Abstract
The origin of black hole entropy and the black hole information problem provide important clues for trying to piece together a quantum theory of gravity. Thus far, discussions on this topic have mostly assumed that in a consistent theory of gravity and quantum mechanics, quantum theory will be unmodified. Here, we examine the black hole information problem in the context of generalisations of quantum theory. In particular, we examine black holes in the setting of generalised probabilistic theories, in which quantum theory and classical probability theory are special cases. We compute the time it takes information to escape a black hole, assuming that information is preserved. We find that under some very general assumptions, the arguments of Page (that information should escape the black hole after half the Hawking photons have been emitted), and the black-hole mirror result of Hayden and Preskill (that information can escape quickly) need to be modified. The modification is determined entirely by what we call the Wootters-Hardy parameter associated with a theory. We find that although the information leaves the black hole after enough photons have been emitted, it is fairly generic that it fails to appear outside the black hole at this point — something impossible in quantum theory due to the no-hiding theorem. The information is neither inside the black hole, nor outside it, but is delocalised. Our central technical result is an information decoupling theorem which holds in the generalised probabilistic framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206–206] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
S. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) [INSPIRE].
S. Hawking, The unpredictability of quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1982) 395 [INSPIRE].
J. Preskill, Do black holes destroy information?, hep-th/9209058 [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, L. Susskind and M.E. Peskin, Difficulties for the evolution of pure states into mixed states, Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 125 [INSPIRE].
W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, On evolution laws taking pure states to mixed states in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 2176 [hep-th/9503024] [INSPIRE].
J. Oppenheim and B. Reznik, Fundamental destruction of information and conservation laws, arXiv:0902.2361 [INSPIRE].
L. Hardy, Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms, quant-ph/0101012 [INSPIRE].
L.A. Khalfin and B.S. Tsirelson, Quantum and quasi-classical analogs of bell inequalities, World Scientific, Singapore (1985), pg. 441.
B.S. Tsirelson, Some results and problems on quantum bell-type inequalities, Hadronic J. Suppl. 8 (1993) 329.
S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Quantum nonlocality as an axiom, Found. Phys. 24 (1994) 379.
J. Barrett, Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories, Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007)032304 [quant-ph/0508211].
B. Mielnik, Generalized quantum mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 37 (1974) 221 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, Hawking radiation and back reaction, Nucl. Phys. B 382 (1992)123 [hep-th/9203054] [INSPIRE].
H. Barnum, J. Barrett, M. Leifer and A. Wilce, Generalized no-broadcasting theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 240501 [arXiv:0707.0620].
G. ’t Hooft, On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 727 [INSPIRE].
Y. Aharonov, A. Casher and S. Nussinov, The unitarity puzzle and Planck mass stable particles, Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 51 [INSPIRE].
R.D. Carlitz and R.S. Willey, The lifetime of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2336 [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Is black hole evaporation predictable?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 301 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, The black hole interpretation of string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 138 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
J. Smolin and J. Oppenheim, Locking information in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081302 [hep-th/0507287] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Braunstein and K. Życzkowski, Entangled black holes as ciphers of hidden information, arXiv:0907.1190 [INSPIRE].
Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE].
M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim and A. Winter, Quantum state merging and negative information, Commun. Math. Phys. 269 (2007) 107 [quant-ph/0512247].
A. Abeyesinghe, I. Devetak, P. Hayden and A. Winter, The mother of all protocols: restructuring quantum information’s family tree, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 465 (2009) 2537 [quant-ph/0606225].
S.L. Braunstein and A.K. Pati, Quantum information cannot be completely hidden in correlations: Implications for the black-hole information paradox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 080502 [gr-qc/0603046] [INSPIRE].
A. Uhlmann, The” transition probability” in the state space of a*-algebra, Rept. Math. Phys. 9 (1976)273.
W.K. Wootters, Quantum mechanics without probability amplitudes, Found. Phys. 16 (1986) 391.
B. Simon, Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 10: Representations of Finite and Compact Groups, American Mathematical Society, Providence U.S.A. (1995).
S.L. Braunstein and M.K. Patra, Black hole evaporation rates without spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 071302 [arXiv:1102.2326] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Müller, O.C.O. Dahlsten and V. Vedral, Unifying typical entanglement and coin tossing: on randomization in probabilistic theories, Commun. Math. Phys. in press (2012), arXiv:1107.6029.
D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE].
C. Hein, Entropy in operational statistics and quantum logic, Found. Phys. 9 (1979) 751.
H. Barnum et al., Entropy and information causality in general probabilistic theories, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 033024 [arXiv:0909.5075].
A.J. Short and S. Wehner, Entropy in general physical theories, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 033023 [arXiv:0909.4801].
M.P. Müller and J. Oppenheim, in preparation.
C. Bennett and S. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2881.
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1955).
M.P. Müller and C. Ududec, Structure of reversible computation determines the self-duality of quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 130401 [arXiv:1110.3516].
J. Bellissard and B. Iochum, Homogeneous self dual cones versus Jordan algebras. The theory revisited, Ann. Inst. Fourier 28 (1978) 27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1206.5030
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, M.P., Oppenheim, J. & Dahlsten, O.C. The black hole information problem beyond quantum theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 116 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)116
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)116