Download PDF

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2012:66 | Cite as

Yukawa-unified natural supersymmetry

Open Access
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Previous work on t − b − τ Yukawa-unified supersymmetry, as expected from SUSY GUT theories based on the gauge group SO(10), tended to have exceedingly large electroweak fine-tuning (EWFT). Here, we examine supersymmetric models where we simultaneously require low EWFT (“natural SUSY”) and a high degree of Yukawa coupling unification, along with a light Higgs scalar with m h ~ 125 GeV. As Yukawa unification requires large tan β ~ 50, while EWFT requires rather light third generation squarks and low μ ≈ 100 − 250 GeV, B-physics constraints from BR(B → X s γ) and BR(B s → μ + μ −) can be severe. We are able to find models with EWFT Δ ≲ 50 − 100 (better than 1–2% EWFT) and with Yukawa unification as low as R yuk ~ 1.2 (20% unification). The unification is lessened to R yuk ~ 1.3 when B-physics constraints are imposed. We present several Yukawa-unified natural SUSY (YUNS) benchmark points. LHC searches will be able to access gluinos in the lower 1 – 2 TeV portion of their predicted mass range although much of YUNS parameter space may lie beyond LHC14 reach. If heavy Higgs bosons can be accessed at a high rate, then the rare H, A → μ + μ − decay might allow a determination of tan β ~ 50 as predicted by YUNS models. Finally, the predicted light higgsinos should be accessible to a linear e + e − collider with \( \sqrt{s}\sim 0.5 \) TeV.

Keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology 
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. [1]
    H. Georgi, in Particles and Fields — 1974, C. Carlson eds., AIP press, New York U.S.A. (1974).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons, Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Color Embeddings, Charge Assignments and Proton Stability in Unified Gauge Theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978) 721 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Mohapatra, Supersymmetric grand unification: An Update, hep-ph/9911272 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    S. Raby, Desperately seeking supersymmetry [susy], Rept. Prog. Phys. 67 (2004) 755 [hep-ph/0401155] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Witten, Dynamical Breaking of Supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 513 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.K. Kaul, Gauge Hierarchy in a Supersymmetric Model, Phys. Lett. B 109 (1982) 19 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and F. Wilczek, Supersymmetry and the Scale of Unification, Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 1681 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Einhorn and D. Jones, The Weak Mixing Angle and Unification Mass in Supersymmetric SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 475 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W.J. Marciano and G. Senjanović, Predictions of Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 3092 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    U. Amaldi, W. de Boer and H. Furstenau, Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 260 (1991) 447 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.R. Ellis, S. Kelley and D.V. Nanopoulos, Probing the desert using gauge coupling unification, Phys. Lett. B 260 (1991) 131 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Langacker and M.-x. Luo, Implications of precision electroweak experiments for M t, ρ 0, sin2 θ W and grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 817 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Top mass prediction from supersymmetric guts, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 1613 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Radiative electroweak breaking and sparticle spectroscopy with tan β ≃ m t/m b, Phys. Lett. B 300 (1993) 245 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    G.W. Anderson, S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos and L.J. Hall, Precise predictions for m(t), V(cb) and tan Beta, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3702 [hep-ph/9209250] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    G. Anderson, S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, L. Hall and G. Starkman, A Systematic SO(10) operator analysis for fermion masses, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3660 [hep-ph/9308333] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V.D. Barger, M. Berger and P. Ohmann, The supersymmetric particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4908 [hep-ph/9311269] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M.S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [hep-ph/9402253] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. Ananthanarayan, Q. Shafi and X. Wang, Improved predictions for top quark, lightest supersymmetric particle and Higgs scalar masses, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5980 [hep-ph/9311225] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The Unified minimal supersymmetric model with large Yukawa couplings, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1553 [hep-ph/9505428] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. Blazek, M.S. Carena, S. Raby and C.E. Wagner, A global χ 2 analysis of electroweak data in SO(10) SUSY GUTs, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6919 [hep-ph/9611217] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Blazek and S. Raby, Supersymmetric grand unified theories and global fits to low-energy data, Phys. Lett. B 392 (1997) 371 [hep-ph/9611319] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    T. Blazek and S. Raby, b → sγ with large tan beta in MSSM analysis constrained by a realistic SO(10) model, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 095002 [hep-ph/9712257] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. Blazek, S. Raby and K. Tobe, Neutrino oscillations in a predictive SUSY GUT, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113001 [hep-ph/9903340] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    T. Blazek, S. Raby and K. Tobe, Neutrino oscillations in an SO(10) SUSY GUT with U(2) × U(1)n family symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 055001 [hep-ph/9912482] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Profumo, Neutralino dark matter, bτ Yukawa unification and nonuniversal sfermion masses, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 015006 [hep-ph/0304071] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    C. Pallis, bτ unification with gaugino and sfermion mass nonuniversality, Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 398 [hep-ph/0304047] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Gomez, G. Lazarides and C. Pallis, Supersymmetric cold dark matter with Yukawa unification, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 123512 [hep-ph/9907261] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Gomez, G. Lazarides and C. Pallis, Yukawa quasi-unification, Nucl. Phys. B 638 (2002) 165 [hep-ph/0203131] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Gomez, G. Lazarides and C. Pallis, On Yukawa quasiunification with μ less than 0, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 097701 [hep-ph/0301064] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    U. Chattopadhyay, A. Corsetti and P. Nath, Supersymmetric dark matter and Yukawa unification, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 035003 [hep-ph/0201001] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    M.E. Gomez, T. Ibrahim, P. Nath and S. Skadhauge, WMAP dark matter constraints and Yukawa unification in SUGRA models with CP phases, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 095008 [hep-ph/0506243] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Badziak and K. Sakurai, LHC constraints on Yukawa unification in SO(10), JHEP 02 (2012) 125 [arXiv:1112.4796] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    M. Badziak, Yukawa unification in SUSY SO(10) in light of the LHC Higgs data, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1230020 [arXiv:1205.6232] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    A.S. Joshipura and K.M. Patel, Yukawa coupling unification in SO(10) with positive μ and a heavier gluino, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035019 [arXiv:1206.3910] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    I. Gogoladze, Q. Shafi and C.S. Un, 125 GeV Higgs Boson from t − b − τ Yukawa Unification, JHEP 07 (2012) 055 [arXiv:1203.6082] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    H. Baer, M.A. Diaz, J. Ferrandis and X. Tata, Sparticle mass spectra from SO(10) grand unified models with Yukawa coupling unification, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 111701 [hep-ph/9907211] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    H. Baer et al., Yukawa unified supersymmetric SO(10) model: Cosmology, rare decays and collider searches, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 015007 [hep-ph/0005027] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    H. Baer and J. Ferrandis, Supersymmetric SO(10) GUT models with Yukawa unification and a positive mu term, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 211803 [hep-ph/0106352] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    D. Auto et al., Yukawa coupling unification in supersymmetric models, JHEP 06 (2003) 023 [hep-ph/0302155] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    T. Blazek, R. Dermisek and S. Raby, Predictions for Higgs and supersymmetry spectra from SO(10) Yukawa unification with μ > 0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 111804 [hep-ph/0107097] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    T. Blazek, R. Dermisek and S. Raby, Yukawa unification in SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 115004 [hep-ph/0201081] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    R. Dermisek, S. Raby, L. Roszkowski and R. Ruiz De Austri, Dark matter and B s → μ + μ − with minimal SO(10) soft SUSY breaking, JHEP 04 (2003) 037 [hep-ph/0304101] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    R. Dermisek, S. Raby, L. Roszkowski and R. Ruiz de Austri, Dark matter and B s → μ + μ − with minimal SO(10) soft SUSY breaking II, JHEP 09 (2005) 029 [hep-ph/0507233] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    H. Baer, S. Kraml, S. Sekmen and H. Summy, Dark matter allowed scenarios for Yukawa-unified SO(10) SUSY GUTs, JHEP 03 (2008) 056 [arXiv:0801.1831] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    W. Altmannshofer, D. Guadagnoli, S. Raby and D.M. Straub, SUSY GUTs with Yukawa unification: A Go/no-go study using FCNC processes, Phys. Lett. B 668 (2008) 385 [arXiv:0801.4363] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    I. Gogoladze, R. Khalid, S. Raza and Q. Shafi, t − b − τ Yukawa unification for μ < 0 with a sub-TeV sparticle spectrum, JHEP 12 (2010) 055 [arXiv:1008.2765] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    I. Gogoladze, R. Khalid, S. Raza and Q. Shafi, Higgs and sparticle spectroscopy with gauge-Yukawa unification, JHEP 06 (2011) 117 [arXiv:1102.0013] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    G. Elor, L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, Yukawa unification and the superpartner mass scale, JHEP 10 (2012) 111 [arXiv:1206.5301] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    F. Brummer, S. Kraml and S. Kulkarni, Anatomy of maximal stop mixing in the MSSM, JHEP 08 (2012) 089 [arXiv:1204.5977] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV in final states with missing transverse momentum and b − jets with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 112006 [arXiv:1203.6193] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    H. Baer, S. Raza and Q. Shafi, A Heavier gluino from t − b − τ Yukawa-unified SUSY, Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 250 [arXiv:1201.5668] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 161802 [arXiv:1207.3343] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [hep-ph/0602096] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    D.M. Ghilencea, H.M. Lee and M. Park, Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level, JHEP 07 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.0569] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    C. Wymant, Optimising Stop Naturalness, arXiv:1208.1737 [INSPIRE].
  63. [63]
    S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness and GUT Scale Yukawa Coupling Ratios in the CMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035025 [arXiv:1111.6547] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness of the Non-Universal MSSM in the Light of the Recent Higgs Results, arXiv:1207.7236 [INSPIRE].
  65. [65]
    G. Giudice and A. Masiero, A Natural Solution to the mu Problem in Supergravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 480 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    F.E. Paige, S.D. Protopopescu, H. Baer and X. Tata, ISAJET 7.69: A Monte Carlo event generator for pp, \( \overline{p}p \) and e + e − reactions, hep-ph/0312045 [INSPIRE].
  67. [67]
    H. Baer, C.-H. Chen, R.B. Munroe, F.E. Paige and X. Tata, Multichannel search for minimal supergravity at \( p\overline{p} \) and e + e − colliders, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1046 [hep-ph/9408265] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    H. Baer, J. Ferrandis, S. Kraml and W. Porod, Treatment of threshold effects in supersymmetric spectrum computations, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 015010.ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
  70. [70]
    H.E. Haber and R. Hempfling, The Renormalization group improved Higgs sector of the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4280 [hep-ph/9307201] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    R. Hempfling, Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6168 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    M.S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [hep-ph/9402253] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    D.M. Pierce, J.A. Bagger, K.T. Matchev and R.-j. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9606211] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. [76]
    H. Baer, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, S. Sekmen and X. Tata, Effective supersymmetry at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2010) 018 [arXiv:1007.3897] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    M. Asano, H.D. Kim, R. Kitano and Y. Shimizu, Natural supersymmetry at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2010) 019 [arXiv:1010.0692] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. [78]
    H. Baer, V. Barger and P. Huang, Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider, JHEP 11 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1107.5581] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1110.6926] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the third generation and the LHC, JHEP 03 (2012) 103 [arXiv:1110.6670] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang and X. Tata, Natural supersymmetry: LHC, dark matter and ILC searches, JHEP 05 (2012) 109 [arXiv:1203.5539] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 4.7 fb −1 of \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV proton-proton collision data, arXiv:1208.0949 [INSPIRE].
  83. [83]
    CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in hadronic final states using MT2 in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 10 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1207.1798] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    CMS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to τ pairs in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 68 [arXiv:1202.4083] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Joint LEP 2 Supersymmetry Working Group, Combined LEP Chargino Results up to 208 GeV, http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/www/inos_moriond01/charginos_pub.html.
  86. [86]
    M. Misiak et al., Estimate of \( B\left( {\overline{B}\to X(s)\gamma } \right) \) at O \( \left( {\alpha_s^2} \right) \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    A. Crivellin et al., SUSY_FLAVOR v2: A Computational tool for FCNC and CP-violating processes in the MSSM, arXiv:1203.5023 [INSPIRE].
  88. [88]
    H. Baer, A. Lessa and W. Sreethawong, Coupled Boltzmann calculation of mixed axion/neutralino cold dark matter production in the early universe, JCAP 01 (2012) 036 [arXiv:1110.2491] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. [89]
    M. Albrecht, W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli and D.M. Straub, Challenging SO(10) SUSY GUTs with family symmetries through FCNC processes, JHEP 10 (2007) 055 [arXiv:0707.3954] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    H. Baer, M. Haider, S. Kraml, S. Sekmen and H. Summy, Cosmological consequences of Yukawa-unified SUSY with mixed axion/axino cold and warm dark matter, JCAP 02 (2009) 002 [arXiv:0812.2693] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    H. Baer, S. Kraml and S. Sekmen, Is ’just-so’ Higgs splitting needed for t − b − τ Yukawa unified SUSY GUTs?, JHEP 09 (2009) 005 [arXiv:0908.0134] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. [92]
    H. Baer, X. Tata and J. Woodside, Multi-lepton signals from supersymmetry at hadron super colliders, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 142 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, F. Paige and X. Tata, Signals for minimal supergravity at the CERN large hadron collider: Multi-jet plus missing energy channel, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 2746 [hep-ph/9503271] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, F. Paige and X. Tata, Signals for minimal supergravity at the CERN large hadron collider. 2: Multi-lepton channels, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6241 [hep-ph/9512383] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    H. Baer, C.-h. Chen, M. Drees, F. Paige and X. Tata, Probing minimal supergravity at the CERN LHC for large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 055014 [hep-ph/9809223] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    H. Baer, C. Balázs, A. Belyaev, T. Krupovnickas and X. Tata, Updated reach of the CERN LHC and constraints from relic density, b → sγ and a(μ) in the mSUGRA model, JHEP 06 (2003) 054 [hep-ph/0304303] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    S. Abdullin and F. Charles, Search for SUSY in (leptons +) jets + E(T)(miss) final states, Nucl. Phys. B 547 (1999) 60 [hep-ph/9811402] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    CMS collaboration, Discovery potential for supersymmetry in CMS, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 469 [hep-ph/9806366] [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  99. [99]
    B. Allanach, J. Hetherington, A. Parker and B. Webber, Naturalness reach of the large hadron collider in minimal supergravity, JHEP 08 (2000) 017.ADSGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    H. Baer, X. Tata and J. Woodside, Phenomenology of gluino decays via loops and top quark Yukawa coupling, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1568 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  101. [101]
    F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, A Complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 321 [hep-ph/9604387] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero and G. Ridolfi, Effects of supergravity induced electroweak breaking on rare B decays and mixings, Nucl. Phys. B 353 (1991) 591 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    H. Baer and M. Brhlik, QCD improved b → sγ constraints on the minimal supergravity model, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3201 [hep-ph/9610224] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    H. Baer, M. Brhlik, D. Castano and X. Tata, b → sγ constraints on the minimal supergravity model with large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015007 [hep-ph/9712305] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  105. [105]
    H. Baer, A. Belyaev, C. Kao and P. Svantesson, Exploring neutralino dark matter resonance annihilation via bA, bH → bμ + μ − at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095029 [arXiv:1106.5055] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. [107]
    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., First evidence for the decay B s → μ + μ −, arXiv:1211.2674 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© SISSA 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of OklahomaNormanU.S.A.
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, UJF Grenoble 1, CNRS/IN2P3, INPGGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations