We study the sensitivity of the Iron Calorimeter (ICAL) at the India-Based Neutrino Observatory (INO) to Lorentz and CPT violation in the neutrino sector. Its ability to identify the charge of muons in addition to their direction and energy makes ICAL a useful tool in putting constraints on these fundamental symmetries. Using resolution, efficiencies, errors and uncertainties obtained from ICAL detector simulations, we determine sensitivities to δb31, which parametizes the violations in the muon neutrino sector. We carry out calculations for three generic cases representing mixing in the CPT violating part of the hamiltonian, specifically , when the mixing is 1) small, 2) large, 3) the same as that in the PMNS matrix. We find that for both types of hierarchy, ICAL at INO should be sensitive to δb31 ≳ 4 × 10−23 GeV at 99% C.L. for 500 kt-yr exposure, unless the mixing in the CPT violation sector is small.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
W. Pauli, Exclusion principle, Lorentz group and reflection of space-time and charge, Pergamon Press, London U.K. (1955).Google Scholar
IceCube collaboration, R. Abbasi et al., Search for a Lorentz-violating sidereal signal with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 112003 [arXiv:1010.4096] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
Double CHOOZ collaboration, Y. Abe et al., First Test of Lorentz Violation with a Reactor-based Antineutrino Experiment, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 112009 [arXiv:1209.5810] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
MINOS collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Search for Lorentz invariance and CPT violation with muon antineutrinos in the MINOS Near Detector, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 031101 [arXiv:1201.2631] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
E. Borriello, S. Chakraborty, A. Mirizzi and P.D. Serpico, Stringent constraint on neutrino Lorentz-invariance violation from the two IceCube PeV neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 116009 [arXiv:1303.5843] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
INO collaboration, M.S. Athar et al., A Report of the INO Feasibility Study, INO-2006-01.Google Scholar
D. Indumathi and M.V.N. Murthy, A question of hierarchy: Matter effects with atmospheric neutrinos and anti-neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 013001 [hep-ph/0407336] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
R. Gandhi, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, P. Mehta, S.U. Sankar and S. Shalgar, Mass Hierarchy Determination via future Atmospheric Neutrino Detectors, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 073012 [arXiv:0707.1723] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
M. Honda, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara and S. Midorikawa, Improvement of low energy atmospheric neutrino flux calculation using the JAM nuclear interaction model, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 123001 [arXiv:1102.2688] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
INO collaboration, A. Chatterjee et al., A Simulations Study of the Muon Response of the Iron Calorimeter Detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory, arXiv:1405.7243 [INSPIRE].