Advertisement

Cosmology with a very light LμLτ gauge boson

  • Miguel EscuderoEmail author
  • Dan Hooper
  • Gordan Krnjaic
  • Mathias Pierre
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we explore in detail the cosmological implications of an abelian LμLτ gauge extension of the Standard Model featuring a light and weakly coupled Z′. Such a scenario is motivated by the longstanding ∼ 4σ discrepancy between the measured and predicted values of the muon’s anomalous magnetic moment, (g − 2)μ, as well as the tension between late and early time determinations of the Hubble constant. If sufficiently light, the Z′ population will decay to neutrinos, increasing the overall energy density of radiation and altering the expansion history of the early universe. We identify two distinct regions of parameter space in this model in which the Hubble tension can be significantly relaxed. The first of these is the previously identified region in which a ∼ 10 − 20 MeV Z′ reaches equilibrium in the early universe and then decays, heating the neutrino population and delaying the process of neutrino decoupling. For a coupling of gμτ ≃ (3 − 8) × 10−4, such a particle can also explain the observed (g − 2)μ anomaly. In the second region, the Z′ is very light (\( {m}_{Z^{\prime }} \) ∼ 1eV to MeV) and very weakly coupled (gμτ ∼ 10−13 to 10−9). In this case, the Z′ population is produced through freeze-in, and decays to neutrinos after neutrino decoupling. Across large regions of parameter space, we predict a contribution to the energy density of radiation that can appreciably relax the reported Hubble tension, ΔNeff ≃ 0.2.

Keywords

Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM Beyond Standard Model Neutrino Physics 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Essig et al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, arXiv:1311.0029 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    J. Alexander et al., Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report, arXiv:1608.08632 [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095002 [arXiv:0811.1030] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091801 [arXiv:1406.2332] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A.G. Riess et al., Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J. 861 (2018) 126 [arXiv:1804.10655] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A.G. Riess et al., A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J. 826 (2016) 56 [arXiv:1604.01424] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209 [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    J.L. Bernal, L. Verde and A.G. Riess, The trouble with H 0, JCAP 10 (2016) 019 [arXiv:1607.05617] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. Aylor, M. Joy, L. Knox, M. Millea, S. Raghunathan and W.L.K. Wu, Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder & ΛCDM-based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon, arXiv:1811.00537 [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    S. Weinberg, Goldstone Bosons as Fractional Cosmic Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 241301 [arXiv:1305.1971] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Shakya and J.D. Wells, Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 031702 [arXiv:1611.01517] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Berlin and N. Blinov, A Thermal Neutrino Portal to Sub-MeV Dark Matter, arXiv:1807.04282 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    F. D’Eramo, R.Z. Ferreira, A. Notari and J.L. Bernal, Hot Axions and the H 0 tension, JCAP 11 (2018) 014 [arXiv:1808.07430] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Dessert, C. Kilic, C. Trendafilova and Y. Tsai, Addressing Astrophysical and Cosmological Problems With Secretly Asymmetric Dark Matter, arXiv:1811.05534 [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension, arXiv:1811.04083 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, D. Grin, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 083525 [arXiv:1806.10608] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Poulin, K.K. Boddy, S. Bird and M. Kamionkowski, Implications of an extended dark energy cosmology with massive neutrinos for cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123504 [arXiv:1803.02474] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and P. Walia, Converting nonrelativistic dark matter to radiation, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 023543 [arXiv:1803.03644] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    CMB-S4 collaboration, CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition, arXiv:1610.02743 [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    X.G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, New Z-prime Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    X.-G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in L μL τ models, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095033 [arXiv:1403.1269] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Coherent Propagation of PeV Neutrinos and the Dip in the Neutrino Spectrum at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 113004 [arXiv:1504.00711] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi and H.-B. Yu, Self-interacting dark matter and muon g−2 in a gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, JHEP 06 (2018) 117 [arXiv:1805.00651] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    P. Foldenauer, Light dark matter in a gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035007 [arXiv:1808.03647] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, S.-Y. Tseng and K. Tsumura, Minimal Gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\alpha }-{L}_{\beta }} \) Models Driven into a Corner, arXiv:1811.07571 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    M. Carena, M. Quirós and Y. Zhang, Electroweak Baryogenesis From Dark CP-violation, arXiv:1811.09719 [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    G. Arcadi, T. Hugle and F.S. Queiroz, The Dark L μL τ Rises via Kinetic Mixing, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 151 [arXiv:1803.05723] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Bauer, S. Diefenbacher, T. Plehn, M. Russell and D.A. Camargo, Dark Matter in Anomaly-Free Gauge Extensions, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1805.01904] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an L μL τ model, JHEP 12 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1609.04026] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    A. Biswas, S. Choubey and S. Khan, Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter and Anomalous Magnetic Moment of Muon in a \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) Model, JHEP 09 (2016) 147 [arXiv:1608.04194] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. DiFranzo and D. Hooper, Searching for MeV-Scale Gauge Bosons with IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 095007 [arXiv:1507.03015] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel, Hunting All the Hidden Photons, JHEP 07 (2018) 094 [arXiv:1803.05466] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams and W. Xue, Serendipity in dark photon searches, JHEP 06 (2018) 004 [arXiv:1801.04847] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    P.F. de Salas and S. Pastor, Relic neutrino decoupling with flavour oscillations revisited, JCAP 07 (2016) 051 [arXiv:1606.06986] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti and P.D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 729 (2005) 221 [hep-ph/0506164] [INSPIRE].
  38. [38]
    A.D. Dolgov, S.H. Hansen and D.V. Semikoz, Nonequilibrium corrections to the spectra of massless neutrinos in the early universe, Nucl. Phys. B 503 (1997) 426 [hep-ph/9703315] [INSPIRE].
  39. [39]
    D.A. Dicus, E.W. Kolb, A.M. Gleeson, E.C.G. Sudarshan, V.L. Teplitz and M.S. Turner, Primordial Nucleosynthesis Including Radiative, Coulomb and Finite Temperature Corrections to Weak Rates, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2694 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    CCFR collaboration, Neutrino tridents and W Z interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 3117 [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
    R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P.A.N. Machado, Exploring ν Signals in Dark Matter Detectors, JCAP 07 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1202.6073] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    R. Laha, B. Dasgupta and J.F. Beacom, Constraints on New Neutrino Interactions via Light Abelian Vector Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 093025 [arXiv:1304.3460] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    H. An, M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, New stellar constraints on dark photons, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 190 [arXiv:1302.3884] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects, JHEP 02 (2017) 033 [arXiv:1611.05852] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, Supernova SN 1987a and the Secret Interactions of Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2895 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    M. Escudero, Neutrino decoupling beyond the Standard Model: CMB constraints on the Dark Matter mass with a fast and precise N eff evaluation, JCAP 02 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1812.05605] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    S. Hannestad and J. Madsen, Neutrino decoupling in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1764 [astro-ph/9506015] [INSPIRE].
  48. [48]
    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127] [INSPIRE].
  49. [49]
    A.D. Dolgov, S.H. Hansen, S. Pastor, S.T. Petcov, G.G. Raffelt and D.V. Semikoz, Cosmological bounds on neutrino degeneracy improved by flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 632 (2002) 363 [hep-ph/0201287] [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    S. Hannestad, Oscillation effects on neutrino decoupling in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 083006 [astro-ph/0111423] [INSPIRE].
  51. [51]
    A.D. Dolgov, Neutrinos in cosmology, Phys. Rept. 370 (2002) 333 [hep-ph/0202122] [INSPIRE].
  52. [52]
    M. Ibe, W. Nakano and M. Suzuki, Constraints on L μL τ gauge interactions from rare kaon decay, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055022 [arXiv:1611.08460] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    S.N. Gninenko and N.V. Krasnikov, Probing the muon g μ − 2 anomaly, L μL τ gauge boson and Dark Matter in dark photon experiments, Phys. Lett. B 783 (2018) 24 [arXiv:1801.10448] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran and A. Whitbeck, M 3 : a new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g − 2)μ and dark matter at Fermilab, JHEP 09 (2018) 153 [arXiv:1804.03144] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    A. Berlin, N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Dark Matter, Millicharges, Axion and Scalar Particles, Gauge Bosons and Other New Physics with LDMX, arXiv:1807.01730 [INSPIRE].
  56. [56]
    C.-Y. Chen, J. Kozaczuk and Y.-M. Zhong, Exploring leptophilic dark matter with NA64-μ, JHEP 10 (2018) 154 [arXiv:1807.03790] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo and K. Tobioka, in preparation.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    T. Araki, S. Hoshino, T. Ota, J. Sato and T. Shimomura, Detecting the L μL τ gauge boson at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055006 [arXiv:1702.01497] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    H. Banerjee and S. Roy, Signatures of supersymmetry and L μL τ gauge bosons at Belle-II, arXiv:1811.00407 [INSPIRE].
  60. [60]
    M. Kawasaki, G. Steigman and H.-S. Kang, Cosmological evolution of an early decaying particle, Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 671 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    A.D. Dolgov, S.H. Hansen, S. Pastor and D.V. Semikoz, Unstable massive tau-neutrinos and primordial nucleosynthesis, Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 385 [hep-ph/9809598] [INSPIRE].
  62. [62]
    A. Fradette, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler and A. Ritz, Cosmological Constraints on Very Dark Photons, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035022 [arXiv:1407.0993] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    H.K. Dreiner, J.-F. Fortin, J. Isern and L. Ubaldi, White Dwarfs constrain Dark Forces, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043517 [arXiv:1303.7232] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKing’s College LondonLondonU.K.
  2. 2.Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC-Universitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryBataviaU.S.A.
  4. 4.Department of Astronomy and AstrophysicsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.
  5. 5.Kavli Institute for Cosmological PhysicsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.
  6. 6.Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (UMR8627), CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-SaclayOrsayFrance
  7. 7.Instituto de Física Teórica (IFT) UAM-CSICMadridSpain
  8. 8.Departamento de Física TeóricaUniversidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations