Standard Model parton distributions at very high energies

  • Christian W. Bauer
  • Nicolas Ferland
  • Bryan R. Webber
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We compute the leading-order evolution of parton distribution functions for all the Standard Model fermions and bosons up to energy scales far above the electroweak scale, where electroweak symmetry is restored. Our results include the 52 PDFs of the unpolarized proton, evolving according to the SU(3), SU(2), U(1), mixed SU(2)×U(1) and Yukawa interactions. We illustrate the numerical effects on parton distributions at large energies, and show that this can lead to important corrections to parton luminosities at a future 100 TeV collider.

Keywords

Jets QCD Phenomenology 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Buckley et al., General-purpose event generators for LHC physics, Phys. Rept. 504 (2011) 145 [arXiv:1101.2599] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Sjöstrand, A Model for Initial State Parton Showers, Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985) 321 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber, QCD and collider physics, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 8 (1996) 1 [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Chen, T. Han and B. Tweedie, Electroweak Splitting Functions and High Energy Showering, arXiv:1611.00788 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    V.N. Gribov and L.N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438 [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y.L. Dokshitzer, Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e + e Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics., Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language, Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak evolution equations, JHEP 11 (2005) 022 [hep-ph/0505047] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    H. Spiesberger, QED radiative corrections for parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4936 [hep-ph/9412286] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    A.D. Martin, R.G. Roberts, W.J. Stirling and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions incorporating QED contributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 39 (2005) 155 [hep-ph/0411040] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    M. Roth and S. Weinzierl, QED corrections to the evolution of parton distributions, Phys. Lett. B 590 (2004) 190 [hep-ph/0403200] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions with QED corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 290 [arXiv:1308.0598] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    R. Sadykov, Impact of QED radiative corrections on Parton Distribution Functions, arXiv:1401.1133 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    S. Carrazza, Parton distribution functions with QED corrections, arXiv:1509.00209 [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    C. Schmidt, J. Pumplin, D. Stump and C.P. Yuan, CT14QED parton distribution functions from isolated photon production in deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114015 [arXiv:1509.02905] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Manohar, P. Nason, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi, How bright is the proton? A precise determination of the photon parton distribution function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 242002 [arXiv:1607.04266] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Sudakov enhancement of electroweak corrections, Phys. Lett. B 446 (1999) 278 [hep-ph/9809321] [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak Sudakov form-factors and nonfactorizable soft QED effects at NLC energies, Phys. Lett. B 476 (2000) 49 [hep-ph/9910278] [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Bloch-Nordsieck violating electroweak corrections to inclusive TeV scale hard processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4810 [hep-ph/0001142] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak double logarithms in inclusive observables for a generic initial state, Phys. Lett. B 501 (2001) 216 [hep-ph/0007096] [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak Bloch-Nordsieck violation at the TeV scale: ‘Strong’ weak interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 589 (2000) 359 [hep-ph/0004071] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Enhanced electroweak corrections to inclusive boson fusion processes at the TeV scale, Nucl. Phys. B 613 (2001) 382 [hep-ph/0103316] [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Towards collinear evolution equations in electroweak theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 102001 [hep-ph/0111109] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli and A. Vergine, Sudakov electroweak effects in transversely polarized beams, JHEP 07 (2004) 039 [hep-ph/0311260] [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, The Importance of weak bosons emission at LHC, JHEP 09 (2006) 055 [hep-ph/0604070] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak double-logs at small x, JHEP 05 (2008) 039 [arXiv:0802.0168] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. Ciafaloni and A. Urbano, Infrared weak corrections to strongly interacting gauge bosons scattering, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085033 [arXiv:0902.1855] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, A. Riotto, F. Sala, A. Strumia and A. Urbano, Weak Corrections are Relevant for Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP 03 (2011) 019 [arXiv:1009.0224] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    S. Forte et al., The Standard Model from LHC to future colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 554 [arXiv:1505.01279] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M.L. Mangano et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Standard Model processes, CERN Yellow Report (2017) 1 [arXiv:1607.01831] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian W. Bauer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicolas Ferland
    • 1
  • Bryan R. Webber
    • 3
  1. 1.Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.
  2. 2.Theoretical Physics DepartmentCERNGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of Cambridge, Cavendish LaboratoryCambridgeU.K.

Personalised recommendations