Advertisement

OPE and a low-energy theorem in QCD-like theories

  • Matteo BecchettiEmail author
  • Marco Bochicchio
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

We verify, both perturbatively and nonperturbatively asymptotically in the ultraviolet (UV), a special case of a low-energy theorem of the NSVZ type in QCD-like theories, recently derived in Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054010, that relates the logarithmic derivative with respect to the gauge coupling, or the logarithmic derivative with respect to the renormalization-group (RG) invariant scale, of an n-point correlator of local operators in one side to an n + 1-point correlator with the insertion of TrF2 at zero momentum in the other side. Our computation involves the operator product expansion (OPE) of the scalar glueball operator, TrF2, in massless QCD, worked out perturbatively in JHEP 12 (2012) 119 — and in its RG-improved form in the present paper — by means of which we extract both the perturbative divergences and the nonperturbative UV asymptotics in both sides. We also discuss the role of the contact terms in the OPE, both finite and divergent, discovered some years ago in JHEP 12 (2012) 119, in relation to the low-energy theorem. Besides, working the other way around by assuming the low-energy theorem for any 2-point correlator of a multiplicatively renormalizable gauge-invariant operator, we compute in a massless QCD-like theory the corresponding perturbative OPE to the order of g2 and nonperturbative asymptotics. The low-energy theorem has a number of applications: to the renormalization in asymptotically free QCD-like theories, both perturbatively and nonperturbatively in the large-N ’t Hooft and Veneziano expansions, and to the way the open/closed string duality may or may not be realized in the would-be solution by canonical string theories for QCD-like theories, both perturbatively and in the ’t Hooft large-N expansion. Our computations will also enter further developments based on the low-energy theorem.

Keywords

Perturbative QCD Renormalization Group 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Bochicchio, The large-N Yang-Mills S-matrix is ultraviolet finite, but the large-N QCD S-matrix is only renormalizable, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054010 [arXiv:1701.07833] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Are All Hadrons Alike?, Nucl. Phys. B 191 (1981) 301 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Bochicchio, Renormalization in large-N QCD is incompatible with open/closed string duality, Phys. Lett. B 783 (2018) 341 [arXiv:1703.10176] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Khoury and H.L. Verlinde, On open/closed string duality, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 1893 [hep-th/0001056] [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    P. Di Vecchia, A. Liccardo, R. Marotta and F. Pezzella, On the gauge/gravity correspondence and the open/closed string duality, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 4699 [hep-th/0503156] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    G. Veneziano, Some Aspects of a Unified Approach to Gauge, Dual and Gribov Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 117 (1976) 519 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Veneziano, An Introduction to Dual Models of Strong Interactions and Their Physical Motivations, Phys. Rept. 9 (1974) 199 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Bochicchio, Open/closed string duality is incompatible with renormalization int Hooft large-N QCD, but not in Veneziano large-N QCD, PoS(EPS-HEP2017)539 (2017).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.F. Zoller and K.G. Chetyrkin, OPE of the energy-momentum tensor correlator in massless QCD, JHEP 12 (2012) 119 [arXiv:1209.1516] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M.F. Zoller, OPE of the energy-momentum tensor correlator and the gluon condensate operator in massless QCD to three-loop order, JHEP 10 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1407.6921] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M.F. Zoller, On the renormalization of operator products: the scalar gluonic case, JHEP 04 (2016) 165 [arXiv:1601.08094] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    A.L. Kataev, N.V. Krasnikov and A.A. Pivovarov, Two Loop Calculations for the Propagators of Gluonic Currents, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 508 [Erratum ibid. B 490 (1997) 505] [hep-ph/9612326] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    M. Bochicchio and S.P. Muscinelli, Ultraviolet asymptotics of glueball propagators, JHEP 08 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1304.6409] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    M. Bochicchio, Glueball and meson propagators of any spin in large-N QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 875 (2013) 621 [arXiv:1305.0273] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    V. Prochazka and R. Zwicky, Finiteness of two- and three-point functions and the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065027 [arXiv:1611.01367] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, Holomorphy, rescaling anomalies and exact β-functions in supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2000) 030 [hep-th/9707133] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S.D. Joglekar and B.W. Lee, General Theory of Renormalization of Gauge Invariant Operators, Annals Phys. 97 (1976) 160 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Henneaux, Remarks on the renormalization of gauge invariant operators in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 313 (1993) 35 [Erratum ibid. B 316 (1993) 633] [hep-th/9306101] [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    J.C. Collins and R.J. Scalise, The Renormalization of composite operators in Yang-Mills theories using general covariant gauge, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4117 [hep-ph/9403231] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    V.P. Spiridonov, Anomalous Dimension of G μν2 and β-function, IYaI-P-0378 (1984) [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9307274] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    V.M. Braun, G.P. Korchemsky and D. Mueller, The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51 (2003) 311 [hep-ph/0306057] [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    M. Bochicchio, An asymptotic solution of large-N QCD and of large-N \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 SU SY Y M, in Prospects and Precision at the Large Hadron Collider at 14 TeV, Arcetri, Florence, Italy, September 1–October 24, 2014 (2014) [arXiv:1409.5149] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    M. Becchetti, M. Bochicchio, Operator mixing and asymptotics in asymptotically free and logarithmic conformal theories, to appear in arXiv.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. Holland and S. Hollands, Recursive construction of operator product expansion coefficients, Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1555 [arXiv:1401.3144] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    M.B. Fröb and J. Holland, All-order existence of and recursion relations for the operator product expansion in Yang-Mills theory, arXiv:1603.08012 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza — Università di RomaRomeItaly
  2. 2.INFN Sezione di RomaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations