Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 97–106 | Cite as

An Estimate of Divergence Time of Parazoa and Eumetazoa and That of Cephalochordata and Vertebrata by Aldolase and Triose Phosphate Isomerase Clocks

  • Naruo Nikoh
  • Naoyuki Iwabe
  • Kei-ichi Kuma
  • Mutsuhito Ohno
  • Tsutomu Sugiyama
  • Yoko Watanabe
  • Kinya Yasui
  • Zhang Shi-cui
  • Katsuji Hori
  • Yoshiro Shimura
  • Takashi Miyata
Article

Abstract

Previously we suggested that four proteins including aldolase and triose phosphate isomerase (TPI) evolved with approximately constant rates over long periods covering the whole animal phyla. The constant rates of aldolase and TPI evolution were reexamined based on three different models for estimating evolutionary distances. It was shown that the evolutionary rates remain essentially unchanged in comparisons not only between different classes of vertebrates but also between vertebrates and arthropods and even between animals and plants, irrespective of the models used. Thus these enzymes might be useful molecular clocks for inferring divergence times of animal phyla. To know the divergence time of Parazoa and Eumetazoa and that of Cephalochordata and Vertebrata, the aldolase cDNAs from Ephydatia fluviatilis, a freshwater sponge, and the TPI cDNAs from Ephydatia fluviatilis and Branchiostoma belcheri, an amphioxus, have been cloned and se-quenced. Comparisons of the deduced amino acid sequences of aldolase and TPI from the freshwater sponge with known sequences revealed that the Parazoa-Eumetazoa split occurred about 940 million years ago (Ma) as determined by the average of two proteins and three models. Similarly, the aldolase and TPI clocks suggest that vertebrates and amphioxus last shared a common ancestor around 700 Ma and they possibly diverged shortly after the divergence of deuterostomes and protostomes.

Key words

Divergence time Molecular clock Aldolase Triose phosphate isomerase Sponge Amphioxus Evolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adachi J, Hasegawa M (1992) Computer science monographs, No. 27, MOLPHY: programs for molecular phylogenetics, I. PROTML: maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny. The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Adachi J, Cao Y, Hasegawa M (1993) Tempo and mode of mitochon- drial DNA evolution in vertebrates at the amino acid sequence level: rapid evolution in warm-blooded vertebrates. J Mol Evol 36: 270–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber T, Banner DW, Bloomer AC, Petsko GA, Phillios D, Rivers PS, Wilson IA (1991) On the three-dimensional structure and catalytic mechanism of triose phosphate isomerase. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 293: 153–171Google Scholar
  4. Berger MP, Munson PJ (1991) A novel randomized iterative strategy for aligning multiple protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 7: 479–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Britten RJ (1986) Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231: 1393–1398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway Morris S (1993) The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature 361: 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson EH, Peterson KJ, Cameron RA (1995) Origin of bilaterian body plans: evolution of developmental regulatory mechanisms. Science 270: 1319–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dayhoff MO (1978) Survey of new data and computer methods of analysis. In: Dayhoff MO (ed) Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol 5, suppl 3. National Biochemical Research Foundation, Washington, DC, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  9. Dickerson RE (1971) The structures of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol 1: 26–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickerson RE, Geis I (1983) Hemoglobin. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  11. Doolittle RF, Feng DF, Tsang S, Cho G, Little E (1996) Determining divergence times of the major kingdoms of living organisms with a protein clock. Science 271: 470–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frohman MA, Dush MK, Martin GR (1988) Rapid production of full- length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 8998–9002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamblin SJ, Davies GJ, Grimes JM, Jackson RM, Littlechild JA, Watson HC (1991) Activity and specificity of human aldolases. J Mol Biol 219: 573–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grishin NV (1995) Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites. J Mol Evol 41: 675–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1987) Man’s place in Hominoidea as inferred from molecular clocks of DNA. J Mol Evol 26: 132–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashimoto T, Nakamura Y, Nakamura F, Shirakura T, Adachi J, Goto N, Okamoto K, Hasegawa M (1994) Protein phylogeny gives a robust estimation for early divergences of eukaryotes: phylogenetic place of a mitochondria-lacking protozoan, Giardia lamblia. Mol Biol Evol 11: 65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Han TH, Runnegar B (1992) Megascopic eukaryotic algae from the 2.1-billion-year-old Negaunee iron-formation, Michigan. Science 257: 232–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horecker BL, Tsolas O, Lai CY (1972) Aldolases. In: Boyer PD (ed) The enzymes, vol 7.Academic Press, New York, pp 213–258Google Scholar
  20. Iwabe N, Kuma K, Nikoh N, Miyata T (1995) Molecular clock for dating of divergence between animal phyla. Jpn J Genet 70: 687–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iwabe N, Kuma K, Miyata T (1996) Evolution of gene families and relationship with organismal evolution: rapid divergence of tissue- specific genes in the early evolution of chordates. Mol Biol Evol 13: 483–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism III. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–132Google Scholar
  23. Kai T, Sugimoto Y, Kusakabe T, Zhang R, Koga K, Hori K (1992) Gene structure and multiple mRNA species of Drosophila melanogaster aldolase generating three isozymes with different enzymatic properties. J Biochem 112: 677–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamaishi T, Hashimoto T, Nakamura Y, Nakamura F, Murata S, Okada N, Okamoto K, Shimizu M, Hasegawa M (1996) Protein phylogeny of translation factor EF-1α suggests microsporidians are extremely ancient eukaryotes. J Mol Evol 42: 257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M (1990) Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J Mol Evol 30: 151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J, Yim JJ, Wang S, Dorsett D (1992) Alternate use of divergent forms of an ancient exon in the fructose-1,6- bisphosphate aldolase gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 12: 773–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Knoll AH (1992) The early evolution of eukaryotes: a geological perspective. Science 256: 622–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kobayashi M, Takahashi M, Wada H, Satoh N (1993) Molecular phylogeny inferred from sequences of small subunit ribosomal DNA supports the monophyly of the metazoa. Zool Sci 10: 827–833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Miyata T, Kuma K, Iwabe N, Nikoh N (1994) A possible link between molecular evolution and tissue evolution demonstrated by tissue specific genes. Jpn J Genet 69: 473–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Needleman Sb, Wunsch CD (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48: 443–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Ono K, Tsutsumi K, Ishikawa K (1990) Structure of chicken aldolase C mRNA and its expression in the liver and brain during development. Biochem Int 20: 921–929PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Richard OC, Rutter WJ (1961) Preparation and properties of yeast aldolase. J Biol Chem 236: 3177–3184Google Scholar
  35. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaw-Lee R, Lissemore JL, Sullivan DT, Tolan DR (1992) Alternative splicing of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster predicts three isozymes. J Biol Chem 267: 3959–3967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sogin ML, Gunderson JH, Elwood HJ, Alonso RA, Peattie DA (1989) Phylogenetic meaning of the kingdom concept: an unusual ribosomal RNA from Giardia lamblia. Science 243: 75–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valentine JW (1994) Late Precambrian bilaterians: grades and clades. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6751–6757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wada H, Satoh N (1994) Details of the evolutionary history from invertebrates to vertebrates, as deduced from the sequences of 18S rDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1801–1804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wainright PO, Hinkle G, Sogin ML, Stickel SK (1993) Monophyletic origins of the metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi. Science 260: 340–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willmer PG (1990) Invertebrate relationships. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson AC, Carlson SS, White TJ (1977) Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 573–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wray GA, Levinton JS, Shapiro LH (1996) Molecular evidence for deep precambrian divergences among metazoan phyla. Science 274: 568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang R, Yatsuki H, Kusakabe T, Iwabe N, Mlyata T, Imai T, Yoshida M, Hori K (1995) Structures of cDNA encoding the muscle-type and non muscle-type isozymes of lamprey fructose bisphosphate aldolase and the evolution of aldolase genes. J Biochem 117: 545–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds) Evolving genes and proteins. Academic Press,New York, pp 97–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naruo Nikoh
    • 1
  • Naoyuki Iwabe
    • 1
  • Kei-ichi Kuma
    • 1
  • Mutsuhito Ohno
    • 1
  • Tsutomu Sugiyama
    • 2
  • Yoko Watanabe
    • 3
  • Kinya Yasui
    • 4
  • Zhang Shi-cui
    • 5
  • Katsuji Hori
    • 6
  • Yoshiro Shimura
    • 1
    • 7
  • Takashi Miyata
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiophysicsFaculty of Science, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of GeneticsMishimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceOchanomizu University, BunkyouTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Oral Anatomy 1Kagoshima University Dental SchoolKagoshimaJapan
  5. 5.Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  6. 6.Department of BiochemistrySaga Medical SchoolSagaJapan
  7. 7.Biomolecular Engineering Research InstituteFuruedai, Suita, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations