Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:264 | Cite as

On the evolution of operator complexity beyond scrambling

  • J.L.F. BarbónEmail author
  • E. Rabinovici
  • R. Shir
  • R. Sinha
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

We study operator complexity on various time scales with emphasis on those much larger than the scrambling period. We use, for systems with a large but finite number of degrees of freedom, the notion of K-complexity employed in [1] for infinite systems. We present evidence that K-complexity of ETH operators has indeed the character associated with the bulk time evolution of extremal volumes and actions. Namely, after a period of exponential growth during the scrambling period the K-complexity increases only linearly with time for exponentially long times in terms of the entropy, and it eventually saturates at a constant value also exponential in terms of the entropy. This constant value depends on the Hamiltonian and the operator but not on any extrinsic tolerance parameter. Thus K-complexity deserves to be an entry in the AdS/CFT dictionary. Invoking a concept of K-entropy and some numerical examples we also discuss the extent to which the long period of linear complexity growth entails an efficient randomization of operators.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Random Systems 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

References

  1. [1]
    D.E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman, A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis, arXiv:1812.08657 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    A.R. Brown and L. Susskind, Second law of quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 086015 [arXiv:1701.01107] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Susskind, Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes, 2018, arXiv:1810.11563 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (2000).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.A. Nielsen, A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds, quant-ph/0502070.
  6. [6]
    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.L.F. Barbon and E. Rabinovici, Geometry And Quantum Noise, Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 626 [arXiv:1404.7085] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    A. Kitaev and S.J. Suh, The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual, JHEP 05 (2018) 183 [arXiv:1711.08467] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and A. Streicher, Operator growth in the SYK model, JHEP 06 (2018) 122 [arXiv:1802.02633] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, Quantum Epidemiology: Operator Growth, Thermal Effects and SYK, JHEP 08 (2019) 012 [arXiv:1810.11958] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    V.S. Viswanath and G. Müller, The Recursion Method: Application to Many-Body Physics, Springer Verlag (1994).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Peres, Ergodicity and mixing in quantum theory. I, Phys. Rev. A 30 (1984) 504 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    M. Feingold and A. Peres, Distribution of Matrix Elements of Chaotic Systems, Phys. Rev. A 34 (1986) 591 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43 (1991) 2046.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50 (1994) 888 [cond-mat/9403051].
  20. [20]
    M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A 32 (1999) 1163 [cond-mat/9809360].
  21. [21]
    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, Academic Press, (2000).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J.S. Cotler et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices, JHEP 05 (2017) 118 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2018) 002] [arXiv:1611.04650] [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu and B. Yoshida, Chaos, Complexity and Random Matrices, JHEP 11 (2017) 048 [arXiv:1706.05400] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, arXiv:1806.06840 [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    L. Susskind, Why do Things Fall?, arXiv:1802.01198 [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    L. Susskind, Complexity and Newton’s Laws, arXiv:1904.12819 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    J.M. Magán, Black holes, complexity and quantum chaos, JHEP 09 (2018) 043 [arXiv:1805.05839] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.L.F. Barbón
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Rabinovici
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Shir
    • 2
  • R. Sinha
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Fisica Teorica IFT-UAM/CSICMadridSpain
  2. 2.Racah InstituteThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Institut des Hautes Etudes ScientifiquesBures-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations