Models of dynamical R-parity violation

  • Csaba Csáki
  • Eric Kuflik
  • Oren Slone
  • Tomer Volansky
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics


The presence of R-parity violating interactions may relieve the tension between existing LHC constraints and natural supersymmetry. In this paper we lay down the theoretical framework and explore models of dynamical R-parity violation in which the breaking of R-parity is communicated to the visible sector by heavy messenger fields. We find that R-parity violation is often dominated by non-holomorphic operators that have so far been largely ignored, and might require a modification of the existing searches at the LHC. The dynamical origin implies that the effects of such operators are suppressed by the ratio of either the light fermion masses or the supersymmetry breaking scale to the mediation scale, thereby providing a natural explanation for the smallness of R-parity violation. We consider various scenarios, classified by whether R-parity violation, flavor breaking and/or supersymmetry breaking are mediated by the same messenger fields. The most compact case, corresponding to a deformation of the so called flavor mediation scenario, allows for the mediation of supersymmetry breaking, R-parity breaking, and flavor symmetry breaking in a unified manner.


Supersymmetry Phenomenology 


Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. [1]
    ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV proton-proton collision data, JHEP 09 (2014) 176 [arXiv:1405.7875] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV in events with a single lepton, large jet multiplicity and multiple b jets, Phys. Lett. B 733 (2014) 328 [arXiv:1311.4937] [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    C.S. Aulakh and R.N. Mohapatra, Neutrino as the supersymmetric partner of the Majoron, Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 136 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L.J. Hall and M. Suzuki, Explicit R-parity breaking in supersymmetric models, Nucl. Phys. B 231 (1984) 419 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G.G. Ross and J.W.F. Valle, Supersymmetric models without R-parity, Phys. Lett. B 151 (1985) 375 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    V.D. Barger, G.F. Giudice and T. Han, Some new aspects of supersymmetry R-parity violating interactions, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2987 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H.K. Dreiner, An introduction to explicit R-parity violation, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 565 [hep-ph/9707435] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Bhattacharyya, A brief review of R-parity violating couplings, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Beyond the Desert: Accelerator and Nonaccelerator Approaches, Tegernsee Germany (1997), pp. 194–201 [hep-ph/9709395] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    R. Barbier et al., R-parity violating supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406039] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith, Minimal flavor violation, seesaw and R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015021 [arXiv:0710.3129] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, MFV SUSY: a natural theory for R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095009 [arXiv:1111.1239] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Krnjaic and D. Stolarski, Gauging the way to MFV, JHEP 04 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1212.4860] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Franceschini and R.N. Mohapatra, New patterns of natural R-parity violation with supersymmetric gauged flavor, JHEP 04 (2013) 098 [arXiv:1301.3637] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Csáki and B. Heidenreich, A complete model for R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055023 [arXiv:1302.0004] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G. Krnjaic and Y. Tsai, Soft RPV through the baryon portal, JHEP 03 (2014) 104 [arXiv:1304.7004] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Brust, A. Katz and R. Sundrum, SUSY stops at a bump, JHEP 08 (2012) 059 [arXiv:1206.2353] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    P.W. Graham, D.E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Displaced supersymmetry, JHEP 07 (2012) 149 [arXiv:1204.6038] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, The minimal theory for R-parity violation at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2012) 118 [arXiv:1201.5923] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Z. Han, A. Katz, M. Son and B. Tweedie, Boosting searches for natural supersymmetry with R-parity violation via gluino cascades, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 075003 [arXiv:1211.4025] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Berger, C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, Mesino oscillation in MFV SUSY, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2408 [arXiv:1209.4645] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Franceschini and R. Torre, RPV stops bump off the background, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2422 [arXiv:1212.3622] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J.T. Ruderman, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A collective breaking of R-parity, JHEP 09 (2013) 094 [arXiv:1207.5787] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, Minimal gauged U(1)BL model with spontaneous R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 181802 [arXiv:0812.3661] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Masiero and J.W.F. Valle, A model for spontaneous R parity breaking, Phys. Lett. B 251 (1990) 273 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    C. Csáki, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Dynamical R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 131801 [arXiv:1309.5957] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Hirsch and J.W.F. Valle, Supersymmetric origin of neutrino mass, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 76 [hep-ph/0405015] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, Minimal gauged U(1)BL model with spontaneous R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 181802 [arXiv:0812.3661] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, The fate of R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 035004 [arXiv:1005.4930] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Hierarchy of quark masses, Cabibbo angles and CP-violation, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 277 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    D.E. Kaplan, F. Lepeintre, A. Masiero, A.E. Nelson and A. Riotto, Fermion masses and gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking from a single U(1), Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 055003 [hep-ph/9806430] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D.E. Kaplan and G.D. Kribs, Phenomenology of flavor mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075011 [hep-ph/9906341] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Y. Shadmi and P.Z. Szabo, Flavored gauge-mediation, JHEP 06 (2012) 124 [arXiv:1103.0292] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    M. Abdullah, I. Galon, Y. Shadmi and Y. Shirman, Flavored gauge mediation, a heavy Higgs and supersymmetric alignment, JHEP 06 (2013) 057 [arXiv:1209.4904] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    I. Galon, G. Perez and Y. Shadmi, Non-degenerate squarks from flavored gauge mediation, JHEP 09 (2013) 117 [arXiv:1306.6631] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Y. Nomura and D. Stolarski, Naturally flavorful supersymmetry at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 095011 [arXiv:0808.1380] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Y. Nomura, M. Papucci and D. Stolarski, Flavorful supersymmetry from higher dimensions, JHEP 07 (2008) 055 [arXiv:0802.2582] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    N. Craig, M. McCullough and J. Thaler, Flavor mediation delivers natural SUSY, JHEP 06 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.1622] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    A. Pomarol and D. Tommasini, Horizontal symmetries for the supersymmetric flavor problem, Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507462] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Y. Grossman, Y. Nir, J. Thaler, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Probing minimal flavor violation at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 096006 [arXiv:0706.1845] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Extracting supersymmetry breaking effects from wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 511 (1998) 25 [hep-ph/9706540] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    A. Monteux, Natural, R-parity violating supersymmetry and horizontal flavor symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 045029 [arXiv:1305.2921] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    O.C.W. Kong, Neutrino oscillations and flavor structure of supersymmetry without R-parity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 903 [hep-ph/9808304] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, A theory of flavor mixing, Annals Phys. 109 (1977) 258 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    S. Dimopoulos, L.J. Hall and S. Raby, A predictive framework for fermion masses in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1984 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    R.N. Cahn and H. Harari, Bounds on the masses of neutral generation changing gauge bosons, Nucl. Phys. B 176 (1980) 135 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    B.S. Balakrishna and R.N. Mohapatra, Radiative fermion masses from new physics at TeV scale, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 349 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991) 259 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    B. Keren-Zur et al., On partial compositeness and the CP asymmetry in charm decays, Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 394 [arXiv:1205.5803] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 016002 [hep-ph/0408134] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Y. Nomura, M. Papucci and D. Stolarski, Flavorful supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 075006 [arXiv:0712.2074] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Mass matrix models, Nucl. Phys. B 398 (1993) 319 [hep-ph/9212278] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Mass matrix models: the sequel, Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 468 [hep-ph/9310320] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    C. Csáki, E. Kuflik, S. Lombardo, O. Slone and T. Volansky, The phenomenology of dynamical R-parity violation, to appear.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
  56. [56]
    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, H. Nishino et al., Search for proton decay via pe + π 0 and pμ + π 0 in a large water Cherenkov detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 141801 [arXiv:0903.0676] [INSPIRE].
  57. [57]
    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K. Kobayashi et al., Search for nucleon decay via modes favored by supersymmetric grand unification models in Super-Kamiokande-I, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 052007 [hep-ex/0502026] [INSPIRE].
  58. [58]
    RBC-UKQCD collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., Proton lifetime bounds from chirally symmetric lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 054505 [arXiv:0806.1031] [INSPIRE].
  59. [59]
    V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Minimal flavor violation in the lepton sector, Nucl. Phys. B 728 (2005) 121 [hep-ph/0507001] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    G.C. Branco, A.J. Buras, S. Jager, S. Uhlig and A. Weiler, Another look at minimal lepton flavour violation, leptogenesis and the ratio M ν /ΛLFV, JHEP 09 (2007) 004 [hep-ph/0609067] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 1 [hep-ph/9709356] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Csaba Csáki
    • 1
  • Eric Kuflik
    • 1
  • Oren Slone
    • 2
  • Tomer Volansky
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics, LEPPCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and AstronomyTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations