Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2010:46 | Cite as

Boundary operators in minimal Liouville gravity and matrix models

  • Jean-Emile Bourgine
  • Goro Ishiki
  • Chaiho RimEmail author
Article

Abstract

We interpret the matrix boundaries of the one matrix model (1MM) recently constructed by two of the authors as an outcome of a relation among FZZT branes. In the double scaling limit, the 1MM is described by the (2, 2p + 1) minimal Liouville gravity. These matrix operators are shown to create a boundary with matter boundary conditions given by the Cardy states. We also demonstrate a recursion relation among the matrix disc correlator with two different boundaries. This construction is then extended to the two matrix model and the disc correlator with two boundaries is compared with the Liouville boundary two point functions. In addition, the realization within the matrix model of several symmetries among FZZT branes is discussed.

Keywords

Matrix Models Boundary Quantum Field Theory Conformal Field Models in String Theory 

References

  1. [1]
    H. Kawai, D.C. Lewellen and S.H.H. Tye, A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 269 (1986) 1 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Onogi and N. Ishibashi, Conformal field theories on surfaces with boundaries and crosscaps, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 161 [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. Ishibashi, The boundary and crosscap states in conformal field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 251 [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 514 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.L. Cardy, Effect of boundary conditions on the operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 275 (1986) 200 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Saleur and M. Bauer, On some relations between local height probabilities and conformal invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 320 (1989) 591 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 581 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.L. Cardy and D.C. Lewellen, Bulk and boundary operators in conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 259 (1991) 274 [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Dorey, C. Rim and R. Tateo, Exact g-function flow between conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 834 (2010) 485 [arXiv:0911.4969] [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Fredenhagen, M.R. Gaberdiel and C. Schmidt-Colinet, Bulk flows in Virasoro minimal models with boundaries, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 495403 [arXiv:0907.2560] [SPIRES].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Dorey, R. Tateo and R. Wilbourne, Exact g-function flows from the staircase model, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 724 [arXiv:1008.1190] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    V.G. Knizhnik, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Fractal structure of 2d-quantum gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988) 819 [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. David, Conformal Field Theories Coupled to 2D Gravity in the Conformal Gauge, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988) 1651 [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Distler and H. Kawai, Conformal field theory and 2D quantum gravity or who’s afraid of Joseph Liouville?, Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 509 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    I.K. Kostov, Thermal flow in the gravitational O(n) model, contributed to 4th International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries (QTS-4) and 6th International Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics (LT-6), Varna, Bulgaria, 15–21 Aug 2005 (2006) hep-th/0602075 [SPIRES].
  16. [16]
    J.-E. Bourgine, K. Hosomichi and I. Kostov, Boundary transitions of the O(n) model on a dynamical lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 832 (2010) 462 [arXiv:0910.1581] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J.-E. Bourgine and K. Hosomichi, Boundary operators in the O(n) and RSOS matrix models, JHEP 01 (2009) 009 [arXiv:0811.3252] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.-E. Bourgine, Boundary changing operators in the O(n) matrix model, JHEP 09 (2009) 020 [arXiv:0904.2297] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Seiberg, Notes on quantum Liouville theory and quantum gravity, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 102 (1990) 319 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    V. Fateev, A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Boundary Liouville field theory. I: Boundary state and boundary two-point function, hep-th/0001012 [SPIRES].
  21. [21]
    J. Teschner, Remarks on Liouville theory with boundary, presented at the 4th Annual European TMR Conference on Integrability, NonPerturbative Effects and Symmetry in Quantum Field Theory, Paris, France, 7–13September 2000 hep-th/0009138 [SPIRES].
  22. [22]
    G. Ishiki and C. Rim, Boundary correlation numbers in one matrix model, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2010) 272 [arXiv:1006.3906] [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Di Francesco, P.H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin, 2−D Gravity and random matrices, Phys. Rept. 254 (1995) 1 [hep-th/9306153] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    P.H. Ginsparg and G.W. Moore, Lectures on 2 −D gravity and 2 −D string theory, hep-th/9304011 [SPIRES].
  25. [25]
    S. Alexandrov and E. Imeroni, c = 1 from c< 1: Bulk and boundary correlators, Nucl. Phys. B 731 (2005) 242 [hep-th/0504199] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Branes, rings and matrix models in minimal (super)string theory, JHEP 02 (2004) 021 [hep-th/0312170] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. Basu and E.J. Martinec, Boundary ground ring in minimal string theory, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005)106007 [Tech.Rep EFI-05-15] [hep-th/0509142] [SPIRES].
  28. [28]
    B. Eynard, Topological expansion for the 1-hermitian matrix model correlation functions, JHEP 11 (2004) 031 [hep-th/0407261] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    V.A. Kazakov, Ising model on dynamical planar random lattice: Exact solution, Phys. Lett. A 119 (1986) 140 [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Anazawa, A. Ishikawa and H. Itoyama, Universal annulus amplitude from the two matrix model, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6016 [hep-th/9410015] [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Anazawa and H. Itoyama, Macroscopic n-Loop Amplitude for Minimal Models Coupled to Two-Dimensional Gravity: Fusion Rules and Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 334 [hep-th/9511220] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J.M. Daul, V.A. Kazakov and I.K. Kostov, Rational theories of 2 −D gravity from the two matrix model, Nucl. Phys. B 409 (1993) 311 [hep-th/9303093] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Topological expansion of the 2-matrix model correlation functions: Diagrammatic rules for a residue formula, JHEP 12 (2005) 034 [math-ph/0504058] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Mixed correlation functions in the 2-matrix model and the Bethe ansatz, JHEP 08 (2005) 028 [hep-th/0504029] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    K. Hosomichi, Minimal Open Strings, JHEP 06 (2008) 029 [arXiv:0804.4721] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    I. Runkel, Boundary structure constants for the A - series Virasoro minimal models, Nucl. Phys. B 549 (1999) 563 [hep-th/9811178] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    G.W. Moore, N. Seiberg and M. Staudacher, From loops to states in 2 − D quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 362 (1991) 665 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    A.A. Belavin and A.B. Zamolodchikov, On Correlation Numbers in 2D Minimal Gravity and Matrix Models, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 304004 [arXiv:0811.0450] [SPIRES].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Belavin and C. Rim, Bulk one-point function on disk in one-matrix model, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 264 [arXiv:1001.4356] [SPIRES].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    I.K. Kostov, Boundary correlators in 2D quantum gravity: Liouville versus discrete approach, Nucl. Phys. B 658 (2003) 397 [hep-th/0212194] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Quantum Spacetime (CQUeST)Sogang UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsSogang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations