Resummation of heavy jet mass and comparison to LEP data

Article

Abstract

The heavy jet mass distribution in e+e collisions is computed to next-to-nextto-next-to leading logarithmic (N3LL) and next-to-next-to leading fixed order accuracy (NNLO). The singular terms predicted from the resummed distribution are confirmed by the fixed order distributions allowing a precise extraction of the unknown soft function coefficients. A number of quantitative and qualitative comparisons of heavy jet mass and the related thrust distribution are made. From fitting to ALEPH data, a value of αs is extracted, αs(mZ) = 0.1220 ± 0.0031, which is larger than, but not in conflict with, the corresponding value for thrust. A weighted average of the two produces αs(mZ) = 0.1193 ± 0.0027, consistent with the world average. A study of the non-perturbative corrections shows that the flat direction observed for thrust between αs and a simple non-perturbative shape parameter is not lifted in combining with heavy jet mass. The Monte Carlo treatment of hadronization gives qualitatively different results for thrust and heavy jet mass, and we conclude that it cannot be trusted to add power corrections to the event shape distributions at this accuracy. Whether a more sophisticated effective field theory approach to power corrections can reconcile the thrust and heavy jet mass distributions remains an open question.

Keywords

Jets NLO Computations QCD 

References

  1. [1]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP 09 (2005) 056 [hep-ph/0505111] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and G. Heinrich, Second-order QCD corrections to the thrust distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 132002 [arXiv:0707.1285] [SPIRES]. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and G. Heinrich, NNLO corrections to event shapes in e + e annihilation, JHEP 12 (2007) 094 [arXiv:0711.4711] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Weinzierl, NNLO corrections to 3-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 162001 [arXiv:0807.3241] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Fleming, A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry and I.W. Stewart, Jets from massive unstable particles: Top-mass determination, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 074010 [hep-ph/0703207] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M.D. Schwartz, Resummation and NLO matching of event shapes with effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014026 [arXiv:0709.2709] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Toward a NNLO calculation of the \( \bar{B} \to X_s^{+} {{\upgamma }} \) decay rate with a cut on photon energy. II: Two-loop result for the jet function, Phys. Lett. B 637 (2006) 251 [hep-ph/0603140] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, Soft-collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Beneke, A.P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl and T. Feldmann, Soft-collinear effective theory and heavy-to-light currents beyond leading power, Nucl. Phys. B 643 (2002) 431 [hep-ph/0206152] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Becher and M.D. Schwartz, A precise determination of α s from LEP thrust data using effective field theory, JHEP 07 (2008) 034 [arXiv:0803.0342] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.K. Ellis, D.A. Ross and A.E. Terrano, The perturbative calculation of jet structure in e + e annihilation, Nucl. Phys. B 178 (1981) 421 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Catani, L. Trentadue, G. Turnock and B.R. Webber, Resummation of large logarithms in e + e event shape distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 407 (1993) 3 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Abbate, M. Fickinger, A. Hoang, V. Mateu and I.W. Stewart, Global fit of α s(m Z) to thrust at NNNLL order with power corrections, PoS(RADCOR2009)040 [arXiv:1004.4894] [SPIRES].
  15. [15]
    Particle Data Group collaboration, W.M. Yao et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1 [SPIRES]. ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. Bethke, The 2009 wolrd average of α s(M Z), Eur. Phys. J. C 64 (2009) 689 [arXiv:0908.1135] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    G. Dissertori et al., Determination of the strong coupling constant using matched NNLO+NLLA predictions for hadronic event shapes in e + e annihilations, JHEP 08 (2009) 036 [arXiv:0906.3436] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    G. Dissertori et al., First determination of the strong coupling constant using NNLO predictions for hadronic event shapes in e + e annihilations, JHEP 02 (2008) 040 [arXiv:0712.0327] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Becher and M.D. Schwartz, Direct photon production with effective field theory, JHEP 02 (2010) 040 [arXiv:0911.0681] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S.D. Ellis, C.K. Vermilion, J.R. Walsh, A. Hornig and C. Lee, Jet shapes and jet algorithms in SCET, arXiv:1001.0014 [SPIRES].
  21. [21]
    C.W. Bauer, N.D. Dunn and A. Hornig, Factorization of boosted multijet processes for threshold resummation, arXiv:1002.1307 [SPIRES].
  22. [22]
    A.H. Hoang and S. Kluth, Hemisphere soft function at O(α s 2) for Dijet production in e + e annihilation, arXiv:0806.3852 [SPIRES].
  23. [23]
    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    ALEPH collaboration, A. Heister et al., Studies of QCD at e + e centre-of-mass energies between 91-GeV and 209-GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 457 [SPIRES].Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    D.E. Kaplan and M.D. Schwartz, Constraining light colored particles with event shapes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 022002 [arXiv:0804.2477] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    T. Becher, M. Neubert and B.D. Pecjak, Factorization and momentum-space resummation in deep-inelastic scattering, JHEP 01 (2007) 076 [hep-ph/0607228] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Fleming, A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry and I.W. Stewart, Top jets in the Peak region: factorization analysis with NLL resummation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114003 [arXiv:0711.2079] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, The dipole formalism for the calculation of QCD jet cross sections at next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 378 (1996) 287 [hep-ph/9602277] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and G. Heinrich, Infrared structure of e + e 3 jets at NNLO, JHEP 11 (2007) 058 [arXiv:0710.0346] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Dasgupta and G.P. Salam, Resummation of non-global QCD observables, Phys. Lett. B 512 (2001) 323 [hep-ph/0104277] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    R.W.L. Jones, M. Ford, G.P. Salam, H. Stenzel and D. Wicke, Theoretical uncertainties on α s from event-shape variables in e + e annihilations, JHEP 12 (2003) 007 [hep-ph/0312016] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    L. Lönnblad, ARIADNE version 4: A program for simulation of QCD cascades implementing the color dipole model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 71 (1992) 15 [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A.H. Hoang and I.W. Stewart, Designing gapped soft functions for jet production, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 483 [arXiv:0709.3519] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    C.W. Bauer and M.D. Schwartz, Event generation from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 074004 [hep-ph/0607296] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    C.W. Bauer and M.D. Schwartz, Improving jet distributions with effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 142001 [hep-ph/0604065] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    T. Gehrmann, M. Jaquier and G. Luisoni, Hadronization effects in event shape moments, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 57 [arXiv:0911.2422] [SPIRES].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    G.P. Salam and D. Wicke, Hadron masses and power corrections to event shapes, JHEP 05 (2001) 061 [hep-ph/0102343] [SPIRES].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHarvard UniversityCambridgeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations