Advertisement

Gauged and ungauged: a nonperturbative test

  • Evan Berkowitz
  • Masanori Hanada
  • Enrico RinaldiEmail author
  • Pavlos Vranas
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
First Online:

Abstract

We study the thermodynamics of the ‘ungauged’ D0-brane matrix model by Monte Carlo simulation. Our results appear to be consistent with the conjecture by Maldacena and Milekhin.

Keywords

Gauge-gravity correspondence Lattice Quantum Field Theory M(atrix) Theories 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    J.B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 395 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Witten, Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 335 [hep-th/9510135] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Ghosh, R.M. Soni and S.P. Trivedi, On the entanglement entropy for gauge theories, JHEP 09 (2015) 069 [arXiv:1501.02593] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Aoki et al., On the definition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2015) 187 [arXiv:1502.04267] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Hanada, J. Maltz and L. Susskind, Deconfinement transition as black hole formation by the condensation of QCD strings, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 105019 [arXiv:1405.1732] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Maldacena and A. Milekhin, To gauge or not to gauge?, JHEP 04 (2018) 084 [arXiv:1802.00428] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: a conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, On the quantum mechanics of supermembranes, Nucl. Phys. B 305 (1988) 545 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    N. Itzhaki, J.M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz, Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 046004 [hep-th/9802042] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Berkowitz et al., Precision lattice test of the gauge/gravity duality at large-N , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 094501 [arXiv:1606.04951] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, M. Hanada, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Monte Carlo studies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021601 [arXiv:0707.4454] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 041502 [arXiv:0803.4273] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 191602 [arXiv:0811.3102] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Kadoh and S. Kamata, One dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory with 16 supercharges, PoS(LATTICE 2012)064 [arXiv:1212.4919] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki and J. Nishimura, Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer, Science 344 (2014) 882 [arXiv:1311.5607] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Kadoh and S. Kamata, Gauge/gravity duality and lattice simulations of one dimensional SYM with sixteen supercharges, arXiv:1503.08499 [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    V.G. Filev and D. O’Connor, A computer test of holographic flavour dynamics, JHEP 05 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1512.02536] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki and J. Nishimura, Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finite N, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 086010 [arXiv:1603.00538] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Hanada, A. Miwa, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Schwarzschild radius from Monte Carlo calculation of the Wilson loop in supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 181602 [arXiv:0811.2081] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J.M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large N field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859 [hep-th/9803002] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Hanada, J. Nishimura, Y. Sekino and T. Yoneya, Direct test of the gauge-gravity correspondence for Matrix theory correlation functions, JHEP 12 (2011) 020 [arXiv:1108.5153] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Y. Sekino and T. Yoneya, Generalized AdS/CFT correspondence for matrix theory in the large N limit, Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 174 [hep-th/9907029] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    L. Susskind, Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory, hep-th/9309145 [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    E. Halyo, A. Rajaraman and L. Susskind, Braneless black holes, Phys. Lett. B 392 (1997) 319 [hep-th/9605112] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    G.T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6189 [hep-th/9612146] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, Towards lattice simulation of the gauge theory duals to black holes and hot strings, JHEP 12 (2007) 104 [arXiv:0706.3518] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla and T. Wiseman, Black hole-black string phase transitions in thermal 1+1 dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a circle, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5169 [hep-th/0406210] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    O. Aharony et al., The Phase structure of low dimensional large N gauge theories on Tori, JHEP 01 (2006) 140 [hep-th/0508077] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Phase structure of matrix quantum mechanics at finite temperature, JHEP 10 (2007) 097 [arXiv:0706.3517] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    G. Mandal, M. Mahato and T. Morita, Phases of one dimensional large N gauge theory in a 1/D expansion, JHEP 02 (2010) 034 [arXiv:0910.4526] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    T. Eguchi and H. Kawai, Reduction of dynamical degrees of freedom in the large N gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1063 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    B. de Wit, M. Lüscher and H. Nicolai, The supermembrane is unstable, Nucl. Phys. B 320 (1989) 135 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    A.V. Smilga, Super-Yang-Mills quantum mechanics and supermembrane spectrum, in the proceedings of the Trieste Conference on Supermembranes and Physics in 2 + 1 Dimensions, July 17-21, Trieste Italy (1989), arXiv:1406.5987 [INSPIRE].
  38. [38]
    E. Berkowitz, M. Hanada and J. Maltz, Chaos in matrix models and black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 126009 [arXiv:1602.01473] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    V. Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 440301 [arXiv:1608.02952] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    U.H. Danielsson, G. Ferretti and B. Sundborg, D particle dynamics and bound states, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 5463 [hep-th/9603081] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    D.N. Kabat and P. Pouliot, A Comment on zero-brane quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1004 [hep-th/9603127] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    K. Becker, M. Becker, J. Polchinski and A.A. Tseytlin, Higher order graviton scattering in M(atrix) theory, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) R3174 [hep-th/9706072] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Kernphysik and Institute for Advanced SimulationJülichGermany
  2. 2.Yukawa Institute for Theoretical PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.The Hakubi Center for Advanced ResearchKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of PhysicsUniversity of ColoradoBoulderU.S.A.
  5. 5.RIKEN-BNL Research CenterBrookhaven National LaboratoryUptonU.S.A.
  6. 6.Nuclear Science DivisionLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyU.S.A.
  7. 7.Nuclear and Chemical Sciences DivisionLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations