Advertisement

Dichroic subjettiness ratios to distinguish colour flows in boosted boson tagging

  • Gavin P. Salam
  • Lais Schunk
  • Gregory SoyezEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

N-subjettiness ratios are in wide use for tagging heavy boosted objects, in particular the ratio of 2-subjettiness to 1-subjettiness for tagging boosted electroweak bosons. In this article we introduce a new, dichroic ratio, which uses different regions of a jet to determine the two subjettiness measures, emphasising the hard substructure for the 1-subjettiness and the full colour radiation pattern for the 2-subjettiness. Relative to existing N -subjettiness ratios, the dichroic extension, combined with SoftDrop (pre-)grooming, makes it possible to increase the ultimate signal significance by about 25% (for 2 TeV jets), or to reduce non-perturbative effects by a factor of 2−3 at 50% signal efficiency while maintaining comparable background rejection. We motivate the dichroic approach through the study of Lund diagrams, supplemented with resummed analytical calculations.

Keywords

Jets QCD Phenomenology 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Butterworth, A.R. Davison, M. Rubin and G.P. Salam, Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 242001 [arXiv:0802.2470] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and G.P. Salam, Towards an understanding of jet substructure, JHEP 09 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1307.0007] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez and J. Thaler, Soft Drop, JHEP 05 (2014) 146 [arXiv:1402.2657] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, Identifying Boosted Objects with N-subjettiness, JHEP 03 (2011) 015 [arXiv:1011.2268] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.-H. Kim, Rest Frame Subjet Algorithm With SISCone Jet For Fully Hadronic Decaying Higgs Search, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 011502 [arXiv:1011.1493] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, Maximizing Boosted Top Identification by Minimizing N-subjettiness, JHEP 02 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1108.2701] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.K. Behr, D. Bortoletto, J.A. Frost, N.P. Hartland, C. Issever and J. Rojo, Boosting Higgs pair production in the \( b\overline{b}b\overline{b} \) final state with multivariate techniques, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 386 [arXiv:1512.08928] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    ATLAS collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H ±tb decay channel in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV using the ATLAS detector, JHEP 03 (2016) 127 [arXiv:1512.03704] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    CMS collaboration, Search for heavy resonances decaying to two Higgs bosons in final states containing four b quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 371 [arXiv:1602.08762] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    J. Dolen, P. Harris, S. Marzani, S. Rappoccio and N. Tran, Thinking outside the ROCs: Designing Decorrelated Taggers (DDT) for jet substructure, JHEP 05 (2016) 156 [arXiv:1603.00027] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV with missing transverse momentum and vector boson tagged jets, JHEP 12 (2016) 083 [arXiv:1607.05764] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    M. Dasgupta, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, Jet shapes for boosted jet two-prong decays from first-principles, JHEP 04 (2016) 166 [arXiv:1512.00516] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, J. Thaler, C.K. Vermilion and T.F. Wilkason, XCone: N-jettiness as an Exclusive Cone Jet Algorithm, JHEP 11 (2015) 072 [arXiv:1508.01516] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A.J. Larkoski and I. Moult, The Singular Behavior of Jet Substructure Observables, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014017 [arXiv:1510.08459] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A.J. Larkoski, D. Neill and J. Thaler, Jet Shapes with the Broadening Axis, JHEP 04 (2014) 017 [arXiv:1401.2158] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Bertolini, T. Chan and J. Thaler, Jet Observables Without Jet Algorithms, JHEP 04 (2014) 013 [arXiv:1310.7584] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    G.P. Salam, unpublished.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad and U. Pettersson, Coherence Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering, Z. Phys. C 43 (1989) 625 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    C. Frye, A.J. Larkoski, M.D. Schwartz and K. Yan, Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm, JHEP 07 (2016) 064 [arXiv:1603.09338] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A.J. Larkoski, G.P. Salam and J. Thaler, Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substructure, JHEP 06 (2013) 108 [arXiv:1305.0007] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Power Counting to Better Jet Observables, JHEP 12 (2014) 009 [arXiv:1409.6298] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    I. Moult, L. Necib and J. Thaler, New Angles on Energy Correlation Functions, JHEP 12 (2016) 153 [arXiv:1609.07483] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. Gallicchio and M.D. Schwartz, Quark and Gluon Tagging at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 172001 [arXiv:1106.3076] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Gallicchio and M.D. Schwartz, Quark and Gluon Jet Substructure, JHEP 04 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1211.7038] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J.R. Andersen et al., Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, arXiv:1605.04692 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    M. Dasgupta, A. Powling and A. Siodmok, On jet substructure methods for signal jets, JHEP 08 (2015) 079 [arXiv:1503.01088] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Dasgupta, A. Powling, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, Improved jet substructure methods: Y-splitter and variants with grooming, JHEP 12 (2016) 079 [arXiv:1609.07149] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Altheimer et al., Boosted objects and jet substructure at the LHC. Report of BOOST2012, held at IFIC Valencia, 23rd-27th of July 2012, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2792 [arXiv:1311.2708] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Pileup subtraction using jet areas, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 119 [arXiv:0707.1378] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The Catchment Area of Jets, JHEP 04 (2008) 005 [arXiv:0802.1188] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    ATLAS collaboration, Tagging and suppression of pileup jets, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-001 (2014).
  34. [34]
    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, Use of charged-track information to subtract neutral pileup, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 014003 [arXiv:1404.7353] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    D. Krohn, M.D. Schwartz, M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Jet Cleansing: Pileup Removal at High Luminosity, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 065020 [arXiv:1309.4777] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    P. Berta, M. Spousta, D.W. Miller and R. Leitner, Particle-level pileup subtraction for jets and jet shapes, JHEP 06 (2014) 092 [arXiv:1403.3108] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, SoftKiller, a particle-level pileup removal method, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 59 [arXiv:1407.0408] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low and N. Tran, Pileup Per Particle Identification, JHEP 10 (2014) 059 [arXiv:1407.6013] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].
  40. [40]
    M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3 myth for the k t jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    G.P. Salam, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, Calculating jet shapes for jet substructure, in preparation.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    J.M. Butterworth, B.E. Cox and J.R. Forshaw, WW scattering at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 096014 [hep-ph/0201098] [INSPIRE].
  44. [44]
    D. Krohn, J. Thaler and L.-T. Wang, Jet Trimming, JHEP 02 (2010) 084 [arXiv:0912.1342] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Analytic Boosted Boson Discrimination, JHEP 05 (2016) 117 [arXiv:1507.03018] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    J.F. Gunion and Z. Kunszt, Lepton Correlations in Gauge Boson Pair Production and Decay, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 665 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].
  48. [48]
    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    D. de Florian et al., Differential Higgs Boson Pair Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD, JHEP 09 (2016) 151 [arXiv:1606.09519] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113006 [hep-ph/9905386] [INSPIRE].
  53. [53]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Vector boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1105.0020] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    R. Boughezal et al., Color singlet production at NNLO in MCFM, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 7 [arXiv:1605.08011] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    G. Soyez, G.P. Salam, J. Kim, S. Dutta and M. Cacciari, Pileup subtraction for jet shapes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 162001 [arXiv:1211.2811] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERN, Theoretical Physics DepartmentGeneva 23Switzerland
  2. 2.IPhT, CEA Saclay, CNRS UMR 3681Gif-sur-Yvette cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations