Independently parameterised momenta variables and Monte Carlo IR subtraction

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We introduce a system of parameters for the Monte Carlo generation of Lorentz invariant phase space that is particularly well-suited to the treatment of the infrared divergences that occur in the most singular, Born-like configurations of 1 → n QCD processes. A key feature is that particle momenta are generated independently of one another, leading to a simple parameterisation of all such IR limits. We exemplify the use of these variables in conjunction with the projection to Born subtraction technique at next-to-next-to-leading order. The geometric origins of this parameterisation lie in a coordinate chart on a Grassmannian manifold.

A preprint version of the article is available at ArXiv.

References

  1. [1]

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP 09 (2005) 056 [hep-ph/0505111] [INSPIRE].

  2. [2]

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Gluon-gluon antenna functions from Higgs boson decay, Phys. Lett. B 612 (2005) 49 [hep-ph/0502110] [INSPIRE].

  3. [3]

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Quark-gluon antenna functions from neutralino decay, Phys. Lett. B 612 (2005) 36 [hep-ph/0501291] [INSPIRE].

  4. [4]

    A. Daleo, T. Gehrmann and D. Maître, Antenna subtraction with hadronic initial states, JHEP 04 (2007) 016 [hep-ph/0612257] [INSPIRE].

  5. [5]

    A. Daleo, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Luisoni, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: initial-final configurations, JHEP 01 (2010) 118 [arXiv:0912.0374] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    T. Gehrmann and P.F. Monni, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: real-virtual initial-initial configurations, JHEP 12 (2011) 049 [arXiv:1107.4037] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    R. Boughezal, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder and M. Ritzmann, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: double real radiation for initial-initial configurations with two quark flavours, JHEP 02 (2011) 098 [arXiv:1011.6631] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and M. Ritzmann, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: double real initial-initial configurations, JHEP 10 (2012) 047 [arXiv:1207.5779] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and S. Wells, Infrared structure at NNLO using antenna subtraction, JHEP 04 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1301.4693] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    M. Czakon, A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 259 [arXiv:1005.0274] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    M. Czakon, Double-real radiation in hadronic top quark pair production as a proof of a certain concept, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 250 [arXiv:1101.0642] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    M. Czakon and D. Heymes, Four-dimensional formulation of the sector-improved residue subtraction scheme, Nucl. Phys. B 890 (2014) 152 [arXiv:1408.2500] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    R. Boughezal, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, A subtraction scheme for NNLO computations, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034025 [arXiv:1111.7041] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    M. Cacciari, F.A. Dreyer, A. Karlberg, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi, Fully differential vector-boson-fusion Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 082002 [Erratum ibid. 120 (2018) 139901] [arXiv:1506.02660] [INSPIRE].

  15. [15]

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 222002 [hep-ph/0703012] [INSPIRE].

  16. [16]

    M. Grazzini, NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the HWWℓνℓν and HZZ → 4ℓ decay channels, JHEP 02 (2008) 043 [arXiv:0801.3232] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu and F. Petriello, W-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F.J. Tackmann and J.R. Walsh, N-jettiness subtractions for NNLO QCD calculations, JHEP 09 (2015) 058 [arXiv:1505.04794] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi and Z. Trócsányi, Three-jet production in electron-positron collisions at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 152004 [arXiv:1603.08927] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    V. Del Duca et al., Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 074019 [arXiv:1606.03453] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann, W + W production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD, JHEP 08 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1605.02716] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    S. Dawson, P. Jaiswal, Y. Li, H. Ramani and M. Zeng, Resummation of jet veto logarithms at N 3 LL a + NNLO for W + W production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 114014 [arXiv:1606.01034] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov and R. Röntsch, Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 248 [arXiv:1702.01352] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    F. Caola, M. Delto, H. Frellesvig and K. Melnikov, The double-soft integral for an arbitrary angle between hard radiators, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 687 [arXiv:1807.05835] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, R. Mondini and C. Williams, The NNLO QCD soft function for 1-jettiness, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 234 [arXiv:1711.09984] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    I. Moult, L. Rothen, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and H.X. Zhu, N-jettiness subtractions for ggH at subleading power, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 014013 [arXiv:1710.03227] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    M.A. Ebert, I. Moult, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, G. Vita and H.X. Zhu, Power corrections for N-jettiness subtractions at \( \mathcal{O} \)(α s), arXiv:1807.10764 [INSPIRE].

  28. [28]

    F. Herzog, Geometric IR subtraction for final state real radiation, JHEP 08 (2018) 006 [arXiv:1804.07949] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    L. Magnea, E. Maina, G. Pelliccioli, C. Signorile-Signorile, P. Torrielli and S. Uccirati, Local analytic sector subtraction at NNLO, arXiv:1806.09570 [INSPIRE].

  30. [30]

    F. Dulat, B. Mistlberger and A. Pelloni, Differential Higgs production at N 3 LO beyond threshold, JHEP 01 (2018) 145 [arXiv:1710.03016] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    J. Currie, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss, J. Niehues and A. Vogt, N 3 LO corrections to jet production in deep inelastic scattering using the Projection-to-Born method, JHEP 05 (2018) 209 [arXiv:1803.09973] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32]

    L. Cieri, X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and A. Huss, Higgs boson production at the LHC using the q T subtraction formalism at N 3 LO QCD, arXiv:1807.11501 [INSPIRE].

  33. [33]

    E.L. Berger, J. Gao, C.P. Yuan and H.X. Zhu, NNLO QCD corrections to t-channel single top-quark production and decay, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 071501 [arXiv:1606.08463] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. [34]

    R. Kleiss, W.J. Stirling and S.D. Ellis, A new Monte Carlo treatment of multiparticle phase space at high-energies, Comput. Phys. Commun. 40 (1986) 359 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [35]

    B. Henning and T. Melia, in preparation, (2018).

  36. [36]

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan, A duality for the S matrix, JHEP 03 (2010) 020 [arXiv:0907.5418] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. [37]

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H.B. Hartanto and T. Peraro, First look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 092001 [arXiv:1712.02229] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. [38]

    S. Badger et al., Applications of integrand reduction to two-loop five-point scattering amplitudes in QCD, PoS(LL2018)006 (2018) [arXiv:1807.09709] [INSPIRE].

  39. [39]

    H. Murayama, Notes on Faddeev-Popov ghosts, (2007).

  40. [40]

    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, A general algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291 [Erratum ibid. B 510 (1998) 503] [hep-ph/9605323] [INSPIRE].

  41. [41]

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Heinrich, Four particle phase space integrals in massless QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 682 (2004) 265 [hep-ph/0311276] [INSPIRE].

  42. [42]

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 220 [hep-ph/0207004] [INSPIRE].

  43. [43]

    A.V. Smirnov, Algorithm FIREFeynman Integral REduction, JHEP 10 (2008) 107 [arXiv:0807.3243] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. [44]

    A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov, FIRE4, LiteRed and accompanying tools to solve integration by parts relations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 2820 [arXiv:1302.5885] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Melia.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1809.09325

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, P., Melia, T. Independently parameterised momenta variables and Monte Carlo IR subtraction. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)038

Download citation

Keywords

  • NLO Computations
  • QCD Phenomenology