A new look at instantons and large-N limit
- 185 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
We analyze instantons in the very strongly coupled large-N limit (N → ∞ with g 2 fixed) of large-N gauge theories, where the effect of the instantons remains finite. By using the exact partition function of four-dimensional \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2* gauge theories as a concrete example, we demonstrate that each instanton sector in the very strongly coupled large-N limit is related to the one in the ’t Hooft limit (N → ∞ with g 2 N fixed) through a simple analytic continuation. Furthermore we show the equivalence between the instanton partition functions of a pair of large-N gauge theories related by an orbifold projection. This can open up a new way to analyze the partition functions of low/non-supersymmetric theories. We also discuss implication of our result to gauge/gravity dualities for M-theory as well as a possible application to large-N QCD.
Keywords
Nonperturbative Effects 1/N ExpansionNotes
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
- [1]G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
- [2]M. Mariño, Lectures on non-perturbative effects in large-N gauge theories, matrix models and strings, arXiv:1206.6272 [INSPIRE].
- [3]T. Azeyanagi, M. Fujita and M. Hanada, From the planar limit to M-theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 121601 [arXiv:1210.3601] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]M. Fujita, M. Hanada and C. Hoyos, A new large-N limit and the planar equivalence outside the planar limit, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 026007 [arXiv:1205.0853] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
- [5]J.M. Maldacena, The Large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
- [6]S. Kachru and E. Silverstein, 4−D conformal theories and strings on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855 [hep-th/9802183] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [7]M. Bershadsky and A. Johansen, Large-N limit of orbifold field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998) 141 [hep-th/9803249] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [8]P. Kovtun, M. Ünsal and L.G. Yaffe, Necessary and sufficient conditions for non-perturbative equivalences of large-N c orbifold gauge theories, JHEP 07 (2005) 008 [hep-th/0411177] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]V. Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys. 313 (2012) 71 [arXiv:0712.2824] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [10]N.A. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2004) 831 [hep-th/0206161] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [11]A. Buchel, J.G. Russo and K. Zarembo, Rigorous Test of Non-conformal Holography: Wilson Loops in N = 2* Theory, JHEP 03 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1301.1597] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]J.G. Russo and K. Zarembo, Large-N Limit of N = 2 SU(N) Gauge Theories from Localization, JHEP 10 (2012) 082 [arXiv:1207.3806] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar