Advertisement

On the quantum stability of Q-balls

  • Anders Tranberg
  • David J. WeirEmail author
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We consider the evolution and decay of Q-balls under the influence of quantum fluctuations. We argue that the most important effect resulting from these fluctuations is the modification of the effective potential in which the Q-ball evolves. This is in addition to spontaneous decay into elementary particle excitations and fission into smaller Q-balls previously considered in the literature, which — like most tunnelling processes — are likely to be strongly suppressed. We illustrate the effect of quantum fluctuations in a particular model ϕ 6 potential, for which we implement the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation to quantum dynamics and solve for the evolution of Q-balls in 3 + 1 dimensions. We find that the stability range as a function of (field space) angular velocity ω is modified significantly compared to the classical case, so that small-ω Q-balls are less stable than in the classical limit, and large-ω Q-balls are more stable. This can be understood qualitatively in a simple way.

Keywords

Solitons Monopoles and Instantons Lattice Quantum Field Theory 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S.R. Coleman, Q balls, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985) 263 [Erratum ibid. B 269 (1986) 744] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and A. Sirlin, A class of scalar-field soliton solutions in three space dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2739 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M.I. Tsumagari, E.J. Copeland and P.M. Saffin, Some stationary properties of a Q-ball in arbitrary space dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065021 [arXiv:0805.3233] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M.I. Tsumagari, The physics of Q-balls, arXiv:0910.3845 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    A. Rajantie and D.J. Weir, Soliton form factors from lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 111502 [arXiv:1006.2410] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Salle, J. Smit and J.C. Vink, Thermalization in a Hartree ensemble approximation to quantum field dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 025016 [hep-ph/0012346] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Salle, J. Smit and J.C. Vink, Staying thermal with Hartree ensemble approximations, Nucl. Phys. B 625 (2002) 495 [hep-ph/0012362] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Salle, Kinks in the Hartree approximation, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 025005 [hep-ph/0307080] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Borsányi and M. Hindmarsh, Semiclassical decay of topological defects, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 045022 [arXiv:0712.0300] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Bergner and L.M.A. Bettencourt, Dressing up the kink, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 045002 [hep-th/0305190] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (2005) 3 [hep-ph/0409233] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Aarts, G.F. Bonini and C. Wetterich, Exact and truncated dynamics in nonequilibrium field theory, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 025012 [hep-ph/0007357] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Arrizabalaga, J. Smit and A. Tranberg, Equilibration in ϕ 4 theory in 3 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 025014 [hep-ph/0503287] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Fejos, A. Patkos and Z. Szep, Renormalisability of the 2PI-Hartree approximation of multicomponent scalar models in the broken symmetry phase, Nucl. Phys. A 803 (2008) 115 [arXiv:0711.2933] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Gleiser and J. Thorarinson, Energy landscape of d-dimensional Q-balls, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 065008 [hep-th/0505251] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. Battye and P. Sutcliffe, Q-ball dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 590 (2000) 329 [hep-th/0003252] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Enqvist, A. Jokinen, T. Multamaki and I. Vilja, Numerical simulations of fragmentation of the Affleck-Dine condensate, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 083501 [hep-ph/0011134] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    T. Multamaki and I. Vilja, Simulations of Q ball formation, Phys. Lett. B 535 (2002) 170 [hep-ph/0203195] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki and F. Takahashi, Numerical study of Q-ball formation in gravity mediation, JCAP 06 (2010) 008 [arXiv:1003.1779] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations