusion of vibrational energy in proteins. J Chem Phys 119:12673–12679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 110.Leitner DM (2008) Energy flow in proteins. Annu Rev Phys Chem 59:233–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 111.Li MS, Klimov DK, Thirumalai D (2004) Finite size effects on thermal denaturation of globular proteins. Phys Rev Lett 93:268107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 112.Peierls RE (1934) Bemerkungüber Umwandlungstemperaturen. Helv Phys Acta 7:S81–S83Google Scholar
- 113.Reuveni S, Granek R, Klafter J (2010) Anomalies in the vibrational dynamics of proteins are a consequence of fractal-like structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13696–13700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 114.Lois G, Blawzdziewicz J, O’Hern CS (2010) Protein folding on rugged energy landscapes: conformational diffusion on fractal networks. Phys Rev E 81:051907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 115.Sangha AK, Keyes T (2009) Proteins fold by subdiffusion of the order parameter. J Phys Chem B 113:15886–15894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 116.Moret MA, Santana MC, Zebende GF, Pascutti PG (2009) Self-similarity and protein compactness. Phys Rev E 80:041908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 117.Morita H, Takano M (2009) Residue network in protein native structure belongs to the universality class of three dimensional critical percolation cluster. Phys Rev E79:020901Google Scholar
- 118.Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 119.Bashford D, Karplus M (1990) pKas of ionization groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. Biochemistry 29:10219–10225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 120.Warshel A, Papazyan A (1998) Electrostatic effects in macromolecules: fundamental concepts and practical modeling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 121.Zhou Z, Payne P, Vasquez M, Kuhn N, Levitt M (1996) Finite-difference solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation: complete elimination of self-energy. J Comput Chem 17:1344–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 122.Lu B, Zhang D, McCammon J (2005) Computation of electrostatic forces between solvated molecules determined by the Poisson–Boltzmann equation using a boundary element method. J Chem Phys 122:214102–214108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 123.Feig M, Onufriev A, Lee M, Im W, Case E, Brooks C (2004) Performance comparison of generalized Born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures. J Comput Chem 25:265–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 124.Spassov V, Ladenstein R, Karshikoff (1997) A optimization of the electrostatic interactions between ionized groups and peptide dipoles in proteins. Protein Sci 6:1190–1196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 125.Petrey D, Honig B (2000) Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci 9:2181–2191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 126.Shoemaker K, Kim P, York E, Stewart J, Baldwin R (1987) Tests of the helix dipole model for stabilization of alpha-helices. Nature 326:563–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 127.Åqvist J, Luecke H, Quiocho F, Warshel A (1991) Dipoles localized at helix termini of proteins stabilize charges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2026–2030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 128.Wada A (1976) The alpha-helix as an electric macro-dipole. Adv Biophys 9:1–63Google Scholar
- 129.Miyazawa S, Jernigan R (1999) Evaluation of short-range interactions as secondary structure energies for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 36:347–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 130.Selvaraj S, Gromiha MM (2003) Role of hydrophobic clusters and long-range contact networks in the folding of (alpha/beta)8 barrel proteins. Biophys J 84:1919–1925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 131.Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H (2003) Announcing the worldwide. Protein Data Bank Nat Struct Biol 10:980Google Scholar
- 132.Theiler J (1987) Efficient algorithm for estimating the correlation dimension from a set of discrete points. Phys Rev A 36:4456–4462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 133.Gallivan JP, Dougherty DA (1999) Cation–π interactions in structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9459–9464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 134.Glockle WG, Nonnenmacher TF (1995) A fractional calculus approach to self-similar protein dynamics. Biophys J 68:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 135.Cserzöa M, Vicsek T (1991) Self-affine fractal analysis of protein structures. Chaos Solitons Fractals 1:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 136.Isvoran A (2004) Describing some properties of adenylate kinase using fractal concepts. Chaos Solitons Fractals 19:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 137.Mitra C, Rani M (1993) Protein sequences as random fractals. J Biosci 18:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 138.Banerji A, Ghosh I (2010) Mathematical criteria to observe mesoscopic emergence of protein biochemical properties. J Math Chem 49(3):643–665. doi: 10.1007/s10910-010-9760-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 139.Grosberg Y, Khokhlov AR (1994) Statistical physics of macromolecules. American Institute of Physics, WoodburyGoogle Scholar
- 140.Røgen P, Fain B (2003) Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 141.Ramnarayan K, Bohr H, Jalkanen K (2008) Classification of protein fold classes by knot theory and prediction of folds by neural networks: a combined theoretical and experimental approach. Theor Chim Acta 119:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 142.Kolaskar AS, Ramabrahmam V (1983) Conformational properties of pairs of amino acids. Int J Peptide Protein Res 22:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 143.Alexander S (1989) Vibrations of fractals and scattering of light from aerogels. Phys Rev B 40(11):7953–7965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 144.Korb JP, Bryant RG (2005) Noise and functional protein dynamics. Biophys J 89:2685–2692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 145.Haliloglu T, Bahar I, Erman B (1997) Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys Rev Lett 79:3090–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 146.Aksimentiev A, Holyst R (1999) Single-chain statistics in polymer systems. Prog Polym Sci 24:1045–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 147.Ben-Avraham D, Havlin S (2000) Diffusion and reactions in fractals and disordered systems. Cambridge University, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 148.Arteca GA (1994) Scaling behaviour of some molecular shape descriptors of polymer chains and protein backbones. Phys Rev E 49:2417–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 149.Arteca GA (1995) Scaling regimes of molecular size and self-entanglements in very compact proteins. Phys Rev E 51:2600–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 150.Flory PJ (1953) Principles of polymer chemistry. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 151.Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 152.Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer physics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 153.Hypertext link. http://paulbourke.net/fractals/fracdim/. Accessed 16 May 2011
- 154.Granek R, Klafter J (2005) Fractons in proteins: can they lead to anomalously decaying time autocorrelations? Phys Rev Lett 95:098106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar