Bound state transformation walls

  • Evgeny Andriyash
  • Frederik Denef
  • Daniel L. Jafferis
  • Gregory W. Moore
Article

Abstract

In four dimensional N = 2 supergravity theories, BPS bound states near marginal stability are described by configurations of widely separated constituents with nearly parallel central charges. When the vacuum moduli can be dialed adiabatically until the central charges become anti -parallel, a paradox arises. We show that this paradox is always resolved by the existence of “bound state transformation walls” across which the nature of the bound state changes, although the index does not jump. We find that there are two distinct phenomena that can take place on these walls, which we call recombination and conjugation. The latter is associated to the presence of singularities at finite distance in moduli space. Consistency of conjugation and wall-crossing rules near these singularities leads to new constraints on the BPS spectrum. Singular loci supporting massless vector bosons are particularly subtle in this respect. We argue that the spectrum at such loci necessarily contains massless magnetic monopoles, and that bound states around them transform by intricate hybrids of conjugation and recombination.

Keywords

Black Holes in String Theory D-branes Differential and Algebraic Geometry 

References

  1. [1]
    M. Aganagic and K. Schaeffer, Wall crossing, quivers and crystals, arXiv:1006.2113 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    G. Aldazabal, A. Font, L.E. Ibáñez and F. Quevedo, Chains of N = 2, D = 4 heterotic type-II duals, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 85 [hep-th/9510093] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Andriyash and G.W. Moore, Ample D4-D2-D0 decay, arXiv:0806.4960 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    E. Andriyash, F. Denef, D.L. Jafferis and G.W. Moore, Wall-crossing from supersymmetric galaxies, arXiv:1008.0030 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    P.S. Aspinwall, An N = 2 dual pair and a phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 57 [hep-th/9510142] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    P.S. Aspinwall, R.L. Karp and R.P. Horja, Massless D-branes on Calabi-Yau threefolds and monodromy, Commun. Math. Phys. 259 (2005) 45 [hep-th/0209161] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. Bates and F. Denef, Exact solutions for supersymmetric stationary black hole composites, JHEP 11 (2011) 127 [hep-th/0304094] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Behrndt, D. Lüst and W.A. Sabra, Stationary solutions of N = 2 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998) 264 [hep-th/9705169] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Berglund, S.H. Katz, A. Klemm and P. Mayr, New Higgs transitions between dual N = 2 string models, Nucl. Phys. B 483 (1997) 209 [hep-th/9605154] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    O. Bergman and A. Fayyazuddin, String junctions and BPS states in Seiberg-Witten theory, Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 108 [hep-th/9802033] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Berenstein and M.R. Douglas, Seiberg duality for quiver gauge theories, hep-th/0207027 [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, Quantizing N = 2 multicenter solutions, JHEP 05 (2009) 002 [arXiv:0807.4556] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. de Boer, F. Denef, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, Black hole bound states in AdS 3× S 2, JHEP 11 (2008) 050 [arXiv:0802.2257] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Cecotti, P. Fendley, K.A. Intriligator and C. Vafa, A new supersymmetric index, Nucl. Phys. B 386 (1992) 405 [hep-th/9204102] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Cecotti and C. Vafa, On classification of N = 2 supersymmetric theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 158 (1993) 569 [hep-th/9211097] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Chalmers, M. Roček and R. von Unge, Monopoles in quantum corrected N = 2 super Yang-Mills theory, hep-th/9612195 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    F. Denef, Supergravity flows and D-brane stability, JHEP 08 (2000) 050 [hep-th/0005049] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. Denef, On the correspondence between D-branes and stationary supergravity solutions of type-II Calabi-Yau compactifications, hep-th/0010222 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    F. Denef, B.R. Greene and M. Raugas, Split attractor flows and the spectrum of BPS D-branes on the quintic, JHEP 05 (2001) 012 [hep-th/0101135] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    F. Denef, (Dis)assembling special Lagrangians, hep-th/0107152 [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    F. Denef, Quantum quivers and Hall/hole halos, JHEP 10 (2002) 023 [hep-th/0206072] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F. Denef and G.W. Moore, Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos, JHEP 11 (2011) 129 [hep-th/0702146] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    E. Diaconescu and G.W. Moore, Crossing the wall: branes versus bundles, arXiv:0706.3193 [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    T. Dimofte and S. Gukov, Refined, motivic and quantum, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0904.1420] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. Dimofte, Refined BPS invariants, Chern-Simons theory, and the quantum dilogarithm, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena U.S.A. (2010), http://theory.caltech.edu/tdd/work/papers/DimofteTDdis.pdf.
  26. [26]
    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger, N = 2 extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 5412 [hep-th/9508072] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Ferrara, J.A. Harvey, A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Second quantized mirror symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 361 (1995) 59 [hep-th/9505162] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    S. Ferrara, G.W. Gibbons and R. Kallosh, Black holes and critical points in moduli space, Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 75 [hep-th/9702103] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger, N = 2 extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 5412 [hep-th/9508072] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, T. Hauer and B. Zwiebach, Open string-string junction transitions, Nucl. Phys. B 525 (1998) 117 [hep-th/9801205] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Four-dimensional wall-crossing via three-dimensional field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 299 (2010) 163 [arXiv:0807.4723] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems and the WKB approximation, arXiv:0907.3987 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, M theory and topological strings. 1., hep-th/9809187 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, M theory and topological strings. 2., hep-th/9812127 [INSPIRE].
  35. [35]
    B.R. Greene, D.R. Morrison and A. Strominger, Black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 109 [hep-th/9504145] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    B.R. Greene, D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa, A geometric realization of confinement, Nucl. Phys. B 481 (1996) 513 [hep-th/9608039] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, Algebras, BPS states and strings, Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 315 [hep-th/9510182] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, On the algebras of BPS states, Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 489 [hep-th/9609017] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov and C. Vafa, Quantum foam and topological strings, JHEP 04 (2008) 011 [hep-th/0312022] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    D.L. Jafferis and G.W. Moore, Wall crossing in local Calabi Yau manifolds, arXiv:0810.4909 [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
    C.V. Johnson, A.W. Peet and J. Polchinski, Gauge theory and the excision of repulson singularities, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 086001 [hep-th/9911161] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    S. Kachru and C. Vafa, Exact results for N = 2 compactifications of heterotic strings, Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 69 [hep-th/9505105] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    S. Kachru, A. Klemm, W. Lerche, P. Mayr and C. Vafa, Nonperturbative results on the point particle limit of N = 2 heterotic string compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 459 (1996) 537 [hep-th/9508155] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    S.H. Katz, A. Klemm and C. Vafa, Geometric engineering of quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997) 173 [hep-th/9609239] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    S.H. Katz, D.R. Morrison and M. Plesser, Enhanced gauge symmetry in type II string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 105 [hep-th/9601108] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations, arXiv:0811.2435.
  47. [47]
    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants: summary of results, arXiv:0910.4315 [INSPIRE].
  48. [48]
    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, to appear.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, J. Kappeli and T. Mohaupt, Stationary BPS solutions in N =2 supergravity with R 2 interactions, JHEP 12(2000) 019 [hep-th/0009234] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    J. Manschot, Wall-crossing of D4-branes using flow trees, arXiv:1003.1570 [INSPIRE].
  51. [51]
    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. I, math/0312059.
  52. [52]
    A. Mikhailov, N. Nekrasov and S. Sethi, Geometric realizations of BPS states in N = 2 theories, Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 345 [hep-th/9803142] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    G.W. Moore, String duality, automorphic forms and generalized Kac-Moody algebras, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 67 (1998) 56 [hep-th/9710198] [INSPIRE].ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    G.W. Moore, Arithmetic and attractors, hep-th/9807087 [INSPIRE].
  55. [55]
    G.W. Moore, Attractors and arithmetic, hep-th/9807056 [INSPIRE].
  56. [56]
    G.W. Moore, Les Houches lectures on strings and arithmetic, hep-th/0401049 [INSPIRE].
  57. [57]
    G.W. Moore, PiTP lectures on wall crossing, available at http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~gmoore/, lecture 34, or at the PiTP Website.
  58. [58]
    K. Nagao and H. Nakajima, Counting invariant of perverse coherent sheaves and its wall-crossing, arXiv:0809.2992 [INSPIRE].
  59. [59]
    K. Nagao, Derived categories of small toric Calabi-Yau 3-folds and counting invariants, arXiv:0809.2994.
  60. [60]
    R. Pandharipande and R. Thomas, Stable pairs and BPS invariants, arXiv:0711.3899 [INSPIRE].
  61. [61]
    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation and confinement in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 19 [Erratum ibid. B 430 (1994) 485] [hep-th/9407087] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    M. Shmakova, Calabi-Yau black holes, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 540 [hep-th/9612076] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    A. Strominger, Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 96 [hep-th/9504090] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    A. Strominger, Macroscopic entropy of N = 2 extremal black holes, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 39 [hep-th/9602111] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    B. Szendrői, Non-commutative Donaldson-Thomas theory and the conifold, Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1171 [arXiv:0705.3419] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    B. Young, Computing a pyramid partition generating function with dimer shuffling, arXiv:0709.3079.
  67. [67]
    B. Young and J. Bryan, Generating functions for colored 3D Young diagrams and the Donaldson-Thomas invariants of orbifolds, arXiv:0802.3948 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evgeny Andriyash
    • 1
  • Frederik Denef
    • 2
    • 3
  • Daniel L. Jafferis
    • 4
  • Gregory W. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.NHETC and Department of Physics and AstronomyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickU.S.A.
  2. 2.Center for the Fundamental Laws of NatureHarvard UniversityCambridgeU.S.A.
  3. 3.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.School of Natural SciencesInstitute for Advanced StudyPrincetonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations