Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 351–372 | Cite as

Measuring Lisbon Patterns: Baixa from 1650 to 2010

  • Teresa Marat-Mendes
  • Mafalda Teixeira de Sampayo
  • David M. S. Rodrigues
Research

Abstract

The present study, based on a comparative analysis of several plans for Lisbon’s Baixa district, with an emphasis on that area’s public space, contributes to an understanding of the urban design process and presents a fresh perspective on dealing with historical data by conducting a posteriori analysis using mathematical tools to uncover relations in the historical data. The nine plans used were quantified and evaluated in a comparative manner. While CAD was used to quantify the urban morphology of the different plans, comparative tables make it possible to register the data, which was further evaluated through two interrelated processes: mathematical analysis and the urban analysis. The results show the existence of power law relations for the areas of each of the city’s different elements (e.g., blocks, churches, largos and adros). We discuss how this contributes to the understanding of the plans’ elements.

Keywords

urban design design analysis design theory CAD computer technology morphology patterns proportion measurement mappings geometry analysis fractals graph theory statistical analysis 

References

  1. Batty M. (2007) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedikt M.L. (1979) To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, P. and D. Volchenkov. 2008a. Exploring Urban Environments By Random Walks. In vol. 1021, pp. 183-203 of Stochastic and Quantum Dynamics of Biomolecular Systems: Proceedings of the 5th Jagna International Workshop. DOI 10.1063/1.2956796.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard P., Volchenkov D. (2008b) Mathematical Analysis of Urban Spatial Networks. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Carmona M., Tiesdell S., Heath T., Oc T. (2010) Public Places – Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design 2nd ed. Architectural Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Castex J., Depaule J.C., Panerai P. (1977) Formes urbaines: de l’ilot a la barre. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Castex J., Panerai P. (1971) Notes sur la structure de l’espace urbain. Architecture d’Aujourd’hui 153: 30–33Google Scholar
  8. Choay F., Merlin P. (1988) Dictionnaire de l’urbanisme et de l’aménagement. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Conzen M.R.G. (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dias, F. D. S. 2000. Tipologia de espaços urbanos: análise toponímica. Pp. 301-310 in III Jornadas sobre toponímia de Lisboa, António Trindade, Paula Machado, Teresa Sancha Pereira, coord. Lisbon: CM.Google Scholar
  11. Euler L. (1741) Solvtio Problematis Ad Geometriam Sitvs Pertinentis (E53). Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 8: 128–140 Rpt. Leonhard Euler Opera Omnia, series 1, vol. 7, pp. 1-10Google Scholar
  12. França J.-A. (1987) Lisboa Pombalina e o Iluminismo. Lisbon, Bertrand EditoraGoogle Scholar
  13. Heitor, T. K. M., J. Muchagato, and A. Tostões. 1999. Breaking of the medieval space. The Emergence of a New City of Enlightenment. In: Second International Space Syntax Symposium, vol. II. Brasilia.Google Scholar
  14. Hillier B., Hanson J. (1989) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Krier L. (1978). Fourth Lesson: Analysis and project of traditional urban block. Lotus International 19 (L’isolato urbano | The urban block): 42-54.Google Scholar
  16. Krier L. (1979) Communities versus zones: A plan for Sodermalm in Stockholm. Lotus International 36: 22–24Google Scholar
  17. Krier L. (1999) Arquitectura : escolha ou fatalidade. Lisbon, Estar EditoraGoogle Scholar
  18. Krier R. (1979) Typological and Morphological elements of the concept of urban space. Architectural Design 49: 1–17Google Scholar
  19. Kropf K. (1998) Facing up to evolution. Urban Morphology 2: 45–47Google Scholar
  20. Krüger M. (1998) A Sintaxe da Cidade de Lisboa. Contribuições Para o Desenvolvimento da Cidade. Coimbra, FCTUCGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopes dos Santos, V. M. V. 1994. O sistema construtivo pombalino em Lisboa em edifícios urbanos agrupados de habitação colectiva. Estudo de um legado humanista da segunda metade do Século XVIII. Contributos para uma abordagem na área da recuperação e restauro arquitectónico do património construído. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  22. Lynch K. (1981) A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch K. (1996) The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Marat-Mendes, T. 2002. The Sustainable Urban Form: A comparative study in Lisbon, Edinburgh and Barcelona. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  25. Miller J.G. (1978) Living systems. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, COGoogle Scholar
  26. Monteiro, C. 2010. Escrever Direito por linhas rectas: Legislação e planeamento urbanístico na Baixa de Lisboa (1755-1833). Lisbon: AAFDL.Google Scholar
  27. Moreira, M. P. P. C. 1993. Conservation of an historic urban centre a study of downtown pombaline Lisbon. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, University of York.Google Scholar
  28. Morris A.E.J. (1994) History of Urban Form before the Industrial Revolution. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  29. Moudon A.V. (1986) Built for Change. Neighbourhood Architecture in San Francisco. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Moudon A.V. (1997) Urban Morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology 1: 3–10Google Scholar
  31. Mullin J.R. (1992) The reconstruction of Lisbon following the earthquake of 1755: a study of despotic planning. Planning Perspectives 7(7): 157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muratori S. (1959) Studi per una operante stiria urbana di Venezia. Instituto Poligraphico dello Stato, RomeGoogle Scholar
  33. Papageorgiou A. (1971) Continuity and Change. Pall Mall Press, Preservation in City Planning. LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Pereira L.V. (1983) A forma urbana no planeamento físico. Lisbon, Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia CivilGoogle Scholar
  35. Rapoport A. (1990) History and Precedents in Environmental Design. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Rossi A. (1983) The Architecture of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  37. Sampayo, M. and Rodrigues, D. 2009. The Five Plans for the Aftermath of 1755 Lisbon Earthquake: The Interplay of Urban Public Spaces. ISUF Conference 2009 “Urban morphology and urban transformation”. Guangzhou, China.Google Scholar
  38. Sampayo, M. G. T. D. 2007. Theoretical fundamentals in the construction of the portuguese public squares of the 18th Century. In: ISUF (ed.) Fourteenth International Seminar on Urban Form. Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
  39. Samuels, I. 1993. Working in the park: changes in the form of employment locations. Pp. 113-121 in Making Better Places: Urban Design Now, R. Hayward and S. McGlynn, eds. Oxford: Butterwoth Architecture.Google Scholar
  40. Samuels I. (1997) From description to prescription: reflections on the use of a morphological approach in urban design guidance. Urban Design International 2: 81–91MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Samuels I. (1999) A typomorphological approach to design: the plan for St Gervais. Urban Design International 4: 129–141Google Scholar
  42. Santos, M. H. R. D. 2009. Os seis planos da reconstrução. In: Jornadas sobre A CIDADE POMBALINA: História, Urbanismo e Arquitectura Os 250 Anos do Plano da Baixa, 2008 Lisboa. Lisbon: Grupo ‘Amigos de Lisboa’ and Fundação das Casas de Fronteira e Alorna.Google Scholar
  43. Savage, V. and G. West. 2006. Biological Scaling and Physiological Time. Biomedical Applications. Pp. 141-164 in Complex Systems Science in Biomedicine, T. Deisboeck and J. Yasha Kresh, eds. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Siksna, A. 1990. A comparative study of Block size and form (in selected New Towns in the history of western civilisation and in selected North American and Australian City Centres). Ph.D. thesis, The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  45. Solá-Morales, M. de. 1978. Towards a Definition. Lotus International 19 (L’isolato urbano | The urban block): 28-36.Google Scholar
  46. Tostões, A. and W. ROSSA, eds. 2008. Lisboa 1758 : O plano da baixa hoje. Exhibition catalogue. (Eng. trans. Lisboa 1758 - The Baixa Plan Today). Lisbon: Câmara Municipal de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  47. Tudela J. (1977) As praças e largos de Lisboa: esboço para uma sistematização caracterológica. Lisbon, Câmara Municipal LisboaGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitehand J. (1981) The urban landscape: Historical Development and Management. Papers by M. R. G. Conzen. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitehand, J. 1990. Townscape management: ideal and reality. Pp. 147-158 in The Built form of Western Cities. Essays for M.G. Conzen on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, T. R. Slater, ed. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Whitehand J. (2000) From explanation to prescription. Urban Morphology 4: 1–2Google Scholar
  51. Whitehand J. (2001) British urban morphology: the Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology 5: 103–109Google Scholar
  52. ZIPF G.K. (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Marat-Mendes
    • 1
  • Mafalda Teixeira de Sampayo
    • 1
  • David M. S. Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.Lisbon University Institute – ISCTELisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations