Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 1–113 | Cite as

A monograph ofManihot Esculenta with an explanation of the taximetrics methods used

  • David J. Rogers
  • Henry S. Fleming
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Keywords

Economic Botany Median Lobe Bluish Green Smooth Margin Leaf Lobe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E. 1951. Inclusive herbaria. Ind. Jour. Genet. Pl. Breeding11(1): 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E., R. O. Erickson & N. C. Fassett 1941. Mass collections. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.28: 287–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauhin, C. 1658. Theatri botanici sive Historia plantarum etc. Vol. II. p. 90.Google Scholar
  4. Chandraratna, M. F., & K. D. S. S. Nanayakkara 1944. Studies in cassava: I. A classification of races occurring in Ceylon. Trop. Agric. (Ceylon)100: 219–230. Continued, 1945.101: 3–12,214–222.Google Scholar
  5. Ciferri, R. 1938. Saggio di classificazionne delle razze di manioca (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Relazioni e Monografic Agrario Coloniali No. 44. pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
  6. Ciferri, R. 1942. Fondamenti per una classificazione subspecifica dellaManihot esculenta Crantz. Archivio Botanico Forli18: 17–33.Google Scholar
  7. Cours, G. 1951. Le manioc a Madagascar. Mem. Inst. Sci. Madag. Ser. B. TomeIII, Fasc. 2: 203–400, pl. 1–15, fig. 1–61.Google Scholar
  8. Crantz, H. I. N. 1766. Institutiones Rei Herbariae, juxta nutum naturae digestae ex habitu. Tom. I., p. 166, 167. Vienna.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, P. H. & V. H. Heywood 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  10. Doku, E. V. 1966. Cultivated cassava varieties in Ghana. Ghana Jour. Sci.6(3,4): 74–86.Google Scholar
  11. Du Rietz, G. E. 1930. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Bot. Tidskr.24: 333–428.Google Scholar
  12. Echandi, M. O. 1952. Valor de la harina de hojas y tallos deshidratos de la yuca en la produccion de leche. Turrialba12(4): 166.Google Scholar
  13. Estabrook, G. 1966. A mathematical model in graph theory for biological classification. Jour. Theoret. Biol.12: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Estabrook, G. & D. J. Rogers 1966. A general method of taxonomic description for a computed similarity measure. Bioscience16(11): 789–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilmour, J. S. L., F. R. Home, E. L. Little, Jr., & F. A. Stafleu 1969. International code of nomenclature of cultivated plants. Regnum vegetabile64: 1–32. Publ. by the Intern. Bur. Pl. Taxon. & Nomencl. Utrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Hawksworth, F. G., G. F. Estabrook & D. J. Rogers 1968. Application of an Information theory model for character analysis in the genusArceuthobium (Viscaceae). Taxon17(6): 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holleman, L. W. J., & A. Aten 1956. Processing of cassava and cassava products in rural industries. F. A. O. Agric. Develop. Paper 54.Google Scholar
  18. Hsu, K. S., & J. Valerio 1966. Preliminary observation on meiotic chromosome pairing inManihot esculenta, 19–24 (mimeograph).In: C. C. Moh (Ed.), The application of nuclear energy to agriculture. Ann. Rpt. 1 July 1966. Interamerican Inst. of Agric. Sci., Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  19. Irwin, H. S., & D. J. Rogers 1967. Monographic studies inCassia (Leguminosae-Caesalpini-oideae). II. A taximetric study of section Apoucouita. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.16: 71–118.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, W. O. 1959. Manioc in Africa. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. 315 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Lanjouw, J. 1939. Two interesting species ofManihot L. from Suriname. Mededeelingen von het Botanisch Museum en Herbarium van de Rijksuniversitaeit te Utrecht69: 543–549.Google Scholar
  22. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. p. 1007.Google Scholar
  23. Merian, M. 1726. Dissertatione generatione et metamorphosibus insectorum Surinamensium. p. 4, Figs. 4 & 5.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, P. 1754. The Gardeners Dictionary Vol. II.Manihot. London.Google Scholar
  25. Mueller, J. argoviensi. 1866.Manihot in De Candolle Prodromus15(2): 1057–1075.Google Scholar
  26. Pax, F., & K. Hoffman 1910. Pflanzenr. Euphorbiaceae-Adrianeae44(IV.147.II): 1–111.Google Scholar
  27. Pereira, A. S., J. P. Nery & T. Igue 1965. Selecao de novos clones de mandioca para mesa, pela toxicidade e paladar de suas raizes “in natura.” Bragantia24: Nota no. 10; LV–LVIII.Google Scholar
  28. Pereira, A. S., & M. G. Pinto 1962. Determinação da toxicidade da mandioca pelo paladar das raizes “in natura.” Bragantia21: Nota no. 25. CXLV–CL.Google Scholar
  29. Pohl, J. E. 1827. Plantarum Brasiliae. cones et Descriptiones. IV. Manihot. 17–56.Google Scholar
  30. Prance, G. T., D. J. Rogers & F. White 1969. A taximetric study of an angiosperm family: generic delimitation in the Chrysobalanaceae. New Phytol.68: 1203–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers, D. J. 1959. Cassava leaf protein. Econ. Bot.13(3): 261–263.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, D. J. 1963a. Studies ofManihot esculenta Crantz and related species. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club90(1): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers, D. J. 1963b. Taximetrics — New name, old concept. Brittonia15: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers, D. J. 1965. Some botanical and ethnological considerations ofManihot esculenta. Econ. Bot.19(4): 369–377.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, D. J., & S. G. Appan 1969. Taximetric methods for delimiting biological species. Taxon18: 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers, D. J., H. S. Fleming & G. F. Estabrook 1967. Use of Computers in Studies of Taxonomy and Evolution, Ch. 6, pp. 169–196.In: Evolutionary Biology. Vol. I. Dobzhansky, Hecht, and Steere (Eds.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, D. J., & M. Milner 1963. Amino Acid profile of manioc leaf protein in relation to nutritive value. Econ. Bot.17(3): 211–216.Google Scholar
  38. Rothmaler, W. 1944. Systemstische Einkeiten in de Botanik. Feddes Rep.54: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinha, S. K. & T. V. R. Nair 1968. Studies on the variability of cyanoglucoside content in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Ind. J. Agric. Sci., Dec, 1968.Google Scholar
  40. Templeton, J. K. 1969. Identification and naming of tapioca varieties in West Malaysia. Preprint No. 11 from the Malaysian Crop Diversification Conf., Rubber Research Inst. of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  41. Tournefort, J. P. 1700. Institutiones rei Herbariae. Parisii. P. 658. (Tab. 436).Google Scholar
  42. Wirth, M., G. F. Estabrook & D. J. Rogers 1966. A graph theory model for systematic biology, with an example for the Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae). Syst. Zool.15(1): 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zehntner, L. 1919. Estudo sobra algumos variedades de mandiocas Brasileiras. Sociedad Nacionale de Agricultura, Imprensa Ingleza-Camerino 61, Rio de Janeiro. Also reprinted in Bragantia7(1): 22.1947.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Rogers
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henry S. Fleming
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental, Population and Organismic BiologyThe University of ColoradoBoulder
  2. 2.Gulf Universities Research Consortium Bay St. LouisMississippi

Personalised recommendations