Fetal/Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics and Prevention

  • Ewa BrojerEmail author
  • Anne Husebekk
  • Marzena Dębska
  • Małgorzata Uhrynowska
  • Katarzyna Guz
  • Agnieszka Orzińska
  • Romuald Dębski
  • Krystyna Maślanka
Open Access


Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a relatively rare condition (1/1000–1/2000) that was granted orphan status by the European Medicines Agency in 2011. Clinical consequences of FNAIT, however, may be severe. A thrombocytopenic fetus or new-born is at risk of intracranial hemorrhage that may result in lifelong disability or death. Preventing such bleeding is thus vital and requires a solution. Anti-HPA1a antibodies are the most frequent cause of FNAIT in Caucasians. Its pathogenesis is similar to hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) due to anti-RhD antibodies, but is characterized by platelet destruction and is more often observed in the first pregnancy. In 75 % of these women, alloimmunization by HPA-1a antigens, however, occurs at delivery, which enables development of antibody-mediated immune suppression to prevent maternal immunization. As for HDN, the recurrence rate of FNAIT is high. For advancing diagnostic efforts and treatment, it is thereby crucial to understand the pathogenesis of FNAIT, including cellular immunity involvement. This review presents the current knowledge on FNAIT. Also described is a program for HPA-1a screening in identifying HPA-1a negative pregnant women at risk of immunization. This program is now performed at the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine in cooperation with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education in Warsaw as well as the UiT The Arctic University of Norway.


Human platelet alloantigens Pregnancy Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia Therapeutic intervention 


Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), caused by maternal alloantibodies against fetal human platelet antigens (HPA) is a relatively rare condition (1/800–2000 live newborns) but its consequences may be severe (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2007; Uhrynowska et al. 2000; Williamson et al. 1998). Over 80 % of FNAIT cases result from mother and fetus incompatibility to the human platelet antigen-1a (HPA-1a); the remaining ones arise, respectively, from antibodies against HPA-5b on GPIa (15 %) and those against other HPAs (5 %) (Peterson et al. 2013; Sachs 2013). A thrombocytopenic fetus or new-born is at risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) that may result in lifelong disability or death. The disease may appear in the first pregnancy, but since there are no screening programs, FNAIT is currently diagnosed only after birth of a thrombocytopenic baby. Many FNAIT cases are not properly diagnosed or treated. It is, therefore, particularly important to identify those pregnancies at risk of fetal/neonatal thrombocytopenia caused by alloimmunization requiring treatment, together with developing new methods for noninvasive and effective treatment for preventing fetal bleeding; the latter being a key issue that needs to be resolved. This review aims to present the clinical characteristics of FNAIT and its pathogenesis, including factors that determine antibody generation and disease severity. We also discuss in summary current treatment methods, future developments as well as the perspectives of immunoprophylaxis. Furthermore, the legitimacy and perspectives of screening methods for eliminating FNAIT risk is presented in light of the current methods for preventing hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) due to red blood cell alloimmunization.

Pathogenesis of FNAIT; Cellular and Humoral Immunity

Thrombocytopenia in the fetus or newborn is most commonly caused by viral or bacterial infections. However, it can also have an immunological etiology due to maternal auto- or alloantibodies. Autoantibodies are produced by patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) or systemic lupus erythematosus which bind to both maternal and fetal platelets. Maternal alloantibodies usually do not induce thrombocytopenia in the mother but do so to the fetus. Nevertheless, it should be stressed that alloantibodies can be also produced by mothers with ITP. The production of alloantibodies against a fetal platelet specific antigen, which is unknown to the maternal immune system, constitutes the basis of FNAIT pathogenesis.

Maternal IgG is actively transferred to the fetus via the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). IgA and IgM are not transferred because there are no specific receptors (Kumpel 2012; Kumpel and Manoussaka 2012; Leach et al. 1996). After crossing the placenta, maternal alloantibodies opsonize fetal platelets (PLTs) that are subsequently destroyed.

Alloantibody production by the maternal immune system is initiated when platelet antigens are presented by professional antigen presenting cells in maternal lymph nodes and spleen (Kumpel and Manoussaka 2012). This may result from fetomaternal hemorrhage, which can occur during delivery or miscarriage, as a result of platelet leakage into the maternal circulation. The women patients’ obstetric history is also important and must be considered carefully.

The alloimmunization by HPAs might be caused by very small (<500 nm) syncytiotrophoblast microparticles (STMP) released from syncytiotrophoblasts (ST) (Kumpel and Manoussaka 2012; Smith et al. 1977). The presence of glycoprotein GPIIIa which contains many HPA epitopes, including the most immunogenic one—HPA-1a, has been shown on STMP complexed with CD51 (αV integrin) (Kumpel et al. 2008). Platelet antigens are expressed in the fetus from gestational week 16 (Gruel et al. 1986). Trophoblasts, which are the interface between fetal and maternal tissue on one side and blood on the other, escape allorecognition because they do not express the classical HLA class I and II molecules, but, almost uniquely, express HLA-G which is a non-classical HLA class I molecule. This local immunoregulation leads to fetal alloantigen tolerance and prevents a killing of fetal and placental cells by maternal natural killer cells, cytotoxic T cells and macrophages. ST at the surface of chorionic villi, together with ST debris that shed into maternal blood, create a state of mild maternal systemic inflammation by enhancing innate immunity and prevents humoral immunity. This mode of immunization is presented in several reviews (Kumpel 2012; Kumpel and Manoussaka 2012; Warning et al. 2011).

The mechanisms that must be activated for producing platelet-reactive antibodies, has been carefully studied (Ahlen et al. 2009; Jackson et al. 2005; Kuwana et al. 2002; Maslanka et al. 1996; Wu et al. 1997). IgG antibody production requires interaction between T and B cells for the same antigen complex. T cell activated B cells differentiate into antibody producing plasma cells. In FNAIT, due to anti-HPA-1a, the platelet-reactive antibodies bind to an allogeneic epitope located on integrin β3 (defined by leucine at residue 33); a much less frequent alloform has a proline at this position and is defined as HPA-1b (Newman et al. 1989).

Antigen Presentation

Not all women with the HPA-1bb genotype (phenotype HPA-1a negative) who give birth to an HPA-1ab (HPA-1a positive) child are immunized. Some may not be exposed to fetal antigens or the maternal genetic constitution is not suitable for the immune response. It is a well-accepted fact that the antigen must be presented to the maternal T cells mediated by certain HLA class II molecules. It was found that HPA-1a alloimmunization is initiated by binding of the HPA-1a peptides to HLA DRB3*01:01 molecules (Ahlen et al. 2009; Parry et al. 2007; Rayment et al. 2009; Wu et al. 1997). In the 1990s, Jack Gorski group (Maslanka et al. 1996; Wu et al. 1997) studied HPA-1a antigen recognition by T cells in the context of HLA DRB3*01:01. In the paper published by Maslanka et al. (1996) the authors describe a study in which they used T-cell receptor (TCR) spectratyping and PCR techniques with clonotypic primers to track T cells from women who delivered FNAIT babies. The cells were grown in a culture and stimulated with peptide containing the HPA-1a epitope. Molecular analysis of the responding T-cell repertoire identified two T cells that predominated in the culture stimulated with the alloantigen peptide. Detailed analysis revealed that two predominant clonotypes were involved. They shared a recognizable CDR3 motif (L-P-S/T) that was present in two different TCR Vβ families (Vβ5.3 and Vβ11). The presence of a CDR3 motif indicates specific selection for HPA-1a antigen recognition (Hedrick et al. 1988; Maslanka et al. 1996). T cells with TCR BV family were considered candidates for providing the HLA-DR restricted help for production of FNAIT-associated anti-platelet alloantibodies. However, further studies with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from other mothers who had given birth to FNAIT babies did not confirm the presence of the same CDR3. This may suggest that a broader repertoire of HPA-1a specific T cells is involved in the cell mediated immune response to HPA-1a peptide. Studies by other authors demonstrated proliferative responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HPA-1a-immunized women cultured with HPA-1a peptides (Jackson et al. 2005). This was supported by finding numerous different HPA-1a specific T-cell clones isolated from a HPA-1a immunized woman (Ahlen et al. 2009). PBMCs were cultured from an HPA-1a-alloimmunized woman in the presence of HPA-1a peptide, labeled with CFSE, and assayed for antigen-specific proliferation. Individual proliferating cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and expanded in culture. Antigen specificity and HLA restriction were determined by cytokine secretion (enzyme-linked immunospot) and proliferation assays. Several isolated CD3+CD4+ T-cell clones proliferated and secreted cytokines in response to HPA-1a peptide. Two of these clones were established in long-term culture. Both recognize synthetic as well as naturally processed HPA-1a antigen, and the recognition is restricted by the MHC molecule HLA-DRB3*01:01.

HLA DRB3*01:01 is present in >90 % of the immunized women versus 27 % in the general population (Ahlen et al. 2009). This means that also some other unidentified factors must be crucial for understanding the FNAIT pathophysiology and its prevention (Ahlen et al. 2009). L’Abbe et al. (1992) have found that both HLADRB3*01:01 and HLA DQB*02:01 are associated with alloimmunization to HPA-1a. It has recently been suggested that the presence of two HLA alleles (DRB3*01:01 and DRB4*01:01) in the mother increases the risk and severity of FNAIT and reduces the success of preventive IgG treatment (Loewenthal et al. 2013).

Anti-HPA Antibodies: Function, Activity and Effect on the Severity of FNAIT

In those pregnant women with detectable anti-HPA-1a antibodies, the disease severity widely varies (Maslanka et al. 2003; Tiller et al. 2013, 2014; Uhrynowska et al. 1997, 2000). IgG is the only antibody class to cross the placenta and only IgG is involved in the pathogenesis (Kumpel 2012; Kumpel and Manoussaka 2012). Several factors may be responsible: antibody type (subclass), concentration, ability to cross the placenta as well as the glycosylation pattern. The interaction with endothelial cells in the fetus may also be of importance (Yougbaré et al. 2015).

Most alloantibodies to platelets and red cells are IgG1, sometimes IgG3 or a mixture of both (Mawas et al. 1997). Antibodies may bind complement on the opsonized target cells. However, the four subclasses of IgG differ both in the ability to cross the placenta as well as of targeted cell destruction. IgG3 has very strong effector functions, but rather poorly transports across the placenta. It has recently been observed that placental transport of this subclass strongly depends on a single-amino-acid polymorphism at position 435; it was found that some allotypes of IgG3 resemble those of IgG1 (Einarsdottir et al. 2014).

IgG’s activity in adherence, phagocytosis and lysis of IgG-coated cells by IgG Fc receptors on macrophages can be modulated by glycosylation. Kapur et al. (2014) reported that platelet alloantibodies in pregnant women lack IgG1-Fc fucosylation. Antibodies with a low amount of fucose displayed higher binding affinity to FcγRIIIa and FcγRIIIb, but not to FcγRIIa, as compared to antibodies with a high amount of Fc fucose. The authors also confirmed that a lowered anti-HPA-1a Fc fucosylation correlates with decreased neonatal platelet counts and increased disease severity in FNAIT patients. Interestingly, in contrast to the FNAIT patients, no changes in core fucosylation were observed for anti-HLA antibodies in refractory thrombocytopenia (post platelet transfusion) which indicates that the level of fucosylation may be antigen dependent and/or related to the immune milieu defined by pregnancy.

It was also found that HPA-1 a alloantibodies are heterogeneous in their ability to interfere with fibrinogen binding to the GPIIbIIIa receptor which may contribute to pronounced bleeding in patients with alloimmune thrombocytopenia (Kroll et al. 2005). For FNAIT pathogenicity, it is also noteworthy that HPA-1a alloantibodies bind the β3 integrin not only on platelets, but also on the surface of vascular endothelial cells via the αVβ3 complex and have a direct effect on endothelial cell spreading and monolayer integrity (van Gils et al. 2009). This may contribute to the increased tendency for FNAIT children to bleed (van Gils et al. 2009). Endothelial cell damage may explain the difficulty in predicting adverse fetal hemorrhagic outcomes from platelet counts alone. Endothelial cell activation and subsequent damage may contribute to explaining FNAIT’s propensity for intraparenchymal ICH, as opposed to the intraventricular hemorrhage more commonly observed in prematurity and other conditions (Althaus et al. 2005; Leeksma et al. 1987).

It is still debatable whether the maternal anti-HPA-1a antibody level during pregnancy is a good predictive factor of disease severity. A correlation between antibody levels in the last trimester and severity of thrombocytopenia was reported by Williamson et al. (1998). Several authors confirmed this observation through measuring the antibody concentration by the monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens technique (Bertrand et al. 2011; Bertrand and Kaplan 2014; Bertrand et al. 2006; Killie et al. 2008). Antibody concentrations for identifying cases at risk of FNAIT varied from 3 to 28 IU/ml. The positive predictive value of antibody concentration is reported to be similar to the predictive value of obstetric history, which, however, cannot be used for analysis of the first pregnancy. It is suggested that antibody concentration is superior to obstetric history as predictive factor since it has a much higher negative predictive value (Bertrand et al. 2006; Killie et al. 2008). Nonetheless, it is also worthy to note that some studies did not confirm correlation between antibody concentration and thrombocytopenia of the newborn (Bessos et al. 2005; Ghevaert et al. 2007).

Influence of Other Factors on FNAIT Risk

A correlation has recently been reported between maternal ABO phenotype and ABO genotype with the severity of thrombocytopenia in the newborn; blood group O immunized women were at lower risk of having a child with severe FNAIT than blood group A women. 20 % of the former gave birth to children with severe FNAIT as compared to 47 % of the latter (Ahlen et al. 2012).

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in neonatal thrombocytopenia should also be considered. It is known that in general fetal/maternal mismatch of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is beneficial for fetal growth and survival (Rugeles and Shearer 2004). HLA antibodies are usually stimulated by pregnancy in healthy women, and appear to have no harmful effect if they are IgM, but it is speculated that FNAIT can occur due to IgG HLA class I antibodies. Anti-HLA antibodies are usually adsorbed rapidly onto the surfaces of fetal cells. It has been confirmed that they can cause complement-mediated platelet aggregation, and it cannot be excluded that they may exacerbate the clinical symptoms in FNAIT. However, the role of concurrent HLA alloantibodies in neonatal thrombocytopenia is still controversial (De Tar et al. 2002; Loewenthal et al. 2013; Salomon et al. 2011; Taaning 2000).

Li et al. (2013) observed that the effect of lipopolysaccharide and Poly I:C stimulation enhanced the immune response to β3 integrin, suggesting that bacterial and viral infections facilitate the risk of fetal disease.

Prevalence of FNAIT

Prospective Studies on Thrombocytopenia Due to Alloimmunization

Kamphuis et al. (2014) recently performed a metanalysis of prospective studies available on Medline, Embase and Cochrane database dedicated to FNAIT diagnosis in a general, non-selected newborn population with sufficient access to information on platelet count at birth, bleeding complications and treatment. In the group of six papers, which met the inclusion criteria, one was from Poland and included the largest group of newborns (26,275) (Uhrynowska et al. 2000). In total, Kamphuis’s analysis was based on data from 59,425 newborns and in 89 cases (0.15 %) severe thrombocytopenia was defined by a platelet count <50 × 109/L. Of these, FNAIT was diagnosed in 24 (27 %). In 6 (25 %), ICHs were reported, most likely of antenatal origin. The study confirms that FNAIT is one of the major causes of neonatal thrombocytopenia. Intracranial hemorrhage due to FNAIT occurred in 10 per 10,000 neonates, typically before birth.

Screening for HPA-1a as a Method for Identifying the Most Frequent and Severe FNAIT

The frequency and clinical presentation of FNAIT was also analyzed in several prospective studies where the screening procedure was similar as for RhD examination. They identified HPA-1a negative women as a risk group for the most frequent and most severe FNAIT. The largest study on FNAIT due to anti-HPA1a included >100,000 pregnancies and was performed in Norway (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2007). The prevalence of at-risk pregnant women with the HPA-1bb genotype was 2.1 % (1990 women) and 210 women (10.6 %) of these were immunized against HPA-1a. In 39 cases, anti-HPA 1a was first-time detected in a sample obtained approximately 6 weeks postpartum. Out of 161 HPA 1a-positive children, 55 had severe thrombocytopenia (<50 × 109/L) including two with ICH. This means that FNAIT occurred in about one in 2000 pregnancies. In Poland during 1999–2003, the HPA-1 phenotype was determined by ELISA in 8031 pregnant women, followed by anti-HPA-1a analysis in HPA-1bb women. In accordance with similar studies, FNAIT was diagnosed for one in 2000 fetuses and newborns (Maslanka et al. 2003).

The systematic review of prospective studies results for HPA-1a alloimmunisation in low risk pregnant women was done by Kamphuis et al. (2010). They summarized the data from 176,084 cases published in ten papers in the period 1985–2007, including two papers described above (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2007; Maslanka et al. 2003). The rates of HPA-1a negative women varied from 1.3–3.1 % of whom 9.7 % developed anti-HPA-1a antibodies of which 31 % had severe FNAIT.

Clinical Presentation of FNAIT

The clinical presentation of FNAIT varies from asymptomatic thrombocytopenia to a very severe, sometimes lethal ICH (Husebekk et al. 2008; Sachs 2013; Salomon and Rosenberg 2013; Tiller et al. 2014; Uhrynowska et al. 2000). Other consequences of FNAIT have also been described and a recent study has shown that the anti-HPA-1a antibodies or thrombocytopenia may be the reason for decreased birth weight and a too low weight for gestational age which confers a health risk later in life (Tiller et al. 2012b).

Various studies have demonstrated ICH, the most severe clinical symptom of FNAIT, in 10–26 % of mothers with anti-HPA-1a antibodies. Contrary to the other factors causing ICH, in FNAIT intraparenchymal hemorrhage in the temporal lobe is most frequently observed (Dale and Coleman 2002). Fatal outcomes are reported in one-third of cases and various neurodevelopmental consequences may occur in alive children (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2008; Mueller-Eckhardt et al. 1989; Spencer and Burrows 2001).

Clinical presentation data on FNAIT, including the frequency and severity of ICH, are based on the different ways of collecting data and conducting follow up (i.e., prospective, retrospective, observational). Prospective studies on NAIT in nonselected newborns with thrombocytopenia, as those summarized by Kamphuis et al. (2014) (see above), give the best possible incidence estimates of NAIT and NAIT-related ICH. When comparing these studies, it is clearly shown that ICH due to FNAIT in non-screened population is much higher (24/59,425) than that found in the group of women who were antenatally screened for FNAIT risk (HPA-1a determination and antibody detection in HPA-1a negatives) (7/176,084 cases). In all such programs, various antenatal and intrapartum treatment methods are introduced which had apparently reduced the mortality and morbidity associated with FNAIT.

We must also underline the role of observational retrospective study focused on children with FNAIT pregnancies. Such a multicenter study was performed by Tiller et al. (2013) on almost 600 FNAIT and was focused on ICH. The study found that the majority of bleeding occurred by the end of the second trimester and were in most cases devastating. This is at odds with other studies which have suggested that the onset of bleeding is in the third trimester (Spencer and Burrows 2001). Tiller et al. (2013) also found that most cases of ICH occurred in boys and that bleeding is often lethal if the fetus is male. They also found that bleeding often affects the first-born child (Tiller et al. 2013). High levels of maternal alloantibodies are reported as being predictors for low fetal platelet count (Killie et al. 2008). But there is no predictive factor for ICH. Even a low platelet count is not a good predictor. The most likely reason being that some anti-platelet antibodies cause not only platelet destruction but also effect brain endothelium (Kroll et al. 2005; van Gils et al. 2009).

In most FNAIT cases, the disease presents as petechiae, hematomas, melena, sometimes hemoptysis, retinal bleeding and hematuria (Mueller-Eckhardt et al. 1989; Sachs 2013). Platelet counts may continue to fall for some days after delivery. The duration of untreated thrombocytopenia differs from patient to patient; usually between several days or weeks and occasionally it may persist for longer periods (Peterson et al. 2013).

In ~50 % of babies born by mothers with anti-HPA-1a antibodies the platelet count is normal (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2007). However, it is very important to diagnose symptomless FNAIT since there is a disease risk in the next incompatible pregnancy. Such cases must be monitored for anti-HPA1a antibody levels during subsequent pregnancy. The antibody test should also be performed after delivery (~6 weeks) since most HPA-1a negative women who delivered HPA-1a positive babies are immunized at delivery (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2007; Uhrynowska et al. 2000).

Current Treatment Methods

Several peer reviewed papers on FNAIT management have been published, but there is still no international consensus on how to prevent FNAIT-related sequels (Kanhai et al. 2007; Murphy and Bussel 2007; Rayment et al. 2011; van den Akker and Oepkes 2008; van den Akker et al. 2007). Various strategies are employed when FNAIT is accidentally discovered in a neonate after delivery or when FNAIT is suspected because the woman had previously given birth to an affected child. For obvious reasons, there is no universally accepted strategy for women in their first pregnancy (primigravidae) with anti-HPA-1a antibodies detected within the screening program (Table 1).
Table 1

FNAIT current treatment methods


Clinical situation

Treatment strategy



FNAIT accidentally discovered in a neonate after delivery: postnatal treatment

Subsequent pregnancy must be treated according to strategy 2b or 2c

Depends on the platelet count and clinical symptoms

In case of very low platelet count with or without ICH, the newborn should immediately receive a platelet transfusion:

Bussel et al. (2010), Kanhai et al. (2007), Murphy and Bussel (2007), van den Akker et al. (2007)

 Compatible platelets from blood donor or maternal platelets (remove plasma which contain alloantibodies)

 If antigen negative platelets are not available, the newborn should be transfused with random buffy coat platelets

 IVIG may also be applied


FNAIT suspected based on patient’s history: the woman has previously given birth to an affected child


 Prenatal treatment of current and subsequent pregnancy:



Invasive strategy: FBS and intrauterine transfusion (IUT) of mother platelets once a week (not recommended in many countries)

Overton et al. (2002), van Kamp et al. (2005)



Combined strategy:

Bussel et al. (2010)

 Treatment of the mother with IVIG with or without steroids

 Diagnostic FBS to evaluate fetal platelet count, combined with preventive IUT with maternal platelets (not recommended in many countries)

 The mode of delivery depends on fetal platelet count



Non-invasive strategy:

Kamphuis and Oepkes (2011)

 Treatment of the mother with IVIG with or without steroids, without diagnostic FBS

 In some countries this line of treatment is followed by spontaneous delivery or by cesarean section a few weeks before term with compatible platelets available for the baby after delivery


FNAIT suspected based on detection of anti-HPA-1a antibodies within the screening program: women in first pregnancy (primigravidae), with no obstetric history


 Prenatal treatment of current and subsequent pregnancy:



Conservative management:

Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. (2007)

 No treatment during pregnancy

 Cesarean section a few weeks prior to term with compatible platelets to be transfused immediately in severely thrombocytopenic neonates



Combined strategy:


 Diagnostic FBS with preventive intrauterine transfusion of maternal platelets to evaluate fetal platelet count

 Treating mothers of thrombocytopaenic fetuses with IVIG with or without steroids

 The mode of delivery depends on fetal platelet count

Once FNAIT is diagnosed in the neonate, treatment will depend on the platelet count and clinical symptoms. In cases of very low platelet count, with or without ICH diagnosis, the newborn should immediately receive a transfusion of compatible platelets (Bussel et al. 2010; Kanhai et al. 2007; van den Akker et al. 2007). Maternal platelets may be used; however, the plasma, which contains alloantibodies should be removed. If antigen negative platelets are not available, the newborn should be transfused with random buffy coat platelets. The use of compatible platelets is generally preferred because they produce a higher increment and survive longer (Bussel et al. 2010; Kanhai et al. 2007; van den Akker et al. 2007).

Many neonatologists additionally administer intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) which is also applied in milder thrombocytopenia cases (Murphy and Bussel 2007).

Prophylactics prior to delivery is possible in those women who had previously given birth to a child with FNAIT or in a setting where risky pregnancies have been identified through a screening program. As most ICH bleeding in fetuses of women with anti-HPA-1a occurred during pregnancy, predominantly in the firstborn (Tiller et al. 2013), treating fetal thrombocytopenia is of crucial importance. The commonly used dose of weekly IVIG is 1 g/kg maternal weight. However, since IVIG is an expensive multi-donor human blood product with dose-related side effects, checks if lower doses are effective have been attempted. In a recently published paper, which summarized an uncompleted trial, it was suggested that pregnancies can be successfully treated with IVIG at 0.5 g/kg (Paridaans et al. 2015).

As opposed to Rh-disease, intrauterine platelet transfusions (IUTs) are not recommended as the first line treatment in FNAIT, mainly due to the short half-life of transfused platelets and high risk of fetal bleeding complications in repeated procedures. IUTs for therapeutic purposes, would involve a significant risk of pregnancy loss, boostering of HPA-1a-immunization and additional alloimmunisation, and should be limited to selected clinical situations. When diagnostic fetal blood sampling (FBS) is performed, transfusion of platelets is administered to prevent prolonged bleeding from the umbilical vein in thrombocytopenic fetuses. However, minimizing the number of fetal sampling procedures is commonly recommended, and in some countries these procedures have been abandoned altogether. The most common treatment regime of the expectant mother is IVIG, with or without steroids supported by data from the patient’s history. In some countries this line of treatment is followed by cesarean section 2–4 weeks before term with compatible platelets available for the baby after delivery.

In Poland, as in other countries, the therapeutic FNAIT algorithm has gradually evolved from being more invasive to mostly non-invasive. Initially, in the 1990s, FBS for assessing fetal platelet count was offered to all pregnant women with anti-platelet antibodies. Platelet transfusions with platelet concentrates obtained from maternal blood were performed to increase the safety of the procedure and to avoid further alloimmunization. Diagnostic FBS in experienced hands and in combination with immediate platelet transfusion did not, however, cause significant risk as compared to the standard procedure performed in otherwise healthy fetuses. Nevertheless, the procedure is now limited to cases that require measuring platelet levels in patients with anti-HPA-1a antibodies in first pregnancies. As mentioned above, fetal thrombocytopenia will affect only a small group and up to date laboratory data (presence of the HLA DRB3*01:01 antigen, level of antibodies) did not sufficiently inform on the fetal status. In mothers of thrombocytopenic fetuses and in all pregnant women with a history of a FNAIT affected child, IVIG is administered and continued until delivery. If the father is heterozygous regarding the HPA-1 antigen, the fetus genotype is examined by noninvasive detection of HPA-1a allele in fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma (Avent 2014).

Perspectives of Immunoprophylaxis

Human platelet antigens are expressed on fetal platelets as early as the 16th gestational week (Gruel et al. 1986) and anti-HPA-1a antibodies can be detected in the first pregnancy. Rates of alloimmunization during the first pregnancy are about 25 % (Killie et al. 2008). In a prospective study of antenatal screening for anti-HPA-1a antibodies, Turner et al. (2005) reported that only one in 25 women were in their first pregnancy upon immunization and in the study of Williamson et al. (1998), 8/33 immunized women were primigravidae. This means that FNAIT resembles hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn and immunization in many cases is related to delivery; the second child being at risk of the disease. This observation was the starting point for the project funded by EU (PROFNAIT, 2012–2018,, coordinated by the Norwegian company Prophylix Pharma AS ( which aims at developing an immunoprophylaxis for HPA-1a negative women who deliver an HPA-1a positive child. The prophylactic drug is based on a polyclonal antibody preparation that does not deviate too much from the current anti-D whose effect is well proven. In spite of efforts to develop anti-D prophylaxis based on engineered monoclonal antibodies, there is still no alternative to anti-D purified from immunized individuals. In the future, however, recombinant anti-HPA-1a can also be considered as prevention against HPA-1a alloimmunization; recombinant high-affinity HPA-1a antibody (B2G1Δnab) developed by Ghevaert et al. (2013) efficiently cleared antibody-sensitized platelets. Monoclonal antibodies examined by Tiller et al. (2012a) induced an antibody-mediated immune suppression against allogeneic platelets in mice as efficiently as polyclonal ones.

Another way to prevent alloimmunization towards the HPA-1a antigen is to induce cellular tolerance against it. This procedure is used therapeutically for adapting the immune system to external antigens or allergens—in allergy, asthma and autoimmune diseases (Cavkaytar et al. 2014). Identifying the major T-cell epitope associated with FNAIT and the availability of clonal HPA-1a-specific CD4+ T cells are important contributions in the development of such therapeutic strategies (Skogen et al. 2010).

Perspectives on New Treatment Methods

Several studies indicate novel treatment modalities (Bakchoul et al. 2013; Ghevaert et al. 2013; Mathiesen et al. 2013) most of which used animal models, although some are also human studies (Ghevaert et al. 2013). The principle is to administer a nondestructive IgG antibody sharing the specificity of the pathogenic antibody to the mother which has retained the ability to be transported across the placenta. Notably, at the molecular level, the IgG given must lack the ability to activate complement; it will not bind classical Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) that induce effector functions, whereas binding to FcRn must be preserved to allow the transplacental transport. By competing-out pathogenic anti-HPA-1a antibodies, these humanized monoclonal antibodies which are constructed in this way may be a novel treatment strategy to prevent anti-HPA-1a-mediated platelet destruction in FNAIT. One example is the human recombinant high-affinity HPA-1a antibody-specific scFv (B2) (Ghevaert et al. 2008, 2013). The B2 antibody is modified by changing the Fc portion which blocks the actual antibody from binding and therefore prevents, or at least ameliorates, fetal and neonatal thrombocytopenia in sensitized mothers who would otherwise be affected; the B2 antibody normally interacts with FcRn, allowing transplacental passage.

Bakchoul et al. (2013) conducted an extensive study of SZ21, a murine monoclonal antibody directed against platelet glycoprotein IIIa. This found that SZ21 F(ab’)2 fragments might be therapeutically effective for inhibiting or displacing maternal HPA-1a antibodies from the fetal platelet surface and thus prevent clearance from the circulation. Administration of these fragments not only inhibited the binding of HPA-1a antibodies to circulating human platelets which prevented their clearance, but also displaced the bound HPA-1a antibodies from the platelet surface. Bakchoul et al. (2013) presented further studies on SZ21. The antibody was modified by deglycosylation thereby removing complement activation and phagocytosis whilst in vivo transplacental transport of modified (NGM)-SZ21 was not impaired. When injected into pregnant mice, both native-SZ21 and NGM-SZ21 were transported equally into the fetal circulation where NGM-SZ21 prevented PLT destruction induced by maternal anti-HPA-1a antibodies. This suggests that also humanized, deglycosylated anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies may represent a novel treatment strategy for preventing anti-HPA-1a.

Another approach to antibody modification is to produce antibodies with a hinge region deletion (IgG3ΔHinge) (Mathiesen et al. 2013). IgG3ΔHinge is inactive in both complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity as measured in functional assays. Modified antibodies are efficiently delivered from the maternal to the fetal compartment in ex vivo placenta perfusions experiments.

Chen et al. (2010) demonstrated, using a mouse model, that FcRn is required for transporting all IgG isotypes to the fetus that includes both transport of pathogenic IgG, as well as human IVIG. They found that FNAIT in mice can be prevented by blocking FcRn with the anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody 1G3. This data suggests that FcRn can also be a potential target for therapy (Chen et al. 2010).

FNAIT in Poland as well as in Other Countries is Underdiagnosed

Many studies stress that FNAIT is highly underdiagnosed (Sachs 2013; Skogen et al. 2009, 2010; Tiller et al. 2009). One such study by Tiller et al. (2009) demonstrated that the disease is diagnosed in only around 15 % of cases in an unscreened population. Moreover, there are some severely thrombocytopenic newborns who do not have any petechiae, and this may be the reason why some FNAIT cases with ICH are not examined for maternal antibodies against platelets and thus remain undiagnosed.

Based on an incidence of one in 2000, the annual numbers of live births (400,000) and stillbirths (1500) in Poland, about 200 cases of FNAIT can be estimated annually. However, only less than 30 cases are diagnosed. Most cases (~90 %) are diagnosed after birth if petechia or ICH occurs in a newborn. Laboratory results on the mother and newborn verify the diagnosis of FNAIT. Hence, every year many FNAIT cases in escape proper diagnosis and treatment. A low diagnostic rate could also reflect an ignorance of the disease in smaller maternity hospitals. The Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine therefore initiated the project PREVFNAIT: “Prevention of alloimmune thrombocytopenia in fetuses and neonates (AIMPN) in Poland”. Testing of HPA-1a antigen in a large group of pregnant women (~30,000) is planned from different regions of Poland. More than 260 collection sites have been set up. Gynecologists were informed about the project via the Regional Consultant for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the general public by means of an extensive media promotional campaign. It is hoped that such public media exposure will raise the level of awareness about the FNAIT. HPA-1a typing is done by phenotyping (FACS analysis) or by genotyping. All HPA-1a negative (HPA-1bb) women are at risk of immunization and will be tested for anti-HPA-1a antibodies at 16–20, 24, 32 and 40 weeks of gestation along with ~6 weeks after delivery. They will be also tested for HLA immunization to determine anti-HLA class I involvement in FNAIT. Fathers will be tested for their “zygosity” in HPA-1. When the father is heterozygous for HPA-1a/b there is a 50 % chance that the fetus will be compatible with the mother (HPA-1bb) and immunization will not occur where preformed HPA-1a antibodies will not react with fetal platelets. In anti-HPA-1a women, non-invasive determination of fetal genotype will be undertaken through analyzing cell free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma to establish if the fetus is incompatible with the mother. Women with antibodies will be offered treatment at the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education.

All alloimmunised pregnant women with anti-HPA-1a antibodies and with fetal/neonatal thrombocytopaenia or ICH in previous pregnancies will be empirically treated with weekly IVIG 1 g/kg starting from 24 to 28 weeks of pregnancy. Decisions in choosing appropriate therapy for alloimmunised women in their first pregnancies will be made based on individual fetal platelet count. All those women will have offered fetal blood sampling between 24–28 weeks to determine the platelet count. Mothers of thrombocytopenic fetuses will be treated with an IVIG dose of 1 g/kg weekly. Fetal blood sampling will be available to all women in the third trimester (34–36 weeks) for assessing the efficacy of the therapy and for planning the delivery mode. Women with profound thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50 × 103/mm3), diagnosed close to term, will additionally receive steroids (prednisone 1 mg/kg once daily) and delivery will be by cesarean section.

The second project aim is to find biomarkers for predicting the risk of antibody development and thrombocytopenia in the fetus exposed to maternal alloantibodies. Blood samples will be collected at sites listed on the grant website ( and delivered to the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine in Warsaw for further studies no later than 7 days after collection.

Similarity of FNAIT and HDN: Rationale for Implementing a Screening Program

HDN due to the feto-maternal incompatibility in the D antigen of RhD system has been effectively limited by introduction of immunoprophylaxis. This can be regarded as a major medical achievement in this field and has consequently saved many lives (Reali 2007). Table 2 compares HDN and FNAIT characteristics and strategies used for prevention and treatment.
Table 2

Characteristics of HDN and FNAIT; strategies for prevention and treatment





Alloantibodies to erythrocyte antigens

Alloantibodies to platelet antigens

Clinical symptoms

Hemolytic disease

Most severe: hydrops fetalis

Petechiae, hematomas, melena, hemoptysis, retinal bleeding or hematuria

Most severe: ICH in fetus or newborn


>95 % cases during delivery; HDN risk in the next pregnancy

75 % of cases during delivery; 25 % of cases during pregnancy

Most frequent and most severe: others

Anti-D; risk in RhD negative women (15 % in Caucasian population)

Anti-Rhc; E; K; others

Anti-HPA-1a; risk in HPA-1a negative women (2 % in Caucasian population)

Anti-HPA-5a; other HPAs

Antigen characteristics

Rh proteins only on erythrocytes

HPA-1a present on integrin β3 on platelets and vascular endothelial cells

HLA restriction


HLA DRB3*01:01


1/1000–2000 (in the era of immunoprophylaxis)


Screening methods

RhD phenotyping in all pregnant women; anti-RhD examination 3× during pregnancy plus antibodies to other RBC antigens tested 2× during pregnancya

Not performed

Doppler USG

Effective in detecting fetal anemia; therapeutic intervention can prevent hydrops fetalis

ICH can be detected but therapeutic intervention which minimize its effect are limited


Effective; standardized

Effective; individualized


Available for anti-D; not available for others

Under development for HPA-1a

HDFN hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

aTotal number of tests in Poland 400,000 pregnancies × 5 = 2,000,000

Immunoprophylaxis for FNAIT prevention is still unavailable but its development is ongoing (Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2012; Tiller et al. 2012a). Some studies have confirmed that a routine screening program for identifying HPA1-1a negative women is effective for preventing FNAIT since the monitoring of antibody production and USG examination enable treatment for women at risk of fetal disease to be implemented. Many cases of severe neurological complications or intrauterine fetal deaths due to FNAIT may be thus prevented by early diagnosis. The analysis performed by Killie et al. (2007) confirms that such a program is cost effective. Implementation a screening program is currently under debate (Husebekk et al. 2009; Kjeldsen-Kragh et al. 2008; Skogen et al. 2010). Skogen et al. (2010) discuss this issue in relation to the revised WHO screening criteria based on the newly acquired knowledge and conclude that such screening programs should be implemented.



This paper was supported by the Polish-Norwegian Research Program conducted by The National Centre for Research and Development within the framework of the Norwegian Financial Mechanism for years 2009–2014; Project Agreement No. Pol-Nor/203111/69/2013.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The PREVFNAIT Grant was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.


  1. Ahlen MT, Husebekk A, Killie MK (2009) T-cell responses associated with neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: isolation of HPA-1a-specific, HLA-DRB3*0101-restricted CD4+ T cells. Blood 113:3838–3844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlen MT, Husebekk A, Killie MK et al (2012) The development of severe neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia due to anti-HPA-1a antibodies is correlated to maternal ABO genotypes. Clin Dev Immunol 2012:156867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Althaus J, Weir EG, Askin F et al (2005) Chronic villitis in untreated neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an etiology for severe early intrauterine growth restriction and the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1100–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Avent ND (2014) Prenatal testing for hemolytic disease of the newborn and fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia—current status. Expert Rev Hematol 7:741–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakchoul T, Greinacher A, Sachs UJ et al (2013) Inhibition of HPA-1a alloantibody-mediated platelet destruction by a deglycosylated anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibody in mice: toward targeted treatment of fetal-alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Blood 122:321–327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand G, Kaplan C (2014) How do we treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia? Transfusion 54:1698–1703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand G, Martageix C, Jallu V et al (2006) Predictive value of sequential maternal anti-HPA-1a antibody concentrations for the severity of fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 4:628–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertrand G, Drame M, Martageix C et al (2011) Prediction of the fetal status in noninvasive management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Blood 117:3209–3213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bessos H, Turner M, Urbaniak SJ (2005) Is there a relationship between anti-HPA-1a concentration and severity of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia? Immunohematology 21:102–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bussel JB, Berkowitz RL, Hung C et al (2010) Intracranial hemorrhage in alloimmune thrombocytopenia: stratified management to prevent recurrence in the subsequent affected fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(135):e1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavkaytar O, Akdis CA, Akdis M (2014) Modulation of immune responses by immunotherapy in allergic diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol 17:30–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen P, Li C, Lang S et al (2010) Animal model of fetal and neonatal immune thrombocytopenia: role of neonatal Fc receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy. Blood 116:3660–3668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dale ST, Coleman LT (2002) Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: antenatal and postnatal imaging findings in the pediatric brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1457–1465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Tar MW, Klohe E, Grosset A et al (2002) Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia with HLA alloimmunization: case report with immunohematologic and placental findings. Pediatr Dev Pathol 5:200–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Einarsdottir H, Ji Y, Visser R et al (2014) H435-containing immunoglobulin G3 allotypes are transported efficiently across the human placenta: implications for alloantibody-mediated diseases of the newborn. Transfusion 54:665–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghevaert C, Campbell K, Stafford P et al (2007) HPA-1a antibody potency and bioactivity do not predict severity of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 47:1296–1305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghevaert C, Wilcox DA, Fang J et al (2008) Developing recombinant HPA-1a-specific antibodies with abrogated Fc gamma receptor binding for the treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. J Clin Invest 118:2929–2938PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghevaert C, Herbert N, Hawkins L et al (2013) Recombinant HPA-1a antibody therapy for treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: proof of principle in human volunteers. Blood 122:313–320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruel Y, Boizard B, Daffos F et al (1986) Determination of platelet antigens and glycoproteins in the human-fetus. Blood 68:488–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedrick SM, Engel I, McElligott DL et al (1988) Selection of amino-acid sequences in the beta chain of the T-cell antigen receptor. Science 239:1541–1544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Husebekk A, Mk K, Stuge T et al (2008) The knowledge of the pathophysiology of fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia is of importance to prevent immunization and to handle the immunized pregnancies in order to prevent hemorrhage. Vox Sang 95:203Google Scholar
  22. Husebekk A, Killie MK, Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al (2009) Is it time to implement HPA-1 screening in pregnancy? Curr Opin Hematol 16:497–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson DJ, Murphy MF, Soothill PW et al (2005) Reactivity of T cells from women with antibodies to the human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a to peptides encompassing the HPA-1 polymorphism. Clin Exp Immunol 142:92–102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamphuis MM, Oepkes D (2011) Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: prenatal interventions. Prenat Diagn 31:712–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamphuis MM, Paridaans N, Porcelijn L et al (2010) Screening in pregnancy for fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: systematic review. BJOG 117:1335–1343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kamphuis MM, Paridaans NP, Porcelijn L et al (2014) Incidence and consequences of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review. Pediatrics 133:715–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kanhai HH, Porcelijn L, Engelfriet CP et al (2007) Management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Vox Sang 93:370–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kapur R, Kustiawan I, Vestrheim A et al (2014) A prominent lack of IgG1-Fc fucosylation of platelet alloantibodies in pregnancy. Blood 123:471–480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Killie MK, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Husebekk A et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. BJOG 114:588–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Killie MK, Husebekk A, Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al (2008) A prospective study of maternal anti-HPA1a antibody level as a potential predictor for alloimmune thrombocytopenia in the newborn. Haematologica 93:870–877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Killie MK, Tomter G et al (2007) A screening and intervention program aimed to reduce mortality and serious morbidity associated with severe neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Blood 110:833–839CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Husebekk A, Killie MK et al (2008) Is it time to include screening for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in the general antenatal health care programme? Transfus Apher Sci 38:183–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Ni H, Skogen B (2012) Towards a prophylactic treatment of HPA-related foetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Curr Opin Hematol 19:469–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kroll H, Penke G, Santoso S (2005) Functional heterogeneity of alloantibodies against the human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a. Thromb Haemost 94:1224–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumpel BM (2012) Pregnancy immunology and maternal alloimmune responses. Vox Sang 103:7Google Scholar
  36. Kumpel BM, Manoussaka MS (2012) Placental immunology and maternal alloimmune responses. Vox Sang 102:2–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumpel BM, Sibley K, Jackson DJ et al (2008) Ultrastructural localization of glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa, beta 3 integrin) on placental syncytiotrophoblast microvilli: implications for platelet alloimmunization during pregnancy. Transfusion 48:2077–2086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuwana M, Okazaki Y, Kaburaki J et al (2002) Spleen is a primary site for activation of platelet-reactive T and B cells in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. J Immunol 168:3675–3682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. L’Abbe D, Tremblay L, Filion M et al (1992) Alloimmunization to platelet antigen HPA-1a (Pl(A1)) is strongly associated with both HlA-DRB3*0101 and HlA-DQB1*0201. Hum Immunol 34:107–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Leach JL, Sedmak DD, Osborne JM et al (1996) Isolation from human placenta of the IgG transporter, FcRn, and localization to the syncytiotrophoblast—implications for maternal–fetal antibody transport. J Immunol 157:3317–3322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Leeksma OC, Giltay JC, Zandbergenspaargaren J et al (1987) The platelet alloantigen Zwa or Plal is expressed by cultured endothelial-cells. Br J Haematol 66:369–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Li C, Chen P, Vadasz B et al (2013) Co-stimulation with LPS or Poly I: C markedly enhances the anti-platelet immune response and severity of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 110:1250–1258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Loewenthal R, Rosenberg N, Kalt R et al (2013) Compound heterozygosity of HLA-DRB3*01:01 and HLA-DRB4*01:01 as a potential predictor of fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 53:344–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Maslanka K, Yassai M, Gorski J (1996) Molecular identification of T cells that respond in a primary bulk culture to a peptide derived from a platelet glycoprotein implicated in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. J Clin Invest 98:1802–1808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Maslanka K, Guz K, Zupanska B (2003) Antenatal screening of unselected pregnant women for HPA-1a antigen, antibody and alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Vox Sang 85:326–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mathiesen L, Nielsen LK, Andersen JT et al (2013) Maternofetal transplacental transport of recombinant IgG antibodies lacking effector functions. Blood 122:1174–1181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mawas F, Wiener E, Williamson LM et al (1997) Immunoglobulin G subclasses of anti-human platelet antigen 1a in maternal sera: relation to the severity of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Eur J Haematol 59:287–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mueller-Eckhardt C, Kiefel V, Grubert A et al (1989) 348 cases of suspected neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Lancet 1:363–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy MF, Bussel JB (2007) Advances in the management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 136:366–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Newman PJ, Derbes RS, Aster RH (1989) The human-platelet alloantigens, Pla1 and Pla2, are associated with a leucine-33 proline-33 amino-acid polymorphism in membrane glycoprotein III, and are distinguishable by DNA typing. J Clin Invest 83:1778–1781CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Overton TG, Duncan KR, Jolly M et al (2002) Serial aggressive platelet transfusion for fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: platelet dynamics and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol 186:826–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paridaans NP, Kamphuis MM, Taune Wikman AD et al (2015) Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent fetal intracranial hemorrhage in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial. Fetal Diagn Ther 38:147–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Parry CS, Gorski J, Stern LJ (2007) Crystallographic structure of the human leukocyte antigen DRA DR133*0101: models of a directional alloimmune response and autoimmunity. J Mol Biol 371:435–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Peterson JA, McFarland JG, Curtis BR et al (2013) Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Br J Haematol 161:3–14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Rayment R, Kooij TW, Zhang W et al (2009) Evidence for the specificity for platelet HPA-1a alloepitope and the presenting HLA-DR52a of diverse antigen-specific helper T cell clones from alloimmunized mothers. J Immunol 183:677–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rayment R, Brunskill SJ, Soothill PW et al (2011) Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD004226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Reali G (2007) Forty years of anti-D immunoprophylaxis. Blood Transfus 5:3–6PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Rugeles MT, Shearer GM (2004) Alloantigen recognition in utero: dual advantage for the fetus? Trends Immunol 25:348–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sachs UJ (2013) Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 131(Suppl 1):S42–S46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Salomon O, Rosenberg N (2013) Predicting risk severity and response of fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 162:304–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Salomon O, Loewenthal R, Kalt R et al (2011) HLADRB3*0101 combined with DRB4*0101 are potential predictor of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) development. Blood 118:967Google Scholar
  62. Skogen B, Husebekk A, Killie MK et al (2009) Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia is not what it was a lesson learned from a large prospective screening and intervention program. Scand J Immunol 70:531–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Skogen B, Killie MK, Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al (2010) Reconsidering fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia with a focus on screening and prevention. Expert Rev Hematol 3:559–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith CH, Nelson DM, King BF et al (1977) Characterization of a microvillous membrane preparation from human placental syncytiotrophoblast—morphologic, biochemical, and physiologic study. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol 128:190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spencer JA, Burrows RF (2001) Feto-maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a literature review and statistical analysis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:45–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Taaning E (2000) HLA antibodies and fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: myth or meaningful? Transfus Med Rev 14:275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Tiller H, Killie MK, Skogen B et al (2009) Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in Norway: poor detection rate with nonscreening versus a general screening programme. BJOG 116:594–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Tiller H, Killie MK, Chen P et al (2012a) Toward a prophylaxis against fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: induction of antibody-mediated immune suppression and prevention of severe clinical complications in a murine model. Transfusion 52:1446–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Tiller H, Killie MK, Husebekk A et al (2012b) Platelet antibodies and fetal growth: maternal antibodies against fetal platelet antigen 1a are strongly associated with reduced birthweight in boys. Acta Obstetricia Gynecol Scand 91:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tiller H, Kamphuis MM, Flodmark O et al (2013) Fetal intracranial haemorrhages caused by fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an observational cohort study of 43 cases from an international multicentre registry. BMJ Open. pii: e002490Google Scholar
  71. Tiller H, Killie MK, Husebekk A et al (2014) The natural course of HPA-1a-immunized subsequent pregnancies and clinical outcome of neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:S89–S89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turner ML, Bessos H, Fagge T et al (2005) Prospective epidemiologic study of the outcome and cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening to detect neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia due to anti-HPA-1a. Transfusion 45:1945–1956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Uhrynowska M, Maślanka K, Żupańska B (1997) Neonatal thrombocytopenia:incidence, serological and clinical observations. Am J Perinatol 14:415–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Uhrynowska M, Niznikowska-Marks M, Zupanska B (2000) Neonatal and maternal thrombocytopenia: incidence and immune background. Eur J Haematol 64:42–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. van den Akker ES, Oepkes D (2008) Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22:3–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. van den Akker ES, Oepkes D, Lopriore E et al (2007) Noninvasive antenatal management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: safe and effective. BJOG 114:469–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. van Gils JM, Stutterheim J, van Duijn TJ et al (2009) HPA-1a alloantibodies reduce endothelial cell spreading and monolayer integrity. Mol Immunol 46:406–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. van Kamp IL, Klumper F, Oepkes D et al (2005) Complications of intrauterine intravascular transfusion for fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol 192:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Warning JC, McCracken SA, Morris JM (2011) A balancing act: mechanisms by which the fetus avoids rejection by the maternal immune system. Reproduction 141:715–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Williamson LM, Hackett G, Rennie J et al (1998) The natural history of fetomaternal alloimmunization to the platelet-specific antigen HPA-1a (P1(A1), Zw(a)) as determined by antenatal screening. Blood 92:2280–2287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wu SH, Maslanka K, Gorski J (1997) An integrin polymorphism that defines reactivity with alloantibodies generates an anchor for MHC class II peptide binding—a model for unidirectional alloimmune responses. J Immunol 158:3221–3226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Yougbaré I, Lang S, Yang H et al (2015) Maternal anti-platelet β3 integrins impair angiogenesis and cause intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Invest 125:1545–1556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Immunohematology and Immunology of Transfusion MedicineInstitute of Hematology and Transfusion MedicineWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Medical BiologyUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
  3. 3.2nd Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical Centre of Postgraduate EducationWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations