Advertisement

Understanding forward B hadron production

  • Rhorry GauldEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

The LHCb collaboration has recently performed a measurement of the production rate of inclusive B hadron production (ppBX) at both 7 and 13 TeV centre-of-mass (CoM) energies. As part of this measurement, the ratio of these two cross section measurements has been presented differentially in B hadron pseudorapidity within the range of η B ∈ [2.0, 5.0]. A large tension (4σ) is observed for the ratio measurement in the lower pseudorapidity range of η B ∈ [2.0, 3.0], where the data is observed to exceed theoretical predictions, while consistency is found at larger η B values. This behaviour is not expected within perturbative QCD, and can only be achieved by introducing ad-hoc features into the structure of the non-perturbative gluon PDF within the region of x ∈ [10−3 , 10−4]. Specifically, the gluon PDF must grow extremely quickly with decreasing x within this kinematic range, closely followed by a period of decelerated growth. However, such behaviour is highly disfavoured by global fits of proton structure. Further studies of the available LHCb B and D hadron cross section data, available for a range of CoM energies, indicate systematic tension in the (pseudo)rapidity region of [2.0, 2.5].

Keywords

QCD Phenomenology 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the b-quark production cross-section in 7 and 13 TeV pp collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 052002 [arXiv:1612.05140] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    R. Gauld, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli and J. Talbert, Charm production in the forward region: constraints on the small-x gluon and backgrounds for neutrino astronomy, JHEP 11 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1506.08025] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Cacciari, M.L. Mangano and P. Nason, Gluon PDF constraints from the ratio of forward heavy-quark production at the LHC at \( \sqrt{S}=7 \) and 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 610 [arXiv:1507.06197] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Gauld and J. Rojo, Precision determination of the small-x gluon from charm production at LHCb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 072001 [arXiv:1610.09373] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=5 \) TeV, arXiv:1610.02230 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    LHCb collaboration, Prompt charm production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1302.2864] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV, JHEP 03 (2016) 159 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2016) 013] [arXiv:1510.01707] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    ZEUS collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Measurement of beauty and charm production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA and measurement of the beauty-quark mass, JHEP 09 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1405.6915] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of B meson production cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 08 (2013) 117 [arXiv:1306.3663] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    P. Nason, S. Dawson and R.K. Ellis, The Total Cross-Section for the Production of Heavy Quarks in Hadronic Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988) 607 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Nason, S. Dawson and R.K. Ellis, The One Particle Inclusive Differential Cross-Section for Heavy Quark Production in Hadronic Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 49 [Erratum ibid. B 335 (1990) 260] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Heavy quark correlations in hadron collisions at next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 295 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. Beenakker, W.L. van Neerven, R. Meng, G.A. Schuler and J. Smith, QCD corrections to heavy quark production in hadron hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 351 (1991) 507 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. Beenakker, H. Kuijf, W.L. van Neerven and J. Smith, QCD Corrections to Heavy Quark Production in \( p\overline{p} \) Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 54 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Frixione, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP 09 (2007) 126 [arXiv:0707.3088] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo, Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3024 [arXiv:1404.5630] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 137 [arXiv:1205.6344] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    S. Frixione and B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 06 (2002) 029 [hep-ph/0204244] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Cacciari and M. Greco, Large p T hadroproduction of heavy quarks, Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 530 [hep-ph/9311260] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    M. Cacciari, M. Greco and P. Nason, The p T spectrum in heavy flavor hadroproduction, JHEP 05 (1998) 007 [hep-ph/9803400] [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione and P. Nason, The p T spectrum in heavy flavor photoproduction, JHEP 03 (2001) 006 [hep-ph/0102134] [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    M. Cacciari and P. Nason, Charm cross-sections for the Tevatron Run II, JHEP 09 (2003) 006 [hep-ph/0306212] [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    M. Cacciari, P. Nason and C. Oleari, A study of heavy flavored meson fragmentation functions in e + e annihilation, JHEP 04 (2006) 006 [hep-ph/0510032] [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein and H. Spiesberger, Inclusive D ∗± production in \( p\overline{p} \) collisions with massive charm quarks, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014018 [hep-ph/0410289] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    B.A. Kniehl and G. Kramer, D 0 , D + , D s+ and Λ c+ fragmentation functions from CERN LEP1, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 094013 [hep-ph/0504058] [INSPIRE].
  32. [32]
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein and H. Spiesberger, Collinear subtractions in hadroproduction of heavy quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 199 [hep-ph/0502194] [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein and H. Spiesberger, Reconciling open charm production at the Fermilab Tevatron with QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 012001 [hep-ph/0508129] [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    T. Kneesch, B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer and I. Schienbein, Charmed-meson fragmentation functions with finite-mass corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 799 (2008) 34 [arXiv:0712.0481] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein and H. Spiesberger, Open charm hadroproduction and the charm content of the proton, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 094009 [arXiv:0901.4130] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein and H. Spiesberger, Inclusive Charmed-Meson Production at the CERN LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2082 [arXiv:1202.0439] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction, JHEP 01 (2013) 080 [arXiv:1210.6832] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Percent Level Precision Physics at the Tevatron: First Genuine NNLO QCD Corrections to \( q\overline{q}\to t\overline{t}+X \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 132001 [arXiv:1204.5201] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross section at Hadron Colliders Through O(α S4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252004 [arXiv:1303.6254] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires, Next-to-Next-to Leading Order QCD Predictions for Single Jet Inclusive Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 072002 [arXiv:1611.01460] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Resolving the Tevatron Top Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry Puzzle: Fully Differential Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Calculation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 052001 [arXiv:1411.3007] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    M. Czakon, A. Mitov and J. Rojo, Summary of the Topical Workshop on Top Quark Differential Distributions 2014, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 015004 [arXiv:1501.01112] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 082003 [arXiv:1511.00549] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, NNLO QCD predictions for fully-differential top-quark pair production at the Tevatron, JHEP 05 (2016) 034 [arXiv:1601.05375] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
  46. [46]
    A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, arXiv:1610.07922 [INSPIRE].
  48. [48]
    M.G. Bowler, e + e Production of Heavy Quarks in the String Model, Z. Phys. C 11 (1981) 169 [INSPIRE].
  49. [49]
    E. Norrbin and T. Sjöstrand, Production and hadronization of heavy quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) 137 [hep-ph/0005110] [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    R. Corke and T. Sjöstrand, Interleaved Parton Showers and Tuning Prospects, JHEP 03 (2011) 032 [arXiv:1011.1759] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    R. Gauld, Feasibility of top quark measurements at LHCb and constraints on the large-x gluon PDF, JHEP 02 (2014) 126 [arXiv:1311.1810] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    PROSA collaboration, O. Zenaiev et al., Impact of heavy-flavour production cross sections measured by the LHCb experiment on parton distribution functions at low x, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 396 [arXiv:1503.04581] [INSPIRE].
  53. [53]
    ZEUS, H1 collaborations, F.D. Aaron et al., Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusive e ± p Scattering Cross sections at HERA, JHEP 01 (2010) 109 [arXiv:0911.0884] [INSPIRE].
  54. [54]
    ZEUS, H1 collaborations, H. Abramowicz et al., Combination and QCD Analysis of Charm Production Cross section Measurements in Deep-Inelastic ep Scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2311 [arXiv:1211.1182] [INSPIRE].
  55. [55]
    G. Ciezarek, A. Lupato, M. Rotondo and M. Vesterinen, Reconstruction of semileptonically decaying beauty hadrons produced in high energy pp collisions, JHEP 02 (2017) 021 [arXiv:1611.08522] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of b-hadron production fractions in 7 TeV pp collisions, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 032008 [arXiv:1111.2357] [INSPIRE].
  57. [57]
    M.L. Mangano and J. Rojo, Cross section Ratios between different CM energies at the LHC: opportunities for precision measurements and BSM sensitivity, JHEP 08 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1206.3557] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    R.D. Ball, E.R. Nocera and J. Rojo, The asymptotic behaviour of parton distributions at small and large x, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 383 [arXiv:1604.00024] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Charm and beauty quark masses in the MMHT2014 global PDF analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 10 [arXiv:1510.02332] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    ZEUS, H1 collaborations, H. Abramowicz et al., Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e ± p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 580 [arXiv:1506.06042] [INSPIRE].
  61. [61]
    A. Accardi, L.T. Brady, W. Melnitchouk, J.F. Owens and N. Sato, Constraints on large-x parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114017 [arXiv:1602.03154] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    S. Alekhin, J. Blümlein and S. Moch, Parton Distribution Functions and Benchmark Cross sections at NNLO, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054009 [arXiv:1202.2281] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    V. Bertone, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo, APFEL: A PDF Evolution Library with QED corrections, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1647 [arXiv:1310.1394] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    M. Bahr et al., HERWIG++ Physics and Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639 [arXiv:0803.0883] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 196 [arXiv:1512.01178] [INSPIRE].
  67. [67]
    F. Arleo, É. Chapon and H. Paukkunen, Scaling properties of inclusive W ± production at hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 214 [arXiv:1509.03993] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    LHCb collaboration, First measurement of the charge asymmetry in beauty-quark pair production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 082003 [arXiv:1406.4789] [INSPIRE].
  69. [69]
    C.W. Murphy, Bottom-Quark Forward-Backward and Charge Asymmetries at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054003 [arXiv:1504.02493] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    R. Gauld, U. Haisch, B.D. Pecjak and E. Re, Beauty-quark and charm-quark pair production asymmetries at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 034007 [arXiv:1505.02429] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    T. Regge, Introduction to complex orbital momenta, Nuovo Cim. 14 (1959) 951 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    S.J. Brodsky and G.R. Farrar, Scaling Laws at Large Transverse Momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 1153 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    R.D. Ball and S. Forte, Double asymptotic scaling at HERA, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 77 [hep-ph/9405320] [INSPIRE].
  74. [74]
    R.D. Ball and S. Forte, A direct test of perturbative QCD at small x, Phys. Lett. B 336 (1994) 77 [hep-ph/9406385] [INSPIRE].
  75. [75]
    S. Forte and R.D. Ball, Universality and scaling in perturbative QCD at small x, Acta Phys. Polon. B 26 (1995) 2097 [hep-ph/9512208] [INSPIRE].
  76. [76]
    LHeC Study Group, J.L. Abelleira Fernandez et al., A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN: Report on the Physics and Design Concepts for Machine and Detector, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1206.2913] [INSPIRE].
  77. [77]
    M.L. Mangano et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Standard Model processes, arXiv:1607.01831 [INSPIRE].
  78. [78]
    R. Gauld, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli, S. Sarkar and J. Talbert, The prompt atmospheric neutrino flux in the light of LHCb, JHEP 02 (2016) 130 [arXiv:1511.06346] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    PROSA collaboration, M.V. Garzelli et al., Prompt neutrino fluxes in the atmosphere with PROSA parton distribution functions, JHEP 05 (2017) 004 [arXiv:1611.03815] [INSPIRE].
  80. [80]
    A. Cooper-Sarkar, P. Mertsch and S. Sarkar, The high energy neutrino cross-section in the Standard Model and its uncertainty, JHEP 08 (2011) 042 [arXiv:1106.3723] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH Zurich, Institut fur theoretische PhysikZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations