Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 89–108 | Cite as

A Clifford Algebraic Framework for Coxeter Group Theoretic Computations

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Real physical systems with reflective and rotational symmetries such as viruses, fullerenes and quasicrystals have recently been modeled successfully in terms of three-dimensional (affine) Coxeter groups. Motivated by this progress, we explore here the benefits of performing the relevant computations in a Geometric Algebra framework, which is particularly suited to describing reflections. Starting from the Coxeter generators of the reflections, we describe how the relevant chiral (rotational), full (Coxeter) and binary polyhedral groups can be easily generated and treated in a unified way in a versor formalism. In particular, this yields a simple construction of the binary polyhedral groups as discrete spinor groups. These in turn are known to generate Lie and Coxeter groups in dimension four, notably the exceptional groups D 4, F 4 and H 4. A Clifford algebra approach thus reveals an unexpected connection between Coxeter groups of ranks 3 and 4. We discuss how to extend these considerations and computations to the Conformal Geometric Algebra setup, in particular for the non-crystallographic groups, and construct root systems and quasicrystalline point arrays. We finally show how a Clifford versor framework sheds light on the geometry of the Coxeter element and the Coxeter plane for the examples of the twodimensional non-crystallographic Coxeter groups I 2(n) and the threedimensional groups A 3, B 3, as well as the icosahedral group H 3. IPPP/12/49, DCPT/12/98

Keywords

Coxeter groups Clifford algebras root systems versor computations conformal geometry Coxeter element Coxeter plane spinors complex structures viruses fullerenes quasicrystals 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pierre Anglès, Construction de revêtements du groupe conforme d’un espace vectoriel muni d’une métrique de type (p, q). Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré (A) Physique théorique, 33 (1) 33, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pierre Anglès, Conformal Groups In Geometry And Spin Structures. Progress in Mathematical Physics. Birkhäuser, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    James Emory Baugh, Regular Quantum Dynamics. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. L. D. Caspar and A. Klug, Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 27, 1–24 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coxeter H.S.M.: Discrete groups generated by reflections. Ann. of Math. 35, 588–621 (1934)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Models of the Early Universe. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Clifford algebra unveils a surprising geometric significance of quaternionic root systems of Coxeter groups. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 23 (2) (2013), 301-321.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Rank-3 root systems induce root systems of rank 4 via a new Clifford spinor construction. ArXiv e-print 1207.7339, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Platonic solids generate their four-dimensional analogues. Acta Cryst. A69 (2013). doi: 10.1107/S0108767313021442
  10. 10.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Céline Boehm, and Reidun Twarock, Novel Kac-Moody-type affine extensions of non-crystallographic Coxeter groups. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45 (28), 285202, (2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Céline Boehm, and Reidun Twarock, Affine extensions of non-crystallographic Coxeter groups induced by projection. Journal of Mathematical Physics 54 (2013). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4820441]
  12. 12.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Céline Boehm, and Reidun Twarock, Applications of affine extensions of non-crystallographic Coxeter groups in carbon chemistry and virology. in preparation, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Christoph Luhn, Céline Boehm, and Silvia Pascoli, Discrete anomalies of chiral and binary polyhedral groups and their implications for neutrino and flavour model building. in preparation, 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space. The Annals of Mathematics 37 (2) (1936), pp. 429–442.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chris Doran and Anthony N. Lasenby, Geometric Algebra for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. G. O. Freund, Introduction to Supersymmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, April 1988.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. J. H. Garling, Clifford Algebras: An Introduction. London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    David Hestenes, Space-Time Algebra. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    David Hestenes, New foundations for classical mechanics; 2nd ed. Fundamental theories of physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    David Hestenes, Point Groups and Space Groups in Geometric Algebra Birkhäuser, Boston, 2002, pages 3–34.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    David Hestenes and Jeremy W. Holt, The Crystallographic Space Groups in Geometric Algebra. Journal of Mathematical Physics 48:023514, 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    David Hestenes and Garret Sobczyk, Clifford algebra to geometric calculus: a unified language for mathematics and physics. Fundamental theories of physics. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eckhard Hitzer and Christian Perwass, Interactive 3D space group visualization with CLUCalc and the Clifford Geometric Algebra description of space groups. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 20 (2010), 631–658. 10.1007/s00006-010-0214-z.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. E. Humphreys, Reflection groups and Coxeter groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giuliana Indelicato, Paolo Cermelli, David Salthouse, Simone Racca, Giovanni Zanzotto, and Reidun Twarock, A crystallographic approach to structural transitions in icosahedral viruses. Journal of Mathematical Biology (2011), pages 1–29.  10.1007/s00285-011-0425-5.
  26. 26.
    A. Janner, Towards a classification of icosahedral viruses in terms of indexed polyhedra. Acta Crystallographica Section A 62 (5) 2006, 319–330.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Katz, Some local properties of the 3-dimensional Penrose tilings, an introduction to the mathematics of quasicrystals. Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. Keef and R. Twarock, Affine extensions of the icosahedral group with applications to the three-dimensional organisation of simple viruses. J Math Biol 59 (3) (2009), 287–313.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Keef, J.Wardman, N.A. Ranson, P. G. Stockley, and R. Twarock, Structural constraints on the three-dimensional geometry of simple viruses: case studies of a new predictive tool. Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography 69 (Pt 2) (2013), 140-150.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tom Keef, Pierre-Philippe Dechant, and Reidun Twarock, Packings of solids with non-crystallographic symmetry. in preparation, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Koca, M. Al-Ajmi, and S. Al-Shidhani, Quasi-regular polyhedra and their duals with Coxeter symmetries represented by quaternions ii. The African Review of Physics 6 (0), 2011.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Koca, R. Koc, and M. Al-Barwani, Noncrystallographic Coxeter group H 4 in E 8. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34 dec 2001, 11201–11213.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Koca, N. O. Koca, and R. Koç, Quaternionic roots of E 8 related Coxeter graphs and quasicrystals. Turkish Journal of Physics 22 May 1998, 421–436.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mehmet Koca, Mudhahir Al-Ajmi, and Ramazan Koç, Polyhedra obtained from Coxeter groups and quaternions. Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 (11) 113514, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mehmet Koca, Nazife Ozdes Koca, and Ramazan Koç, Catalan solids derived from three-dimensional root systems and quaternions. Journal of Mathematical Physics 51 (4) 043501, 2010.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Kroto, Carbon onions introduce new flavour to fullerene studies. Nature 359, (1992), 670–671.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. Kroto, J. R. Heath, S. C. O’Brien, R. F. Curl, and R. E. Smalley, C60:Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 318, (1985), 162–163.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. F. Kustov, V. I. Nefedov, A. V. Kalinin, and G. S. Chernova, Classification system for fullerenes. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 53 (9) 2008, 1384–1395.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A N Lasenby, Joan Lasenby, and Richard Wareham, A covariant approach to geometry using Geometric Algebra. Technical Report. University of Cambridge Department of Engineering, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anthony N. Lasenby, Recent applications of Conformal Geometric Algebra. In Hongbo Li, Peter J. Olver, and Gerald Sommer, editors, Computer Algebra and Geometric Algebra with Applications: 6th InternationalWorkshop, IWMM 2004, Shanghai, China, May 19-21, 2004, volume 3519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 298–328. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    L.S. Levitov and J. Rhyner, Crystallography of quasicrystals; application to icosahedral symmetry. J. Phys. France 49 (49) (1988), 1835–1849.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jon McCammond and T. Petersen, Bounding reflection length in an affine Coxeter group. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics pages 1–9. 10.1007/s10801-011-0289-1.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    R. V. Moody and J. Patera, Quasicrystals and icosians. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26 (12), (1993), 2829.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. Patera and R. Twarock, Affine extensions of noncrystallographic Coxeter groups and quasicrystals. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 35 (2002), 1551–1574.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ian R. Porteous, Clifford Algebras and the Classical Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. Senechal, Quasicrystals and Geometry. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    O. P. Shcherbak, Wavefronts and reflection groups. Russian Mathematical Surveys 43 (3) (1988), 149.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J.W. Cahn, Metallic phase with longrange order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 1951–1953.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    P. G. Stockley and R. Twarock, Emerging Topics in Physical Virology. Imperial College Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. Twarock, New group structures for carbon onions and carbon nanotubes via affine extensions of noncrystallographic Coxeter groups. Phys. Lett. A 300 (2002), 437–444.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. Twarock, Mathematical virology: a novel approach to the structure and assembly of viruses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (364) (2006), 3357–3373.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    R. Zandi, D. Reguera, R. F. Bruinsma, W. M. Gelbart, and J. Rudnick, Origin of icosahedral symmetry in viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101 (44) (2004), 15556–15560.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Ogden Centre for Fundamental Physics, Department of PhysicsUniversity of DurhamDurhamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations