Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2013:113 | Cite as

Constraining MPI models using σ eff and recent Tevatron and LHC Underlying Event data

  • M. H. Seymour
  • A. Siódmok
Article

Abstract

We review the modelling of multiple interactions in the event generator Herwig++ and study implications of recent tuning efforts to Tevatron and LHC data. It is often said that measurements of the effective cross section for double-parton scattering, σ eff , are in contradiction with models of the final state of multi-parton interactions, but we show that the Herwig++ model is consistent with both and gives stable predictions for underlying event observables at 14 TeV.

Keywords

Monte Carlo Simulations Hadronic Colliders 

References

  1. [1]
    T. Sjöstrand and M. van Zijl, A Multiple Interaction Model for the Event Structure in Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2019 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Marchesini and B. Webber, Associated Transverse Energy in Hadronic Jet Production, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3419 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Axial Field Spectrometer collaboration, T. Akesson et al., Double Parton Scattering in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=63\hbox{-}GeV \), Z. Phys. C 34 (1987) 163 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    UA2 collaboration, J. Alitti et al., A study of multi-jet events at the CERN \( \overline{p}p \) collider and a search for double parton scattering, Phys. Lett. B 268 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    CDF collaboration, F. Abe et al., Study of four jet events and evidence for double parton interactions in \( p\overline{p} \) collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=1.8 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 4857 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    CDF collaboration, F. Abe et al., Double parton scattering in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=1.8 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3811 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D0 collaboration, V. Abazov et al., Double parton interactions in photon+3 jet events in pp bar collisions \( \sqrt{s}=1.96 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 052012 [arXiv:0912.5104] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    LHCb collaboration, Observation of J/ψ pair production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) T eV, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 52 [arXiv:1109.0963] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    LHCb collaboration, Observation of double charm production involving open charm in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 06 (2012) 141 [arXiv:1205.0975] [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of hard double-parton interactions in W (→ ) + 2 jet events at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 033038 [arXiv:1301.6872] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Gieseke, C. Rohr and A. Siodmok, Multiple Partonic Interaction Developments in Herwig++, arXiv:1110.2675 [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    S. Gieseke et al., Herwig++ 2.5 Release Note, arXiv:1102.1672 [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    S. Gieseke, C. Rohr and A. Siodmok, Colour reconnections in Herwig++, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2225 [arXiv:1206.0041] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. Arnold, L. d’Errico, S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton et al., Herwig++ 2.6 Release Note, arXiv:1205.4902 [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    R. Corke and T. Sjöstrand, Interleaved Parton Showers and Tuning Prospects, JHEP 03 (2011)032 [arXiv:1011.1759] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    T. Sjöstrand and P.Z. Skands, private communication.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P.Z. Skands, The Perugia Tunes, arXiv:0905.3418 [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    P. Bartolini, private communication.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Strikman, Transverse Nucleon Structure and Multiparton Interactions, Acta Phys. Polon. B 42 (2011) 2607 [arXiv:1112.3834] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman and C. Weiss, Transverse nucleon structure and diagnostics of hard parton-parton processes at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 054012 [arXiv:1009.2559] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Corke and T. Sjöstrand, Multiparton Interactions with an x-dependent Proton Size, JHEP 05 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1101.5953] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    B. Blok, Y. Dokshitzer, L. Frankfurt and M. Strikman, Perturbative QCD correlations in multi-parton collisions, arXiv:1306.3763 [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    H. Abramowicz et al., Summary of the Workshop on Multi-Parton Interactions (MPI@LHC 2012), arXiv:1306.5413 [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    J. Butterworth, J.R. Forshaw and M. Seymour, Multiparton interactions in photoproduction at HERA, Z. Phys. C 72 (1996) 637 [hep-ph/9601371] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    I. Borozan and M. Seymour, An eikonal model for multiparticle production in hadron hadron interactions, JHEP 09 (2002) 015 [hep-ph/0207283] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Bahr, S. Gieseke and M.H. Seymour, Simulation of multiple partonic interactions in Herwig++, JHEP 07 (2008) 076 [arXiv:0803.3633] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    M. Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639 [arXiv:0803.0883] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    D. Treleani, Double parton scattering, diffraction and effective cross section, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007)076006 [arXiv:0708.2603] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Bahr, M. Myska, M.H. Seymour and A. Siodmok, Extracting σ eff from the CDF γ + 3jets measurement, JHEP 03 (2013) 129 [arXiv:1302.4325] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    R. Maciula and A. Szczurek, Production of \( c\overline{c}c\overline{c} \) in double-parton scattering within k t -factorization approach - meson-meson correlations, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 074039 [arXiv:1301.4469] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    A. Berezhnoy, A. Likhoded, A. Luchinsky and A. Novoselov, Double \( c\overline{c} \) production at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 034017 [arXiv:1204.1058] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    A. Buckley, H. Hoeth, H. Lacker, H. Schulz and J.E. von Seggern, Systematic event generator tuning for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 65 (2010) 331 [arXiv:0907.2973] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. Buckley et al., Rivet user manual, arXiv:1003.0694 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of underlying event characteristics using charged particles in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=900 \) GeV and 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 112001 [arXiv:1012.0791] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    CDF collaboration, R. Field et al., The Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event in Hadronic Collisions, talk presented by R. Field at The 36th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2012), CDF/ANAL/CDF/CDFR/10874, Melbourne, Australia, July 5 2012.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    CMS collaboration, Measurement of the Underlying Event Activity at the LHC with \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV and Comparison with \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 09 (2011) 109 [arXiv:1107.0330] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    D. Stump et al., Inclusive jet production, parton distributions and the search for new physics, JHEP 10 (2003) 046 [hep-ph/0303013] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    A. Martin, W. Stirling, R. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consortium for Fundamental Physics, School of Physics and AstronomyThe University of ManchesterManchesterU.K.

Personalised recommendations