Singular potentials (the inverse-square potential, for example) arise in many situations and their quantum treatment leads to well-known ambiguities in choosing boundary conditions for the wave-function at the position of the potential’s singularity. These ambiguities are usually resolved by developing a self-adjoint extension of the original prob-lem; a non-unique procedure that leaves undetermined which extension should apply in specific physical systems. We take the guesswork out of this picture by using techniques of effective field theory to derive the required boundary conditions at the origin in terms of the effective point-particle action describing the physics of the source. In this picture ambiguities in boundary conditions boil down to the allowed choices for the source action, but casting them in terms of an action provides a physical criterion for their determination. The resulting extension is self-adjoint if the source action is real (and involves no new degrees of freedom), and not otherwise (as can also happen for reasonable systems). We show how this effective-field picture provides a simple framework for understanding well-known renormalization effects that arise in these systems, including how renormalization-group techniques can resum non-perturbative interactions that often arise, particularly for non-relativistic applications. In particular we argue why the low-energy effective theory tends to produce a universal RG flow of this type and describe how this can lead to the phenomenon of reaction catalysis, in which physical quantities (like scattering cross sections) can sometimes be surprisingly large compared to the underlying scales of the source in question. We comment in passing on the possible relevance of these observations to the phenomenon of the catalysis of baryon-number violation by scattering from magnetic monopoles.
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Williams and L. Zalavári, Point-particle effective field theory II: relativistic effects and coulomb/inverse-square competition, to appear.
C.P. Burgess, F. Metz and M. Rummel, Point-particle effective field theory III: fermions and the Dirac equation, to appear.
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Rummel and L. Zalavári, The proton-radius problem and point-particle effective field theory, to appear.
B. Holstein, Anomalies for pedestrians, Am. J. Phys. 61 (1993) 142.
A.M. Essin and D.J. Griffiths, Quantum mechanics of the 1/x 2 potential, Am. J. Phys. 74 (2006) 109.
B. Kayser, Classical limit of scattering in a 1/r 2 potential, Am. J. Phys. 42 (1974) 960.
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti and C.A. Garcia Canal, Dimensional transmutation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics. 1. General theory, Annals Phys. 287 (2001) 14 [hep-th/0003255] [INSPIRE].
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti and C.A. Garcia Canal, Dimensional transmutation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics. 2. Rotational invariance, Annals Phys. 287 (2001) 57 [hep-th/0003267] [INSPIRE].
A.K. Roy, Studies on some singular potentials in quantum mechanics, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 104 (2005) 861 [arXiv:1307.2687].
M. Andrews, Singular potentials in one dimension, Am. J. Phys. 44 (1976) 1064.
K.M. Case, Singular potentials, Phys. Rev. 80 (1950) 797.
W. Frank, D.J. Land and R.M. Spector, Singular potentials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43 (1971) 36 [INSPIRE].
H. Weyl, Über gewöhnliche Differentialgleichungen mit Singularitäten und de zeugehörigen Entwicklungen willkürlicher Funktionen, Math. Ann. 68 (1910) 220.
J. von Neumann, Allgemeine Eigenwertheorie Hermitescher funktionaloperatoren, Math. Ann. 102 (1929) 49.
M.H. Stone, On one-parameter unitary groups in Hilbert space, Ann. Math. 33 (1932) 643.
A.Z. Capri, Selfadjointness and spontaneously broken symmetry, Am. J. Phys. 45 (1977) 823 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dupré, J. A. Goldstein and M. Levy, The nearest self-adjoint operator, J. Chem. Phys. 72 (1980) 780.
J.L. Borg and J.V. Pulé, Pauli approximations to the sef-adjoint extensions of the Aharonov-Bohm Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 4385.
V.S. Araujo, F.A.B. Coutinho, J.F. Perez, Operator domains and self-adjoint operators, Am. J. Phys. 72 (2004) 203.
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C.A. Garcia Canal and C.R. Ordonez, On the inequivalence of renormalization and self-adjoint extensions for quantum singular interactions, Phys. Lett. A 364 (2007) 458 [hep-th/0604018] [INSPIRE].
T. Fülöp, Singular potentials in quantum mechanics and ambiguity in the self-adjoint hamiltonian, SIGMA 3 (2007) 107 [arXiv:0708.0866].
V.S. Araujo, F.A.B. Coutinho, F.M. Toyama, The time-dependent Schrödinger equation: the need for the Hamiltonian to be self-adjoint, Braz. J. Phys. 38 (2008) 178.
N. Arrizabalaga, J. Duoandikoetxea and L. Vega, Self-adjoint extensions of Dirac operators with a Coulomb type singularity, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 041504.
L. A. González-Díaz and S. Díaz-Solórzano, Bound states and scattering coefficients of self-adjoint Hamiltonians with a mass jump, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 042106.
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, Singular behavior of the Laplace operator in polar spherical coordinates and some of its consequences for the radial wave function at the origin of coordinates, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 12 (2015) 11 [arXiv:1502.04008] [INSPIRE].
V. Efimov, Energy levels arising form the resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. 33B (1970) 563 [INSPIRE].
A.C. Fonseca, E.F. Redish and P.E. Shanley, Efimov effect in an analytically solvable model, Nucl. Phys. A 320 (1979) 273 [INSPIRE].
V. Efimov, Low-energy properties of three resonantly interacting particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29 (1979) 546 [Yad. Fiz. 29 (1979) 1058] [INSPIRE].
H.W. Hammer and L. Platter, Efimov states in nuclear and particle physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 207 [arXiv:1001.1981].
D. MacNeill and F. Zhou, Pauli blocking effect on Efimov states near Feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 145301 [arXiv:1011.0006].
H. W. Hammer and L. Platter, Efimov physics from a renormalization group perspective, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 369 (2011) 2679.
T. Kraemer et al., Evidence for Efimov quantum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms, Nature 440 (2006) 315.
A.D. Alhaidari and H. Bahlouli, Electron in the field of a molecule with an electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 110401 [INSPIRE].
A.D. Alhaidari, Charged particle in the field an electric quadrupole in two dimensions, J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 14843 [arXiv:0709.3580].
S. Hikami, A.I. Larkin and Y. Nagaoka, Spin-orbit interaction and magnetoresistance in the two dimensional random system, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63 (1980) 707.
A. De Martino, D. Kloepfer, D. Matrasulov and R. Egger, Electric dipole induced universality for Dirac fermions in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 186603 [arXiv:1401.5992].
J. Denschlag, G. Umshaus and J. Schmiedmayer, Probing a singular potential with cold atoms: a neutral atom and a charged wire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 737.
R.A. Porto, A. Ross and I.Z. Rothstein, Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave amplitude from binary inspirals to 2.5 post-newtonian order, JCAP 09 (2012) 028 [arXiv:1203.2962] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, R. Diener and M. Williams, A problem with δ-functions: stress-energy constraints on bulk-brane matching (with comments on arXiv:1508.01124), JHEP 01 (2016) 017 [arXiv:1509.04201] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Berezin and L.D. Faddeev, A remark on Schrodinger’s equation with a singular potential, Sov. Math. Dokl. 2 (1961) 372 [Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 137 (1961) 1011] [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw, Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics,in Diverse topics in theoretical and mathematical physics, R. Jackiw ed., World Sceitnific, Singapore (1991).
S. Deser, M.L. Goldberger, K. Baumann and W.E. Thirring, Energy level displacements in pi mesonic atoms, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 774 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr., Monopole catalysis of baryon decay, Nucl. Phys. B 212 (1983) 391 [INSPIRE].
V.A. Rubakov, Structure of the vacuum in gauge theories and monopole catalysis of proton decay, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26 (1983) 1111 [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 141 (1983) 714] [INSPIRE].
Y. Schnir, Magnetic monopoles, Springer, Germany (2015).
J. Preskill, Magnetic monopoles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34 (1984) 461.
L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory, Pergamon Press, U.K. (1976).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
ArXiv ePrint: 1612.07313
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, C., Hayman, P., Williams, M. et al. Point-particle effective field theory I: classical renormalization and the inverse-square potential. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)106
- Effective field theories
- Nonperturbative Effects
- Renormalization Group