The gravitational sector of 2d (0, 2) F-theory vacua

  • Craig Lawrie
  • Sakura Schäfer-Nameki
  • Timo Weigand
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

F-theory compactifications on Calabi-Yau fivefolds give rise to two-dimensional N = (0, 2) supersymmetric field theories coupled to gravity. We explore the dilaton supergravity defined by the moduli sector of such compactifications. The massless moduli spectrum is found by uplifting Type IIB compactifications on Calabi-Yau fourfolds. This spectrum matches expectations from duality with M-theory on the same elliptic fibration. The latter defines an N = 2 Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics related to the 2d (0, 2) F-theory supergravity via circle reduction. Using our recent results on the gravitational anomalies of duality twisted D3-branes wrapping curves in Calabi-Yau fivefolds we show that the F-theory spectrum is anomaly free. We match the classical Chern-Simons terms of the M-theory Super Quantum Mechanics to one-loop contributions to the effective action by S 1 reduction of the dual F-theory.

Keywords

F-Theory Superstring Vacua 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and D. Yokoyama, 2d (0, 2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-branes, JHEP 09 (2015) 072 [arXiv:1506.03818] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0, 2) Quivers, JHEP 02 (2016) 047 [arXiv:1510.01744] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Schäfer-Nameki and T. Weigand, F-theory and 2d (0, 2) theories, JHEP 05 (2016) 059 [arXiv:1601.02015] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality, JHEP 05 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1602.01834] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Apruzzi, F. Hassler, J.J. Heckman and I.V. Melnikov, UV Completions for Non-Critical Strings, JHEP 07 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1602.04221] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa, Brane Brick Models in the Mirror, JHEP 02 (2017) 106 [arXiv:1609.01723] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Apruzzi, F. Hassler, J.J. Heckman and I.V. Melnikov, From 6D SCFTs to Dynamic GLSMs, arXiv:1610.00718 [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    J.J. Heckman, D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa, On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds, JHEP 05 (2014) 028 [Erratum JHEP 06 (2015) 017] [arXiv:1312.5746] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    J.J. Heckman, D.R. Morrison, T. Rudelius and C. Vafa, Atomic Classification of 6D SCFTs, Fortsch. Phys. 63 (2015) 468 [arXiv:1502.05405] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Lawrie, S. Schäfer-Nameki and T. Weigand, Chiral 2d Theories from N = 4 SYM with Varying Coupling, JHEP 04 (2017) 111 [arXiv:1612.05640] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    L. Martucci, Topological duality twist and brane instantons in F-theory, JHEP 06 (2014) 180 [arXiv:1403.2530] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K. Dasgupta and S. Mukhi, A Note on low dimensional string compactifications, Phys. Lett. B 398 (1997) 285 [hep-th/9612188] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S.J. Gates Jr., S. Gukov and E. Witten, Two two-dimensional supergravity theories from Calabi-Yau four folds, Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 109 [hep-th/0005120] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Förste and D. Ghoshal, Strings from orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 95 [hep-th/9711039] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Font and J.A. Lopez, Strings on eight-orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 177 [hep-th/0405151] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S.J. Gates Jr., W.D. Linch III and J. Phillips, When superspace is not enough, hep-th/0211034 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    S. Bellucci, S. Krivonos, A. Marrani and E. Orazi, ‘Root’ action for N = 4 supersymmetric mechanics theories, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 025011 [hep-th/0511249] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A.S. Haupt, A. Lukas and K.S. Stelle, M-theory on Calabi-Yau Five-Folds, JHEP 05 (2009) 069 [arXiv:0810.2685] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    K.A. Intriligator, D.R. Morrison and N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997) 56 [hep-th/9702198] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K.A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg and M.J. Strassler, Aspects of N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 67 [hep-th/9703110] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T.W. Grimm, The N = 1 effective action of F-theory compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 48 [arXiv:1008.4133] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F. Bonetti and T.W. Grimm, Six-dimensional (1,0) effective action of F-theory via M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds, JHEP 05 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1112.1082] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T.W. Grimm and H. Hayashi, F-theory fluxes, Chirality and Chern-Simons theories, JHEP 03 (2012) 027 [arXiv:1111.1232] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Cvetič, T.W. Grimm and D. Klevers, Anomaly Cancellation And Abelian Gauge Symmetries In F-theory, JHEP 02 (2013) 101 [arXiv:1210.6034] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    F. Bonetti, T.W. Grimm and S. Hohenegger, Exploring 6D origins of 5D supergravities with Chern-Simons terms, JHEP 05 (2013) 124 [arXiv:1303.2661] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. Bonetti, T.W. Grimm and S. Hohenegger, One-loop Chern-Simons terms in five dimensions, JHEP 07 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1302.2918] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    O.J. Ganor, Compactification of tensionless string theories, hep-th/9607092 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    A. Klemm, B. Lian, S.S. Roan and S.-T. Yau, Calabi-Yau fourfolds for M-theory and F-theory compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 518 (1998) 515 [hep-th/9701023] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    L. Álvarez-Gaumé and E. Witten, Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Collinucci, F. Denef and M. Esole, D-brane Deconstructions in IIB Orientifolds, JHEP 02 (2009) 005 [arXiv:0805.1573] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    H. Jockers and J. Louis, The Effective action of D7-branes in N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 705 (2005) 167 [hep-th/0409098] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    R. Blumenhagen, A. Collinucci and B. Jurke, On Instanton Effects in F-theory, JHEP 08 (2010) 079 [arXiv:1002.1894] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. Clingher, R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt, The Sen Limit, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014) 613 [arXiv:1212.4505] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    D.S. Park, Anomaly Equations and Intersection Theory, JHEP 01 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1111.2351] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. Sethi, C. Vafa and E. Witten, Constraints on low dimensional string compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 213 [hep-th/9606122] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig Lawrie
    • 1
  • Sakura Schäfer-Nameki
    • 2
  • Timo Weigand
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikRuprecht-Karls-UniversitätHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Mathematical InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations