Advertisement

Correlation functions with fusion-channel multiplicity in \( {\mathcal{W}}_3 \) Toda field theory

  • Vladimir Belavin
  • Benoit Estienne
  • Omar Foda
  • Raoul Santachiara
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

Current studies of \( {\mathcal{W}}_N \) Toda field theory focus on correlation functions such that the \( {\mathcal{W}}_N \) highest-weight representations in the fusion channels are multiplicity-free. In this work, we study \( {\mathcal{W}}_3 \) Toda 4-point functions with multiplicity in the fusion channel. The conformal blocks of these 4-point functions involve matrix elements of a fully-degenerate primary field with a highest-weight in the adjoint representation of \( \mathfrak{s}{\mathfrak{l}}_3 \), and a fully-degenerate primary field with a highest-weight in the fundamental representation of \( \mathfrak{s}{\mathfrak{l}}_3 \). We show that, when the fusion rules do not involve multiplicities, the matrix elements of the fully-degenerate adjoint field, between two arbitrary descendant states, can be computed explicitly, on equal footing with the matrix elements of the semi-degenerate fundamental field. Using null-state conditions, we obtain a fourth-order Fuchsian differential equation for the conformal blocks. Using Okubo theory, we show that, due to the presence of multiplicities, this differential equation belongs to a class of Fuchsian equations that is different from those that have appeared so far in \( {\mathcal{W}}_N \) theories. We solve this equation, compute its monodromy group, and construct the monodromy-invariant correlation functions. This computation shows in detail how the ambiguities that are caused by the presence of multiplicities are fixed by requiring monodromy-invariance.

Keywords

Conformal and W Symmetry Conformal Field Models in String Theory Integrable Field Theories Supersymmetric gauge theory 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    V.A. Fateev and S.L. Lukyanov, The Models of Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory with Z(n) Symmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3 (1988) 507 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens, W symmetry, Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. 22 (1995) 1.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 333 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    V.A. Fateev and A.V. Litvinov, Correlation functions in conformal Toda field theory I, JHEP 11 (2007) 002 [arXiv:0709.3806] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    V.A. Fateev and A.V. Litvinov, Correlation functions in conformal Toda field theory II, JHEP 01 (2009) 033 [arXiv:0810.3020] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Kanno, Y. Matsuo and S. Shiba, Analysis of correlation functions in Toda theory and AGT-W relation for SU(3) quiver, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 066009 [arXiv:1007.0601] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Furlan and V.B. Petkova, On some 3-point functions in the W 4 CFT and related braiding matrix, JHEP 12 (2015) 079 [arXiv:1504.07556] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, On AGT relation in the case of U(3), Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010)1 [arXiv:0908.2569] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    G. Bonelli, A. Tanzini and J. Zhao, Vertices, Vortices and Interacting Surface Operators, JHEP 06 (2012) 178 [arXiv:1102.0184] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Gomis and B. Le Floch, M2-brane surface operators and gauge theory dualities in Toda, JHEP 04 (2016) 183 [arXiv:1407.1852] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    O. Alekseev and F. Novaes, Wilson loop invariants from W N conformal blocks, Nucl. Phys. B 901 (2015) 461 [arXiv:1505.06221] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Kohno, Global analysis in linear differential equations, Mathematics and its Applications, volume 471, Springer Netherlands (1999).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    V.A. Fateev, Normalization factors, reflection amplitudes and integrable systems, hep-th/0103014 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    V.S. Dotsenko, Série de cours sur la théorie conforme, https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00092929 (2006).
  15. [15]
    V.A. Fateev and A.V. Litvinov, Coulomb integrals in Liouville theory and Liouville gravity, JETP Lett. 84 (2007) 531 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Bowcock and G.M.T. Watts, Null vectors of the W(3) algebra, Phys. Lett. B 297 (1992) 282 [hep-th/9209105] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Z. Bajnok, L. Palla and G. Takács, A 2 Toda theory in reduced WZNW framework and the representations of the W algebra, Nucl. Phys. B 385 (1992) 329 [hep-th/9206075] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Bowcock and G.M.T. Watts, Null vectors, three point and four point functions in conformal field theory, Theor. Math. Phys. 98 (1994) 350 [hep-th/9309146] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    G.M.T. Watts, Fusion in the W(3) algebra, Commun. Math. Phys. 171 (1995) 87 [hep-th/9403163] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Alex, M. Kalus, A. Huckleberry and J. von Delft, A Numerical algorithm for the explicit calculation of SU(N) and SL(N, ℂ) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 023507 [arXiv:1009.0437] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    B. Estienne, V. Pasquier, R. Santachiara and D. Serban, Conformal blocks in Virasoro and W theories: Duality and the Calogero-Sutherland model, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 377 [arXiv:1110.1101] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    V. Belavin, O. Foda and R. Santachiara, AGT, N-Burge partitions and \( {\mathcal{W}}_N \) minimal models, JHEP 10 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1507.03540] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Yoshida, Fuchsian differential equations, Aspects of Mathematics, volume E 11, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (1987).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    K. Okubo, On the group of Fuchsian equations, in Seminar Reports of Tokyo Metropolitan University (1987).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    K. Okubo, Connection problems for systems of linear differential equations, in Japan-United States Seminar on Ordinary Differential and Functional Equations, Springer (1971) pp. 238-248.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    N.M. Katz, Rigid local systems. (AM-139), Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1996).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    E. Ince, Ordinary differential equations, Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford U.S.A. (1956).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Y. Haraoka, Canonical forms of differential equations free from accessory parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 25 (1994) 1203.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    B. Estienne and R. Santachiara, Relating Jack wavefunctions to W A k−1 theories, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 445209 [arXiv:0906.1969] [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [arXiv:0906.3219] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    N. Wyllard, A(N-1) conformal Toda field theory correlation functions from conformal N = 2 SU(N) quiver gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2009) 002 [arXiv:0907.2189] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni, Toda 3-Point Functions From Topological Strings, JHEP 06 (2015) 049 [arXiv:1409.6313] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    M. Isachenkov, V. Mitev and E. Pomoni, Toda 3-Point Functions From Topological Strings II, arXiv:1412.3395 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    B. Belavin, B. Estienne, O. Foda and R. Santachiara, W 3 semi-degenerate fields in higher representations: differential equations and fusion rules in preparation.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    K.B. Alkalaev and V.A. Belavin, Conformal blocks of W N minimal models and AGT correspondence, JHEP 07 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1404.7094] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    M. Bershtein and O. Foda, AGT, Burge pairs and minimal models, JHEP 06 (2014) 177 [arXiv:1404.7075] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    V.S. Dotsenko and V.A. Fateev, Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge C ≤ 1, Nucl. Phys. B 251 (1985) 691 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    V. Dotsenko, M. Picco and P. Pujol, Renormalization group calculation of correlation functions for the 2 − D random bond Ising and Potts models, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 701 [hep-th/9501017] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Belavin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Benoit Estienne
    • 3
  • Omar Foda
    • 4
  • Raoul Santachiara
    • 5
  1. 1.I.E. Tamm Department of Theoretical PhysicsP.N. Lebedev Physical InstituteMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Quantum PhysicsInstitute for Information Transmission ProblemsMoscowRussia
  3. 3.LPTHE, CNRS and Université Pierre et Marie CurieSorbonne UniversitésParis Cedex 05France
  4. 4.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  5. 5.LPTMS, CNRS (UMR 8626), Université Paris-SaclayOrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations