Advertisement

Three-dimensional finite temperature Z2 gauge theory with tensor network scheme

  • Yoshinobu Kuramashi
  • Yusuke YoshimuraEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
First Online:

Abstract

We apply a tensor network scheme to finite temperature Z2 gauge theory in 2+1 dimensions. Finite size scaling analysis with the spatial extension up to Nσ = 4096 at the temporal extension of Nτ = 2, 3, 5 allows us to determine the transition temperature and the critical exponent ν at high level of precision, which shows the consistency with the Svetitsky-Yaffe conjecture.

Keywords

Duality in Gauge Field Theories Lattice QCD 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

References

  1. [1]
    T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Corner transfer matrix renormalization group method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65 (1996) 891.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Maeshima, Y. Hieida, Y. Akutsu, T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Vertical density matrix algorithm: a higher dimensional numerical renormalization scheme based on the tensor product state ansatz, Phys. Rev.E 64 (2001) 016705 [cond-mat/0101360] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Levin and C.P. Nave, Tensor renormalization group approach to 2D classical lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett.99 (2007) 120601 [cond-mat/0611687] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry protected topological order, Phys. Rev.B 80 (2009) 155131 [arXiv:0903.1069] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Shimizu, Tensor renormalization group approach to a lattice boson model, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 27 (2012) 1250035 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one-flavor lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 014508 [arXiv:1403.0642] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Z.-C. Gu, F. Verstraete and X.-G. Wen, Grassmann tensor network states and its renormalization for strongly correlated fermionic and bosonic states, arXiv:1004.2563 [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    Z.-C. Gu, Efficient simulation of Grassmann tensor product states, Phys. Rev.B 88 (2013) 115139 [arXiv:1109.4470] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Critical behavior of the lattice Schwinger model with a topological term at θ = π using the Grassmann tensor renormalization group, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 074503 [arXiv:1408.0897] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in lattice Schwinger model with one flavor of Wilson fermion, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 034502 [arXiv:1712.07808] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Grassmann tensor renormalization group for the one-flavor lattice Gross-Neveu model with finite chemical potential, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2015 (2015) 043B01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Tensor network formulation for two-dimensional lattice N = 1 Wess-Zumino model, JHEP03 (2018) 141 [arXiv:1801.04183] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Higher order tensor renormalization group for relativistic fermion systems, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2017 (2017) 063B07 [arXiv:1705.07764] [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Y. Yoshimura, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, S. Takeda and R. Sakai, Calculation of fermionic Green functions with Grassmann higher-order tensor renormalization group, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 054511 [arXiv:1711.08121] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Y. Liu et al., Exact blocking formulas for spin and gauge models, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 056005 [arXiv:1307.6543] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Dittrich, F.C. Eckert and M. Martin-Benito, Coarse graining methods for spin net and spin foam models, New J. Phys.14 (2012) 035008 [arXiv:1109.4927] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    B. Dittrich and F.C. Eckert, Towards computational insights into the large-scale structure of spin foams, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.360 (2012) 012004 [arXiv:1111.0967] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Dittrich, S. Mizera and S. Steinhaus, Decorated tensor network renormalization for lattice gauge theories and spin foam models, New J. Phys.18 (2016) 053009 [arXiv:1409.2407] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch, Deconfinement transition and dimensional crossover in the 3D gauge Ising model, Nucl. Phys.B 470 (1996) 435 [hep-lat/9511015] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. Svetitsky and L.G. Yaffe, Critical behavior at finite temperature confinement transitions, Nucl. Phys.B 210 (1982) 423 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z.Y. Xie, J. Chen, M.P. Qin, J.W. Zhu, L.P. Yang and T. Xiang, Coarse-graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition, Phys. Rev.B 86 (2012) 045139.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Computational SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations