Optimizing the European Regulatory Framework for Sustainable Bacteriophage Therapy in Human Medicine
- 835 Downloads
For practitioners at hospitals seeking to use natural (not genetically modified, as appearing in nature) bacteriophages for treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections (bacteriophage therapy), Europe’s current regulatory framework for medicinal products hinders more than it facilitates. Although many experts consider bacteriophage therapy to be a promising complementary (or alternative) treatment to antibiotic therapy, no bacteriophage-specific framework for documentation exists to date. Decades worth of historical clinical data on bacteriophage therapy (from Eastern Europe, particularly Poland, and the former Soviet republics, particularly Georgia and Russia, as well as from today’s 27 EU member states and the US) have not been taken into account by European regulators because these data have not been validated under current Western regulatory standards. Consequently, applicants carrying out standard clinical trials on bacteriophages in Europe are obliged to initiate clinical work from scratch. This paper argues for a reduced documentation threshold for Phase 1 clinical trials of bacteriophages and maintains that bacteriophages should not be categorized as classical medicinal products for at least two reasons: (1) such a categorization is scientifically inappropriate for this specific therapy and (2) such a categorization limits the marketing authorization process to industry, the only stakeholder with sufficient financial resources to prepare a complete dossier for the competent authorities. This paper reflects on the current regulatory framework for medicines in Europe and assesses possible regulatory pathways for the (re-)introduction of bacteriophage therapy in a way that maintains its effectiveness and safety as well as its inherent characteristics of sustainability and in situ self-amplification and limitation.
KeywordsBacteriophage Therapy Human European Regulatory Legal
The authors would like to thank Professor Carl Ceulemans from the Military Higher Institute of Defence (Chair of Philosophy, Faculty of Social and Military Sciences, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium) for his honest, coherent and beneficial interactions concerning the re-introduction of phage therapy in routine clinical settings.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.
- Bruynoghe R, Maisin J (1921) Essais de thérapeutique au moyen du bacteriophage du Staphyloccoque [therapeutic trials using bacteriophage of Staphylococcus]. CR Soc Biol 85:1120–1121Google Scholar
- Caplin J (2009) Bacteriophage therapy: old treatment, new focus? Microbiologist 10:20–23Google Scholar
- Krylov V (2011) Use of live phages for therapy on a background of co-evolution on bacteria and phages. Int Res J Microbiol 2:315–332Google Scholar
- Rhoads D, Wolcott R, Kuskowski MA et al (2009) Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety trial. J Wound Care 18(237–238):240–243Google Scholar
- Shorthose S, Bird & Bird LLP (2010) Guide to EU pharmaceutical regulatory law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
- Trouet C, Gobert M et al (2007) Investigational medicinal products. In: Clinical trials in Belgium: the Belgian implementation of the European Clinical Trials Directives. An operational guidance, 2nd edn. Intersentia, AntwerpGoogle Scholar