Advertisement

Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 359–381 | Cite as

New Approach to Proportional Analysis of Palladio’s Designs in Book II with Particular Attention to Loggias

  • Olha Tikhonova
Research
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

The proportions that inform the plans in Palladio’s Quattro Libri have been the subject of studies for several decades and remained unsolved. Since Wittkower proposed his theory of harmonic proportions in Palladio’s architectural design, many researchers supported this idea and started to work around it. However, this theory was found invalid for numerous designs in the Quattro Libri, casting it into doubt. In particular, the harmonic theory does not explain the irrational ratio √2:1, which was among Palladio’s preferred. This research presents a new methodology for analysing the plans presented in Palladio’s Book II to define the proportions of rooms with indicated dimensions. Moreover, loggias and rooms with a ratio whose value is greater than 2 are also considered. The results demonstrated here prove that Palladio’s ratios were derived from a geometric source, namely simple squares and their parts.

Keywords

Andrea Palladio Quattro Libri Proportion theory Loggias 

Notes

Acknowledgements

All figures, tables and charts are by the author. Thanks to Professor Michel Toussaint who encouraged me to do this work, saying that my idea of research is interesting and worthwhile developing into a paper. Kim Williams, the director of the conference series “Nexus: Relationships Between Architecture and Mathematics” and editor-in- chief of the Nexus Network Journal, and Stephen R. Wassell, the guest editor of the “Palladio Century” issue of the Nexus Network Journal, are thanked for critically reading the manuscript and suggesting substantial improvements.

References

  1. Alberti, Leon Battista. 1988. On the Art of Building in Ten Books. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benrós, Deborah and José Pinto Duarte. 2012. A Generic Shape Grammar for the Palladian Villa, Malagueira House, and Prairie House. Design Computing and Cognition’12 12(18): 321–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_18.Google Scholar
  3. Benrós, Deborah, José Pinto Duarte and Sean Hanna. 2012. A New Palladian Shape Grammar. International Journal of Architectural Computing 10(4): 521–540.  https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.10.4.521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benrós, Deborah and José Pinto Duarte. 2012. A Generic Shape Grammar for the Palladian Villa, Malagueira House, and Prairie House. Design Computing and Cognition’12 12(18): 321–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_18.
  5. Cohen, Matthew. 2008. How Much Brunelleschi?? A Late Medieval Proportional System in the Basilica of San Lorenzo in Florence. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 67(1): 18–57.  https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2008.67.1.18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fletcher, Rachel. 2000. Golden Proportions in a Great House: Palladio’s Villa Emo. Pp. 73-85 in Nexus III: Architecture and Mathematics, Kim Williams, ed. Pisa: Pacini Editore. Rpt. in Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future, vol. II, pp. 121-138, Kim Williams and Michael J. Ostwald, eds. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00143-2_8.
  7. Hersey, George and Richard Freedman. 1992. Possible Palladian Villas: (Plus a Few Instructively Impossible Ones). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Howard, Deborah and Malcolm Longair. 1982. Harmonic Proportion and Palladio’s “Quattro Libri”. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 41(2): 116–143.  https://doi.org/10.2307/989675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klerk, Rui de. 2017. A Quinta das Torres - Interpretacao e Analise Geometrica da sua Arquitetura, in Pires, A. G. (ed.) A villa renascentista : arquitetura, jardins, e paisagem : visão pluridisciplinar dos espaços e vivências da quinta de recreio de conceção renacentista. Lisbon: Caleidoscópio: 233–246.Google Scholar
  10. March, Lionel. 1998. Architectonics of Humanism: Essays on Number in Architecture. Chichester: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  11. March, Lionel. 2001. Palladio’s Villa Emo: The Golden Proportion Hypothesis Rebutted. Nexus Network Journal 3(2): 85–104.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mattei, Francesca. 2014. “The Changing Concept of Proportions”: Architecture, Mathematic and Geometry from Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism to the Techno-Organic Movement. The Journal of Art Theory and Practice 18(1): 123–144.  https://doi.org/10.15597/17381789201418123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitrović, Branko. 1990. Palladio’s Theory of Proportions and the Second Book of the “Quattro Libri dell’Architettura”. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 49(3): 279–292.  https://doi.org/10.2307/990519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitrović, Branko. 2001. A Palladian Palinode: Reassessing Rudolf Wittkower’s Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. Architectura 31: 113–131.Google Scholar
  15. Padovan, Richard. 1999. Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture. London ; New York: E & FN Spon.Google Scholar
  16. Palladio, Andrea. 1997. The Four Books on Architecture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Serlio, Sebastiano. 1600. Tutte l’opere d’architettura et prrospetiva [i.e. prospettiva] di Sebastiano Serlio Bolognese. Venice: Presso gli Heredi di Francesco de’Franceschi.Google Scholar
  18. Stiny, George and Mitchell, William J. 1978a. The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5(1): 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b050189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stiny, George and Mitchell, William J. 1978b. Counting Palladian Plans. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5(2): 189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b050189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tavernor, Robert. 1991. Palladio and Palladianism. New York, N.Y: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  21. Tikhonova, Olha. 2018. Architectural Morphology of Fortified Palace in Pidhirtsi, Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering, ed. H. S. Martin, 40-47. Singapore: GSTF.  https://doi.org/10.5176/2301-394x_ace18.75.
  22. Vitruvius, Pollio. 1960. Vitruvius : The Ten Books on Architecture. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Wilinski, Stanislaw. 1969. ‘La serliana’. Bollettino del Centro Internazionale di Studi di Architettura Andrea Palladio/Centro Internazionale di Studi di Architettura Andrea Palladio 7: 399–429.Google Scholar
  24. Wittkower, Rudolf. 1998. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. 5th ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Academy Editions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de ArquiteturaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations