Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 235–251

Fractal Geometrry in Muslim Cities: How Succession Law Shaped Morphology

Research

Abstract

Islamic succession law has deeply affected the urban fabric of Muslim cities. Properties were subdivided according to a refined and elaborate system of shares that were prescribed by jurists. Successive iterations of subdivision over the course of decades or even centuries gave a fractal character to the cities and thus becomes the main source of their complexity. Most property was subject to successive subdivisions until minimum but functional parts were arrived at. However, this fragmentation should not be understood in isolation from other mechanisms which sometimes resulted in a reunification of the fragments, and thus established a dynamic equilibrium in the urban fabric. The paper will present the mechanisms of subdivision according to laws of succession, and illustrate by hypothetical example their direct impact on the urban morphology, as a means of understanding the complexity of old Muslim cities.

Keywords

Islamic law succession urban design subdivision iteration fraction fractals chaos morphology urban geometry 

Bibliography

  1. Abdul-Jamal, R. 2005. The Issue On Inheritance for Women available online: http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/the-issue-on-inheritance-for-women/. Last accessed 5 Sept. 2010.
  2. Akbar J. (1988) Crisis in the built environment. Concept Mass Media, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  3. Amrani (Al), M. 2000. Al-Myrath. Algiers: ANEP.Google Scholar
  4. Barbier J. (1900) Droit Musulman: Des droits et obligations entre propriétaires. Revue Algérienne et Tunisienne de Législation et de Jurisprudence XVI: 9–114Google Scholar
  5. Batty, M. 1991. Cities as Fractals: Simulating Growth and Form. In Fractals and Chaos, R. Crilly, A. Earnshaw and H. Jones, eds. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bechhoefer, W. and M. Appleby. 1997. Fractals, Music and Vernacular Architecture: An Experiment in Contextual Design Traditional Dwellings and Settlements. In Critical Methodologies in the Study of Traditional Environments 97. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Centre for Environmental Design.Google Scholar
  7. Bechhoefer, W. and C. Bovill. 1994. Fractal Analysis of Traditional Housing in Amasya, Turkey. Proceedings of the fourth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Traditional Environments. Berkeley: International Association for the Study of the Traditional Environment.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Hamouche M. (2003) Decision-Making System and Urban Geometry: The Case of Algiers. Journal of Architectural & Planning Research 20(4): 307–322Google Scholar
  9. Ben-Hamouche, M. 2008. Islamic Law for Water and Land Management and its Impact on Urban Morphology. Second International Conference on Built Environment in Developing Countries, Penang, Malaysia, 1-3 December, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Hamouche M. (2009a) Can Chaos Theory Explain Complexity In Urban Fabric? Applications in Traditional Muslim Settlements. Nexus Network Journal 11(2): 217–242CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben-Hamouche M. (2009b) Complexity of urban fabric in traditional Muslim cities: Importing old wisdom to present cities. URBAN DESIGN International 14(1): 22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben-Hamouche M. (2009c) Dar Es-Sultan L’Algérois á l’époque Ottomane. Dar El-Bassair, AlgiersGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonine M.E. (1979) The Morphogenesis of Iranian Cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69(2): 208–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bovill C. (1996) Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser, BostonMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Bovill, C. 1996. Fractal Calculations in Vernacular Design in Traditional Dwellings and Settlements. International Association for the Study of Traditional Environments (IASTE) Working Paper Series 97: 35-51. Berkeley: IASTE.Google Scholar
  16. Briggs J. (1992) Fractals: The Patterns of Chaos: Discovering a New Aesthetic of Art, Science, and Nature. Touchstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Brunschwig R. 1947. Urbanisme médiéval et droit musulman. Revue des Etudes Islamiques XV: 127-155; rpt. in Etudes d’islamologie (Paris : Maisonneuve et Larose, 1976), vol. II, 7-35.Google Scholar
  18. Ca’fer Efendi. 1987. Risale-I Mimariyye: An Early Seventeenth Century Ottoman Treatise on Architecture. Howard Crane, ed. and trans. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  19. Cami-Efendi. 2000. Riyadh Al-Qasemeen. M. Ben-Hamouche, ed. Damascus: Dar-Al-Bashair.Google Scholar
  20. De Soto Hernando (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Devaney, R. L. 1990. Chaos, Fractals and Dynamics: Computer Experiments in Mathematics Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  22. Eglash R. (1999) African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway NJMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Hakim B.S. (1988) Arabic-Islamic Cities. Kegan Paul International, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hakim, B. S. 2009. Sidi Boussa’id, Tunisia: Structure and Form of a Mediterranean Village. Emergent City Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hamilton, C., trans. 1989. The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic laws. Karachi: Darul Ishaat.Google Scholar
  26. Huma, A. 1997. Muslim Contributions to Science, Philosophy, and the Arts available online http://www.jannah.org/articles/contrib.html. Last accessed on Sept. 5th 2010.
  27. Letourneau, R. 1987. Fès avant le protectorat : étude économique et sociale d’une ville de l’occident musulman Publications de l’Institut des hautes études marocaines, t. 45. Rabat: Éditions La Porte.Google Scholar
  28. Ostwald M. (2001) Fractal Architecture: Late Twentieth-Century Connections Between Architecture and Fractal Geometry. Nexus Network Journal 3(1): 73–84CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Raymond A. (1994) Islamic City, Arab City: Orientalist Myths and Recent Views. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 21(1): 3–19CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Raymond A. (1985) Les Grandes Villes Arabes a l’Epoque Ottomane. Sindbad, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Rumsey, A., ed. and W. Jones, trans. 1869. Al-Sirajiyyah: or Mohammedan Law of Inheritance. London: William Amer; rpt. Whitefish, MT: Kessenger Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  32. Szemplinska-Stupnicka, W. 2003. Chaos, Bifurcations and Fractals Around Us: A Brief Introduction. World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science, Series A, vol. 47, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  33. Un-Habitat. 2005. Islam, Land & Property Research Series Paper 6: Islamic Inheritance Laws & Systems. http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/3546_3490_ILP%206.doc. Last accessed 18 November 2010.
  34. Yekini, A. O. 2008. Women and Intestate Succession in Islamic Law. Lagos State University available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1278077. Last accessed on September 20, 2010.

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Engineering, Department of Architecture and, Civil EngineeringUniversity of BahrainIsa TownKingdom of Bahrain

Personalised recommendations