Advertisement

Complexity-action of subregions with corners

  • Elena Caceres
  • Ming-Lei XiaoEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

In the past, the study of the divergence structure of the holographic entanglement entropy on singular boundary regions uncovered cut-off independent coefficients. These coefficients were shown to be universal and to encode important field theory data. Inspired by these lessons we study the UV divergences of subregion complexity-action (CA) in a region with corner (kink). We develop a systematic approach to study all the divergence structures, and we emphasize that the counter term that restores reparameterization invariance on the null boundaries plays a crucial role in simplifying the results and rendering them more transparent. We find that a general form of subregion CA contains a part dependent on the null generator normalizations and a part that is independent of them. The former includes a volume contribution as well as an area contribution. We comment on the origin of the area term as entanglement entropy, and point out that its presence constitutes a robust difference between the two prescriptions to calculate subregion complexity (-action vs. -volume). We also find universal log δ divergence associated with the kink feature of the subregion. Similar flat angle limit as the subregion-CV result is obtained.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Classical Theories of Gravity Models of Quantum Gravity 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Susskind, Butterflies on the Stretched Horizon, arXiv:1311.7379 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    L. Susskind, Entanglement is not enough, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1411.0690] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Jefferson and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity in quantum field theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1707.08570] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Chapman, M.P. Heller, H. Marrochio and F. Pastawski, Toward a Definition of Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121602 [arXiv:1707.08582] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    M. Alishahiha, Holographic Complexity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 126009 [arXiv:1509.06614] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    O. Ben-Ami and D. Carmi, On Volumes of Subregions in Holography and Complexity, JHEP 11 (2016) 129 [arXiv:1609.02514] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Carmi, R.C. Myers and P. Rath, Comments on Holographic Complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 118 [arXiv:1612.00433] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    C.A. Agón, M. Headrick and B. Swingle, Subsystem Complexity and Holography, JHEP 02 (2019) 145 [arXiv:1804.01561] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Universal terms for the entanglement entropy in 2+1 dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 764 (2007) 183 [hep-th/0606256] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    H. Casini, M. Huerta and L. Leitao, Entanglement entropy for a Dirac fermion in three dimensions: Vertex contribution, Nucl. Phys. B 814 (2009) 594 [arXiv:0811.1968] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    P. Bueno, R.C. Myers and W. Witczak-Krempa, Universal corner entanglement from twist operators, JHEP 09 (2015) 091 [arXiv:1507.06997] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R.C. Myers and A. Singh, Entanglement Entropy for Singular Surfaces, JHEP 09 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1206.5225] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Bueno, R.C. Myers and W. Witczak-Krempa, Universality of corner entanglement in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 021602 [arXiv:1505.04804] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    P. Bueno and R.C. Myers, Corner contributions to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 08 (2015) 068 [arXiv:1505.07842] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Bueno and R.C. Myers, Universal entanglement for higher dimensional cones, JHEP 12 (2015) 168 [arXiv:1508.00587] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    E. Bakhshaei, A. Mollabashi and A. Shirzad, Holographic Subregion Complexity for Singular Surfaces, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 665 [arXiv:1703.03469] [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    S.N. Solodukhin, The Conical singularity and quantum corrections to entropy of black hole, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 609 [hep-th/9407001] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1408.6300] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B.R. Majhi and T. Padmanabhan, A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries, Gen. Rel. Grav. 48 (2016) 94 [arXiv:1501.01053] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin, Gravitational action with null boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084046 [arXiv:1609.00207] [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R.C. Myers, Complexity of Formation in Holography, JHEP 01 (2017) 062 [arXiv:1610.08063] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    J. Couch, S. Eccles, W. Fischler and M.-L. Xiao, Holographic complexity and noncommutative gauge theory, JHEP 03 (2018) 108 [arXiv:1710.07833] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theory Group, Department of PhysicsUniversity of TexasAustinU.S.A.
  2. 2.Institute of Theoretical PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations