Model-independent constraints on new physics in bs transitions

  • Wolfgang Altmannshofer
  • Paride Paradisi
  • David M. Straub
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive model-independent analysis of rare decays involving the bs transition to put constraints on dimension-six ΔF = 1 effective operators. The constraints are derived from all the available up-to-date experimental data from the B-factories, CDF and LHCb. The implications and future prospects for observables in bsℓ+ and b\( s\nu \overline \nu \) transitions in view of improved measurements are also investigated. The present work updates and generalises previous studies providing, at the same time, a useful tool to test the flavour structure of any theory beyond the SM.

Keywords

Rare Decays Beyond Standard Model B-Physics 

References

  1. [1]
    A. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. D’Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    The LHCb collaboration, B. Adeva et al., Roadmap for selected key measurements of LHCb, arXiv:0912.4179 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    T. Aushev et al., Physics at Super B Factory, arXiv:1002.5012 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    SuperB collaboration, B. O’Leary et al., SuperB Progress ReportsPhysics, arXiv:1008.1541 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of B 0K *0 μ + μ , LHCb-CONF-2011-038.
  7. [7]
    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of \( \overline B \to K\overline l l \) decays, 12 (2007) 040 [arXiv:0709.4174] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, D. van Dyk and C. Wacker, The decay BKl + l at Low Hadronic Recoil and Model-Independent ΔB = 1 Constraints, JHEP 01 (2012) 107 [arXiv:1111.2558] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. Bobeth et al., Upper bounds on rare K and B decays from minimal flavor violation, Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005) 252 [hep-ph/0505110] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    U. Haisch and A. Weiler, Determining the Sign of the Z-Penguin Amplitude, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 074027 [arXiv:0706.2054] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Hurth, G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik and F. Mescia, Constraints on New Physics in MFV models: A Model-independent analysis of ΔF = 1 processes, Nucl. Phys. B 808 (2009) 326 [arXiv:0807.5039] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Descotes-Genon, D. Ghosh, J. Matias and M. Ramon, Exploring new physics in the C 7\( C_{{^{{7}}}}^{\prime } \) plane, JHEP 06 (2011) 099 [arXiv:1104.3342] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Gambino, U. Haisch and M. Misiak, Determining the sign of the bsγ amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 061803 [hep-ph/0410155] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and D. van Dyk, The benefits of \( \overline B \to {\overline K^{ * }}{l^{ + }}{l^{ - }} \) decays at low recoil, JHEP 07 (2010) 098 [arXiv:1006.5013] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and D. van Dyk, More benefits of semileptonic rare B decays at low recoil: CP-violation, JHEP 07 (2011) 067 [arXiv:1105.0376] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Hiller and F. Krüger, More model independent analysis of bs processes, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 074020 [hep-ph/0310219] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, CP asymmetries in \( \overline B \to {\overline K^{ * }}\left( { \to \overline K \pi } \right)\overline \ell \ell \) and untagged \( {\overline B_{\text{s}}},\,{\overline B_{\text{s}}} \to \phi \left( { \to {K^{ + }}{K^{ - }}} \right)\overline l l \) decays at NLO, JHEP 07 (2008) 106 [arXiv:0805.2525] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Bobeth and U. Haisch, New physics in \( \Gamma_{{12}}^s \) : \( \left( {\overline s b} \right)\,\left( {\overline \tau \tau } \right) \) operators, arXiv:1109.1826 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    C. Bobeth, M. Misiak and J. Urban, Photonic penguins at two loops and m t dependence of BR[BX s + ], Nucl. Phys. B 574 (2000) 291 [hep-ph/9910220] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Bobeth, A.J. Buras, F. Krüger and J. Urban, QCD corrections to \( \overline B \to {X_{{d,s}}}\nu \overline \nu \) , \( {\overline B_{{{\text{d}},{\text{s}}}}} \to {\ell^{ + }}{\ell^{ - }},\,K \to \pi \nu \overline \nu \) and K Lμ + μ in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 630 (2002) 87 [hep-ph/0112305] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Laiho, E. Lunghi and R.S. Van de Water, Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034503 [arXiv:0910.2928] [INSPIRE]. Online update at www.latticeaverages.org.
  22. [22]
    C. McNeile, C. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel and G. Lepage, High-Precision \( {f_{{{B_s}}}} \) and HQET from Relativistic Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 031503 [arXiv:1110.4510] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A.J. Buras, Relations between ΔM s,d and B s,d\( \mu \overline \mu \) in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 115 [hep-ph/0303060] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    LHCb collaboration, Search for the rare decays \( B_{{(s)}}^0 \)μ + μ with 300 pb −1 at LHCb, LHCb-CONF-2011-037.
  25. [25]
    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for B s and B to dimuon decays in pp collisions at 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 191802 [arXiv:1107.5834] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    LHCb, CMS collaboration, Search for the rare decay \( B_{{(s)}}^0 \)μ + μ at the LHC with the CMS and LHCb experiments, LHCb-CONF-2011-047.
  27. [27]
    CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Search for B sμ + μ and B dμ + μ decays with CDF II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 239903 [arXiv:1107.2304] [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ-lepton properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    M. Misiak et al., Estimate of B(\( \overline B \)X sγ) at O \( \left( {\alpha_s^2} \right) \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, NNLO QCD corrections to the \( \overline B \)X sγ matrix elements using interpolation in m c, Nucl. Phys. B 764 (2007) 62 [hep-ph/0609241] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    E. Lunghi and J. Matias, Huge right-handed current effects in BK *() + in supersymmetry, JHEP 04 (2007) 058 [hep-ph/0612166] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Atwood, M. Gronau and A. Soni, Mixing induced CP asymmetries in radiative B decays in and beyond the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 185 [hep-ph/9704272] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    B. Grinstein, Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti and D. Pirjol, The photon polarization in BXγ in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 011504 [hep-ph/0412019] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    P. Ball and R. Zwicky, Time-dependent CP Asymmetry in BK *γ as a (Quasi) Null Test of the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 478 [hep-ph/0609037] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    P. Ball, G.W. Jones and R. Zwicky, BVγ beyond QCD factorisation, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 054004 [hep-ph/0612081] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Belle collaboration, Y. Ushiroda et al., Time-dependent CP asymmetries in B 0\( {\text{K}}_s^0{\pi^0}\gamma \) transitions, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 111104 [hep-ex/0608017] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    BABAR collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Measurement of time-dependent CP asymmetry in B 0\( K_s^0{\pi^0}\gamma \) decays, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 071102 [arXiv:0807.3103] [INSPIRE].
  38. [38]
    B. Meadows et al., The impact of SuperB on flavour physics, arXiv:1109.5028 [INSPIRE].
  39. [39]
    J.M. Soares, CP violation in radiative b decays, Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 575 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    A.L. Kagan and M. Neubert, Direct CP-violation in BX sγ decays as a signature of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 094012 [hep-ph/9803368] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    M. Benzke, S.J. Lee, M. Neubert and G. Paz, Long-distance dominance of the CP asymmetry in BX s,d + γ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 141801 [arXiv:1012.3167] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    BABAR collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Measurement of the BX s+ branching fraction with a sum over exclusive modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 081802 [hep-ex/0404006] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Belle collaboration, M. Iwasaki et al., Improved measurement of the electroweak penguin process BX s + , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 092005 [hep-ex/0503044] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    H. Asatrian, H. Asatrian, C. Greub and M. Walker, Two loop virtual corrections to BX s + in the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 507 (2001) 162 [hep-ph/0103087] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    H. Asatryan, H. Asatrian, C. Greub and M. Walker, Calculation of two loop virtual corrections to bsℓ + in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 074004 [hep-ph/0109140] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    C. Bobeth, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Complete NNLO QCD analysis of \( \overline B \)X s + and higher order electroweak effects, JHEP 04 (2004) 071 [hep-ph/0312090] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    A. Ghinculov, T. Hurth, G. Isidori and Y. Yao, The Rare decay BX s + to NNLL precision for arbitrary dilepton invariant mass, Nucl. Phys. B 685 (2004) 351 [hep-ph/0312128] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    T. Huber, E. Lunghi, M. Misiak and D. Wyler, Electromagnetic logarithms in \( \overline B \)X s + , Nucl. Phys. B 740 (2006) 105 [hep-ph/0512066] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Z. Ligeti and F.J. Tackmann, Precise predictions for BX s + in the large q 2 region, Phys. Lett. B 653 (2007) 404 [arXiv:0707.1694] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    T. Huber, T. Hurth and E. Lunghi, Logarithmically enhanced corrections to the decay rate and forward backward asymmetry in \( \overline B \)X s + , Nucl. Phys. B 802 (2008) 40 [arXiv:0712.3009] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    C. Greub, V. Pilipp and C. Schupbach, Analytic calculation of two-loop QCD corrections to bsℓ + in the high q 2 region, JHEP 12 (2008) 040 [arXiv:0810.4077] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    K.S. Lee, Z. Ligeti, I.W. Stewart and F.J. Tackmann, Universality and m(X) cut effects in BX s + , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 011501 [hep-ph/0512191] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    G. Bell, M. Beneke, T. Huber and X.-Q. Li, Heavy-to-light currents at NNLO in SCET and semi-inclusive \( \overline B \)X s l + l decay, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 143 [arXiv:1007.3758] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    T.E. Browder, T. Gershon, D. Pirjol, A. Soni and J. Zupan, New Physics at a Super Flavor Factory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1887 [arXiv:0802.3201] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    W. Altmannshofer et al., Symmetries and asymmetries of BK * μ + μ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, JHEP 01 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0811.1214] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon and W. Reece, New observables in the decay mode \( \overline B \) d\( \overline K \) *0 + , JHEP 11 (2008) 032 [arXiv:0807.2589] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    BABAR collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Angular distributions in the decays BK * + , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 031102 [arXiv:0804.4412] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    BELLE collaboration, J.-T. Wei et al., Measurement of the Differential Branching Fraction and Forward-Backword Asymmetry for BK (*) + , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 171801 [arXiv:0904.0770] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurement of the Forward-Backward Asymmetry in the BK (*) μ + μ Decay and First Observation of the \( B_s^0 \)ϕμ + μ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 161801 [arXiv:1101.1028] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurements of the Angular Distributions in the Decays BK (*) μ + μ at CDF, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 081807 [arXiv:1108.0695] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    F. Krüger and J. Matias, Probing new physics via the transverse amplitudes of B 0K *0(→K π +) + at large recoil, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 094009 [hep-ph/0502060] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    A.K. Alok et al., New-physics contributions to the forward-backward asymmetry in BK * μ + μ , JHEP 02 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0912.1382] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    E. Lunghi and A. Soni, An improved observable for the forward-backward asymmetry in BK * + and B sϕℓ + , JHEP 11 (2010) 121 [arXiv:1007.4015] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    A.K. Alok et al., New Physics in b + μ : CP-Conserving Observables, JHEP 11 (2011) 121 [arXiv:1008.2367] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    A.K. Alok et al., New Physics in b + μ : CP-Violating Observables, JHEP 11 (2011) 122 [arXiv:1103.5344] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon and W. Reece, New physics reach of the decay mode \( \overline B \)\( \overline K \) *0 + , JHEP 10 (2010) 056 [arXiv:1005.0571] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    A. Bharucha and W. Reece, Constraining new physics with BK * μ + μ in the early LHC era, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 623 [arXiv:1002.4310] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. Pivovarov and Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in BK (*) + and BK * γ, JHEP 09 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1006.4945] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Systematic approach to exclusive BVℓ + , Vγ decays, Nucl. Phys. B 612 (2001) 25 [hep-ph/0106067] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Exclusive radiative and electroweak bd and bs penguin decays at NLO, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 173 [hep-ph/0412400] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    P. Ball and R. Zwicky, B d,s → ρ, ω, K * , ϕ decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014029 [hep-ph/0412079] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Exclusive rare BK * + decays at low recoil: Controlling the long-distance effects, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 114005 [hep-ph/0404250] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    M. Beylich, G. Buchalla and T. Feldmann, Theory of BK (*) + decays at high q 2 : OPE and quark-hadron duality, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1635 [arXiv:1101.5118] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    D. Seidel, Analytic two loop virtual corrections to bdℓ + , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094038 [hep-ph/0403185] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    CKMfitter Group collaboration, J. Charles et al., CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406184] [INSPIRE]. Updated results and plots available at: http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr.
  76. [76]
    A. Bharucha, T. Feldmann and M. Wick, Theoretical and Phenomenological Constraints on Form Factors for Radiative and Semi-Leptonic B-Meson Decays, JHEP 09 (2010) 090 [arXiv:1004.3249] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Observation of the Baryonic Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Decay \( \Lambda_b^0 \) → Λμ + μ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 201802 [arXiv:1107.3753] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. [78]
    K.G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak and M. Münz, Weak radiative B meson decay beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 206 [Erratum ibid. B 425 (1998) 414] [hep-ph/9612313] [INSPIRE].
  79. [79]
    M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch and M. Misiak, Three-loop mixing of dipole operators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 102004 [hep-ph/0504194] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    G. D’Agostini, Asymmetric uncertainties: sources, treatment and potential dangers, physics/0403086 [INSPIRE].
  81. [81]
    W. Altmannshofer, A. Buras and P. Paradisi, Low energy probes of CP-violation in a flavor blind MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 669 (2008) 239 [arXiv:0808.0707] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    R. Barbieri, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, CP violation in supersymmetry with effective minimal flavour violation, JHEP 05 (2011) 049 [arXiv:1102.0726] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [arXiv:1105.2296] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    R. Barbieri, P. Campli, G. Isidori, F. Sala and D.M. Straub, B-decay CP-asymmetries in SUSY with a U(2)3 flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1812 [arXiv:1108.5125] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    A. Crivellin and L. Mercolli, BX d γ and constraints on new physics, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 114005 [arXiv:1106.5499] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [arXiv:1002.0900] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    R. Barbier et al., R-parity violating supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406039] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. [88]
    D.M. Straub, New physics correlations in rare decays, arXiv:1012.3893 [INSPIRE].
  89. [89]
    P. Langacker and M. Plümacher, Flavor changing effects in theories with a heavy Z boson with family nonuniversal couplings, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 013006 [hep-ph/0001204] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    P. Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [arXiv:0801.1345] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    A.J. Buras and L. Silvestrini, Upper bounds on K\( \pi \nu \overline \nu \) and K L → π0 e + e from ϵ /ϵ and K Lμ + μ , Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 299 [hep-ph/9811471] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. [92]
    G. Buchalla, G. Hiller and G. Isidori, Phenomenology of nonstandard Z couplings in exclusive semileptonic bs transitions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014015 [hep-ph/0006136] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, D.M. Straub and M. Wick, New strategies for New Physics search in BK * \( \nu \overline \nu \) , BK \( \nu \overline \nu \) and BX s \( \nu \overline \nu \) decays, JHEP 04 (2009) 022 [arXiv:0902.0160] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    E. Lunghi, A. Masiero, I. Scimemi and L. Silvestrini, BX s + decays in supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 120 [hep-ph/9906286] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    LHCb collaboration, Combination of ϕ s measurements from \( B_s^0 \)J/ψϕ and \( B_s^0 \)J/ψf 0(980), LHCb-CONF-2011-056.
  96. [96]
    Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti and E. Nardi, New limit on inclusive BX s \( \nu \overline \nu \) decay and constraints on new physics, Nucl. Phys. B 465 (1996) 369 [Erratum ibid. B 480 (1996) 753-754] [hep-ph/9510378] [INSPIRE].
  97. [97]
    D. Melikhov, N. Nikitin and S. Simula, Right-handed currents in rare exclusive B → (K,K *)\( \nu \overline \nu \) decays, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 171 [hep-ph/9803269] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    M. Bartsch, M. Beylich, G. Buchalla and D.-N. Gao, Precision Flavour Physics with BK \( \nu \overline \nu \) and BKℓ + , JHEP 11 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0909.1512] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    J.F. Kamenik and C. Smith, Tree-level contributions to the rare decays B +π + \( \nu \overline \nu \) , B +K + \( \nu \overline \nu \) and B +K *+ \( \nu \overline \nu \) in the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 471 [arXiv:0908.1174] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    A.J. Buras, K. Gemmler and G. Isidori, Quark flavour mixing with right-handed currents: an effective theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 107 [arXiv:1007.1993] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. [101]
    BABAR collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchez et al., Search for the Rare Decay BK \( \nu \overline \nu \), Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 112002 [arXiv:1009.1529] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and Phenomenology of FCNC and CPV Effects in SUSY Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    A. Buras, M. Misiak, M. Münz and S. Pokorski, Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of BX s γ decay, Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 374 [hep-ph/9311345] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Altmannshofer
    • 1
  • Paride Paradisi
    • 2
  • David M. Straub
    • 3
  1. 1.Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryBataviaU.S.A.
  2. 2.Theory DivisionCERNGeneva 23Switzerland
  3. 3.Scuola Normale Superiore and INFNPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations