We consider the question of entanglement conservation in the context of the ER=EPR correspondence equating quantum entanglement with wormholes. In quantum mechanics, the entanglement between a system and its complement is conserved under unitary operations that act independently on each; ER=EPR suggests that an analogous statement should hold for wormholes. We accordingly prove a new area theorem in general relativity: for a collection of dynamical wormholes and black holes in a spacetime satisfying the null curvature condition, the maximin area for a subset of the horizons (giving the largest area attained by the minimal cross section of the multi-wormhole throat separating the subset from its complement) is invariant under classical time evolution along the outermost apparent horizons. The evolution can be completely general, including horizon mergers and the addition of classical matter satisfying the null energy condition. This theorem is the gravitational dual of entanglement conservation and thus constitutes an explicit characterization of the ER=EPR duality in the classical limit.
D. Dieks, Communication by EPR devices, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 271 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2010).
E.H. Lieb and M.B. Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 1938 [INSPIRE].
J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161.
J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777 [INSPIRE].
A. Einstein and N. Rosen, The particle problem in the general theory of relativity, Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 73 [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 25 (1972) 152 [INSPIRE].
S. Hawking and G. Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1973).
A. Królak, Definitions of black holes without use of the boundary at infinity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 14 (1982) 793.
R.P. Geroch, Domain of dependence, J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970) 437 [INSPIRE].
S.M. Carroll, Spacetime and geometry: an introduction to general relativity, Addison Wesley, U.S.A. (2004).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
ArXiv ePrint: 1604.08217
About this article
Cite this article
Remmen, G.N., Bao, N. & Pollack, J. Entanglement conservation, ER=EPR, and a new classical area theorem for wormholes. J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2016)048
- Classical Theories of Gravity
- Black Holes
- Models of Quantum Gravity
- Gauge-gravity correspondence