Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2017:154 | Cite as

Thermal out-of-time-order correlators, KMS relations, and spectral functions

  • Felix M. Haehl
  • R. Loganayagam
  • Prithvi Narayan
  • Amin A. Nizami
  • Mukund Rangamani
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We describe general features of thermal correlation functions in quantum systems, with specific focus on the fluctuation-dissipation type relations implied by the KMS condition. These end up relating correlation functions with different time ordering and thus should naturally be viewed in the larger context of out-of-time-ordered (OTO) observables. In particular, eschewing the standard formulation of KMS relations where thermal periodicity is combined with time-reversal to stay within the purview of Schwinger-Keldysh functional integrals, we show that there is a natural way to phrase them directly in terms of OTO correlators. We use these observations to construct a natural causal basis for thermal n-point functions in terms of fully nested commutators. We provide several general results which can be inferred from cyclic orbits of permutations, and exemplify the abstract results using a quantum oscillator as an explicit example.

Keywords

Quantum Dissipative Systems Stochastic Processes AdS-CFT Correspondence Thermal Field Theory 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Kubo, Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 12 (1957) 570 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    P.C. Martin and J.S. Schwinger, Theory of many particle systems. 1., Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1342 [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu, Equilibrium and nonequilibrium formalisms made unified, Phys. Rept. 118 (1985) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Haag, N.M. Hugenholtz and M. Winnink, On the equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 5 (1967) 215 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.E. Carrington and U.W. Heinz, Three point functions at finite temperature, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 619 [hep-th/9606055] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.-f. Hou, E. Wang and U.W. Heinz, n-point functions at finite temperature, J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1861 [hep-th/9807118] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    E. Wang and U.W. Heinz, A generalized fluctuation dissipation theorem for nonlinear response functions, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025008 [hep-th/9809016] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    M.E. Carrington, D.-f. Hou and J.C. Sowiak, KMS conditions for four point Green functions at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 065003 [hep-ph/0008282] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    H.A. Weldon, Two sum rules for the thermal n-point functions, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 117901 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T.S. Evans, Spectral representation of three point functions at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 252 (1990) 108 [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    T.S. Evans, Three point functions at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 249 (1990) 286 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    P. Aurenche and T. Becherrawy, A comparison of the real time and the imaginary time formalisms of finite temperature field theory for 2, 3 and 4 point Green’s functions, Nucl. Phys. B 379 (1992) 259 [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    T.S. Evans, N -point finite temperature expectation values at real times, Nucl. Phys. B 374 (1992) 340 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    J.C. Taylor, On real and imaginary time thermal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 725 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J.C. Taylor, Spectral representation of hard thermal loops, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 958 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    F. Guerin, Retarded-advanced N point Green functions in thermal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 432 (1994) 281 [hep-ph/9306210] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    F. Guerin, Four point functions in Keldysh basis, hep-ph/0105313 [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, P. Narayan and M. Rangamani, Classification of out-of-time-order correlators, arXiv:1701.02820 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace, JHEP 06 (2017) 069 [arXiv:1610.01940] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP 08 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1503.01409] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D.A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, Chaos in quantum channels, JHEP 02 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1511.04021] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    D.A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, Chaos and complexity by design, JHEP 04 (2017) 121 [arXiv:1610.04903] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    N. Yunger Halpern, B. Swingl and J. Dressel, The quasiprobability behind the out-of-time-ordered correlator, arXiv:1704.01971.
  24. [24]
    L.M. Sieberer et al., Thermodynamic equilibrium as a symmetry of the Schwinger-Keldysh action, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 134307 [arXiv:1505.00912] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    N. Tsuji, T. Shitara and M. Ueda, Out-of-time-order fluctuation-dissipation theorem, arXiv:1612.08781 [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    N. Yunger Halpern, Jarzynski-like equality for the out-of-time-ordered correlator, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 012120 [arXiv:1609.00015] [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. E 56 (1997) 5018 [cond-mat/9707325].
  28. [28]
    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2690 [cond-mat/9610209] [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A.I. Larkin and Y.N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity, Sov. Phys. JETP 28 (1969) 1200.ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    C.J. Fewster and D. Siemssen, Enumerating permutations by their run structure, arXiv:1403.1723.
  32. [32]
    M.L. Bellac, Thermal field theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2011).Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part II: thermal equivariant cohomology, JHEP 06 (2017) 070 [arXiv:1610.01941] [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu and B. Yoshida, Chaos, complexity and random matrices, JHEP 11 (2017) 048 [arXiv:1706.05400] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    R.P. Feynman and F.L. Vernon Jr., The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Annals Phys. 24 (1963) 118 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    A.O. Caldeira and A.J. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A 121 (1983) 587.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, JHEP 07 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1704.05464] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement wedge reconstruction via universal recovery channels, arXiv:1704.05839 [INSPIRE].
  40. [40]
    M.E. Carrington, T. Fugleberg, D.S. Irvine and D. Pickering, Real time statistical field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 50 (2007) 711 [hep-ph/0608298] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix M. Haehl
    • 1
  • R. Loganayagam
    • 2
  • Prithvi Narayan
    • 2
  • Amin A. Nizami
    • 2
  • Mukund Rangamani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS-TIFR)BengaluruIndia
  3. 3.Center for Quantum Mathematics and Physics (QMAP), Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations