Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:50 | Cite as

Plane partition realization of (web of) \( \mathcal{W} \)-algebra minimal models

  • Koichi HaradaEmail author
  • Yutaka Matsuo
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Recently, Gaiotto and Rapčák (GR) proposed a new family of the vertex operator algebra (VOA) as the symmetry appearing at an intersection of five-branes to which they refer as Y algebra. Procházka and Rapčák, then proposed to interpret Y algebra as a truncation of affine Yangian whose module is directly connected to plane partitions (PP). They also developed GR’s idea to generate a new VOA by connecting plane partitions through an infinite leg shared by them and referred it as the web of W-algebra (WoW). In this paper, we demonstrate that double truncation of PP gives the minimal models of such VOAs. For a single PP, it generates all the minimal model irreducible representations of W-algebra. We find that the rule connecting two PPs is more involved than those in the literature when the U(1) charge connecting two PPs is negative. For the simplest nontrivial WoW, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 superconformal algebra, we demonstrate that the improved rule precisely reproduces the known character of the minimal models.

Keywords

Conformal and W Symmetry Conformal Field Theory Supersymmetric Gauge Theory 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, Conformal field theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer, Germany (1997).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [arXiv:0906.3219] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Schiffmann and E. Vasserot, Cherednik algebras, W-algebras and the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons on A 2, Publ. Math. IHES 118 (2013) 213.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Maulik and A. Okounkov, Quantum groups and quantum cohomology, arXiv:1211.1287 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    B. Feigin et al., Quantum continuous gl(∞): Semiinfinite construction of representations, Kyoto J. Math. 51 (2011) 337 [arXiv:1002.3100].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Tsymbaliuk, The affine Yangian of gl1 revisited, Adv. Math. 304 (2017) 583.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, Triality in minimal model holography, JHEP 07 (2012) 127 [arXiv:1205.2472] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M.R. Gaberdiel and T. Hartman, Symmetries of holographic minimal models, JHEP 05 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1101.2910] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    D. Gaiotto and M. Rapčák, Vertex algebras at the corner, JHEP 01 (2019) 160 [arXiv:1703.00982] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Procházka and M. Rapčák, Webs of W-algebras, JHEP 11 (2018) 109 [arXiv:1711.06888] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, W. Li, C. Peng and H. Zhang, The supersymmetric affine Yangian, JHEP 05 (2018) 200 [arXiv:1711.07449] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, W. Li and C. Peng, Twin-plane-partitions and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 affine Yangian, JHEP 11 (2018) 192 [arXiv:1807.11304] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    M. Bershtein, B. Feigin and G. Merzon, Plane partitions with a “pit”: generating functions and representation theory, Selecta Math. 24 (2018) 21.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. Burge, Restricted partition pairs, J. Comb. Theory A 63 (1993) 210.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    V. Belavin, O. Foda and R. Santachiara, AGT, N-Burge partitions and \( \mathcal{W} \) N minimal models, JHEP 10 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1507.03540] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K.B. Alkalaev and V.A. Belavin, Conformal blocks of W N minimal models and AGT correspondence, JHEP 07 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1404.7094] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    F. Ravanini and S.-K. Yang, Modular invariance in N = 2 superconformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987) 202 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Y. Matsuo, Character formula of C < 1 unitary representation of N = 2 superconformal algebra, Prog. Theor. Phys. 77 (1987) 793 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    V.K. Dobrev, Characters of the unitarizable highest weight modules over the N = 2 superconformal algebras, Phys. Lett. B 186 (1987) 43 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. Kiritsis, Character formulae and the structure of the representations of the N = 1, N = 2 superconformal algebras, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3 (1988) 1871 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Procházka, \( \mathcal{W} \) -symmetry, topological vertex and affine Yangian, JHEP 10 (2016) 077 [arXiv:1512.07178] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. Procházka, Exploring \( \mathcal{W} \) in the quadratic basis, JHEP 09 (2015) 116 [arXiv:1411.7697] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    N.A. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003) 831 [hep-th/0206161] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Mariño and C. Vafa, The topological vertex, Commun. Math. Phys. 254 (2005) 425 [hep-th/0305132] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Iqbal, C. Kozcaz and C. Vafa, The Refined topological vertex, JHEP 10 (2009) 069 [hep-th/0701156] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    H. Awata and H. Kanno, Refined BPS state counting from Nekrasov’s formula and Macdonald functions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009) 2253 [arXiv:0805.0191] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    H. Awata, B. Feigin and J. Shiraishi, Quantum algebraic approach to refined topological vertex, JHEP 03 (2012) 041 [arXiv:1112.6074] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    N. Wyllard, A N − 1 conformal Toda field theory correlation functions from conformal N = 2 SU(N) quiver gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2009) 002 [arXiv:0907.2189] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    V.A. Alba, V.A. Fateev, A.V. Litvinov and G.M. Tarnopolskiy, On combinatorial expansion of the conformal blocks arising from AGT conjecture, Lett. Math. Phys. 98 (2011) 33 [arXiv:1012.1312] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Okounkov, N. Reshetikhin and C. Vafa, Quantum Calabi-Yau and classical crystals, Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 597 [hep-th/0309208] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D. Friedan, E.J. Martinec and S.H. Shenker, Conformal invariance, supersymmetry and string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 93 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    T. Procházka and M. Rapčák, \( \mathcal{W} \) -algebra modules, free fields and Gukov-Witten defects, arXiv:1808.08837 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    C.N. Pope, L.J. Romans and X. Shen, The complete structure of W(∞), Phys. Lett. B 236 (1990) 173 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    V. Kac and A. Radul, Quasifinite highest weight modules over the Lie algebra of differential operators on the circle, Commun. Math. Phys. 157 (1993) 429 [hep-th/9308153] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    H. Awata, M. Fukuma, Y. Matsuo and S. Odake, Representation theory of the W(1 + ∞) algebra, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 118 (1995) 343 [hep-th/9408158] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    H. Awata, M. Fukuma, Y. Matsuo and S. Odake, Representation theory of W 1+∞ algebra, in the proceedings of the 40th Yamada Conference, 20th International Colloquium, July 4–9, Toyonaka, Japan (1994).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    H. Awata, M. Fukuma, Y. Matsuo and S. Odake, Quasifinite highest weight modules over the super W(1 + ∞) algebra, Comm. Math. Phys. 170 (1995) 151.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    M. Fukuda, S. Nakamura, Y. Matsuo and R.-D. Zhu, SH c realization of minimal model CFT: triality, poset and Burge condition, JHEP 11 (2015) 168 [arXiv:1509.01000] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    F.J. Narganes Quijano, On the parafermionic W N algebra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6 (1991) 2611.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    F.J. Narganes-Quijano, Bosonization of parafermions and related conformal models: W(N) algebras, Annals Phys. 206 (1991) 494 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    T. Kimura and V. Pestun, Quiver W-algebras, Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018) 1351 [arXiv:1512.08533] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    J.-E. Bourgine et al., (p, q)-webs of DIM representations, 5d \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 instanton partition functions and qq-characters, JHEP 11 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1703.10759] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations