# New opportunities in *h* → 4*ℓ*

- 186 Downloads
- 5 Citations

## Abstract

The Higgs decay *h* → 4*ℓ* has played an important role in discovering the Higgs and measuring its mass thanks to low background and excellent resolution. Current cuts in this channel have been optimized for Higgs discovery via the dominant tree level *ZZ* contribution arising from electroweak symmetry breaking. Going forward, one of the primary objectives of this sensitive channel will be to probe other Higgs couplings and search for new physics on top of the tree level *ZZ* ‘background’. Thanks to interference between these small couplings and the large tree level contribution to *ZZ*, the *h* → 4ℓ decay is uniquely capable of probing the magnitude *and* CP phases of the Higgs couplings to *γγ* and *Zγ* as well as, to a lesser extent, *ZZ* couplings arising from higher dimensional operators. With this in mind we examine how much relaxing current cuts can enhance the sensitivity while also accounting for the dominant non-Higgs continuum \( q\overline{q}\to 4\ell \) background. We find the largest enhancement in sensitivity for the *hZγ* couplings (≳100%) followed by *hγγ* (≳40%) and less so for the higher dimensional *hZZ* couplings (a few percent). With these enhancements, we show that couplings of order Standard Model values for *hγγ* may optimistically be probed by end of Run-II at the LHC while for *hZγ* perhaps towards the end of a high luminosity LHC. Thus an appropriately optimized *h* → 4*ℓ* analysis can complement direct decays of the Higgs to on-shell *γγ* and *Zγ* pairs giving a unique opportunity to directly access the CP properties of these couplings.

## Keywords

Higgs Physics Beyond Standard Model CP violation## Notes

### **Open Access**

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

## References

- [1]ATLAS collaboration,
*Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC*,*Phys. Lett.***B 716**(2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE]. - [2]CMS collaboration,
*Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC*,*Phys. Lett.***B 716**(2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE]. - [3]A. Falkowski, F. Riva and A. Urbano,
*Higgs at last*,*JHEP***11**(2013) 111 [arXiv:1303.1812] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [4]CMS collaboration,
*Constraints on anomalous HVV interactions using H*→ 4*ℓ decays*, CMS-PAS-HIG-14-014 (2014). - [5]CMS collaboration,
*Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV*,*Phys. Rev.***D 92**(2015) 012004 [arXiv:1411.3441] [INSPIRE]. - [6]C.A. Nelson,
*Correlation between decay planes in Higgs-boson decays into a W pair (into a Z pair)*,*Phys. Rev.***D 37**(1988) 1220 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [7]A. Soni and R.M. Xu,
*Probing CP-violation via Higgs decays to four leptons*,*Phys. Rev.***D 48**(1993) 5259 [hep-ph/9301225] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [8]D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung and I. Phillips,
*CP odd correlation in the decay of neutral Higgs boson into ZZ, W*^{+}*W*^{−}*, or*\( t\overline{t} \),*Phys. Rev.***D 48**(1993) 3225 [hep-ph/9303226] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [9]V.D. Barger, K.-m. Cheung, A. Djouadi, B.A. Kniehl and P.M. Zerwas,
*Higgs bosons: intermediate mass range at e*^{+}*e*^{−}*colliders*,*Phys. Rev.***D 49**(1994) 79 [hep-ph/9306270] [INSPIRE]. - [10]T. Arens and L.M. Sehgal,
*Energy spectra and energy correlations in the decay H*→*ZZ*→*μ*^{+}*μ*^{−}*μ*^{+}*μ*^{−},*Z. Phys.***C 66**(1995) 89 [hep-ph/9409396] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [11]S.Y. Choi, D.J. Miller, M.M. Mühlleitner and P.M. Zerwas,
*Identifying the Higgs spin and parity in decays to Z pairs*,*Phys. Lett.***B 553**(2003) 61 [hep-ph/0210077] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [12]C.P. Buszello, I. Fleck, P. Marquard and J.J. van der Bij,
*Prospective analysis of spin- and CP-sensitive variables in H*→*ZZ*→*l*_{1}^{+}*l*_{1}^{−}*l*_{2}^{+}*l*_{2}^{−}*at the LHC*,*Eur. Phys. J.***C 32**(2004) 209 [hep-ph/0212396] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [13]R.M. Godbole, D.J. Miller and M.M. Mühlleitner,
*Aspects of CP-violation in the HZZ coupling at the LHC*,*JHEP***12**(2007) 031 [arXiv:0708.0458] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [14]V.A. Kovalchuk,
*Model-independent analysis of CP-violation effects in decays of the Higgs boson into a pair of the W and Z bosons*,*J. Exp. Theor. Phys.***107**(2008) 774 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [15]Q.-H. Cao, C.B. Jackson, W.-Y. Keung, I. Low and J. Shu,
*The Higgs mechanism and loop-induced decays of a scalar into two Z bosons*,*Phys. Rev.***D 81**(2010) 015010 [arXiv:0911.3398] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [16]Y. Gao et al.,
*Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders*,*Phys. Rev.***D 81**(2010) 075022 [arXiv:1001.3396] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [17]A. De Rujula, J. Lykken, M. Pierini, C. Rogan and M. Spiropulu,
*Higgs look-alikes at the LHC*,*Phys. Rev.***D 82**(2010) 013003 [arXiv:1001.5300] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [18]J.S. Gainer, K. Kumar, I. Low and R. Vega-Morales,
*Improving the sensitivity of Higgs boson searches in the golden channel*,*JHEP***11**(2011) 027 [arXiv:1108.2274] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [19]B. Coleppa, K. Kumar and H.E. Logan,
*Can the 126 GeV boson be a pseudoscalar?*,*Phys. Rev.***D 86**(2012) 075022 [arXiv:1208.2692] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [20]S. Bolognesi et al.,
*On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC*,*Phys. Rev.***D 86**(2012) 095031 [arXiv:1208.4018] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [21]D. Stolarski and R. Vega-Morales,
*Directly measuring the tensor structure of the scalar coupling to gauge bosons*,*Phys. Rev.***D 86**(2012) 117504 [arXiv:1208.4840] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [22]R. Boughezal, T.J. LeCompte and F. Petriello,
*Single-variable asymmetries for measuring the*‘*Higgs*’*boson spin and CP properties*, arXiv:1208.4311 [INSPIRE]. - [23]A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov,
*CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model*,*Comput. Phys. Commun.***184**(2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [24]P. Avery et al.,
*Precision studies of the Higgs boson decay channel H*→*ZZ*→ 4*ℓ with MEKD*,*Phys. Rev.***D 87**(2013) 055006 [arXiv:1210.0896] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [25]J.M. Campbell, W.T. Giele and C. Williams,
*Extending the matrix element method to next-to-leading order*, arXiv:1205.3434 [INSPIRE]. - [26]J.M. Campbell, W.T. Giele and C. Williams,
*The matrix element method at next-to-leading order*,*JHEP***11**(2012) 043 [arXiv:1204.4424] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [27]Y. Chen, N. Tran and R. Vega-Morales,
*Scrutinizing the Higgs signal and background in the*2*e*2*μ golden channel*,*JHEP***01**(2013) 182 [arXiv:1211.1959] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [28]B. Grinstein, C.W. Murphy and D. Pirtskhalava,
*Searching for new physics in the three-body decays of the Higgs-like particle*,*JHEP***10**(2013) 077 [arXiv:1305.6938] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [29]A. Menon, T. Modak, D. Sahoo, R. Sinha and H.-Y. Cheng,
*Inferring the nature of the boson at 125-126 GeV*,*Phys. Rev.***D 89**(2014) 095021 [arXiv:1301.5404] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [30]Y. Sun, X.-F. Wang and D.-N. Gao,
*CP mixed property of the Higgs-like particle in the decay channel h*→*ZZ*^{*}→ 4*l*,*Int. J. Mod. Phys.***A 29**(2014) 1450086 [arXiv:1309.4171] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [31]J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park,
*Geolocating the Higgs boson candidate at the LHC*,*Phys. Rev. Lett.***111**(2013) 041801 [arXiv:1304.4936] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [32]I. Anderson et al.,
*Constraining anomalous HVV interactions at proton and lepton colliders*,*Phys. Rev.***D 89**(2014) 035007 [arXiv:1309.4819] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [33]M. Chen et al.,
*The role of interference in unraveling the ZZ-couplings of the newly discovered boson at the LHC*,*Phys. Rev.***D 89**(2014) 034002 [arXiv:1310.1397] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [34]G. Buchalla, O. Catà and G. D’Ambrosio,
*Nonstandard Higgs couplings from angular distributions in h*→*Zℓ*^{+}*ℓ*^{−},*Eur. Phys. J.***C 74**(2014) 2798 [arXiv:1310.2574] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [35]Y. Chen and R. Vega-Morales,
*Extracting effective Higgs couplings in the golden channel*,*JHEP***04**(2014) 057 [arXiv:1310.2893] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [36]Y. Chen et al.,
*8D likelihood effective Higgs couplings extraction framework in h*→ 4*ℓ*,*JHEP***01**(2015) 125 [arXiv:1401.2077] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [37]J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park,
*Beyond geolocating: constraining higher dimensional operators in H*→ 4*ℓ with off-shell production and more*,*Phys. Rev.***D 91**(2015) 035011 [arXiv:1403.4951] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [38]Y. Chen, R. Harnik and R. Vega-Morales,
*Probing the Higgs couplings to photons in h*→ 4*ℓ at the LHC*,*Phys. Rev. Lett.***113**(2014) 191801 [arXiv:1404.1336] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [39]M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca,
*Pseudo-observables in Higgs decays*,*Eur. Phys. J.***C 75**(2015) 128 [arXiv:1412.6038] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [40]W. Murray,
*HL-LHC Higgs potential*, talk given at the*ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop*, Aix-les-Bains France, 1–3 Oct 2013, http://indico.cern.ch/event/252045/session/3/contribution/8/material/slides/0.pdf. - [41]Y. Chen, A. Falkowski, I. Low and R. Vega-Morales,
*New observables for CP-violation in Higgs decays*,*Phys. Rev.***D 90**(2014) 113006 [arXiv:1405.6723] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [42]F. Bishara et al.,
*Probing CP-violation in h*→*γγ with converted photons*,*JHEP***04**(2014) 084 [arXiv:1312.2955] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [43]B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,
*Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian*,*JHEP***10**(2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [44]M. Dührssen-Debling, A.T. Mendes, A. Falkowski and G. Isidori,
*Higgs basis: proposal for an EFT basis choice for LHC HXSWG*, LHCHXSWG-INT-2015-001 (2015). - [45]A. Pomarol and F. Riva,
*Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics*,*JHEP***01**(2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [46]A. Falkowski and F. Riva,
*Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators*,*JHEP***02**(2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [47]
- [48]Y. Chen, A. Falkowski, R. Harnik and R. Vega-Morales,
*Probing effective Higgs couplings in h*→ 4*ℓ*, in preparation.Google Scholar - [49]M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca,
*Electroweak bounds on Higgs pseudo-observables and h*→ 4*ℓ decays*,*Eur. Phys. J.***C 75**(2015) 341 [arXiv:1504.04018] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [50]Y. Chen, D. Stolarski and R. Vega-Morales,
*Golden probe of the top Yukawa*,*Phys. Rev.***D 92**(2015) 053003 [arXiv:1505.01168] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [51]A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and M.M. Weber,
*Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decay H*→*WW/ZZ*→ 4*leptons*,*Phys. Rev.***D 74**(2006) 013004 [hep-ph/0604011] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [52]A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and M.M. Weber,
*Precision calculations for the Higgs decays H*→*ZZ/WW*→ 4*leptons*,*Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.***160**(2006) 131 [hep-ph/0607060] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [53]M. Bordone, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, D. Marzocca and A. Pattori,
*Higgs pseudo observables and radiative corrections*,*Eur. Phys. J.***C 75**(2015) 385 [arXiv:1507.02555] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [54]C. Hartmann and M. Trott,
*On one-loop corrections in the standard model effective field theory; the*Γ(*h*→*γγ*)*case*,*JHEP***07**(2015) 151 [arXiv:1505.02646] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [55]M. Ghezzi, R. Gomez-Ambrosio, G. Passarino and S. Uccirati,
*NLO Higgs effective field theory and κ-framework*,*JHEP***07**(2015) 175 [arXiv:1505.03706] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [56]C. Hartmann and M. Trott,
*Higgs decay to two photons at one-loop in the SMEFT*, arXiv:1507.03568 [INSPIRE]. - [57]J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol,
*Higgs windows to new physics through d*= 6*operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions*,*JHEP***11**(2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [58]R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva,
*BSM primary effects*,*Phys. Rev.***D 91**(2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [59]M. Trott,
*On the consistent use of constructed observables*,*JHEP***02**(2015) 046 [arXiv:1409.7605] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [60]I. Low, J. Lykken and G. Shaughnessy,
*Have we observed the Higgs (imposter)?*,*Phys. Rev.***D 86**(2012) 093012 [arXiv:1207.1093] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [61]ATLAS collaboration,
*Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings in diboson final states with the ATLAS detector at the LHC*,*Phys. Lett.***B 726**(2013) 88 [*Erratum ibid.***B 734**(2014) 406] [arXiv:1307.1427] [INSPIRE]. - [62]D. McKeen, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,
*Modified Higgs branching ratios versus CP and lepton flavor violation*,*Phys. Rev.***D 86**(2012) 113004 [arXiv:1208.4597] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar - [63]ACME collaboration, J. Baron et al.,
*Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron*,*Science***343**(2014) 269 [arXiv:1310.7534] [INSPIRE]. - [64]CMS collaboration,
*Study of the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs*,*Phys. Rev. Lett.***110**(2013) 081803 [arXiv:1212.6639] [INSPIRE]. - [65]CMS collaboration,
*Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state*,*Phys. Rev.***D 89**(2014) 092007 [arXiv:1312.5353] [INSPIRE]. - [66]G. Isidori, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott,
*Probing the nature of the Higgs-like boson via h*→*VF decays*,*Phys. Lett.***B 728**(2014) 131 [arXiv:1305.0663] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [67]M. Gonzalez-Alonso and G. Isidori,
*The h*→ 4*l spectrum at low m*_{34}*: standard model vs. light new physics*,*Phys. Lett.***B 733**(2014) 359 [arXiv:1403.2648] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [68]CMS collaboration,
*Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states*,*Phys. Lett.***B 726**(2013) 564 [arXiv:1210.7619] [INSPIRE]. - [69]CTEQ collaboration, H.L. Lai et al.,
*Global QCD analysis of parton structure of the nucleon: CTEQ5 parton distributions*,*Eur. Phys. J.***C 12**(2000) 375 [hep-ph/9903282] [INSPIRE]. - [70]J. Pumplin et al.,
*New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis*,*JHEP***07**(2002) 012 [hep-ph/0201195] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [71]J. Alwall et al.,
*The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations*,*JHEP***07**(2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [72]Y. Chen et al.,
*Technical note for 8D likelihood effective Higgs couplings extraction framework in the golden channel*, arXiv:1410.4817 [INSPIRE]. - [73]LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al.,
*Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables*, arXiv:1101.0593 [INSPIRE]. - [74]LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, J.R. Andersen et al.,
*Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties*, arXiv:1307.1347 [INSPIRE].