First measurement of the CKM angle ϕ3 withS B±→ D(\( {K}_{\mathrm{S}}^0 \)π+π−π0) K± decays
- 56 Downloads
Abstract
We present the first model-independent measurement of the CKM unitarity triangle angle ϕ3 using B±→ D(\( {K}_{\mathrm{S}}^0 \)π+π−π0) K± decays, where D indicates either a D0 or \( \overline{D} \)0 meson. Measurements of the strong-phase difference of the D →\( {K}_{\mathrm{S}}^0 \)π+π−π0 amplitude obtained from CLEO-c data are used as input. This analysis is based on the full Belle data set of 772 × 106B\( \overline{B} \) events collected at the Υ(4S) resonance. We obtain ϕ3 = (\( {5.7}_{-8.8}^{+10.2} \)±3.5±5.7)° and the suppressed amplitude ratio rB = 0.323±0.147±0.023±0.051. Here the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the experimental systematic, and the third is due to the precision of the strong-phase parameters measured from CLEO-c data. The 95% confidence interval on ϕ3 is (−29.7, 109.5)°, which is consistent with the current world average.
Keywords
CKM angle gamma CP violation e+-e- Experiments B physics Flavor physicsNotes
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
References
- [1]N. Cabibbo, Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.10 (1963) 531 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49 (1973) 652 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]J. Brod and J. Zupan, The ultimate theoretical error on γ from B → DK decays, JHEP01 (2014) 051 [arXiv:1308.5663] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]CKMfitter Group collaboration, CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J.C 41 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406184] [INSPIRE].
- [5]M. Blanke and A.J. Buras, Emerging ∆M d-anomaly from tree-level determinations of |V cb| and the angle γ, Eur. Phys. J.C 79 (2019) 159 [arXiv:1812.06963] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]J. Brod, A. Lenz, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi and M. Wiebusch, New physics effects in tree-level decays and the precision in the determination of the quark mixing angle γ, Phys. Rev.D 92 (2015) 033002 [arXiv:1412.1446] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
- [7]LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the CKM angle γ using B ±→ DK ±with D → \( {K}_S^0 \)π +π −, \( {K}_S^0 \)K +K −decays, JHEP08 (2018) 176 [Erratum ibid.10 (2018) 107] S S [arXiv:1806.01202] [INSPIRE].
- [8]A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer and J. Zupan, Determining γ using B ±→ DK ±with multibody D decays, Phys. Rev.D 68 (2003) 054018 [hep-ph/0303187] [INSPIRE].
- [9]A. Bondar, Proceedings of BINP special analysis meeting on Dalitz analysis, unpublished (2002).Google Scholar
- [10]CLEO collaboration, Model-independent determination of the strong-phase difference S,L between D 0 and \( {\overline{D}}^0\to {K}_{S,L}^0{h}^{+}{h}^{-}\left(h=\pi, K\ \right) \)and its impact on the measurement of the CKM angle γ/ϕ 3, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 112006 [arXiv:1010.2817] [INSPIRE].
- [11]Belle collaboration, First measurement of ϕ 3with a model-independent Dalitz plot analysis of B ±→ DK ±, D → \( {K}_S^0 \)π +π −decay, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 112014 [arXiv:1204.6561] [INSPIRE].
- [12]
- [13]P.K. Resmi, J. Libby, S. Malde and G. Wilkinson, Quantum-correlated measurements of D → \( {K}_S^0 \)π +π −π 0decays and consequences for the determination of the CKM angle γ, JHEP01 (2018) 082 [arXiv:1710.10086] [INSPIRE].
- [14]CLEO collaboration, The CLEO-II detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 320 (1992) 66 [INSPIRE].
- [15]D. Peterson et al., The CLEO III drift chamber, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 478 (2002) 142 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]M. Artuso et al., Construction, pattern recognition and performance of the CLEO-III LiF-TEA RICH detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 502 (2003) 91 [hep-ex/0209009] [INSPIRE].
- [17]CLEO-c/CESR-c taskforces and CLEO-c collaboration, CLEO-c and CESR-c: a new frontier of weak and strong interactions, Cornell LEPP Report CLNS Report No. 01/1742 (2001) [INSPIRE].
- [18]Belle collaboration, Evidence for direct C P violation in the decay B ±→ D (∗)K ±, D → \( {K}_S^0 \)π +π −and measurement of the CKM phase φ3 , Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 112002 [arXiv:1003.3360] [INSPIRE].
- [19]D.J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 462 (2001) 152 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]R. Brun et al., GEANT 3.21, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013, unpublished.Google Scholar
- [21]E. Barberio and Z. Wa¸s, PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun.79 (1994) 291 [INSPIRE].
- [22]Belle collaboration, The Belle Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 479 (2002) 117 [INSPIRE].
- [23]Belle collaboration, Physics Achievements from the Belle Experiment, PTEP2012 (2012) 04D001 [arXiv:1212.5342] [INSPIRE].
- [24]S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Overview of the KEKB accelerators, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 499 (2003) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]T. Abe et al., Achievements of KEKB, PTEP2013 (2013) 03A001 [INSPIRE].
- [26]M. Kenzie, M. Martinelli and N. Tuning, Estimating r Dπas an input to the determination of the CKM angle γ, Phys. Rev.D 94 (2016) 054021 [arXiv:1606.09129] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
- [27]Belle collaboration, Evidence for the Suppressed Decay B −→ DK −, D → K +π − , Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 231803 [arXiv:1103.5951] [INSPIRE].
- [28]M. Feindt and U. Kerzel, The NeuroBayes neural network package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 559 (2006) 190 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]H. Nakano, Search for new physics by a time-dependent CP violation analysis of the decay B → KS ηγ using the Belle detector, Ph.D. Thesis, Tohoku University (2014) [https://belle.kek.jp/belle/theses/doctor/nakano15.pdf].
- [30]R.A. Fisher, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals Eugen.7 (1936) 179 [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [31]G.C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Observables for the Analysis of Event Shapes in e +e −Annihilation and Other Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.41 (1978) 1581 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [32]Belle collaboration, Evidence for B 0→ π 0π 0, Phys. Rev. Lett.91 (2003) 261801 [hep-ex/0308040] [INSPIRE].
- [33]H. Tajima et al., Proper time resolution function for measurement of time evolution of B mesons at the KEK B factory, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 533 (2004) 370 [hep-ex/0301026] [INSPIRE].
- [34]Belle collaboration, Neutral B flavor tagging for the measurement of mixing induced CP-violation at Belle, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 533 (2004) 516 [hep-ex/0403022] [INSPIRE].
- [35]T. Skwarnicki, A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Υ and Υ′ resonances, Ph.D. Thesis, DESY F31-86-02 (1986).Google Scholar
- [36]HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016, Eur. Phys. J.C 77 (2017) 895 [arXiv:1612.07233] [INSPIRE].
- [37]G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev.D 57 (1998) 3873 [physics/9711021] [INSPIRE].
- [38]Belle collaboration, First model-independent Dalitz analysis of B 0→ DK ∗0, D → \( {K}_S^0 \)π +π −decay, PTEP2016 (2016) 043C01 [arXiv:1509.01098] [INSPIRE].
- [39]LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the CKM angle γ from a combination of LHCb results, JHEP12 (2016) 087 [arXiv:1611.03076] [INSPIRE].
- [40]