Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 378–391 | Cite as

Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: Mitochondrial versus nuclear genes

  • Etsuko N. Moriyama
  • Jeffrey R. Powell
Articles

Abstract

Synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial and nuclear genes of Drosophila were compared. To make accurate comparisons, we considered the following: (1) relative synonymous rates, which do not require divergence time estimates, should be used; (2) methods estimating divergence should take into account base composition; (3) only very closely related species should be used to avoid effects of saturation; (4) the heterogeneity of rates should be examined. We modified the methods estimating synonymous substitution numbers to account for base composition bias. By using these methods, we found that mitochondrial genes have 1.7—3.4 times higher synonymous substitution rates than the fastest nuclear genes or 4.5–9.0 times higher rates than the average nuclear genes. The average rate of synonymous transversions was 2.7 (estimated from the melanogaster species subgroup) or 2.9 (estimated from the obscura group) times higher in mitochondrial genes than in nuclear genes. Synonymous transversions in mitochondrial genes occurred at an approximately equivalent rate to those in the fastest nuclear genes. This last result is not consistent with the hypothesis that the difference in turnover rates between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes is the major factor determining higher synonymous substitution rates in mtDNA. We conclude that the difference in synonymous substitution rates is due to a combination of two factors: a higher transitional mutation rate in mtDNA and constraints on nuclear genes due to selection for codon usage.

Key words

Drosophila the melanogaster species subgroup the obscura species group Synonymous substitution rate Transition Transversion Nuclear gene Mitochondria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayala FJ, Chang BSW, Hartl DL (1993) Molecular evolution of the Rh3 gene in Drosophila. Genetica 92:23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayala FJ, Hartl DL (1993) Molecular drift of the bride of sevenless (boss) gene in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 10:1030–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballard JWO, Kreitman M (1994) Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics 138:757–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballard JWO, Kreitman M (1995) Is mitochondrial DNA a strictly neutral marker? TREE 10:485–188Google Scholar
  5. Begun DJ, Aquadro CF (1994) Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of Drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation. Genetics 136:155–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry AJ, Ajioka JW, Kreitman M (1991) Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics 129:1111–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berthier F, Renaud M, Alziari S, Durand R (1986) RNA mapping on Drosophila mitochondrial DNA: precursors and template strands. Nucleic Acids Res 14:4519–4533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC (1982) Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol 18:225–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caccone A, Amato GD, Powell JR (1988) Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Genetics 118:671–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR (1985) The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J Mol Evol 22:252–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Comeron JM (1995) A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J Mol Evol 41: 1152–1159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeSalle R, Freedman T, Prager EM, Wilson AC (1987) Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J Mol Evol 26:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FlyBase (1997) FlyBase —A Drosophila database. Nucleic Acids Res 25:63–66 [http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleason JM, Caccone A, Moriyama EN, White KP, Powell JR (1997) Mitochondrial DNA phylogenies for the Drosophila obscura group. Evolution 51:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilton H, Kliman RM, Hey J (1994) Using hitchhiking genes to study adaptation and divergence during speciation within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Evolution 48:1900–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ina Y (1995) New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. J Mol Evol 40:190–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ina Y (1997) Pattern of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions: an indicator of mechanisms of molecular evolution. J Genet 75:91–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li W-H (1993) Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol 36:96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li W-H, Wu C-I, Luo C-C (1985) A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol 2:150–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin AP, Palumbi SR (1993) Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4087–4091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyata T, Hayashida H, Kikuno R, Hasegawa M, Kobayashi M, Koike K (1982) Molecular clock of silent substitution: at least six-fold preponderance of silent changes in mitochondrial genes over those in nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 19:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moriyama EN, Gojobori T (1992) Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 130:855–864PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moriyama EN, Hartl DL (1993) Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 134:847–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moriyama EN, Powell JR (in press) Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila. J Mol EvolGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3:418–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pamilo P, Bianchi NO (1993) Evolution of the Zfx and Zfy genes: rates and interdependence between the genes. Mol Biol Evol 10:271–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pesole G, Dellisanti G, Preparata G, Saccone C (1995) The importance of base composition in the correct assessment of genetic distance. J Mol Evol 41:1124–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell JR (1983) Interspecific cytoplasmic gene flow in the absence of nuclear gene flow: evidence from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:492–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell JR, Caccone A, Amato GD, Yoon C (1986) Rates of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA are similar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9090–9093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell JR, Moriyama EN (1997) Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7784–7790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rand DM (1994) Thermal habit, metabolic rate and the evolution of mitochondrial DNA. TREE 9:125–131Google Scholar
  33. Rand DM, Dorfsman M, Kann LM (1994) Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 138:741–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rand DM, Kann LM (1996) Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol 13:735–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Satta Y, Ishiwa H, Chigusa SI (1987) Analysis of nucleotide substitutions of mitochondrial DNAs in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. Mol Biol Evol 4:638–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol 28:398–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shields DC, Sharp PM, Higgins DG, Wright F (1988) “Silent” sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simmons GM, Kwok W, Matulonis P, Venkatesh T (1994) Polymorphism and divergence at the prune locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulons. Mol Biol Evol 11:666–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Solignac M, Monnerot M, Mounolou J-C (1986) Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila. J Mol Evol 23:31–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamura K (1992a) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9:678–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tamura K (1992b) The rate and pattern of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol 9:814–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wells RS (1995) Nucleotide variation at the Gpdh locus in the genus Drosophila. Genetics 143:375–384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Etsuko N. Moriyama
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Powell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations