A membrane paradigm at large D

  • Sayantani Bhattacharyya
  • Anandita De
  • Shiraz Minwalla
  • Ravi Mohan
  • Arunabha Saha
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We study SO(d + 1) invariant solutions of the classical vacuum Einstein equations in p + d + 3 dimensions. In the limit d → ∞ with p held fixed we construct a class of solutions labelled by the shape of a membrane (the event horizon), together with a ‘velocity’ field that lives on this membrane. We demonstrate that our metrics can be corrected to nonsingular solutions at first sub-leading order in d if and only if the membrane shape and ‘velocity’ field obey equations of motion which we determine. These equations define a well posed initial value problem for the membrane shape and this ‘velocity’ and so completely determine the dynamics of the black hole. They may be viewed as governing the non-linear dynamics of the light quasi normal modes of Emparan, Suzuki and Tanabe.

Keywords

Black Holes Classical Theories of Gravity 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    E. Witten, Quarks, atoms, and the 1/N expansion, Phys. Today 33 (1980) 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, The large D limit of General Relativity, JHEP 06 (2013) 009 [arXiv:1302.6382] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Emparan, D. Grumiller and K. Tanabe, Large-D gravity and low-D strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251102 [arXiv:1303.1995] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Emparan and K. Tanabe, Holographic superconductivity in the large D expansion, JHEP 01 (2014) 145 [arXiv:1312.1108] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Emparan and K. Tanabe, Universal quasinormal modes of large D black holes, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 064028 [arXiv:1401.1957] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Instability of rotating black holes: large D analysis, JHEP 06 (2014) 106 [arXiv:1402.6215] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Decoupling and non-decoupling dynamics of large D black holes, JHEP 07 (2014) 113 [arXiv:1406.1258] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Quasinormal modes of (Anti-)de Sitter black holes in the 1/D expansion, JHEP 04 (2015) 085 [arXiv:1502.02820] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Emparan, Black Holes in 1/D expansion, talk given at Eurostrings 2015, Cambridge, U.K., 23-27 March 2015.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02 (2008) 045 [arXiv:0712.2456] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Rangamani, Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224003 [arXiv:0905.4352] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, The fluid/gravity correspondence, arXiv:1107.5780 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    J. Armas, (Non)-Dissipative Hydrodynamics on Embedded Surfaces, JHEP 09 (2014) 047 [arXiv:1312.0597] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos and N.A. Obers, Blackfolds in Supergravity and String Theory, JHEP 08 (2011) 154 [arXiv:1106.4428] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Camps and R. Emparan, Derivation of the blackfold effective theory, JHEP 03 (2012) 038 [Erratum ibid. 1206 (2012) 155] [arXiv:1201.3506] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    J. Armas, How Fluids Bend: the Elastic Expansion for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 09 (2013) 073 [arXiv:1304.7773] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Emparan, T. Shiromizu, R. Suzuki, K. Tanabe and T. Tanaka, Effective theory of Black Holes in the 1/D expansion, JHEP 06 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1504.06489] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Damour, Black Hole Eddy Currents, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3598 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R.H. Price and K.S. Thorne, The membrane paradigm for black holes, Sci. Am. 258 (1988) 69.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov and A. Strominger, Wilsonian Approach to Fluid/Gravity Duality, JHEP 03 (2011) 141 [arXiv:1006.1902] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S. Bhattacharyya et al., Local Fluid Dynamical Entropy from Gravity, JHEP 06 (2008) 055 [arXiv:0803.2526] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry, Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times, Annals Phys. 172 (1986) 304 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    R.C. Myers, Myers-Perry black holes, arXiv:1111.1903 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sayantani Bhattacharyya
    • 1
  • Anandita De
    • 2
  • Shiraz Minwalla
    • 3
  • Ravi Mohan
    • 3
  • Arunabha Saha
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of Science Education and ResearchPuneIndia
  3. 3.Department of Theoretical PhysicsTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations